Friday, October 30, 2020

Turning the (Voting) Machines Back On

a) He's getting a little ahead of himself: there is no Bush v. Gore type case pending before the Supreme Court.

b) Or he's talking about the recent decision to allow post-election day ballots to be counted in Michigan.

c)  Our man on their side, redux.  If Trump gets an election fraud case to the Supreme Court, this tweet alone could be grounds to arguing the Court shouldn't touch it because any result they render would seriously damage the reputation of the Court (which is all they have, and they know it.  Bush v. Gore, despite multiple opinions being written for it, was per curiam, and expliclty declared not to be precedential, which made that stinkpot even worse, IMHLO.  The Court knows how thin the ice is in these cases, and they don't want to fall through it.  That water is VERY cold.)
And again, every state has its own laws on when ballots can be received after Election Day (if at all), and no court is going to void those because Trump tweets "FRAUD!" One other thing, while we're talking about votes and elections: It tells me that, if the GOP is hoist on its own petar, the solution is to repeal voter ID laws and as many vote suppression measures as possible, and pass laws/amend state constitutions to make voting was easy as possible. The people obviously want it that way, but we shouldn't be complacent if our efforts bring victory in November. The fight isn't over on Tuesday, it just enters Round Two.

(And has anyone considered the impact not just of covid but computers on this election.  How many people are voting by mail so they have a paper record?  It's the only way to get one in Harris County, and while the number of mail in ballots is hardly the majority of the votes cast, one does wonder.  Because, OTOH, Minnesota has received over 1.5 million ballots in the mail.  There's probably not one single reason for such a record, but creating a paper trail could well be one of them.)

No comments:

Post a Comment