Sunday, December 28, 2025

The Windmills Of His Mind

Putin sent missiles into Kyiv just yesterday. They were specifically targeted against electricity generation; in the winter; in Ukraine.

I don’t think Trump even knows that.
Trump: "I saw a very interesting President Putin today. I mean, he wants to see it happen. He wants to see it. He told me very strongly. I believe him. Don't forget, we went through the Russia Russia Russia hoax together and he'd call me, I'd call him, I'd say 'Can you believe the stuff they're making up?' It turned out we were right. They made it all up."

… and Stupidity

I’m thinking of this in terms of this response: Because I don’t read this as a “general claim,” I read it as a categorical one. AAG Dhillon does not say the applicable statute of limitations doesn’t run on January 6, 2026. She’s saying any such statute will be ignored in the name of retribution. What AAG Dhillon is publicly declaring is that malicious prosecutions will happen despite the barriers of the law. She is declaring that the law will not get in the way of criminal and civil investigations, that the DOJ is acting as a vigilante, not seeking justice, but seeking vengeance.

There is a deadline for bringing criminal prosecutions. That’s the law. That’s not the sum total of the law. But the statement: “No statute of limitations will hinder DOJ's efforts to bring justice to those who weaponized persecution of American citizens,” is a categorical statement that law doesn’t apply, only the power of government does. Which, in normal times, would see her cleaning out her desk before tomorrow morning.

This not the way you run a railroad.

Venality And Ignorance …

... are both impervious to education.

The Letitia James indictment was tossed, and then she was no-billed twice. 

The Comey indictment was tossed, and isn’t likely to be reinstated. (Even Alito says the statute doesn’t allow Trump to circumvent the appointments clause.)

The DOJ is investigating the mortgage fraud investigation of  Senator Adam Schiff. A grand jury is involved.

And Trump wants to indict Obama? On the “evidence” Trump couldn’t produce in 2020 in 60+ cases? Evidence he now says he has, but nobody’s seen? Sorta like the evidence he “found” in Hawaii that Obama’s birth certificate was a fake? Nobody ever saw that “evidence,” either.

And, of course, there’s the question of presidential immunity to be litigated….

(I have no opinion on how that would apply. The answer depends entirely on the facts alleged (there aren’t any right now), and on the court answers. Roberts set the immunity question up to be endlessly litigated and basically make the prosecution of any President a legal quagmire. It’s meant to bounce around in the lower courts until the sitting Supremes are all dead. Which works for Obama, and because Roberts feared a vindictive prosecution of a President. Turns out he had a point. Reality is ironic that way.)


The King Is A Fink!

Sure he is.
Due to a missile attack, parts of Kyiv and the surrounding region are plunged into darkness. Ukrainians say: 'We won’t see light in our homes today, but the light in our hearts will never go out! Children warm themselves by bonfires because there is no heating at home. We are huddling together with neighbors, facing another difficult winter together!'

The whole scene looks like something out of an apocalyptic movie where the world has descended into darkness... just like in those films. But this isn't a movie, and these people aren't actors-they are ordinary residents of my country's capital. No matter how much I admire the people of Kyiv, this video creates an atmosphere of despair. Winter has only just begun, yet we are already facing such circumstances because of the russians-who claim to want 'peace' but they do everything possible to make sure that in response we send them to hell!
Meanwhile, Trump is also right that the economy is booming, inflation is non-existent, drug prices are down 1500% ( at least!), Trump’s approval ratings are higher than anyone’s in history, and he’s won every election he was ever in by a landslide.

The King is a fink. The President is an idiot.

Unlike Sen.Scott of Florida

Die, Menswear!

😈

I’m Old Enough To Remember…

... when Elmo tried this.

In another state, in another race. Still, this is not the silver bullet/crucifix combination the edgelords imagine it is.

I know it works for Trump, but Republicans are wimps. I doubt that “strategy” translates to a Democratic primary against an incumbent.

It didn’t work for Elmo.

A Reminder…

There is really no reason to be forced to put up with this:
"Corporate bankruptcies soared to a 15-year high in 2025 as companies struggled to cope with Trump’s trade wars, among other factors, according to a new report.

No fewer than 717 companies filed for Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 bankruptcy between January and November. This marks a 14 percent increase from the same period in 2024 and the highest rate since 2010, when the country was recovering from the Great Recession.

Firms that went bust pointed to inflation, interest rates and Trump’s trade policies — which have hampered supply chains and increased costs — as drivers of their financial troubles."

---

Pending the SCOTUS decision, Congress should put #PrinciplesFirst on affordability, repeal Trump's tariffs immediately, and revoke any presidential authority to unilaterally increase them in the future.
Congress could fix this, even save the GOP some trouble in November. But what are they doing? Resigning in…well, resignation. They’ve given up. They could try. They could easily succeed. The law releasing the Epstein files proves that. Trump is a lame duck, about as threatening as a toothless old man.  But still they fear him.

Which is going to become more and more evident as the new year passes. The GOP has no one to blame but themselves. The real problem is the amount of damage their incompetence and fecklessness will do.
This isn’t rocket science.

GOP RIP. πŸͺ¦ 

“Democrat Inspired Hoax”

Bernie Sanders: "I think we need to be thinking seriously about a moratorium on these data centers. Frankly, I think you gotta slow this process down. It's not good enough for the oligarchs to tell us, 'It's coming, you adapt.' What are they talking about? Are they gonna guarantee healthcare to all people? What are they gonna do when people have no jobs? Make housing free?"
Even the black guy is spouting racist nonsense. “Affordable housing” depends on cheap labor (capitalism has to exploit somebody. That’s how Columbus did it, that’s how we’ve been doing it ever since). Obama’s policies curtailed access to immigrant labor, and housing prices rose on the consequent shortage. Biden continued those policies, Trump made it worse each time he was in office.

