Friday, March 07, 2025

“…Carry ID With Them At All Times.”

I’m old enough to remember when “show me your papers” was the hallmark of a totalitarian state, and all God-fearing right wing Republicans considered that a sign of the end if American freedom which had to be opposed at all costs.

Of course, if that only applies to criminals and Hispanics, then at least it’s not discrimination against white men. Which are the most oppressed group in America.

(The most pitiful part of this story is ICE releasing him once they let him show his Real ID. These ICE agents are so savvy they know he isn’t an American citizen, but they aren’t savvy enough to think the person they are after gave a false address. (Duh!) They obviously didn’t have a picture of their suspect; but the man at that address did. Which they didn’t look at until they handcuffed him and … decided maybe they should check? These ain’t the best and the brightest, but we always think they will be when politicians promise magical solutions to complex problems.)

Not FAFO. SNAFU. And under Trump? FUBAR.

Of Rain And The Rhinoceros 🦏

 I’m not going to improve on Merton this morning.

Thursday, March 06, 2025

Closing Time

And the corrected version: See? Oh, you need more convincing?
Dumb as a bag of hanmers I swear to God, if you shook his head, you could hear the BB rattle. And I got nowhere else to put this just now: Oh, and did you hear about the interim USA who tried to tell Georgetown Law how to be a law school under the new regime?

Senators are asking the DC Office of Disciplinary Counsel to look into the torrent of abnormal and rule-shattering statements Jan. 6 organizer Ed Martin has issued since Trump gave the conservative activist his first-ever prosecutorial job: DC US Attorney. 
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2025-03-06%20SJC%20Bar%20Complaint%20re%20Martin.pdf
I expect by next week DOGE will have notified Georgetown Law that it is dissolved. Meanwhile... What could go wrong?

And in the effort to eradicate any reference to DEI from the Defense Department, references to the Ebola Gay have been tagged for removal from all relevant databases. Because “gay.”
 
And while we WILL say “Merry Christmas,” we will stop singing “Deck the Halls.” Don’t even hum it.
  Mic drop.

Cheering Up, Because It Will Only Get Worse. But It Won't Get THAT Bad. (Well, Not Entirely)

 Was Trump going to sign the EO to abolish the DOE?

No.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt quoted a news report saying it was "fake news" that Trump was expected to sign the order on Thursday. She said he is not signing it.

WSJ had this.  ABCNews had this.  And nobody's screaming about leaks.

Behind the scenes, there was concern among top administration officials about the blowback the order would receive and the lack of messaging in place ahead of the rollout.

Specifically, how the administration would answer questions about how the executive order would impact the school lunch program along with other programs that could no longer exist. 

Tip o' the fuckin' iceberg.  Or the spear, depending on your perspective.  And where the spear was aimed.  But that requires answering the next question:  could an EO end a government department?

No. 

The DOE was established by act of Congress in 1979.  The Department of Education Organization Act (DOEA), to be specific.  It took the "E" out of "HEW" and made it a separate department with Cabinet level secretary.  President Trump wants to know what it does?

The Department now receives over $268 billion in annual appropriations from Congress, with      funding levels specified for the department’s specific programs. Since its creation, the department has played a critical role in administering programs and services that ensure all children can succeed–keeping schools open and afterschool programs available, ensuring children with disabilities have access to education, standing up for kids being harassed or bullied, and helping families pay for college and career training.

Let's start with Title I funding and the role of the DOE:

Section 204 of the Department of Education Organization Act (DEOA) created the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE). OESE’s is tasked by Congress with administering Title I-A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which provides supplemental funding to low-income school districts. The amount each school district gets depends primarily on local poverty estimates updated annually by the Census Bureau. The Education Department uses four different funding formulas required by law to distribute this money, and annual appropriations bills specify the portions to be allocated to states and LEAs under each formula.

I want to emphasize all of that is done by statute.  Not by vague handwaving directions to the Administration to spend Title I money in accordance with the President's agenda.  Congress allocates, the Administration...administrates.  It's what we mean when we say "It's the law."  The amount allocated may change from year to year.  The method of allocation doesn't.  Per the DOEA, that is done by:  the DOE.  Trump can't change that by Presidential fiat because without the DOE, that money can't be distributed as required by federal law.  Federal law that is, in some ways, about 46 years old now.

There are reports Trump wants to move Title I funding to the states in block grants.  Can he do this?  No.

 Section 301(2) of DEOA authorizes the Secretary of the Education Department to administer the ESEA, including Title I-A. Changing the agency responsible for administering Title I-A would require legislative changes. An EO that purports to abolish OESE or to shift Title I-A funding to HHS exceeds the legal authority of the president and usurps Congress’s authority.

He wants to make that transfer to the states with "no strings attached."  Again, federal law says:  "Nope."

Title I-A grants can be used for a broad array of programs to improve education quality and help ensure that all children meet state academic standards, preserving state and local authority over education. The ESSA, the most recent major legislative change to K-12 funding, rolled back much of the federal government’s role in education policy and gave new leeway to the states. This means that the “strings attached” the Trump administration seeks to eliminate are basic mechanisms for accountability and transparency for parents and communities, such as requiring states to measure performance in reading, math, and science, to publish a “State Report Card” online, to publish “per pupil expenditures,” and to provide comprehensive support and improvement to their lowest performing 5 percent of schools.

I think it's the "transparency" Trump objects to. 

Predating the DOE is IDEA, or Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  The funding for that act is, by act of Congress, administered by the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) at the DOE.

In FY 2024, OSERS distributed over $15 billion in grants to support states, local education authorities, and schools in meeting their obligations to students with disabilities under the IDEA. OSERS monitors and supports states’ implementation of IDEA, including by providing written guidance to parents, educators, and state educational agencies.

I'm sure Elmo and DOGE think that's "waste, fraud, and abuse." 

Congress also established the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within DOE "to protect the rights of students and, when necessary, enforce civil rights in schools. OCR is one of the largest civil rights enforcement agencies in the U.S."  Which, to Trump, means only one thing:  DEI. Again, he can't do anything about it.  Only Congress can.  Can he eliminate the employees of OCR?  No, because it has to function, per Congressional authorization. The Higher Education Act of 1965 established most of the student aid program still helping students pay for college.  In 1998 Congress created the office of Federal Student Aid, and put it in the DOE to operate in the way established by law, with policy set by, and oversight provided by, the SOE.  The current SOE cannot dissolve the FSA, or write it out of existence by eliminating its policy provisions. The mandate to oversee is not the power to destroy.

So what can happen?  More chaos; more damage, needlessly inflicted by a man child who doesn't understand what he's doing.

What can you expect except chaos?

