Friday, March 17, 2023

Can’t Tell The Players Without A Program

That’s the end of an interesting thread 🧵 which lines up with this comment left earlier.
The lesson here is the same old lesson. 1. diversify. The bank was not diversified. They did not have a loan portfolio earning them money. They just took money in. 2. Only invest money you can afford to lose. 
Seems these bankers are small, limited thinkers. They took the simple thought of: US Treasuries, safest place in the world and did not actually think through the mechanics of being a bank overall. Thus: We have a lot of cash, where should be put it to be safe. They did not think about the bank actually having to earn an income.
This just viscerally makes sense. Banks are ultimately fairly simple businesses. The idea (I read it somewhere on Twitter) that this was caused by the Fed (interest rates) struck me as remarkably stupid. A schoolchild whose parents listened to NPR would know interest rates were going up for the last year or so. A bunch of SV bankers couldn’t? Sounds like they were pretty stupid, though, because every time I read another reason why it’s not their fault, it makes them stupider than the previous excuse.

Which is why the explanation above makes sense. Occam’s Razor. Simpler is usually better. And it fits the “weak regulation” argument made by smart people (like Prof. Sen. Warren).

And that takes me back to the thread 🧵, which is interesting because it has some data to it.

No comments:

Post a Comment