Let's maybe not mention the lawyers who enabled Trump? From Guliani to Gohmert, and all the attorneys in between. I mean, the sentiment's not wrong, but nothing is so simple it has only one side.Excellent, interesting @NationalAffairs essay by @jon_rauch. Includes an important defense of political parties against amateurs. https://t.co/vPLyFWgwpF
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) January 4, 2021
A bit more to my point.The real Surrender Caucus are the Republicans who surrendered their principles and values to this man. https://t.co/grpC1JnS8W
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) January 4, 2021
Even better. As I said, the French see us. Odd almost no one on this side of the Pond is taking a public stance using that vocabulary.The editor of National Review is worried election-overturning Senate Republicans are "making a basic political mistake." The editors of the Wall Street Journal worry they've chosen a "lousy political strategy for returning to power."
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) January 4, 2021
How about: What they are doing is wrong.
What are the odds Trump notices that one tonight in Georgia?Biden about Trump: “I don’t know why he still wants the job. He doesn’t want to do the work.”
— Geoff Bennett (@GeoffRBennett) January 4, 2021
Preach Claire!! pic.twitter.com/X3BJbkEqFg
— Leslie Jones 🦋 (@Lesdoggg) January 4, 2021
I don't want them dead, I want a lot of them disbarred behind bars.
ReplyDelete