Well, it's Lent; it's the season of penance.  Forgive us, Lord, for we did not want to know what we were doing.  And we did it anyway.....

"BUT!....Elon's Not In Charge!"

That Appointments Clause is fixing to bite his fat ass off. And he doesn't have a clue.

“Let Them Eat Cake” 🎂

And I thought Mnuchin was an elitist, out of touch SOT.

Trump Just Heard About It, So It’s New

During his address to Congress on Tuesday night, Trump boasted about what he described as a major win for the U.S. auto industry, claiming Honda had announced plans to build a massive new plant in Indiana. "In fact, already, numerous car companies have announced that they will be building massive automobile plants in America, with Honda just announcing a new plant in Indiana, one of the largest anywhere in the world," Trump declared, crediting his administration’s tariffs and policies for the supposed expansion.

However, Honda quickly fact-checked the president’s claim, making it clear that no such announcement had been made. In a statement to WRTV, Honda firmly denied Trump’s assertion, emphasizing that its existing Indiana facility has been operational since 2008.
DOGE took credit for ending contracts that ended under Biden, and as far back as Shrub’s administration.

I’m sensing a pattern here. 

C-SPAN Is Not Legally Allowed To Ask Hard Questions

 That’s in the Constitution. I’m pretty sure:

During a Thursday interview on C-SPAN, host Pedro Echevarria noted that Burchett and other DOGE subcommittee members recently met with Elon Musk.

"If he says the things that DOGE has found and the savings they found, how do you verify that other than the fact that it's the word of Elon Musk?" the host wondered.

"They document it," Burchett replied. "There is a, um, paper trail and a computer. It's computer-generated. I have a 17-year-old daughter that shows me how stupid I am with my computer every day."
And the internet is a series of tubes...or is it rubes?
"But he had another gentleman there with him who verified everything that he said," he insisted.
You can’t ask for better'n that!
Burchett then veered into recalling how Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) had appointed him to sit on the DOGE subcommittee.

"And we are actually delving into all that, and I don't want to disclose too much of it because that means that most of the time that those folks will try to close up that paper trail," he claimed. "But it's very well documented, and I'm very confident in what's going on."

The lawmaker also accused the government of paying Social Security benefits to people "that were even older than our country."

"You have to wonder, is that just a computer glitch?" he suggested. "So there's quite a lot there, and I think my biggest fear is that we can stay focused. There's just so much corruption, and it goes so deep."
No, Senator. That’s just you being ignorant. Again. There are two recent audits of Social Security, one in 2015, another in 2023.  Both found there not only was no such fraud, but that there was a harmless error in the database that would cost more to fix than it was worth.

So they saved money by leaving it alone.

In Fact, The Water Is Freezing 🥶

Chaos for everyone!! (Oh, come on! You knew it was coming!) Making America great again by being completely unreliable!

Sticking A Toe In The Water

Deciding the water is still cold.🥶 

🎶”We Don’t Need No Education”🎶

"We don’t need no thought control" Make Sweatshops Great Again! Elmo had to employ one to fake a robot. 🤖 Surely that’s a growth market!
Rest of conversation -

CNBC: Mr. Lutnick, CBP data shows that only 43 pounds of fentanyl were seized at the Canadian border last year. Why is this even a focus?

LUTNICK: I think autopsy deaths—as horrible as that is—should be the statistic.

CNBC: But the majority of fentanyl isn’t coming from Canada. It’s being smuggled in by American citizens through legal ports of entry. It’s not migrants. It’s not some invasion. It’s Americans bringing it in.

LUTNICK: Well look, crooks are crooks.

CNBC: So if crooks are crooks, why are you blaming Canada instead of dealing with the actual issue?

LUTNICK: The president is being strong on the border!

CNBC: Which border? Because over 21,000 pounds of fentanyl were seized at the southern border—500 times what was caught coming from Canada. And yet, Trump is threatening tariffs on Canada instead of investing in solutions that actually stop the problem.

LUTNICK: Tariffs will help!

CNBC: How? Fentanyl isn’t coming in through trade. It’s coming in through U.S. citizens, through legal crossings, through routes Trump refuses to address. If this is about stopping fentanyl, why push policies that don’t even target the real source?

LUTNICK: He’s taking action!

CNBC: No, he’s creating distractions. Canada isn’t the problem. But blaming Canada lets Trump avoid dealing with the real crisis because the truth doesn’t fit his narrative.
I see why Trump appointed Lutnick. He likes hiring people even dumber than he is. Even Bartiromo can do the math…

“The Maximum Extent Appropriate And Permitted By Law”

Why did Trump announce tariffs against Canada and Mexico, and then suspend them before they took affect? Why did he announce tariffs again, only to suspend them for automobile manufacturers for 30 days?
Maddow called out the administration’s move to list 443 government properties, as reported by Bloomberg, which was scrapped.

“They tried that yesterday and then oops, oh, push back. Who could have expected? And so then today, less than 24 hours later, they took it all back. They took them all down,” Maddow said.

She then laid into to Trump and Musk in a passionate analysis that the longtime host of the top-rated primetime show has become known for.

“Everywhere they go, everything they have tried to do, they are running up against opposition and annoyance,” Maddow said. “They are running up against their own stupidity. They are running up against their own ignorance. They are running up against the law.”

She added: “The pushback all over this country has thrown down stop strips in the road to flatten their tires and at least slow them down, and sometimes to stop them."
And why did they announce this so early?
A draft of a new executive that could be signed as early as Thursday aims to abolish the Department of Education, according to a report.

The Wall Street Journal, which reviewed the document, wrote Wednesday night Education Secretary Linda McMahon is instructed in the order to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Education Department” based on “the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.”
"The maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law” sounds like a weaselly attempt to do it without doing it, so Trump can say he did it but a single federal judge usurped his authority.

Damned judicial system. Damned Constitution.

Trump has no idea what the DOE does, and he has no authority to dismantle it. But there’s a pattern here. He has to keep running before it catches up with him.

He’s gotta have something to do with his time. He can’t play golf all the time. He’s got to pretend he tried.

Before he takes it back. 

He’s not even pretending to defy court orders anymore.

Dear Justice Alito And The Katzenjammer Kids

Your concerns are based on a towering pile of shit:
The chief executive of the United States told the country that the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had uncovered an outrageous expenditure authorized by the previous administration: a whopping $8 million 'for making mice transgender,'" reported Miles Klee.

To begin with, the $8 million figure was likely a complete fabrication, wrote Klee. Tech billionaire Elon Musk and his DOGE task force have been compelled to take down numerous claims of savings from their "wall of receipts" after reporters noticed they added extra zeroes, double-counted contracts, and failed to factor in money spent before the contracts were canceled.

But there's an even bigger problem: in all likelihood, the "transgender" mice Trump was referring to were actually transgenic mice genetically altered to allow easy study of potential treatments for cancer, asthma, and HIV.

This kind of mistake has been common in the Trump administration, Klee said.

"In removing certain words from federal agency documents, the administration has repeatedly deleted documents unrelated to its culture war concerns, including a database that helps doctors determine whether to test pregnant women for HIV and sections of the IRS employee handbook that refer to 'inequity' and 'inclusion' as financial terms."

One of the most infamous cases is a list of terms the National Science Foundation is reportedly searching for to "flag" research grants for further scrutiny, including "female," "women," "systemic," "trauma," and "bias," all of which have important uses in science and medicine.

The White House later tried to produce a fact sheet supporting Trump's claim about "transgender mice" — but none of the taxpayer-funded studies they linked involved any transgender mice, Klee reported.

"As is typical of DOGE, the page tallies up spending in a completely misleading way in order to arrive at an arbitrary number. One line item, for more than $3 million, was research examining how 'sex-specific inflammatory mechanisms controlled by hormones' may contribute to asthma, and whether estrogens account for a higher prevalence of the chronic lung disease in women. A different hormone study, priced at $1.2 million, indeed used 'transgenic' — not transgender — mice."

Only one study on the list appeared to involve gender identity at all — and it was looking at whether testosterone therapy in female-to-male transgender patients impacted breast cancer risk. Another study did give mice cross-gender hormones, but not to "make them transgender"; instead, it was to measure how it affected their immune response to HIV.

"It certainly appears that the president’s anti-DEI forces simply flagged a random selection of National Institutes of Health material that included some combination of hormones, mice, gender, and words with the prefix 'trans,' then rolled this all up into the dumbed-down talking point Trump used on Tuesday night," Klee wrote.
“Transgender mice.” The “wall of receipts” that melted away like the morning dew? I’d say you guys should be embarrassed, but I don’t think any of you are capable of shame.
Klee concluded: "So you can rest easy knowing that millions of taxpayer dollars was not frittered away on 'woke' experiments to impose new gender identities on lab rodents — all of the spending cited was, of course, in the interest of improving human health. Because that’s what medical researchers do."
But you all do you, boo.

Upping The Hitler

So let’s talk about Gaza! Sometimes you have to up the Hitler to remain the Hitler. Especially because this just didn’t get enough attention: Gotta distract from this, too. This guy 👇 doesn’t know what “code” means. Or “algorithm.” Question for Lindsey: would that include the idea Social Security is a Ponzi scheme? That NOAA needs to be gutted? FAA needs fewer air traffic controllers, CDC needs fewer employees? (CDC is already begging people to come back. Bird flu or measles seem to persistently be problems.) Maybe just sit this one out, Lindsey. You don’t have any cards. Or setting a precedent...? 🤣🤣🤣👏👏👏🔥🔥🔥🔥 So we’re at war with immigrants? Justice Alito and the Katzenjammer Kids are going to be so upset that a single district court judge can stop that from happening. Silly judicial system. Silly Constitution. What are they against Fat Hitler?

Elon Musk Is A Cartoon Villain From A Bad Action Movie

 He told Joe Rogan: “the fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy"

I mean, even Thanos showed empathy.

And then he spoke to Politico:

“It could be the kind of thing where you sort of fund Ebola prevention, but it turns out that actually you’re funding a lab that develops new Ebola,” Musk said, providing no evidence that the U.S. government was funding a lab doing as much. “They claim it’s Ebola prevention, but it’s actually Ebola creation.”
This is why four Supreme Court justices are worried about getting their money back.

“Trust us! Have we ever lied to you?”
Anyone from DOGE has to go through the same vetting process that those federal employees went through,” Musk said, before adding, “But I mean, obviously the vast numbers of Social Security numbers have leaked onto the internet. People have hacked the government systems multiple times.”
There’s no evidence for that, either.
In Musk’s vision, AI could carry out government functions, though he didn’t provide further detail on what responsibilities it might be tasked with. That’s because the tech billionaire thinks AI will outpace human intelligence by the end of the decade, he said.

His statement comes as federal agency heads at the General Services Administration want to create a chatbot called GSAi to increase worker productivity and use other AI tools to scrub contracts and streamline processes, two staffers previously told POLITICO.

But Musk said he might limit the jurisdiction of AI if it adopts what he believes are far-fetched liberal views. “One of the concerns would be if there’s a super oppressive woke nanny AI that is omnipotent and executes you if you misgender someone,” he said. “That would be a miserable outcome.”
A) What gives him the authority to make that determination?; and 

B) I wonder who the contractor would be for that AI? 🤖 

C) AI that executes someone? Kinda jumped from government services to Arnold Schwarzenegger hellscape pretty quickly there, didn’t you? Must have something to do with empathy being a weakness.

Wednesday, March 05, 2025

Evening Reflections on Ash Wednesday 2025


I didn't grow up in a liturgical tradition. In fact, my vague memory is that communion was an infrequent affair. I suspect, though my memory betrays me, that it was only celebrated in my Presbyterian church, in good Reformed tradition, once every three months or so. The "high holy days" I recall were Christmas Eve (ironically, now that I think of it), Maundy Thursday (of course; and appropriately), and maybe Easter Sunday (though I'm not sure about that). I think the other day was supposed to be Pentecost, but I don't recall hearing much about Pentecost, or Lent, or even the Easter season, in my youth in that church. Perhaps, as I say, my memory betrays me, because I have only the vaguest memory of Advent, either, and that usually started with "O Come, O Come Emmanuel" on the first Sunday after Thanksgiving (very American, in other words) and meant Christmas carols through Christmas Eve. So I never really learned anything about Ash Wednesday until I came across Eliot's poem. Which is why I always connect it with the day, even now.

I first received ashes in seminary, ironically. I think it's because the seminary was historically Evangelical (not in the sense that word is bandied about today), which meant Lutheran in practice, and besides, St. Louis is such a Roman Catholic city that the Baptists in St. Louis stand out because they don't have a smudge on their heads today. If the Catholics in my hometown (one of the few in East Texas with a Catholic church), or the Episcopalians, got ashes, I either never noticed, or they wiped it off quickly. Again, perhaps it's simply my faulty memory.

So I am still coming slowly to the practice and observance of Lent, and still doing it more through Eliot's words than through habit and custom. I have the former; I don't have the latter. And I will try, again, to keep Lent; and will probably do a poor job of it. I wrote some of  this over 15 years ago now.  I won't be going down to the altar to receive the ashes this year.  It's something I miss, now, every Ash Wednesday, because I am no longer a member of any congregation, any faith community.  That is enough reason to make my confession and take another stab at penitence, as I said I would do, originally, 15 years or more ago. It's a new year, and yet another beginning.  We'll see how I do this time.  For you, I cherish the admonition of the Evangelical tradition that ordained me, the words recited, ironically, at communion, and for reasons to do with the very idea of communion:  "May it be unto you according to your faith."

