When Trump’s lawyer tried to cite Judge Aileen Cannon’s order today to Judge Chutkan that dismissed the documents case, Chutkan made it clear she didn’t want or need to hear anything from Cannon. https://t.co/ebL9sVibaZ
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) September 5, 2024
Importantly, Judge Chutkan noted that the upcoming election will not impact the scheduling order, and shot back against Trump's attorney who tried to claim that they are "dealing with the U.S. Presidency." In response, Chutkan noted: I am not talking about the presidency. I am talking about a four-count indictment.”As it relates to a trial date, however, viewers will have to wait a while longer as all sides agreed that setting a trial date would be an exercise in futility given the likelihood of additional interlocutory appeals. As it currently stands, it is unlikely that this case will go to trial until sometime mid to late 2025 or even 2026.
I know I sound like a Pollyanna on this point, but if the Supremes meant to grant Trump outright immunity in this case, they would have done it. I still think Roberts cobbled together a Rube Goldberg mechanism based on invented rules of evidence so he could get 5 1/2 votes. I think he'd lost three of those if he decided on the next appeal Trump was a monarch after all. Especially after Trump confessed to the nation that he had a "right" to interfere in the election (the equivalent "right" I have to go to the bank and demand all their money because I think they shouldn't have charged me an overdraft fee).
So far, they aren't on solid legal ground.That’s not what SCOTUS said but OK, Lauro https://t.co/TozHsul1A5
— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) September 5, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment