This is apparently the story of Trump v. Sanders in a debate sans Hillary:
On ABC's "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Trump was asked if he would consider holding a debate with Sanders. Trump agreed to the idea. "If he paid a sum toward charity I would love to do that," said the business mogul, noting that a Sanders vs. Trump debate "would have such high ratings." Sanders quickly responded with a tweet reading, "Game On. I look forward to debating Donald Trump in California before the June 7th primary."
The alternative is to believe that Sanders has gone crazy from the heat and decided that the best thing he can do as a national politician is to collaborate in a silly and dangerous carny sideshow act that can have only one result: the spectacle of two aging white men slamming the first woman ever to have an odds-on chance to be president of the United States.So, yeah, this is completely "heads I win, tails you lose."
THE NEXT DAY:
As I was saying:
At a press conference in North Dakota on Thursday, Mr. Trump suggested that he was serious about the debate on the condition that the networks would donate $10 million to $15 million of the proceeds to charities that support women’s health causes.Trump the "billionaire" wants people to forget the problems he had donating $1 million as he promised he would do from his last non-debate appearance. Anybody think he's not putting this number out there knowing the networks won't go for it? And what is the Sander campaign saying?
"We hope that he will not chicken out," [Sanders campaign manager Jeff] Weaver said. "We hope Donald Trump has the courage to get on stage now that he said he would."
Gotta know when to hold, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away; and in this case, Sanders should just run. Especially because Bernie would come out of this as their man on our side. I mean, if he wants to burn whatever bridges he has left in the Senate, and become completely useless to Vermont.....