Amen; which is to say, "May it be so."

I

Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the aged eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?

Because I do not hope to know again
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power
Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is nothing again

Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place
I rejoice that things are as they are and
I renounce the blessed face
And renounce the voice
Because I cannot hope to turn again

Consequently I rejoice, having to construct something
Upon which to rejoice

And pray to God to have mercy upon us
And I pray that I may forget
These matters that with myself I too much discuss
Too much explain
Because I do hot hope to turn again
Let these words answer
For what is done, not to be done again
May the judgement not be too heavy upon us

Because these wings are no longer wings to fly
But merely vans to beat the air
The air which is now thoroughly small and dry
Smaller and dryer than the will
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still.

Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death
Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.

(VI)

Blessed sister, holy mother, spirit of the fountain, spirit of the garden,
Suffer us not to mock ourselves with falsehood
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still
Even among these rocks,
Our peace in His will
And even among these rocks
Sister, mother
And spirit of the river, spirit of the sea,
Suffer me not to be separated

And let my cry come unto Thee.


--T.S. Eliot, "Ash Wednesday," The Complete Poems and Plays 1909-1950 (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1971), pp. 60-61, 67)


MEMENTO, homo, quia pulvis es, et in pulverem reverteris.
Remember, human, that you are dust, and to dust you will return
--Genesis 3:19

HEAR my prayer, O Lord;
let my cry come to you.
Do not hide your face from me
in the day of my distress.
Incline your ear to me;
answer me speedily in the day when I call.
My days pass away like smoke,
and my bones burn like a furnace.
My heart is stricken and withered like grass;
I am too wasted to eat my bread.
Because of my loud groaning
my bones cling to my skin.
I am like an owl of the wilderness,
like a little owl of the waste places.
I lie awake;
I am like a lonely bird on the housetop.
All day long my enemies taunt me;
those who deride me use my name for a curse.
For I eat ashes like bread,
and mingle tears with my drink,
because of your indignation and anger;
for you have lifted me up and thrown me aside.
My days are like an evening shadow;
I wither away like grass.
But you, O Lord, are enthroned forever;
your name endures to all generations.
You will rise up and have compassion on Zion,
for it is time to favor it;
the appointed time has come.
For your servants hold its stones dear,
and have pity on its dust.

--Psalm 102:1-14

I said in my heart with regard to human beings that God is testing them to show that they are but animals. For the fate of humans and the fate of animals is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and humans have no advantage over the animals; for all is vanity. All go to one place; all are from the dust, and all turn to dust again.

--Ecclesiastes 3:18-20

THE cross, with which the ashes are traced upon us, is the sign of Christ's victory over death. The words "Remember that thou art dust and that to dust thou shall return" are not to be taken as the quasi-form of a kind of "sacrament of death" (as if such a thing were possible). It might be good stoicism to receive a mere reminder of our condemnation to die, but it is not Christianity.

--Thomas Merton, Seasons of Celebration, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1965

ASHES, ashes, all fall down. How could I have forgotten? Didn't I see the heavens wiped shut just yesterday, on the road walking? Didn't I fall from the dark of the stars to these senselit and noisome days? The great ridged granite millstone of time is illusion, for only the good is real; the great ridged granite millstone of space is illusion, for God is spirit and worlds his flimsiest dreams: but the illusions are almost perfect, are apparently perfect for generations on end, and the pain is also, and undeniably, real. The pain within the mill-stones' pitiless turning is real, for our love for each other-for the world and all the products of extension-is real, vaulting, insofar as it is love, beyond the plane of the stones' sickening churn and arcing to the realm of spirit bare. And you can get caught holding one end of a love, when your father drops, and your mother; when a land is lost, or a time, and your friend blotted out, gone, your brother's body spoiled, and cold, your infant dead, and you dying: you reel out love's long line alone, stripped like a live wire loosing its sparks to a cloud, like a live wire loosed in space to longing and grief everlasting.

--Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm, HarperCollins, 1977.

IN some monastic communities, monks go up to receive the ashes barefoot. Going barefoot is a joyous thing. It is good to feel the floor or the earth under your feet. It is good when the whole church is silent, filled with the hush of people walking without shoes. One wonders why we wear such things as shoes anyway. Prayer is so much more meaningful without them. It would be good to take them off in church all the time. But perhaps this might appear quixotic to those who have forgotten such very elementary satisfactions. Someone might catch cold at the mere thought of it.

--Thomas Merton, Seasons of Celebration

So, Is Canada To Blame?

 Maybe it was that “51st state” crack?

Jack Daniel’s maker Brown Forman’s CEO Lawson Whiting said on Wednesday Canadian provinces taking American liquor off store shelves was “worse than a tariff” and a “disproportionate response” to levies imposed by the Trump administration.

Several Canadian provinces have taken U.S. liquor off store shelves as part of retaliatory measures against President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

“I mean, that’s worse than a tariff, because it’s literally taking your sales away, (and) completely removing our products from the shelves,” Whiting said on a post-earnings call.
It’s not like Trump has stopped saying it. Diplomacy, or the absolute lack thereof, has consequences.

And What Does This Have To Do With The Price Of Eggs?

Domestic Enemy Hat:
Reminder: if you predicted half the things happening now (threatening to take Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal; lawless mass firings; complete defiance of Congressional prerogatives; mass pardons of violent supporters) even a couple of years ago, Serious Thinkers would have dismissed you. /1

/2 They would have said you had Trump Derangement Syndrome or that your extremism was not “helpful” or that you were not focused on serious things.

Those “Serious Thinkers” are still here, hat in hand, asking for your respect and patronage.


/3 Call them out and give them your scorn.
Because everybody knows, as the sign on Chuck Colson’s office wall said:* grab the electorate by the Serious Thinkers, and their hearts and minds will follow.

I’ll retire to Bedlam….


*Ask yer Grandpa! And git offa mah lawn!  Damn punk kids! 

More Feline Political Commentary

Vance defended his statement by he didn’t mean Britain or France were “random countries.” Which is neither an apology or a clarification; but it’s what passes for diplomacy under Trump. The Brits sure took it as aimed at them. Does Vance think that’s their fault?

I Don’t Know If The Democrats Should Have Walked Out

 Hard to orchestrate that among do many, for one thing. A few refusing to leave would have been the dominant news. (Some did leave, but the right people on the intertoobs didn’t notice, answering the question of the tree falling in the forest not making noise.)

