This Is Going To Be A Conversation

The records of the Constitutional Convention reflect that Art. IV's reference to "Privileges and Immunities" of US citizens were understood to encompass the right to travel among the states that was recognized under the Articles of Confederation. https://t.co/rC0BRxh66A

— George Conway🌻 (@gtconway3d) June 24, 2022

Is the word in the constitution, or not? If not, is that decisive? If not, why not?

(And yes, Conway is being obtuse. It’s not working. He’s stating the traditional interpretation. Stern is citing the new method established by Dobbs; even though the majority is trying to eat their cake and have it, too. Thomas is absolutely right; you can’t undo Roe without undoing Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Or Loving for that matter. Funny how Thomas doesn’t want to undo that one.)

In my feckless days (I still don’t have any fecks…), I knew lawyers I respected who didn’t mind the results of Roe, but they were highly critical of the reasoning.

I wonder what they think of the Dobbs opinion.

Start the clock. 30 days from today it will be a first degree felony—punishable by life in prison—for a Texas doctor to perform an abortion for a woman raped and impregnated by a family member.

This is what the Supreme Court has done. pic.twitter.com/iPKqtJIwyJ

— Sawyer Hackett (@SawyerHackett) June 24, 2022

Another conversation entirely.