And the majority of the electorate was stupid enough to believe him?Other countries can do it, why can’t we?https://t.co/twHcB76fjo pic.twitter.com/LfmXehVjob
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) February 15, 2026
Just a guess.
I am pretty damned sure if Harris had won you’d have heard less about Epstein. Or perhaps more; which would be a whole other kind of poetic justice. Because Harris would probably have just dumped it all, without Congressional involvement. And protecting only the victims.
I'm not sure Epstein was a factor in most people's decision to vote for Trump. I think for the people it was a factor, they were coming at it with the idea it would finally "destroy the Clintons". Which is part of why Epstein continues to be the ball chained to Trump's ankle- in those people's minds, Trump has no reason to protect Bill Clinton so who *is* he protecting? And they can pretend they haven't seen all the photos of Trump and Epstein being chummy, but they have...
ReplyDeletethe whole sordid thing seems to be solid proof that, if there is a group of people we need fewer of and to try to make less influential, it is billionaires. I'm willing to start with extremely aggressive taxation, but I'm just kind of a hack centrist
Apparently I am, too, because I think you’re absolutely right.
Delete