You get what you pay for, and we are paying for a shortage of cheap labor we built our expectations on. I have friends who once lived in a very old house that was very small, by modern standards. It once housed three generations of family at once, in four rooms, including a kitchen. I live in a house half again the size of the one I grew up in. With my daughter, we had three people here. She considers it “small,” and now has a house half again the size of ours. With only her and her husband. The house I grew up in held four people quite comfortably. 

There is a “mansion” in Austin, an historic structure. It was built for a large family, includes a library and rooms devoted to social functions. Ironically, the family moved out shortly after the children moved out. It was too big and empty. I’ve toured it. It was a “mansion” in its day. I’ve been in larger modern houses, and no one considers them “mansions,” except derisively.

We are doing this to ourselves. No one is taking anything from us. We are sitting down in the empty theatre, declaring ourselves the owner of the empty seats, and complaining about how few seats we have. And our government is turning that into racism and xenophobia, to make us feel less selfish and childish.

Incompetence And Venality Go Hand In Hand

Also true: And the beats go on:

The Comites Christi

The days after Christmas honor the Comites Christi, the companions of Christ. They are honored with feast days following Christmas, especially Stephen and the Holy Innocents. But those are particulars, and we want the category.  There is no better introduction to the Comites Christi than the words of St. Augustine: 

Consider what is said to you: Love God. If you say to me: Show me whom I am to love, what shall I say if not what Saint John says: No one has ever seen God! But in case you should think that you are completely cut off from the sight of God, he says: God is love, and he who remains in love remains in God. Love your neighbor, then, and see within yourself the power by which you love your neighbor; there you will see God, as far as you are able. 

Begin, then, to love your neighbor. Break your bread to feed the hungry, and bring into your home the homeless poor; if you see someone naked, clothe him, and do not look down on your own flesh and blood. 

What will you gain by doing this? Your light will then burst forth like the dawn. Your light is your God; he is your dawn, for he will come to you when the night of time is over. He does not rise or set but remains for ever. 

In loving and caring for your neighbor you are on a journey. Where are you traveling if not to the Lord God, to him whom we should love with our whole heart, our whole soul, our whole mind? We have not yet reached his presence, but we have our neighbor at our side. Support, then, this companion of your pilgrimage if you want to come into the presence of the one with whom you desire to remain for ever.

Augustine starts with hospitality, which is universally supposed to be the "spirit of the Christmas season."  That spirit isn't (we all say) limited to the 25 days of December, or the 12 days of Christmas.  It is, as Augustine says, a journey.  Scrooge pledged to honor Christmas in his heart all the year 'round, and the narrator says he was as good as his word, and better. And us?

Protestants would call this the "clouds of witness," trying to distinguish themselves from the RC "saints."  More and more I see the wisdom of saints and even images.  The Reformation was rebelling against a culture dominated by those things; but now we are bereft of them, even among Protestant religious leaders and people we know (always the most powerful witness).  Church as a "pillar of society" was waning even in my childhood.  Finding reasons, or even examples, to love your neighbor (something the world has never really taught, and which the current Administration would like to actively eliminate), has never been easy.  Christmastide is a good time to meditate on how to do it on your own; or just be a good example to others.  After all, Christianity didn't start with the approval of the State and society.  I'm not sure it's a bad thing that Christianity looks to be returning to that state.

Third Day of Christmas 2025


This is another old post, but I’ve added a bit which only fits at the end. Sorry to make you wade through it.

Santa Claus is for children, and Christmas Day is for children; but the whole story of Christmas is not.

When Herod realized he had been duped by the astrologers, he was outraged. He then issued a death warrant for all the male children in Bethlehem and surrounding region two years old and younger. this corresponded to the time [of the star] that he had learned from the astrologers. With this event the prediction made by Jeremiah the prophet came true:
'In Ramah the sound of mourning
and bitter grieving was heard:
Rachel weeping for her children.
She refused to be consoled:
They were no more.' " (Matthew 2: 16-18, SV)
Advent and Christmas are seasons steeped in mystery and the whole of the human story, from joy to misery, from peace to pain. We shield our children from these truths, so we can shield ourselves. We pretend God is only about love and peace and our happiness, and complain that the God of Israel is a god of blood and thunder, while the God of Jesus is a god of babies and rainbows. Neither simplicity is true, and the simplicity of the Christmas story, that it begins with the Annunciation to Mary and ends with the angels singing Gloria to the shepherds, is too simple to be true, also. Luke tells one story of the birth, where the power of the state forces the Holy Family to Bethlehem but that power merely fulfills the expectation that the redeemer of the line of David will come from the ancestral home of David. Matthew tells the other story; the story of Herod's fear and insecurity. This is the part of Christmas the world doesn't celebrate. This is the part of Christmas we ignore, for the sake of the children, we tell ourselves; but it's really for our sake. Just as we don't want Advent blighted with the deaths of the innocent, we don't want Christmas spent remembering the Holy Innocents.

Everybody knows the Magi story; but few pay attention to its aftermath:

Jesus was born in Bethlehem, in Judea, when Herod was king. Astrologers from the East showed up in Jerusalem just then.  "Tell us," they said, "where the newborn king of the Judeans is.  We have observed his star in the east and have come to pay him homage."

It's worth noting that births were important to the Egyptians, because they considered Pharoahs to be born gods and rulers.  It was several centuries after the creation of the Church before the Church itself would acknowledge the importance of the birth day of the Christ, and that first recognition came in Alexandria. I interrupt this partially familiar account from Matthew to make us stop and pay attention to what's being said.  The astrologers (Magi) are not children of Abraham, and are not following a star (yet).  They have seen a new star and interpret that as the birth of a king, in Judea.  Which is a political statement threatening Herod and, ultimately, Rome (well, Roman power over Judea.  Herod is a Roman satrap, not a sovereign monarch.)

When this news reached King Herod, he was visibly shaken, and all Jerusalem along with him.

When the King sneezes, the kingdom catches cold.  Well, the capital, in this case.  Matthew is also setting Jesus against Jerusalem, because his life will end there, a death demanded by the crowd.

He called together all the ranking priests and local experts, and pressed them for information:  "Where is the Anointed supposed to be born?
They replied: 'At Bethelem in Judea." This is how it is put by the prophet:
And you, Bethlehem, in the province of Judah,
you are by now means the least among the leaders of Judah.
Out of you will come a leader
who will shepherd my people, Israel.
Then Herod called the astrologers together secretly and ascertained from them the preicse time the star became visible.  Then he sent them to Bethlehem with this instructions:  "Go make a careful search for the child. When you find where he is, report to me so I can come and pay him homage."

They listened to what the king had to say and continued on their way.

Matthew has already cited scripture several times to place Jesus in Hebraic history and in the scriptures, as well.  Here he uses the ranking priests to confirm his readings of those scriptures.  And here we get the first hint that these events take place sometime after the birth of the Christchild.  We'll soon find out how long after.
And there guiding them on was the star they had observed in the East; it led them forward until it came to a standstill above where the child lay. Once they saw the star, there were beside themselves with joy.  And they arrived at the house and saw the child with his mother Mary. They fell down and paid him homage.  Then they opened their treasure chests and presented him with gifts--gold and incense and myrrh. And because they had been alered in a dream not to return to Herod, they journeyed back to their own country by a different route.
Which is where the story usually stops.  But Matthew isn't finished yet:

After the astrologers had departed, a messenger of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph, saying "Get ready, take the child and his mother and flee to Egypt,  Stay there until I give you instructions. You see, Herod is determined to hunt the child down and destroy him."

So Joseph got ready and took the child and his mother under cover of night and set out for Egypt. There they remained until Herod's death.  This happened so the Lord's predictions spoken by the prophet would come true: "Out of Egypt I have called my son."

When Herod realized....

And we're back where the started this. It is also why we guess the age of Jesus at this time to be no older than 2 years old (for the purposes of Matthew's story, I mean). The Epiphany (the revelation to the Gentiles) comes long after the night of the birth story in Luke. But isn't it interesting how much of the birth story events take place in darkness?  Except for the Massacre of the Innocents; but we relegate that one to darkness, the better to ignore it.

This is truly the Church's portion of Christmas. Appropriate to the interests of the church, Walter Brueggeman would call Herod's concerns the theology of scarcity, and point out it's a very old game, even in Biblical history. It is a game we blame on God; but it is one entirely of our making, and it ties the story of the Holy Innocents to our secular observation of Christmas, and our cri de couer for someone to tell us what Christmas is all about. This story, is what it is all about. And the Coventry Carol captures it in one song:

Lully, lullay, thou little tiny child,
bye, bye, lully lullay.

O sisters too, how may we do,
for to preserve this day,
this poor youngling for whom we sing,
bye, bye lully lullay.

Herod the king in his raging,
charged he hath this day,
his men of might, in his own sight,
all young children to slay.

Then woe is me, poor child, for thee!
And every morn and day,
for thy parting not say nor sing
bye, bye, lully lullay.

Lully, lullay, thou little tiny child,
bye, bye, lully lullay.

It is the only remnant of the story that still makes it into our Advent and Christmas music, though we may not always recognize the story and the reason it is a "Christmas carol." In another medieval play, “The Play of Herod,” they take the story even more seriously. To portray the story from Matthew, an angel is sent from God to console Rachel, but she refuses even the aid of God. She refuses all comfort. Of course she does; she is a grieving mother, her children are gone. What comfort can be offered to her? This is real; this has happened. What else could be felt, except bottomless grief, except the sucking, horrible pain of loss?

This is not Matthew reaching for yet another scriptural reference to support his nativity story. This is not Matthew trying to shore up his tale with yet another appeal to authority. This is Matthew telling us he has no words for this horror, and he must borrow words just to be sure we feel it as it was felt by those grieving mothers and fathers. This is not Matthew telling us this is true, because scriptures predicted it. This is Matthew telling us someone else, someone earlier, described it, caught the horror of it, knew what it felt like. This is Matthew telling us this is real. This is Matthew telling us to believe this birth occurred, because the world is not kind to saviors, even when they are babies. The world does not seek salvation, but its own contentment; and it does not react well to mystery.

So Rachel cannot be comforted, but that is not where "The Play of Herod" ends the story. That mystery play ends where it should: in holy mystery.
For there is a Te Deum sung: 'We praise you, God, we confess you as Lord.' The greatest chant of praise. This is sung by Mary and Joseph, processing through the audience, but they are joined in their song and procession by the animals and the angels, by the shepherds, by the lamenting Rachel and the parents of Bethlehem, and they are joined by the soldiers and their victims and by Herod. Knowing that (Hopkins again)

we are wound
With mercy round and round. . . .

they all, incarnate God and all creation, even death, tyrants and martyrs, all process and all sing praise. And we sing too, and find ourselves in the procession.

Today we can't imagine it. We take our Christmas with lots of sugar. And take it in a day. Though we've been baptized into his death, we have little time for or patience with how that death is told at Christmas, a death that confuses lament and praise forever. And no wonder we are careful to keep Christmas at an arm's length. What is Herod in these times?--Gabe Huck
I I have now established (from The Oxford Christmas Handbook, my Xmas light reading) that this was also t. the day for the Feast of Fools, a day of revelry complete with Boy Bishop and the Song of the Ass (brought into the church for the purpose; what, you thought the Baptists made that up in the’60’s?). By the 8th century the frivolity had moved to January 1. The boy bishop was a reversal of order, so the Magnificat was a feature of this “people’s liturgy,” one in which deacons and even priests participated. This was in some areas of some countries, more on the Continent than the British Isles. It was never as widespread as the Christ mass. Most of those churches were in northern France, but a few were rural churches in England. So “The Play of Herod” would have been a feature of the liturgy among the revelry. It is either an unimaginably odd way to remember the Holy Innocents; or (and this is more a pastoral analysis than a scholarly one), it was the laity (and any of the participating priests, deacons, etc) refusing to turn the joy of Christmas into a day of gloom, especially after four weeks of Advent that was really more like a “little Lent,” especially when Lent would come round in about 6 weeks. The Feast of Fools, like Gaudete, was a way of reclaiming liturgical time for the people in the nave.