But a handful of Supreme Court justices is another matter:

The Corrupt: After his speech, Trump shook hands with people in the room, including the four active Supreme Court Justices who were present in their long black robes. Their tradition of dress is meant to ensure that no one mistakes who they are. It separates them from the political fray, even as they attend. That message, however, was lost on Trump.

The moment was captured on CSPAN. Trump thanks the Justices. He doesn’t say what for, but of course, we all know.

“Thank you very much, appreciate it,” he says to Elena Kagan, whose face is a mask in the moment. Then, he moves on to the Chief Justice. “Thank you again. Thank you again,” he says to John Roberts. Then he awkwardly slaps him on the shoulder and says, “Won’t forget it.” The moment has an almost classic mob boss feel to it in context.

Roberts, followed by Kagan, peels off and leaves without comment and immediately.

This is the find out part, but unfortunately, it’s not the Chief Justice who feels the consequences of what he did. You may recall the reporting that Roberts came to conference with the other Justices with an uncompromising stance in the presidential immunity case, unwilling to deliver anything less than the win he gave to Trump, the win that permitted Trump to give the speech and shake hands last night. The rest of the country is now paying the price for that.

The Justices are supposed to protect the integrity and impartiality of the court from even the appearance of impropriety. Last night, and regardless of the truth of the matter, they permitted Donald Trump to insinuate that they are on his side, his captives.

Ironically, Justices Thomas and Alito have dropped away from attending the event over the years. Thomas has said, “It has become so partisan and it’s very uncomfortable for a judge to sit there.” Alito hasn’t attended since the 2010 SOTU when he was seen mouthing "Not true," on camera in response to President Obama’s criticism of the Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down campaign finance restrictions. The Justices’ interaction with the current president last night certainly bore the view that the event is too political for the Court. The Chief Justice’s humiliation at Trump’s hands last night was reminiscent of the moment where Trump included General Milley, in full uniform, in the walk from the White House to St. John's Church for what turned out to be a political photo op. Milley subsequently apologized, saying "My presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics."

Milley subsequently fell out of favor with Trump. Whether the Chief Justice, who has life tenure, will take similar steps to protect the integrity of the Court remains to be seen, but seems unlikely. Milley was widely hailed as a hero in the wake of his apology.
That should certainly make more noise than it did. 

But it was only on C-Span….

Who You Gonna Believe, Your Honor?

 


Me? Or the Lyin’ President of the United States?

Now I Expect To See Birds Flying Backwards And Rivers Running Uphill

And the Cato Institute making common cause with AOC and the ACLU.

Maybe Trump really is bringing us together!

The Irony of Ash Wednesay Following a Fat Tuesday Speech By "Fat Nixon"

You can't conceive, my child, nor I nor anyone, the appalling strangeness of the mercy of God.--Graham Greene

Joel 2:1-2, 12-17
2:1 Blow the trumpet in Zion; sound the alarm on my holy mountain! Let all the inhabitants of the land tremble, for the day of the LORD is coming, it is near-

2:2 a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and thick darkness! Like blackness spread upon the mountains a great and powerful army comes; their like has never been from of old, nor will be again after them in ages to come.

2:12 Yet even now, says the LORD, return to me with all your heart, with fasting, with weeping, and with mourning;

2:13 rend your hearts and not your clothing. Return to the LORD, your God, for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love, and relents from punishing.

2:14 Who knows whether he will not turn and relent, and leave a blessing behind him, a grain offering and a drink offering for the LORD, your God?

2:15 Blow the trumpet in Zion; sanctify a fast; call a solemn assembly;

2:16 gather the people. Sanctify the congregation; assemble the aged; gather the children, even infants at the breast. Let the bridegroom leave his room, and the bride her canopy.

2:17 Between the vestibule and the altar let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep. Let them say, "Spare your people, O LORD, and do not make your heritage a mockery, a byword among the nations. Why should it be said among the peoples, 'Where is their God?'"

Isaiah 58:1-12
58:1 Shout out, do not hold back! Lift up your voice like a trumpet! Announce to my people their rebellion, to the house of Jacob their sins.

58:2 Yet day after day they seek me and delight to know my ways, as if they were a nation that practiced righteousness and did not forsake the ordinance of their God; they ask of me righteous judgments, they delight to draw near to God.

58:3 "Why do we fast, but you do not see? Why humble ourselves, but you do not notice?" Look, you serve your own interest on your fast day, and oppress all your workers.

58:4 Look, you fast only to quarrel and to fight and to strike with a wicked fist. Such fasting as you do today will not make your voice heard on high.

58:5 Is such the fast that I choose, a day to humble oneself? Is it to bow down the head like a bulrush, and to lie in sackcloth and ashes? Will you call this a fast, a day acceptable to the LORD?

58:6 Is not this the fast that I choose: to loose the bonds of injustice, to undo the thongs of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke?

58:7 Is it not to share your bread with the hungry, and bring the homeless poor into your house; when you see the naked, to cover them, and not to hide yourself from your own kin?

58:8 Then your light shall break forth like the dawn, and your healing shall spring up quickly; your vindicator shall go before you, the glory of the LORD shall be your rear guard.

58:9 Then you shall call, and the LORD will answer; you shall cry for help, and he will say, Here I am. If you remove the yoke from among you, the pointing of the finger, the speaking of evil,

58:10 if you offer your food to the hungry and satisfy the needs of the afflicted, then your light shall rise in the darkness and your gloom be like the noonday.

58:11 The LORD will guide you continually, and satisfy your needs in parched places, and make your bones strong; and you shall be like a watered garden, like a spring of water, whose waters never fail.

58:12 Your ancient ruins shall be rebuilt; you shall raise up the foundations of many generations; you shall be called the repairer of the breach, the restorer of streets to live in.

Psalm 51:1-17

1:1 Have mercy on me, O God, according to your steadfast love; according to your abundant mercy blot out my transgressions.

1:2 Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.

1:3 For I know my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me.

1:4 Against you, you alone, have I sinned, and done what is evil in your sight, so that you are justified in your sentence and blameless when you pass judgment.

1:5 Indeed, I was born guilty, a sinner when my mother conceived me.

1:6 You desire truth in the inward being; therefore teach me wisdom in my secret heart.

1:7 Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.

1:8 Let me hear joy and gladness; let the bones that you have crushed rejoice.

1:9 Hide your face from my sins, and blot out all my iniquities.

1:10 Create in me a clean heart, O God, and put a new and right spirit within me.

1:11 Do not cast me away from your presence, and do not take your holy spirit from me.

1:12 Restore to me the joy of your salvation, and sustain in me a willing spirit.

