No, No, No!!! INFLATION!!!!!

DAMN YOU BIDEoh wait https://t.co/bqclL8QBCx

— Dennis Herring (@dcherring) July 2, 2023

It’s so much easier to talk about what didn’t happen:

A bigger SCOTUS scandal than private planes and billionaires. https://t.co/FwG704YMDK

— Ronald Klain (@RonaldKlain) July 2, 2023

I’m not beating that dead horse anymore but, but Jiminy Christmas, now it’s slipped the surly binds of Twitter and wandered into traffic of the real world with the AP.

No one is ever going to pay attention to what that decision actually did. Dammit. 😤  As I was saying about fixing stupid…

“Rush asked OceanGate’s director of finance and administration whether she’d like to take over as chief submersible pilot. ‘It freaked me out that he would want me to be head pilot, since my background is in accounting,’ she told me.” https://t.co/gzuQ6xt2xU

— George Conway (@gtconway3d) July 2, 2023

Read this article yesterday. Short version: that submersible was not. It was the product of an ignorant egotist who thought that made him smarter than people who actually knew the engineering principles involved. Sound familiar?

Amazing that so many attorneys, law profs, and legal reporters don’t seem to know that First Amendment pre-enforcement challenges exist.

— Emil J. Kiehne (@EmilKiehne) July 2, 2023

I’m not even sure that’s the issue. You’d think people would actually read the opinion and the dissent. But I guess that’s expecting too much; especially on Twitter.

Indeed, while the court handed major victories to the right on affirmative action, LGBTQ rights and student loans, overall the three liberals were on the winning side more often than the court's two most conservative justices. https://t.co/1v0gHgYHM9

— Peter Baker (@peterbakernyt) July 2, 2023

Oh, good, now Peter Baker’s weighed. Still wondering which is more important: raw number of cases, or the number of consequential cases?

As I was saying, Twitter is not where you go for reasoning, sound or otherwise.