So let’s return to Luke:
Lord, let your servant 
die in peace
for you kept your promise.
With my own eyes
I see the salvation
you prepared for all peoples;
a light of revelation for the Gentiles
and glory to your people Israel.
I like that translation for this context, because it emphasizes Simeon's wish:  he can die now, God's promise to him has been kept. But that's not the end of Luke's nativity, because Simeon turns back to Mary:

And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against;

(Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.
Even in Luke's more beautiful, more popular version, we cannot escape it: the appalling strangeness of the mercy of God, and the penetrating mystery at the heart of the season, just as the year begins again.

Saturday, December 27, 2025

Why Must Everyone Laugh At His Mighty Sword?

What Everybody Hears About

 


What actually happens:
Since January, religious leaders from local pastors to Pope Leo have rallied against the Trump administration's detention and deportation of thousands of immigrants. Clergy are filing lawsuits, accompanying migrants to court hearings and leading protests at ICE facilities across the country. Altogether, this activity adds up to one of the largest surges of faith-based organizing in recent history, and it's growing.
No wonder Trump claimed he was saving Christians in Nigeria with indiscriminate bombing.
Trump announced on Truth Social on Thursday that U.S. forces had launched a strike against Islamic State militants in northwest Nigeria at the request of Nigeria's government. He said the group had been targeting Christians in the region.

Local media reported loud explosions in the village of Jabo on the evening of Christmas Day. Reuters has not been able to confirm whether there were casualties.

Trump said on Friday that a U.S. military strike targeting Islamic state militants in Nigeria was originally supposed to take place on Wednesday, but he ordered it delayed by a day.

"They were going to do it earlier," Trump told Politico in an interview. "And I said, ‘nope, let’s give a Christmas present.’ … They didn’t think that was coming, but we hit them hard. Every camp got decimated."

This specific strike was carried out by the United States, the official said, in part because the location was too remote for Nigerian forces to reach.

"It's partially symbolic," the official said, adding that the aim was also deterrence and to send a message that the Trump administration was prepared to use the military.

Cameron Hudson, a former U.S. official who worked on Africa-related issues, said the strike was unlikely to have a big impact in the near term.

"It's not realistic to think that a few cruise missiles are going to change much in the short term," Hudson said. "The Trump administration will have to demonstrate its own long-term commitment to ending this militancy if it hopes to have any effect."

Nigeria's population of over 230 million people is roughly evenly divided among Christians, who predominate in the south, and Muslims, who predominate in the north.

Last month, Trump threatened to order his forces to take military action in Nigeria unless the authorities there acted to stop what he described as the persecution of Christian.

While Nigeria has had persistent security challenges, including violence and kidnappings by Islamist insurgents in the north, it strongly denies that Christians are subjected to systematic persecution.

Its government responded to Trump's threat by saying it intended to work with Washington against militants, while rejecting U.S. language that suggested Christians were in particular peril.

"After Trump threatened to come guns-blazing in Nigeria, we saw a Nigerian delegation visit the U.S.," said Kabir Adamu, managing director of Abuja-based Beacon Security and Intelligence Limited.

"The attorney general was involved, and agreements were signed. Then we learned of U.S. surveillance missions mapping terrorist locations."

Participating in the strike could raise a risk that the government could be perceived as endorsing Trump's language on wider sectarian strife, a sensitive issue throughout Nigeria's history.

"Trump is pandering to domestic evangelical Christian objectives with his 'Christian genocide' narrative," Adamu said.
Fuck Nigeria. It’s a “third world country,” says Miller. And they didn’t vote for Trump. And only half the country is Christian, so….

And how many missiles does the Pope have?

I ❤️ This Guy

I can tell you what's stopping most men from dressing like this. Please click open this thread (into a new window) so that you can see the correct placement of my photos. This will help you understand my argument more clearly.

We should first identify what we're looking at. This is James Stewart in the 1946 film It's a Wonderful Life, now beloved as a holiday classic, but during the immediate postwar years, it was eyed with suspicion. During the early days of the Cold War, the FBI thought this film was communist propaganda. After all, the film is about a kind-hearted man who sacrifices his own self-interest to help others. He starts an organization to help working-class families secure affordable housing and takes a stand against the villainous banker Mr. Potter. The FBI felt this was an attack on the upper classes, especially since two of the screenwriters were suspected of being communist sympathizers, so they referred the film to the House Un-American Activities Committee, although no action was ultimately taken.

For the menswear-minded, the film will stand out especially. Despite portraying the humble George Bailey, James Stewart's wardrobe is remarkably good in this film. We see him in some things that today might be judged as strange — such as a peak-lapel single-breasted tweed suit with four (four!) patch pockets, including two at the breast — but for the most part, his clothes have aged very well. Meaning, you could take many of these clothes and wear them today (hence the original poster's question, "what's stopping you from doing so?").

The secret to this success is in the quality of the make and proportions. In the film, Stewart wears trousers that are high enough to cover his shirt when the coat is fastened. The coat bisects him halfway from the collar to the floor. The trousers are full enough to create a smooth silhouette between the bottom and top halves of his outfit. A sharp eye will also notice that the lapel has a very pleasing roll — evidence of hand pad stitching. And of course, the collar always hugs his neck.

The overcoat, which sparked this discussion, is also very long (long enough to reach below his knees, which is what you want in blustery weather). Like the lapels on his suit jacket, the his overcoat lapels are neither overly skimpy nor overly wide — just classic enough so you can never peg the garment to a specific fashion trend or decade.

I can tell you what's stopping most men from dressing like this. Please click open this thread (into a new window) so that you can see the correct placement of my photos. This will help you understand my argument more clearly.

