But the Trump campaign thought they had the antidote:Moskowitz: It wasn’t a hidden strategy. They were literally telling people, "We’re going to get under Trump’s skin." The Trump strategy was also very public — they were going to make sure they didn’t let her get under his skin. Eleven minutes in, she mentions crowd size, and he… pic.twitter.com/ISSa21IBnc
— Acyn (@Acyn) September 11, 2024
Trump was going to manipulate the moderators (hey, it'd worked before!). But, of course, ABC put a thumb on the scale:All jokes about Laura Loomer aside, I had assumed Trump bringing up the “they’re eating dogs” garbage was him going rogue with that approach. pic.twitter.com/yHUaSlUCKz
— Bradley P. Moss (@BradMossEsq) September 11, 2024
Which is to say, the moderators acted like rational people in a room with a lunatic, and told him, no, "abortion" does not include executing babies once they are born, and they weren't going to let the debate devolve into a shouting match about nonsense. (Who was that supposed to serve? Three guesses, first two don't count...) Although, honestly, how dare they intrude on the sacred work of politicians lying to the voters about things that are as untrue as the lizard people are controlling our brains with Z-rays? (That is true, of course, as every right thinking Earthling knows, and only the people under the control of the Lizard Kings think otherwise!)If you had told me in 2008 that Hillary's campaign manager was now pulling hard for the Republican presidential candidate, I wouldn't have been at all surprised, I'm sorry to say. https://t.co/8UrrrGAfp9
— New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) September 11, 2024
The problem with high-speed rail is that we tore up all the train tracks (Houston had an old rail line running parallel to I-10 when I moved here. They finally tore it up to expand the freeway, only later to think they might need some kind of rail to provide mass transit that didn't involve cars clogging freeways. The light rail they built downtown goes nowhere execpt back and forth downtown, in a very limited area, in no small part because ROW is expensive (so it runs on city streets, and crashes into cars). The rail in Chicago runs on "regular" train tracks, but Houston destroyed those and paved over the ROW. Regulation? Or short-sightedness?). New high-speed rail will need new ROW. Texas has talked about high speed rail from Houston to Dallas for decades; but it never gets anywhere because there's too much private property (and development) between here and Dallas, in any kind of straight line. Regulation isn't blocking it: private interests are. Even with eminent domain, it will cost a small fortune just to get the ROW; and then you start laying track. Let's just say colonies on Mars are more likely, and that's so sciencey fictional (yes, that's not a typo) it's more rational to believe in God (nor is that a typo).Trump is a two-bit hustler and con man who hates EVs and thinks your name is Leon. pic.twitter.com/a2rmrcHSM3
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) September 12, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment