Saturday, December 13, 2025

St. Lucy’s Day

Honestly, how could I not use it?


Lucy died during the persecutions of Diocletian at Catania in Sicily, being beheaded by the sword.  Her body was later brought to Constantinople and finally Venice, where she is now resting in the church of Santa Lucia.

Because her name means "light," she very early became the great patron saint for the "light of the body"--the eyes.  All over Christianity her help was invoked against diseases of the eyes, especially the danger of blindness.  The lighters of street lamps in past centuries had her as a patron saint and made a special ceremony of their task on the eve of December 13.

Saint Lucy attained immense popularity in medieval times because, before the calendar reform, her feast happened to fall on the shortest day of the year.  Again because of her name, many of the ancient light and fire customs of the Yuletide became associated with her day.  Thus we find "Lucy candles" lighted in homes and "Lucy fires" burned in the open.  In Scandinavia before the Reformation, Saint Lucy Day was one of unusual celebration and festivity because, for the people of Sweden and Norway, she was the great "light saint" who turned the tides of their long winter and brought the light of day to renewed victory.

A popular custom in Scandinavia on the eve of December 13 is for children to write the word "Lussi" on doors, fences and walls.  With the word always goes the picture of a female figure (Saint Lucy).  The purpose of this practice in ancient times was to announce to the demons of winter that their reign was broken on Saint Lucy's Day, that the sun would return again and the days become longer.

"Lucy fires" used to be burned everywhere in northern Europe on December 13.  Into these bonfires people threw incense and, while the flames rose, trumpets and flutes played to greet the changing of the sun's course.  These fires were greatly valued as a powerful protection against disease, witchcraft and dangers, and people would stand nearby and let the smoke of the incense reach them, thus obtaining the desired "protection."


--Francis X. Weiser

Lucy, whose day is in our darkest season,
(Although your names is full of light,)
We walkers in the murk and rain of flesh and sense,
Lost in the midnight of our dead world's winter solstice
Look for the fogs to open on your friendly star.

We have long since cut down the summer of history;
Our cheerful towns have all gone out
like fireflies in October.
The fields are flooded and the vine is bare;
How have our long days dwindled,
now the world is frozen!

Locked in the cold jails of our stubborn will,
Oh hear the shovels growling in the gravel.
This is the way they'll make our beds for ever,
Ours, whose Decembers have put out the sun;
Doors of whose souls are shut against the summer time!

Martyr, whose short day sees our winter and our Calvary,
Show us some light, who seem forsaken by the sky;
We have so dwelt in darkness that our eyes are screened and dim,
And all but blinded by the weakest ray.

Hallow the vespers and December of our life,
O martyred Lucy:
Console our solstice with your friendly day.

--Thomas Merton

I had a friend named Lucia.  I grew up in Baptist East Texas, and her parents were southern Baptists, but extremely well-educated ones (and lovely people, the dearest and kindest).  It was decades before I connected "Lucia" (she pronounced it "Loo-sha") with Santa Lucia.  At her request, I conducted her funeral. I did it in part because the church of her childhood abandoned both her and her parents, when she came out as a lesbian.  She spent her last years living with her partner, who, had Lucia lived a bit longer, could have been her spouse.

Now, every year, I play Garrison Keillor's version of the familiar song and think of my friend Lucia. If you knew me, you might think I don’t have a drop of water in me. But the memories of the ones I’ve lost might just force a tear.

Christmas has its darknesses which bring us to the light.

Friday, December 12, 2025

Waiting For Kristi Noem…

ICE shoots pepper spray at peaceful observer—from inside the safety of their car.

Jump out of car to spray her again from even closer point blank range—chasing her from behind as she runs away in pain.

Agents get in their car to leave—then get back out to spray her a THIRD time until the canister is literally emptied.

"I lost my voice. I was blind for about 30 minutes," said witness.

"The pepper spray they used was so strong that it blinded me for 30 minutes, actually."

The incident occurred near the Riverside Plaza housing complex in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
...to tell a House Committee this never happened. Of course... ... who is surprised? The cluelessness starts at the top, too. It clearly trickles down.

🤠

You think they’re kidding. It’s the racism, stupid. Just pausing to note Abbott said he was going to direct Texas Education Agency (TEA) to make it so. But TEA has no such authority over independent school districts who, absent a mandate from the Legislature, can do as they please. And he can’t force students to be interested, either. TPUSA is kind of like MAGA without Trump: going nowhere fast. It’s like they want to lose. Trump just lost Texas.

🧌

That rule of law is a sonuvabitch, huh?

(Please note the Administration is not challenging these rulings in front of the Sinister Six. They know there are limits to what they can get.)

Gee! 🤔

And billionaires got tax cuts. who’s bearing the burden of all this?

Remember When Trump Was A Monstrous Bully Who Would Stomp Us All?

 Pepperidge Farm remembers:

Sean Hecker, Kilmar's attorney, once hailed how much courage it took Kilmar to challenge what DOJ/DHS is doing to him. That stuck with me. Kilmar Abrego is just some guy, vulnerable in a way most of us are not.

But he has taken on Trump and ... thus far at least, prevailed.

“Are We Still Talking About This?”

Why are the women’s faces obscured? I don’t object to it. I just want to know what the rationale was.

Why does their identity need to be protected? It can even be as simple as: women are more commonly shamed than men (another method of control). Or is it because they were minors then?

Inquiring minds want to know. It could be as simple as common decency. The men pictured are public figures. Perhaps the women are not?

But one is curious.
🍿  🍿 🍿 Does anyone else stop and think: “95,000 photographs? And that’s not all of them?” Did Epstein chronicle every minute of his life?

Music for Advent: For the Virgin of Guadalupe

 Not here, but here.