We should first identify what we're looking at. This is James Stewart in the 1946 film It's a Wonderful Life, now beloved as a holiday classic, but during the immediate postwar years, it was eyed with suspicion. During the early days of the Cold War, the FBI thought this film was communist propaganda. After all, the film is about a kind-hearted man who sacrifices his own self-interest to help others. He starts an organization to help working-class families secure affordable housing and takes a stand against the villainous banker Mr. Potter. The FBI felt this was an attack on the upper classes, especially since two of the screenwriters were suspected of being communist sympathizers, so they referred the film to the House Un-American Activities Committee, although no action was ultimately taken.

For the menswear-minded, the film will stand out especially. Despite portraying the humble George Bailey, James Stewart's wardrobe is remarkably good in this film. We see him in some things that today might be judged as strange — such as a peak-lapel single-breasted tweed suit with four (four!) patch pockets, including two at the breast — but for the most part, his clothes have aged very well. Meaning, you could take many of these clothes and wear them today (hence the original poster's question, "what's stopping you from doing so?").

The secret to this success is in the quality of the make and proportions. In the film, Stewart wears trousers that are high enough to cover his shirt when the coat is fastened. The coat bisects him halfway from the collar to the floor. The trousers are full enough to create a smooth silhouette between the bottom and top halves of his outfit. A sharp eye will also notice that the lapel has a very pleasing roll — evidence of hand pad stitching. And of course, the collar always hugs his neck.

The overcoat, which sparked this discussion, is also very long (long enough to reach below his knees, which is what you want in blustery weather). Like the lapels on his suit jacket, the his overcoat lapels are neither overly skimpy nor overly wide — just classic enough so you can never peg the garment to a specific fashion trend or decade.

Given what we know about how actors dressed for films during this era, along with what we can see in photos, we can reliably guess that these garments are both bespoke and hand-tailored. By bespoke, I mean the garments were made from scratch and perfected through three fittings.

The advent of ready-to-wear manufacturing in the mid-19th century, along with the explosion of designer clothing and sportswear in the postwar period, effectively swept away our domestic bespoke tailoring trade. Instead, what's left across the country are primarily made-to-measure shops run by businesspeople, not tailors, who have relationships with overseas factories. This system can be fine, but it may not achieve some of the effects you see here. This is especially true if the shop has been influenced by fashion trends (which most have). Such shops produce shorter, tighter garments made from fine, silky materials that don't achieve this look.

Thus, the simple answer to your question is: most men don't dress like this because they don't have access to bespoke tailors.

However, some men have access to bespoke tailors. In the United States, such people tend to be concentrated in or around major cities, such as New York City or San Francisco. However, even in these areas, the number of bespoke tailors remains small. There are several reasons for this.

First, skyrocketing rents make it very difficult for these businesses to survive. Most people have an upper limit for how much they're willing to pay for the outfit you see in the original image, and that limit is not $10,000. To get bespoke tailoring prices down, we must create affordable housing and commercial real estate.

Second, even if you were to open a bespoke tailoring shop in the US, who would you hire? There aren't many skilled tailors in the US for various reasons. It takes a decade or more to train to be a bespoke tailor — and how would you even do so? Can you survive without health insurance for twenty years? Can you find enough customers to pay for astronomical rents? The US tends to celebrate wealthy entrepreneurs, not craftspeople, and the latter requires slow, steady concentration over decades, often living in poverty until you finally perfect your craft. To help create more craftspeople, we need universal healthcare, affordable housing, and a shift in American values (less worship of money).

Thus, even if you're in NYC or San Francisco, the chances of you getting a bespoke garment from a domestically based tailor are slim. That's why most people who are into bespoke tailoring rely on the many international tailors who swing through major US cities three to four times a year to meet with clients. Such tailors typically hail from the UK, Italy, Japan, or South Korea.

But here we land at yet another problem. During their last tour through the US, the managers behind the South Korean tailoring shop Assisi told me that customs and border agents hassled them, seizing some of their luggage. They consequently lost some of their swatch books, which were critical for their trunk shows. As directed by President Trump, border agents have been unusually harsh to travelers. This creates another barrier for US customers to dress like Jimmy Stewart above.

Let us assume that you're able to see one of these tailors in NYC or San Francisco, and that they've somehow successfully navigated borders and customers without issue. And you're able to repeat this four times — initial meeting to be measured and place an order, then basted fitting, forward fitting, and final fitting. Let's assume there are no other issues, and the item can be shipped to you.

Congrats, you've now been hit with a customs bill. Due to Trump's tariffs, a new tax is levied on incoming shipments (which vary depending on the country of origin). For most bespoke tailors, I've seen this range anywhere from 10% to 20% of the declared value (which can be a lot given the price of bespoke clothes!). If you order something made from cashmere or a cashmere blend, it can be as high as 50% (not an unusual fabric for an overcoat). This creates yet *another* barrier for men to dress like this.

So, to answer the question of why men don't dress like this, a big reason is location. Most men don't live in a major US city. Second, the US doesn't have a culture or climate suitable for raising craftspeople — the worship of money, lack of universal healthcare, and skyrocketing rents (both commercial and residential) make it very difficult to become a bespoke tailor in the US. And if you use one of the international operations, you will have to pray that border agents do not hassle your tailor. And when your garment arrives, you will have to fork over more money to cover Trump's tariffs.

The combination of all these effects makes dressing like this a dream for most men. This is assuming they can get past the cultural stigma of men being less masculine or heterosexual if they express an interest in clothes, which will undoubtedly come through if you dress like James Stewart in the 1940s. Breaking this barrier down requires us to expand our understanding of masculinity or to be less judgmental about gender norms. 
 
(Sorry I had to leave out the images. If you want to see them, you can go to the original tweet.)

To write so lucidly and intelligently about a subject that you want to read it even if you have no interest in the subject.

When I got a job in a law firm out of graduate school, I spent my money on suits for work, to a point that a friend an co-worker warned me that I was creating an impression I was overpaid (people were talking, she said). That was the last time I was anything close to a clothes horse. I have since regressed to the mean of my high school years. I had chinos and no jeans at one point; now I have jeans and no chinos. My shirts are what Brooks Brothers calls “sport shirts.” I wear them because they are durable, not because I give a wet snap about what’s au courant.

A long way ‘round to saying I really don’t pay attention to clothes. But if someone can write intelligently about a topic, I’m interested in it. I have a jackdaw mind, which is not nearly as helpful as it could be.

The above is breathtakingly good writing.  Especially when you go from fashion to tailoring (I always wondered what “bespoke” really meant), to labor and social and economic justice…

It just doesn’t get better (or more skillful) than that.

Clear writing is the sign of a clear and thoughtful mind.

The Incredible Shrinking Country

This is a truth sent from above:
“I could reduce Unemployment to 2% overnight by just hiring people into the Federal Government, even though those Jobs are not necessary,” Trump wrote in a recent online post on his social media platform Truth Social. “I wish the Fake News would report the 4.5% correctly. What I am doing is the only way to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
I had two uncles who were police officers. Which is to say, government workers. One of my aunts worked for Dallas PD,  too. The Lovely Wife worked for the local school district for 20 years. I taught English at a community college for nearly 20 years. Government workers.

I have friends who were government employees. Without them, who would teach our children, collect our garbage, maintain our infrastructure, regulate our world? People from the school used to “move up” to the school administration building where my wife worked, expecting to enjoy “easy work” before they retired. They were always surprised to find they were busier, and worked harder, in those derided “bureaucratic jobs,” than when they were on the campuses.

Government workers, ya know.

According to the POTUS, they aren’t real workers doing real jobs. Except for ICE thugs and FBI agents reviewing files for Trump’s name, or DOJ lawyers still willing to try to indict the New York State AG. But the rest of them? Not real people holding real jobs, so not worth counting in labor statistics. The only people who matter are the ones employed in ways the president approves of; and who are people the president approves of.

It’s a very, very small populace who Trump wants to be President of.

Go Woke, Go Broke(?)

NPR:
The European Union has announced a fine of $140 million against Elon Musk's X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, for several failures to comply with rules governing large digital platforms. A European Commission spokesperson said the fine against X's holding company was due to the platform's misleading use of a blue check mark to identify verified users, a poorly functioning advertising repository, and a failure to provide effective data access for researchers.
(That was reported over three weeks ago, now, BTW.) I would love just one MAGAt on Twitter to explain:

A) accurately what the EU did to Twitter, and why: and 

B) what it has to do with “overt and malicious censorship of American speech by foreigners.” Or why it is censorship of free speech, period.

And $140 million? Musk has that much in the couch cushions.

The Minor Inconvenience Of A Kavanaugh Stop

 Separate and apart from the 14th amendment, who decides if you are a U.S. citizen?

Apparently, ICE does:

A 22-year-old woman is now being detained at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Texas, after initially being held in Louisiana.

Dulce Consuelo Diaz Morales's family said she was pulled over by ICE agents last Sunday, held in Baltimore, and then flown to Louisiana.

Her lawyers said ICE has ignored Diaz Morales's claims she is a United States citizen, and they have a birth certificate and other documentation to prove her U.S. citizenship.

...

"It is an indisputable fact that she was born inside the United States. I've seen her birth certificate. We have immunization records. We have multiple affidavits from people who were there at her birth," Slatton said. "I've personally called the hospital, and they confirm they do have records. They just cannot release them at this time. But we are working on getting additional evidence, but we have her birth certificate. That should be enough. She never should have been picked up in the first place."

Diaz Morales's lawyers have since fought back in federal court.

Last week, Maryland District Court Judge Brendan Hurson sided with them and ruled she cannot be removed from the United States for now.

"Specifically, respondents, including all those acting for them or on their behalf, are enjoined from removing Petitioner Dulce Consuelo Diaz Morales from the United States or altering her legal status during the pendency of this action, subject to further order of this Court," Judge Hurson wrote.
All of which means nothing to DHS.
In an interview with CNN Tuesday, Slatton said she was only able to find out Diaz Morales was in Texas was through the ICE detainee locator.

"I have not been able to talk to her. I was supposed to be able to speak to her in a confidential meeting...when we connected to that meeting, we were told that she was transferred," Slatton said in her CNN interview. "Her family was told she's being deported, thank goodness that was not the case."

...

Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin insisted Diaz Morales "is not a U.S. citizen" and claimed "she did not provide a valid U.S. birth certificate or any evidence in support of her claim that she is a U.S. citizen."

McLaughlin also said Diaz Morales was questioned by border patrol in 2023 near the Arizona-Mexico border and told authorities then that she was a Mexican citizen.
Ms. Diaz Morales is, in other words, guilty until proven innocent. And she’s got a non-Anglo name (unlike “Miller,” which was not the family name hysterically grandparents came from Russia with) and doesn’t look Anglo, so she doesn’t belong here. Best to keep her in custody, at least.

When does ICE start wondering about Sotomayor?

Third Day of Christmas 2025: Marina



Quis hic locus, quae regio, quae mundi plaga?

What seas what shores what grey rocks and what islands
What water lapping the bow
And scent of pine and the woodthrush singing through the fog
What images return
O my daughter.

Those who sharpen the tooth of the dog, meaning
Death
Those who glitter with the glory of the hummingbird, meaning
Death
Those who sit in the sty of contentment, meaning
Death
Those who suffer the ecstasy of the animals, meaning
Death

Are become insubstantial, reduced by a wind,
A breath of pine, and the woodsong fog
By this grace dissolved in place

What is this face, less clear and clearer
The pulse in the arm, less strong and stronger—
Given or lent? more distant than stars and nearer than the eye
Whispers and small laughter between leaves and hurrying feet
Under sleep, where all the waters meet.

