Wait another 10 years, see if anything fundamentally changes. I'll be over here, waiting.Enough should have been enough 10 years ago. That so little has changed is too maddening to comprehend.
— RSchooley@socel.net (@Rschooley) November 23, 2022
Trump redux, with a strong does of Mike "The law suit is coming!" Lindell thrown in. And talk is cheap. It doesn't mean jack, except in a courtroom. Trump took his big election talk to a courtroom, over 60 times. Lost everyone of 'em. Kari Lake can look forward to the same outcome.Kari Lake is making threats today: “When our main case drops, they will hear it. Trust me. And they better think really hard before Ducey & Hobbs sign their John Hancock to that certification. They better think long and hard about what they know about this election.” pic.twitter.com/A1vPNrUUHO
— Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 (@RonFilipkowski) November 23, 2022
The more things change...If you watch Ken Burns recent special on America and the Holocaust you’ll recognize these same racist tropes being used a century ago to keep immigrants from coming into the United States https://t.co/WFzulDSYwU
— Zack Hunt (@ZaackHunt) November 23, 2022
Nobody is ever "blatantly racists" except people we can safely "other," like Nazis and white supremacists and sheet-wearing Southerners. The rest of us are fine, we just don't want our daughter to marry one. Or for "them" to get "special privileges," because that means we don't, and that's something up with which we will not put! Just ask the majority of the Supreme Court.Right wing opportunists were able to abstract woke away from its actual meaning into some straw man caricature they get to mock freely to show solidarity with racists without being called blatantly racist.
— RSchooley@socel.net (@Rschooley) November 23, 2022
It always is. Check the category: "Powerful white guys." It's a synonym for "monster ego." Late entry:This really is a golden age for powerful white guys in thrall to their own monster egos.
— RSchooley@socel.net (@Rschooley) November 23, 2022
Question: A) Is that true? B) Assuming it is, so what? Does that affect the outcome of the election? Does it affect the votes cast? Are they somehow uncertain? The best cure for that is to throw out votes, but that's baby and bathwater stuff. But first: is such a failure (if it occurred) grounds for disallowing votes?Kari Lake now says she has the smoking gun evidence to get her a new election - some of the printers weren’t certified at polling places. pic.twitter.com/7fEteAIR2Z
— Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 (@RonFilipkowski) November 23, 2022
No comments:
Post a Comment