1:13 Then I will teach transgressors your ways, and sinners will return to you.

1:14 Deliver me from bloodshed, O God, O God of my salvation, and my tongue will sing aloud of your deliverance.

1:15 O Lord, open my lips, and my mouth will declare your praise.

1:16 For you have no delight in sacrifice; if I were to give a burnt offering, you would not be pleased.

1:17 The sacrifice acceptable to God is a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.

2 Corinthians 5:20b-6:10

5:20b We entreat you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God.

5:21 For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

6:1 As we work together with him, we urge you also not to accept the grace of God in vain.

6:2 For he says, "At an acceptable time I have listened to you, and on a day of salvation I have helped you." See, now is the acceptable time; see, now is the day of salvation!

6:3 We are putting no obstacle in anyone's way, so that no fault may be found with our ministry,

6:4 but as servants of God we have commended ourselves in every way: through great endurance, in afflictions, hardships, calamities,

6:5 beatings, imprisonments, riots, labors, sleepless nights, hunger;

6:6 by purity, knowledge, patience, kindness, holiness of spirit, genuine love,

6:7 truthful speech, and the power of God; with the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left;

6:8 in honor and dishonor, in ill repute and good repute. We are treated as impostors, and yet are true;

6:9 as unknown, and yet are well known; as dying, and see--we are alive; as punished, and yet not killed;

6:10 as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing everything.

Matthew 6:1-6, 16-21

6:1 "Beware of practicing your piety before others in order to be seen by them; for then you have no reward from your Father in heaven.

6:2 "So whenever you give alms, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, so that they may be praised by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward.

6:3 But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing,

6:4 so that your alms may be done in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

6:5 "And whenever you pray, do not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, so that they may be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward.

6:6 But whenever you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

6:16 "And whenever you fast, do not look dismal, like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces so as to show others that they are fasting. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward.

6:17 But when you fast, put oil on your head and wash your face,

6:18 so that your fasting may be seen not by others but by your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.

6:19 "Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust consume and where thieves break in and steal;

6:20 but store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust consumes and where thieves do not break in and steal.

6:21 For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also."

All the triumphant Christianity should die right here. It should crumple against these words like a speeding car against a brick wall. If it sees itself as an unstoppable force, this is the immovable object it impacts, and who wins? And all the obsequious, timid, too scared to speak itself to anyone Christianity, should accept the mark of ash with pride, and get off its knees, and stand up and blow the trumpet in Zion, and sound the alarm on God's holy mountain, and remember the Lord is gracious and merciful and slow to anger and full of steadfast love, should remember that even humility can be selfishness, that too much contrition can make must as much a stone of the heart as too much triumph. No, this is not a day for humiliation, nor for victory. This is a day for restoring the balance. This is the day the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it, and accept our ashes as the turn from Epiphany to responsibility. We must accept them graciously. By the end, we will have too much responsibility to bear. This is not a day for weeping, This is a day the Lord has made. This is a day to begin, again.

Someone challenged me, once, when I had used the 51st Psalm in worship. They challenged me about verse 15: "Indeed, I was born guilty, a sinner when my mother conceived me." They wondered if that meant an infant was born in sin, born damned, corrupted, doomed from birth to hell. I didn't give a very good answer then. I can give a better one now. We have made sin the essential postulate of salvation, and so over centuries have put such a burden on the word as to make it a concept we dare not mention. "Sin" is ultimate condemnation. But it isn't. Sin is error; sin is doing what does not promote life. Sin is mistake and misdirection. If I am a sinner from my mother's womb, it is not because I participate in sin by the act of procreation, nor that sin is passed to me as my blue eyes and brown hair were from my parents. If I am born into sin, it is because I am prone to error, born in a condition in which mistakes will be made, created in a world in which I need direction, but am unlikely to take it. That's why I need to be purged with hyssop and washed clean, so my light will break forth, so the goodness that God gives will glow on the paths of all those who know me, all those who see me. I need to come and confess and be made clean, so I can be made whole. And I need to do this in the presence of the blessed community, in the public act of worship. I need to share this.

Christ be with me, Christ within me,
Christ behind me, Christ before me,
Christ beside me, Christ to win me,
Christ to comfort and restore me,
Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ in quiet, Christ in danger,
Christ in hearts of all that love me,
Christ in mouth of friend and stranger.

This is the fast God chooses; the fast that means I am sharing with my brother and sister, not hoarding while I pride myself on my self-restraint, on my ability to know what it is to go hungry when my pantry is full, to be thirsty when I have more cups than I can drink from in a day, more plates than I can use in a week, so much food I will throw some out if I don't stuff myself with it now. That is why I need guidance, direction, to be washed clean by God: so I will see and know my sister and my brother and share my food with them, bring Carnival to my soul by sharing panem and carnem with those who have neither. Farewell to me, but hello to them. This is the feast the Lord desires.

Humility that is aimed at me is not what God desires. Humility that is aimed at hospitality, at opening my home to the stranger, at making what is mine available to someone else in need, that is the wisdom of God. "You desire truth in the inward being; therefore teach me wisdom in my secret heart." That is the wisdom God would teach to my secret heart, if I will only open it, if I will only humble it and listen.

What reward then, should I look for? Feasting and drinking and celebration are their own reward, but the works of humility are done in secret, so that God and not humankind will reward me. But what reward will that be? In the hereafter, in the sweet bye and bye, in the kingdom yet to come? Perhaps. Seems a long time to wait, and the rewards here are so plentiful and so easily taken. But what greater reward is there than kindness and openness and hospitality? If we have to account for every good thing we might have enjoyed and did not, what reward will we have for that? Pleasures are neither sins nor selfish, but selfish pleasures are sins indeed. Can I be washed of my sins and still enjoy my pleasures? Can I be led by God and still be free?

We are putting no obstacle in anyone's way, so that no fault may be found with our ministry,

but as servants of God we have commended ourselves in every way: through great endurance, in afflictions, hardships, calamities,

beatings, imprisonments, riots, labors, sleepless nights, hunger;

by purity, knowledge, patience, kindness, holiness of spirit, genuine love,

truthful speech, and the power of God; with the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left;

in honor and dishonor, in ill repute and good repute. We are treated as impostors, and yet are true;

as unknown, and yet are well known; as dying, and see--we are alive; as punished, and yet not killed;

as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing everything.

But this everything is clearly "a condition of complete simplicity,/ costing not less than everything." That is quite a price to pay. Surely Ash Wednesday is about the price to pay, too. Surely that is the obstacle in the way. Surely there is no such thing as a free lunch!