Bowsprit cracked with ice and paint cracked with heat.
I made this, I have forgotten
And remember.
The rigging weak and the canvas rotten
Between one June and another September.
Made this unknowing, half conscious, unknown, my own.
The garboard strake leaks, the seams need caulking.
This form, this face, this life
Living to live in a world of time beyond me; let me
Resign my life for this life, my speech for that unspoken,
The awakened, lips parted, the hope, the new ships.

What seas what shores what granite islands towards my timbers
And woodthrush calling through the fog
My daughter.

--T.S. Eliot

Friday, December 26, 2025

“Infinity” Meaning “Any”

There’s a quiet irony here. You’re watching two men whose families came here with foreign names, foreign accents, and an American dream, and using them to argue the dream should be padlocked now.

America isn’t weakened by people who want to belong. It’s weakened by leaders who tell you belonging is a limited-time offer, and then call that “patriotism.”
And "third world” here is being used for an old euphemistic purpose: to declare certain groups “unclean.” It’s as American as cherry πŸ’ pie πŸ₯§. Miller really is following a familiar playbook: And the outcome is pretty well fore-ordained; except Trump won’t be the mastermind who establishes a permanent rule. He’s already failing, and he still has a GOP Congress. The same one that got him this far. But he’s not going any further.

The Comforts Of The 25th Amendment….


Are not all that comforting when the current VP thinks only white people can be ethical and trustworthy, and that they’re going to be overrun and become so dangerous we’ll have to strike first. With nuclear weapons.

It’s the only way to be sure.

Who Needs Wisdom When It Becomes Conventional?

When news:
The U.S. is undergoing its fastest religious shift in modern history, marked by a rapid increase in the religiously unaffiliated and numerous church closures nationwide," Contreras explains in a post-Christmas article published on December 26. "Why it matters: The great unchurching of America comes as identity and reality are increasingly shaped by non-institutional spiritual sources — YouTube mystics, TikTok tarot, digital skeptics, folk saints and AI-generated prayer bots. It's a tectonic transformation that has profound implications for race, civic identity, political persuasion and the ability to govern a fracturing moral landscape."

Contreras continues, "By the numbers: Nearly three in 10 American adults today identify as religiously unaffiliated — a 33 percent jump since 2013, according to the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). That's quicker than almost any major religious shift in modern U.S. history, and it's happening across racial groups, an Axios analysis found…. The shift in religious activity also is leaving behind a trail of 'church graveyards,' or empty buildings that are now difficult to sell or have been abandoned."

The Axios reporter notes that according to Gallup, roughly 57 percent of Americans seldom or never attend religious services — an increase from 40 percent in 2000 — and that an "unprecedented 15,000 churches are expected to shut their doors this year" compared to only a "few thousand expected to open."

PRRI CEO Melissa Deckman told Axios that there is no evidence of a widespread religious revival.

"Despite anecdotal and media reports about Gen Z men returning to church," Contreras notes, "there's little evidence it's happening beyond scattered examples to reverse the overall decline, she said. The bottom line: The old religious map is disappearing."
Isn't new.

March, 2023. Belief in God down to 47% of the population.

I kind of arbitrarily jumped back to 2023. I found two posts on the subject in 2022.

And a post in 2021, where I commented on the fact that even the prophets turned against organized religion. And don’t get me started on the decline of church buildings in America, v. the destruction of the Temple in the Exile, and again in 70 C.E.

Then there are the “nones,” a subject upon which I have posts from 2019, 2017, and another three posts from 2015, including this observation from March, 2015:
It seems that, as of 1906, 41% of the population (per the Census Bureau) considered themselves members of a religious organization (I'll presume this is self-reported, rather than derived from an analysis of church records).  92 years later, that percentage was 70%.

Which, IMHO, renders: “That's quicker than almost any major religious shift in modern U.S. history,” ring rather hollow, since the last religious shift in America was the period between 1906 and 1998. What goes up, must come down.

And this “news” has been news for the last decade. 

But it’s Christmastide, and that makes this timely. Sort of. Or maybe on the highway to “conventional wisdom.”

“The Cruelty Is The Point

And a sign of incompetence. Cruelty is the default of the incapable. I gotta ask: who didn’t see that coming at least 10 years ago? And, to be clear, I’m talking about the quoted opinion piece, not the comment in the tweet. Too often wisdom is not wisdom until it’s conventional. And who needs it then?

I TOLD You It Was The Incompetence

“Am I My Brother’s Keeper?”

" Rivers do not drink their own water; trees do not eat their own fruit; the sun does not shine on itself and flowers do not spread their fragrance for themselves. Living for others is a rule of nature. We are all born to help each other. No matter how difficult it is… life is good when you are happy, but much better when others are happy because of you.”

And Here It Is Christmas Again

Enjoy what may be your last Merry Christmas!" President Donald J. Trump
For Christ said: “Turn the other cheek, unless they’re ISIS Terrorist Scum maybe killing Xians. In that case, show ‘em you mean business! It’s the only way to be sure.”
Russia did not stop its brutal bombing of civilians in Ukraine even on the holy Christmas night.

Strikes on Odesa killed one person and injured two others. One civilian was killed in the Kharkiv region and another in the Chernihiv region. People were injured in the Zaporizhzhia and Sumy regions.

Odesa suffers the most these days. Russia deliberately destroys energy and civilian infrastructure, leaving people without power, water, and heating amid freezing temperatures.

No military purpose—just Russia’s intent to kill people because they are Ukrainians. Such actions fall under Article II (c) of the 1948 Genocide Convention: “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

We urge the world to act, increase pressure on the aggressor, and strengthen Ukraine’s means to defend itself and its people, including air defense.
And speaking of the war on Christians:

St. Stephen's Day 2025


St. Stephen's Day commemorates Stephen, the first martyr of the church:

54 When they heard these things, they became enraged and ground their teeth at Stephen. 55 But filled with the Holy Spirit, he gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. 56 “Look,” he said, “I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God!” 57 But they covered their ears, and with a loud shout all rushed together against him. 58 Then they dragged him out of the city and began to stone him; and the witnesses laid their coats at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59 While they were stoning Stephen, he prayed, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.” 60 Then he knelt down and cried out in a loud voice, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” When he had said this, he died.  (Acts 7:54-60)

We remember this, if at all, because of the song:

Good King Wenceslas looked out
On the feast of Stephen,
When the snow lay round about
Deep and crisp and even;

Brightly shone the moon that night
Though the frost was cruel,
When a poor man came in sight,
Gath'ring winter fuel.

