Adventus

"The central doctrine of Christianity, then, is not that God is a bastard. It is, in the words of the late Dominican theologian Herbert McCabe, that if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you."--Terry Eagleton

"It is impossible for me to say in my book one word about all that music has meant in my life. How then can I hope to be understood?--Ludwig Wittgenstein

“The opposite of poverty is not wealth; the opposite of poverty is justice."--Bryan Stevenson

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

The Eyes of the World Were Upon Them....

I was up at midnight watching this on-line.  I had a hard time finding out in real time just what was going on (turns out the filibuster effectively ended at around 10, but Democrats in the Senate were able to tie up proceedings until nearly midnight, when the crowd in the gallery took over).  I had an even harder time finding out what had just happened.  There was a vote called, but the crowd was so noisy the Lt. Gov. ("Lite Guv," we say down here, thanks to the late Ms. Ivins) seemed to suspend the vote.  Before he could announce a result there were cries from the floor of "It's midnight!  It's midnight!", and a lot of milling about by Senators who didn't seem to know if they should stay or go.

The scene itself was impressive.  The Capitol in Austin sits on 15th street.  The line at 11:30 last night of those wanting to get into the Senate Chamber reportedly stretched all the way down to 11th street.  Wendy Davis reportedly went international.  The whole world, quite literally, was watching; and this morning, I think that's why David Dewhurst threw in the towel at 3 a.m.  He knew he'd never get away with it.

Not that he didn't try:

 “With all the ruckus and noise going on,” Mr. Dewhurst said, he could not complete administrative duties to make the vote official and sign the bill. Senate Democrats and women’s right’s advocates said the real reason the vote could not be made official was a time stamp on official documents that showed the bill passed after midnight. The Legislature’s official Web site first posted that the Senate’s vote occurred on Wednesday, after the midnight deadline, but the date was later changed to Tuesday for unknown reasons.
The reasons, actually, are not unknown; whodunnit is more the question.  But it didn't work; Dewhurst knew he couldn't get away with fudging computer records and turning the Senate chamber into a time machine, so he folded.  It was also just perfectly plain, as of 1:15 this morning,  that the records had been altered.  Hard copies are hard to argue with.

It also appears the arcane Texas Constitution once again reared it's beleaguered head and made a difference here:

Republican senators made a last-ditch effort to approve SB 5, voting 19-10, but by then the clock had ticked past midnight. Under the terms of the state Constitution, the special session had ended, and the bill could not be signed, enrolled or sent to the governor.
So shenanigans and ill intent were defeated, for once.  Shenanigans because it was obvious to anyone watching last night that the rules of the Texas Senate which control filibusters were wielded, albeit in gentlemanly fashion (there was a fascinating debate around 7 p.m. about civility on the Senate floor. I caught that live.), the rules are what the majority says they are.  The 7 p.m. debate was on a point of order about whether another Senator helping Sen. Davis strap on a back brace had violated the filibuster rules.  The factual issue was less important than the excuse to vote on a point of order, which went along party lines.  The final point of order, that Sen. Davis had strayed from a discussion of matters germane to the bill under consideration, is what brought the filibuster to an end.  That vote, too, was a foregone conclusion.  Nobody watching could doubt the Republicans were looking for any excuse that would legitimate ending the filibuster, although they weren't so ham-handed as to do it on the slimmest pretext possible.

The whole world was watching, after all.  That "unruly mob" in the gallery, as the Lite Guv. would later call them, clearly had some impact.

 And even Rachel Maddow finally recognized that Texas is the 2nd most populous state in the country, and what happens here actually does affect a whole lot of people.

Maybe that kind of attention will help us out.  Even if none of this might have happened without the Voting Rights Act. But let's leave the last word to the Lite Guv.:

“An unruly mob using Occupy Wall Street tactics” derailed legislation that was intended to protect women and babies, he told reporters.

"I didn't lose control of what we were doing," he said. "We had an unruly mob."
Or maybe it was just an unruly bill.  Democracy sux, don't it?


2 Comments:

Blogger The Thought Criminal said...

On topic, as it would be, my last post of the day.

Celebrate The Death of DOMA With Expanded Civil Rights Agitation

It is one of the weirdest turn-arounds in my lifetime that gay rights are progressing as the rights of racial and ethnic minorities and women are dying in the courts and legislatures. I never would have expected that Gay folk would be able to cut into the line ahead of other groups who had made more progress in the past. The celebrations of the overturning of the clearly unconstitutional "Defense of Marriage Act" should be muted by the bitter ruling on the Voting Rights Act yesterday and the attacks of the right of women to the most intimate of all rights, the rights to determine the state of their own bodies.

If gay rights advocates do not turn, immediately, to overturning the Supreme Court's assassination of the Voting Rights Act and the attacks on women's rights, we will have nothing to be proud of on the next Gay Pride Day.

If Lesbians and Gay men stop to enjoy this progress, ignoring the attacks on self-government and equality, our rights will prove to be as ephemeral and prone to overturning as the most important civil rights law of the past century. If they can do that to voting rights, they can do it to any rights.

9:45 AM  
Blogger Rmj said...

If they can do that to voting rights, they can do it to any rights.

I really can't read the decision yesterday without thinking it means the 15th Amendment really doesn't mean any damned thing at all.

Especially in conjunction with the voter ID rulings that have upheld that Jim Crow-ish practice. Of course now the discrimination is against "Latinos" who may vote without being citizens, and not against "blacks," which was the object of the 15th Amendment.

'Cause, ya know, as Scalia says, the Constitution is not alive, it's dead.

Yup. Deader'n' hell, brother.

9:51 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home