Of course, there is not. But think of the price you are paying now, the interest accumulating on the debt you owe each other that can never be paid in full, the endless rounds of gift and exchange that can never be ended except by a violent irruption into the cycle! And how do you ever do that?! Without a complete interruption, without festival and celebration leading to humility and penitence, what hope is there?

Who is this who has said:
The house of God is a House of Sorrow,
We must walk in black and go sadly, with longdrawn faces,
We must go between empty walls, quavering lowly, whispering faintly,
Among a few flickering scattered lights?
They would put upon GOD their own sorrow, the grief they should feel
For their sins and faults as they go about their daily occasions.
Yet they walk in the street proudnecked, like thoroughbreds ready for races,
Adorning themselves, and busy in the market, the forum,
And all other secular meetings.
Thinking good of themselves, ready for any festivity,
Doing themselves very well.
Let us mourn in a private chamber, learning the way of pentitence,
And then let us learn the joyful communion of saints.--T.S. Eliot

Mourning we can do in private; indeed, when we mourn for ourselves, we have been instructed to keep it a secret. But the communion of saints can only be shared, can only be public. We cannot commune privately, individually, in our closed rooms. And we cannot learn from the saints by cutting ourselves off from the sinners, from the others as miserable and joyful, as misery-making and inspiring, as we are. Even Ash Wednesday is a day the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it, and the pleasures it offers.

Rune before prayer (from Carmina Gadelica)

I am bending my knee
In the eye of the Father who created me,
In the eye of the Son who purchased me,
In the eye of the Spirit who cleansed me,
In friendship and affection.

Through Thine own and Anointed One, O God,
Bestow upon us fullness in our need,
Love towards God,
The affection of God,
The smile of God,
The wisdom of God,
The grace of God,
The fear of God,
And the will of God.

To do on the world of the Three,
As angels and saints
Do in heaven;
Each shade and light
Each day and night,
Each time in kindness,
Give Thou us Thy Spirit.

Amen.

This Is Not The Court Victory You Are Looking For 🫣

 No, the majority (with Roberts and Barrett) sent the back to the trial court, effectively denying the appeal:

On February 25, the District Court ordered the Government to issue payments for a portion of the paused disbursements—those owed for work already completed before the issuance of the District Court’s temporary restraining order—by 11:59 p.m. on February 26. Several hours before that deadline, the Government filed this application to vacate the District Court’s February 25 order and requested an immediate administrative stay. THE CHIEF JUSTICE entered an administrative stay shortly before the 11:59 p.m. deadline and subsequently referred the application to the Court. The application is denied. Given that the deadline in the challenged order has now passed, and in light of the ongoing preliminary injunction proceedings, the District Court should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order, with due regard for the feasibility of any compliance timelines. The order heretofore entered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE is vacated
Let me point out the highlighted portion is a finding of the lower court as grounds for its order. As such, it must be respected and accepted by the appellate courts. Appellate courts don’t do fact-finding. They accept the facts determined by the trial court. Unless you’re Justice Scalia (joined by Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Thomas):

Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic “No,” but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.

The legal argument isn’t any more clear. The legal basis elucidated in the dissent turns on questions of sovereign immunity (misapplied here*) and procedural law.  I won't bore you with the details.  Concentrate on that summary, and you see the paucity of the argument, starting with the claimed jurisidictional infirmity.

Jurisdiction is so fundamental it can be raised in the Supreme Court for the first time (most error must be asserted in the trial court to be considered on appeal).  That's why Scalia mentions it, then discards it like a spent Kleenex.  Nothing in the rest of the dissenting opinion even mentions the word, much less the concept (except implicitly, in the entirely-for-convenience argument on sovereign immunity).  I like the mention of a "single district court."  What, would multiple district courts somehow acquire both jurisdiction (not a tenet of jurisdiction jurisprudence) and the "unchecked power to compel the government ," etc., etc.? Except, of course, the power is not "unchecked." The majority sends the case back with the directive that:

the District Court should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order, with due regard for the feasibility of any compliance timelines.
And will the taxpayer "lose" ("probably forever") $2 billion?  Maybe, if the dissenting justices disagree with the Congressional allocation of funds.  But why should a single Supreme Court have the jurisdiction or literally "unchecked power" to tell the Congress we don't like the way you’re spending money?  Aside from the fact they are duly appointed to their positions by law, unlike the manic children operating DOGE?

The answer to that question should be an emphatic “No,” but a minority of the Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.  But only by their arrogance.  That, and the absolute paucity of a legal argument for their position, except "We're Supreme Court Justices, bitches!"

Never was that title more ironic and misapplied.

Sovereign immunity bars “a suit by private parties seeking to impose a liability which must be paid from public funds in the . . . treasury.” Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U. S. 651, 663 (1974). But that is exactly what the District Court ordered here. See App. to Application to Vacate Order 85a–86a (“[T]he restrained defendants shall pay all invoices andletter of credit drawdown requests on all contracts for work
completed prior to the entry of the Court’s TRO on February 13”).

Except these are not "public funds in the....treasurry."  These are allocated funds by Congress.  This is not a cash grab based on a civil claim for damages.  This is a suit for enforcement of a legal claim on that money, one impeded by actors with no legal claim to governmental authority. The question raised is: can the Administration freeze payment of such funds, and on what legal basis?  Answer comes there none; at least from the dissent.  The implied answer is:  if that's what the "government" (here, unelected, unappointed non-government employees working under a vague presidential directive) wants, that's good enough for us.  And we don' need no steenken' "findings of fact"!.


Ash Wednesday 2025

Ash Wednesday by T. S. Eliot

I
Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the agèd eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?

Because I do not hope to know
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power

Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is
nothing again
Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place
I rejoice that things are as they are and
I renounce the blessèd face
And renounce the voice
Because I cannot hope to turn again
Consequently I rejoice, having to construct something
Upon which to rejoice

And pray to God to have mercy upon us
And pray that I may forget
These matters that with myself I too much discuss
Too much explain
Because I do not hope to turn again
Let these words answer
For what is done, not to be done again
May the judgement not be too heavy upon us

Because these wings are no longer wings to fly
But merely vans to beat the air
The air which is now thoroughly small and dry
Smaller and dryer than the will
Teach us to care and not to care Teach us to sit still.

Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death
Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.

