Again, For The Peanut Gallery 🥜

🚨 NEW from US Attorney Lindsey Halligan:

“[A]ny assertion that the grand jury ‘never voted on the two-count indictment’ is CONTRADICTED by the official transcript”

👉 Foreperson confirmed the vote
👉 Court acknowledged the vote
👉 Court docketed the 2-count true bill pic.twitter.com/1oRnG2KHuE

— Chad Gilmartin (@ChadGilmartinCA) November 20, 2025

👉This transcript is from court testimony.

👉The court heard more testimony than this excerpt, from this witness alone.

👉Halligan was there. Presumably.

👉If this is all the DOJ’s got, they got nothin’.

👉DOJ lawyers were in the courtroom. And this is the best they can do?

👉Why is Gilmartin trying this case on Twitter? Does he think that matters?

👉👉Does he think the little hands make it more emphatic and serious?

👉👉👉Or is he mocking Trump?

😈

(And of his three “counts,” only the first matters. Court testimony showed clearly the GJ did not vote on the amended indictment (the two counts) again, as drafted by DOJ and subsequently submitted to the court. That is the fatal error that fails to confer jurisdiction on the court. All the rest is eyewash. Clearly, Gilmartin is not a trial attorney. I’m beginning to seriously wonder if Halligan is.)

(The old adage is: “When the facts are on your side, pound in the facts. When the law is on your side, pound on the law. When neither are on your side, pound on the table.” The DOJ has chosen to pound on the judge. It’s a choice. 🤷🏻‍♂️)