'Hither, page, and stand by me,
If thou know'st it, telling
Yonder peasant, who is he?
Where and what his dwelling?'

'Sire, he lives a good league hence,
Underneath the mountain,
Right against the forest fence,
By Saint Agnes' fountain.'

'Bring me flesh and bring me wine,
Bring me pine logs hither,
Thou and I will see him dine
When we bear them thither.'

Page and monarch forth they went,
Forth they went together,
Through the rude wind's wild lament
And the bitter weather.

'Sire, the night is darker now
And the wind blows stronger;
Fails my heart, I know not how,
I can go no longer.'

'Mark my footsteps, good my page,
Tread thou in them boldly:
Thou shalt find the winter's rage
Freeze thy blood less coldly.'

In his master's steps he trod,
Where the snow lay dinted;
Heat was in the very sod
Which the Saint had printed.

Therefore, Christian men, be sure
Wealth or rank possessing,
Ye who now will bless the poor
Shall yourselves find blessing.

Which, if turns out, was written in 1853 to a 13th century tune.

The carol was written for the Feast of St Stephen, better known as Boxing Day. And it celebrates the long tradition of charitable giving on the Second Day of Christmas.

That "long tradition" is something else we've lost in America, thanks to the Puritans who despised Christmas and all traditions surrounding it.  As for Wenceslaus, he had a rough time of it:

Duke, martyr, and patron of Bohemia, born probably 903; died at Alt-Bunzlau, 28 September, 935.

His parents were Duke Wratislaw, a Christian, and Dragomir, a heathen. He received a good Christian education from his grandmother (St. Ludmilla) and at Budweis. After the death of Wratislaw, Dragomir, acting as regent, opposed Christianity, and Wenceslaus, being urged by the people, took the reins of government. He placed his duchy under the protection of Germany, introduced German priests, and favoured the Latin rite instead of the old Slavic, which had gone into disuse in many places for want of priests. Wenceslaus had taken the vow of virginity and was known for his virtues. The Emperor Otto I conferred on him the regal dignity and title. For religious and national motives, and at the instigation of Dragomir, Wenceslaus was murdered by his brother Boleslaw. The body, hacked to pieces, was buried at the place of murder, but three years later Boleslaw, having repented of his deed, ordered its translation to the Church of St. Vitus in Prague. The gathering of his relics is noted in the calendars on 27 June, their translation on 4 March; his feast is celebrated on 28 September.
There's a surprising amount of death on the Christian calendar after the celebration of the birth of the Christ-child.  It's almost a reminder that "peace on earth, goodwill toward" all, is not so much a gift as a hope that we have some part in.  But our part is active, not just passive.

'Mark my footsteps, good my page,
Tread thou in them boldly:
Thou shalt find the winter's rage
Freeze thy blood less coldly.'

Thursday, December 25, 2025

Jimmy Kimmel’s Xmas Message To Britain

I have no idea if you know who I am, but I was asked to deliver this year’s alternative Christmas message (which I’ve heard is a big deal) so I hope you do, but if not I host what you call a chatshow (we call it a talkshow) in what you call the colonies, I think? I honestly have no idea what’s going on over there.

I do know what’s going on over here though, and I can tell you that, from a fascism perspective, this has been a really great year. Tyranny is booming over here.

You may have read in your colourful newspapers that my country’s president would like to shut me up – because I don’t adore him in the way he likes to be adored. The American government made a threat against me and the company I work for, and all of a sudden we were off the air. But then, you know what happened? A Christmas miracle happened. Well, it was September. It was a September miracle. But the holiday does seem to come earlier and earlier every year, doesn’t it?

Millions and millions of people stood up and said: “No, this is not acceptable.” People who never watched my show, people who were on record saying they hate my show spoke out, they marched. They did this all to support the right to a free expression of speech – and because so many people spoke out, we came back. Our show came back stronger than ever. We won, the president lost – and now I’m back on the air every night, givin’ the most powerful politician on Earth a right, and richly deserved, bollocking. That’s a word, right – I used it properly?

And the reason I’m telling you this story is because maybe you’re thinking: “Oh a government silencing its critics is something that happens in places like Russia, or North Korea, or LA, not the UK.” Well, that’s what we thought, and now we’ve got King Donny the Eighth calling for executions. It happens fast.

You know, it’s funny, we Americans are very proud of not having a king. It’s kind of why we left. Earlier this year tens of millions of us marched at protests called No Kings. You had some of those there. And just for the record we have nothing against your king. I mean I don’t know if you know this, but his son lives here. We just – well some of us – have a problem with the guy who thinks he is our king.

Here in the United States right now, we are both figuratively and literally tearing down the structures of our democracy. From the free press, to science, to medicine, to judicial independence, to the actual White House itself, we are a right mess. And we know this is also affecting you, and I just wanted to say sorry. And we want you to know or, at least I want you to know, that we’re not all like him. We’re not all like that.

Look I know (from the musical Hamilton) that our countries didn’t start off on the greatest note, but I also know (from seeing Love Actually) that we have a special relationship. So, if I might speak on behalf of my country – which I most certainly do not – our message to you, our friends across the pond this Christmas is: don’t give up on us. We’re going through a bit of a wobble right now, but we’ll come around. It may not seem like it, but we love you guys. We even love the things about you that you don’t like. Like Simon Cowell, for instance. We are not bright. We’re Americans. No one knows better than you we’re always just a little bit late to the game, but do we come through in the end? Maybe. Give us about three years. Please. Thank you for your patience, and thank you for Spider-Man. Merry Christmas, and happy holidays.