tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9479398.post7387444620571719004..comments2024-03-28T11:33:16.271-05:00Comments on Adventus: O machine! O machine!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9479398.post-27863401081219069362016-05-26T17:41:24.068-05:002016-05-26T17:41:24.068-05:00The picture I found surprised me; for about 20 sec...The picture I found surprised me; for about 20 seconds.<br /><br />Hawking is Sagan, with better scientific cred; but beyond that, just as ignorant and full of nonsense.Rmjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06811456254443706479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9479398.post-1846398885869575762016-05-26T14:35:06.453-05:002016-05-26T14:35:06.453-05:00Lord ha' mercy. Not another Stephen Hawking c...Lord ha' mercy. Not another Stephen Hawking celebrity vehicle. If I hadn't been glad to give up TV already, this would have made me so. <br /><br />There must be a rule that whenever a Brit-atheist scientist ventures into history he'll repeat the same nonsense that has been handed down to them from the most mendacious of anti-Catholic Anglicans and Puritans. With a bunch of 19th century scientistic tripe thrown in. <br /><br />How many of the "geniuses" in this exercise are actual historians, I wonder. But not very hard. <br /><br />I see that it's a co-production between PBS and the National Geographic. Well, it could be worse, I suppose. It could be the Discover or the History channel. The Thought Criminalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01381376556757084468noreply@blogger.com