...won’t vote for him anyway, right?It was a statement that spooked a number of tristate residents, left wondering what exactly it portended for the future. It caught the governor off guard. White House will dismiss it as no big deal; many residents in the area feel like they were played with for no reason. https://t.co/U6tn6MepP8— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) March 29, 2020
The off-hand remark, followed by the tweet, followed by more off-hand remarks during a speech, followed by hours of breathless supposition, followed by deserved outrage, followed by tweets that walk back the whole damn thing.— David Gura 🏡 (@davidgura) March 29, 2020
Let's do it all over again tomorrow?
Because:"The Governors of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut will have full discretion to implement this Domestic Travel Advisory." Gobbledegook. It's meaningless to say that state officials have "discretion" to "implement" a federal advisory to residents.https://t.co/3sJTs5PB1F— Marty Lederman (@marty_lederman) March 29, 2020
This would likely not hold up in court, constitutional lawyers say, as it violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause in the Constitution, which dates to 1787. That bars discrimination between residents of different states, underpinning the right of interstate travel. https://t.co/CCZx5cB2MZ— Neil MacFarquhar (@NeilMacFarquhar) March 29, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment