What Percentage Of A Scaramucci Was This?

Katie Britt finally admits sex-trafficking story isn't linked to Joe Biden: report https://t.co/Dsl3NajEex

— Raw Story (@RawStory) March 9, 2024

Britt won’t answer the same question from the NYTimes, either. https://t.co/UHOTaDAHl8

— Kyle Whitmire (@WarOnDumb) March 9, 2024

WaPo finally got her spokesman to give up, says it was Romero, assaults happened two decades ago in Mexico. So there you go. https://t.co/t66HZ7FHr5

— Kyle Whitmire (@WarOnDumb) March 9, 2024

Back to Raw Story:

"Sean Ross, Britt’s communications director, confirmed that she was talking about Karla Jacinto Romero — who has testified before Congress about being forced to work in Mexican brothels from 2004 to 2008," the outlet reported Saturday. "(A viral TikTok by journalist Jonathan Katz first revealed that Britt was speaking about Romero.) In a phone conversation and a statement, Ross disputed that Britt’s language was misleading." 

The Post, however, vehemently disagreed. 

"Britt’s account of Romero’s experience was a centerpiece of her rebuttal to Biden’s address. The way Britt sets up the story, there is no indication that she is talking about a woman who was working in brothels in Mexico during the George W. Bush administration," according to the Post's fact check. "But Biden has nothing to do with Romero’s story." 

The article continues by suggesting Romero was "never trafficked in the United States." 

"In a high-profile speech like this, a politician should not mislead voters with emotionally charged language," the article states. "Romero’s story is tragic and may be evocative of other Mexican girls trapped in the sex trade in that country. But she was not trafficked across the border — and her story has nothing to do with Biden. Britt’s failure to make that clear earns her Four Pinocchios."

Not to mention an unconscionable exploitation of a woman whose story is about the horror of her exploitation.