Benghazi, Benghazi, BENGHAZI!!, Redux

Chairman @RepJamesComer's arguments always completely crumble when he's asked to provide even a shred of evidence.

Pay close attention: he always talks about crimes (that he doesn’t understand), but never actual evidence.

Why? Because there is NO evidence against POTUS. pic.twitter.com/yHsm4tN6cA

— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) December 9, 2023

“Chairman Comer may be a great farmer, but he has no idea what he's talking about with criminal law. I was a federal prosecutor for ten years. There's nothing remotely close to a FARA violation or to money laundering. I don't think he knows what they are and certainly doesn’t understand what's required by that.”

Tapper to Comer: The entire western world, the European Union, the G8, there was a lot of people. Including Republican members of the House and the Senate who wanted the prosecutor fired. It wasn't just Biden pic.twitter.com/hj0dWXNqfm

— Acyn (@Acyn) December 8, 2023

Goldman also pointed out that when Comer was asked by Tapper to provide evidence credibly linking President Biden to proven misconduct, Comer cited a debunked claim about the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor. Goldman said, "You asked a very good question to actually name evidence. Every time he goes on TV, he makes bold accusations about all these crimes, crimes, crimes, and they, they, they, even though it's only Hunter Biden. The only piece of evidence that he pointed to was the Burisma situation... that has been proven up, down, left, right, every single which way to be completely bogus, and in fact firing Shokin, who was not prosecuting corruption, was actually bad for Burisma… This is a house of cards with no evidence, and Chairman Comer just proved that to you."

Doing the same thing over and over and over again.