He wasn’t a lawyer on the case, nor a judge or justice at any level, trial to appeal. He hasn’t read all the briefs nor the pleadings nor the opinions of the Court.This is a bonafide scandal. On the legal level, it means the Court decided a case that wasn't a real case or controversy as Art III requires. On the political level, it
— Harry Litman (@harrylitman) July 2, 2023
Man cited in Supreme Court LGBTQ rights case says he was never involved https://t.co/SoVIDaXi3h
But he read a WaPo article. On Twitter, that makes you the supreme authority.
🤦🏻♂️
This cartoon is several years old now, but it still pretty much explains where our country is right now. pic.twitter.com/qXnKI0LmT0
— S.V. Dáte (@svdate) July 3, 2023
"One weird trick to reverse a court case..." That's about where we are now with this case and a lot of the commetariat. It's easier to engage in this than to face the actual consequences of the case, that 6 reactionaries on the court haven't just taken a step back, but have triple jumped us back to 1963.
ReplyDelete