II 

Lady, three white leopards sat under a juniper-tree
In the cool of the day, having fed to sateity
On my legs my heart my liver and that which had been
contained
In the hollow round of my skull. And God said
Shall these bones live? shall these
Bones live? And that which had been contained
In the bones (which were already dry) said chirping:
Because of the goodness of this Lady
And because of her loveliness, and because
She honours the Virgin in meditation,
We shine with brightness. And I who am here dissembled
Proffer my deeds to oblivion, and my love
To the posterity of the desert and the fruit of the gourd.
It is this which recovers
My guts the strings of my eyes and the indigestible portions
Which the leopards reject. The Lady is withdrawn
In a white gown, to contemplation, in a white gown.
Let the whiteness of bones atone to forgetfulness.
There is no life in them. As I am forgotten
And would be forgotten, so I would forget
Thus devoted, concentrated in purpose. And God said
Prophesy to the wind, to the wind only for only
The wind will listen. And the bones sang chirping
With the burden of the grasshopper, saying

Lady of silences
Calm and distressed
Torn and most whole
Rose of memory
Rose of forgetfulness
Exhausted and life-giving
Worried reposeful
The single Rose
Is now the Garden
Where all loves end
Terminate torment
Of love unsatisfied
The greater torment
Of love satisfied
End of the endless
Journey to no end
Conclusion of all that
Is inconclusible
Speech without word and
Word of no speech
Grace to the Mother
For the Garden
Where all love ends.
Under a juniper-tree the bones sang, scattered and shining
We are glad to be scattered, we did little good to each
other,

Under a tree in the cool of day, with the blessing of sand,
Forgetting themselves and each other, united
In the quiet of the desert. This is the land which ye
Shall divide by lot. And neither division nor unity
Matters. This is the land. We have our inheritance.


III 

At the first turning of the second stair
I turned and saw below
The same shape twisted on the banister
Under the vapour in the fetid air
Struggling with the devil of the stairs who wears
The deceitul face of hope and of despair.

At the second turning of the second stair
I left them twisting, turning below;
There were no more faces and the stair was dark,
Damp, jaggèd, like an old man's mouth drivelling, beyond
repair,
Or the toothed gullet of an agèd shark.

At the first turning of the third stair
Was a slotted window bellied like the figs's fruit
And beyond the hawthorn blossom and a pasture scene
The broadbacked figure drest in blue and green
Enchanted the maytime with an antique flute.
Blown hair is sweet, brown hair over the mouth blown,
Lilac and brown hair;
Distraction, music of the flute, stops and steps of the mind
over the third stair, 
Fading, fading; strength beyond hope and despair
Climbing the third stair.

Lord, I am not worthy
Lord, I am not worthy
but speak the word only. 

IV 

Who walked between the violet and the violet
Whe walked between
The various ranks of varied green
Going in white and blue, in Mary's colour,
Talking of trivial things
In ignorance and knowledge of eternal dolour
Who moved among the others as they walked,
Who then made strong the fountains and made fresh the springs

Made cool the dry rock and made firm the sand
In blue of larkspur, blue of Mary's colour,
Sovegna vos

Here are the years that walk between, bearing
Away the fiddles and the flutes, restoring
One who moves in the time between sleep and waking, wearing

White light folded, sheathing about her, folded.
The new years walk, restoring
Through a bright cloud of tears, the years, restoring
With a new verse the ancient rhyme. Redeem
The time. Redeem
The unread vision in the higher dream
While jewelled unicorns draw by the gilded hearse.

The silent sister veiled in white and blue
Between the yews, behind the garden god,
Whose flute is breathless, bent her head and signed but spoke
no word

But the fountain sprang up and the bird sang down
Redeem the time, redeem the dream
The token of the word unheard, unspoken

Till the wind shake a thousand whispers from the yew

And after this our exile




If the lost word is lost, if the spent word is spent
If the unheard, unspoken
Word is unspoken, unheard;
Still is the unspoken word, the Word unheard,
The Word without a word, the Word within
The world and for the world;
And the light shone in darkness and
Against the Word the unstilled world still whirled
About the centre of the silent Word.

O my people, what have I done unto thee.

Where shall the word be found, where will the word
Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence
Not on the sea or on the islands, not
On the mainland, in the desert or the rain land,
For those who walk in darkness
Both in the day time and in the night time
The right time and the right place are not here
No place of grace for those who avoid the face
No time to rejoice for those who walk among noise and deny
the voice

Will the veiled sister pray for
Those who walk in darkness, who chose thee and oppose thee,
Those who are torn on the horn between season and season,
time and time, between
Hour and hour, word and word, power and power, those who wait
In darkness? Will the veiled sister pray
For children at the gate
Who will not go away and cannot pray:
Pray for those who chose and oppose

O my people, what have I done unto thee.

Will the veiled sister between the slender
Yew trees pray for those who offend her
And are terrified and cannot surrender
And affirm before the world and deny between the rocks
In the last desert before the last blue rocks
The desert in the garden the garden in the desert
Of drouth, spitting from the mouth the withered apple-seed.

O my people.

VI 

Although I do not hope to turn again
Although I do not hope
Although I do not hope to turn

Wavering between the profit and the loss
In this brief transit where the dreams cross
The dreamcrossed twilight between birth and dying
(Bless me father) though I do not wish to wish these things
From the wide window towards the granite shore
The white sails still fly seaward, seaward flying
Unbroken wings

And the lost heart stiffens and rejoices
In the lost lilac and the lost sea voices
And the weak spirit quickens to rebel
For the bent golden-rod and the lost sea smell
Quickens to recover
The cry of quail and the whirling plover
And the blind eye creates
The empty forms between the ivory gates
And smell renews the salt savour of the sandy earth

This is the time of tension between dying and birth
The place of solitude where three dreams cross
Between blue rocks
But when the voices shaken from the yew-tree drift away
Let the other yew be shaken and reply.

Blessèd sister, holy mother, spirit of the fountain, spirit
of the garden,
Suffer us not to mock ourselves with falsehood
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still
Even among these rocks,
Our peace in His will
And even among these rocks
Sister, mother
And spirit of the river, spirit of the sea,
Suffer me not to be separated

And let my cry come unto Thee. 

This was Eliot publicly turning to Christianity.  Back to Christianity?  Most likely.  I don't know that he was ever that public an atheist.  He was turning to the establishment church, too, as he joined the Church of England at about this time, a church that, liturgically, is more or less properly called "Catholic lite."  So the language here may seem distinctly Catholic, to non-Catholics like me, anyway.  But it is also distinctly Anglican.

This was my first encounter, in high school where I first read Eliot, with the idea of Ash Wednesday.  Needless to say this poem was not terribly enlightening on the liturgical calendar for this observance.  But I return to it every year because it challenges me to understand, much in the same way I try to understand my relationship to God, and to everyone else.  I don't mean because I am so far removed from people, or even in some teen-angst sense from myself.  But every year I start over, "Because I do not hope to turn/Because I do not hope/Because I do not hope to turn again/[Still] Desiring this man's gift or that man's scope."  I tell myself I no longer strive to strive toward such things; but my self knows better than I.

Is that odd?