The Cruelty Is The Point 🎄

 Matthew 25:31-46

25:31 "When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory.

25:32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats,

25:33 and he will put the sheep at his right hand and the goats at the left.

25:34 Then the king will say to those at his right hand, 'Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world;

25:35 for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me,

25:36 I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.'

25:37 Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink?

25:38 And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing?

25:39 And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?'

25:40 And the king will answer them, 'Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.'

25:41 Then he will say to those at his left hand, 'You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels;

25:42 for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,

25:43 I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.'

25:44 Then they also will answer, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?'

25:45 Then he will answer them, 'Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.'

25:46 And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."

Ironically, the lectionary reading for the first Sunday of Christmas. Almost like it was meant to be.

Second Friday of Advent 2025: The Virgin of Guadalupe



God saw the world falling to ruin because of fear and immediately acted to call it back with love.  God invited it by grace, preserved it by love, and embraced it with compassion.

--Peter Chrysologus, 5th century

The joy and hope, the grief and anguish of the people of our time, especially of those who are poor or afflicted in any way, are the joy and hope, the grief and anguish of the followers of Christ as well.  Nothing that is genuinely human fails to find an echo in their hearts.  For theirs is a community composed of human beings who, united in Christ and guided by the Holy Spirit, press onwards toward the kingdom of the Father and are bearers of a message of salvation intended for all.  That is why Christians cherish a feeling of deep solidarity with the human race and its history.

--Vatican II, The Church in the Modern World

"Where are you going?" asks Mary of Juan Diego.  He is stopped in his tracks.  He leaves his "important" plans and becomes her messenger:  Build a church where the cries of the poor and the oppressed will be heard.  The bishop hears these gospel-laden words with shock and disbelief.  Signs, tangible signs, to know if this is true:  That is his demand.  But the words that the Indian brings are the answer.  The church must turn its institutional attention from its needs to listen to the solitary voice of one poor man.  It is a voice caught up in cultural traditions, old Indian ways, unpurified beliefs.  Juan Diego's nervous intensity comes not from self-interest but from the faith that his voice and prayer have been heard by God.  The words he speaks are the answer to his prayers.

What Mary has asked of the bishop is not meant to cause a division among the servants of the Lord.  It is not a condemnation of strategies or theologies.  Rather, it is a word of direction to move from the status quo operations of the day and to build up a place where the prayers, the cries, the heartbreak of people can be heard.  The place becomes symbolic of the fact that a mestizo church emerges from these birth sufferings of a conquered people.  The temple is symbolic of the age-old, faithful word of God  to be with the people.

Guadalupe's significance is both word and symbol.  She provides the answers to the prayers of her faithful people:  "God is with you!"  Her very appearance, as of the poor, aligns her with them.  Guadalupe's proclamation can be seen as God's option for the poor.

"Where are you going?" echoes in the life of God's poor to this present day.

--Arturo Perez

They've come to sing in your honor
from the desert and the forest.
From valleys deep in the mountains;
they make a joyful chorus.
They've brought their drums and their dances,
ancient ways their parents taught them;
Their village saints and their banners,
ev'ry group mad sure they brought them.

O Mother dark and lovely
hear the poor who come with their song;
Lead them into Jesus' kingdom
where they truly do belong.

From Vera Cruz and Nogales,
from old Taxco with its fountains,
Tehuantepec, Zacetecas,
and Durango in the mountains;
The come from humid Tampico,
Matamoros near the river,
From the ranchos deep in Sonora
where the cottonwoods still quiver.

They dance to show they love you,
out of faith and deep emotion,
They offer flowers and candles
as a sign of their devotion.
The children run and are laughing
all are sure that you still love them,
While parents weep out of gladness,
for you picture's there above them.

--Willard F. Jabusch

The picture really constitutes Guadalupe. It makes the shrine: it occasions the devotion. It is taken as representing the Immaculate Conception, being the lone figure of the woman with the sun, moon, and star accompaniments of the great apocalyptic sign, and in addition a supporting angel under the crescent. Its tradition is, as the new Breviary lessons declare, "long-standing and constant". Oral and written, Indian and Spanish, the account is unwavering. To a neophyte, fifty five years old, named Juan Diego, who was hurrying down Tepeyac hill to hear Mass in Mexico City, on Saturday, 9 December, 1531, the Blessed Virgin appeared and sent him to Bishop Zumárraga to have a temple built where she stood. She was at the same place that evening and Sunday evening to get the bishop's answer. He had not immediately believed the messenger; having cross-questioned him and had him watched, he finally bade him ask a sign of the lady who said she was the mother of the true God. The neophyte agreed so readily to ask any sign desired, that the bishop was impressed and left the sign to the apparition. Juan was occupied all Monday with Bernardino, an uncle, who seemed dying of fever. Indian specifics failed; so at daybreak on Tuesday, 12 December, the grieved nephew was running to the St. James's convent for a priest. To avoid the apparition and untimely message to the bishop, he slipped round where the well chapel now stands. But the Blessed Virgin crossed down to meet him and said: "What road is this thou takest son?" A tender dialogue ensued. Reassuring Juan about his uncle whom at that instant she cured, appearing to him also and calling herself Holy Mary of Guadalupe she bade him go again to the bishop. Without hesitating he joyously asked the sign. She told him to go up to the rocks and gather roses. He knew it was neither the time nor the place for roses, but he went and found them. Gathering many into the lap of his tilma a long cloak or wrapper used by Mexican Indians he came back. The Holy Mother, rearranging the roses, bade him keep them untouched and unseen till he reached the bishop. Having got to the presence of Zumárraga, Juan offered the sign. As he unfolded his cloak the roses fell out, and he was startled to see the bishop and his attendants kneeling before him: the life size figure of the Virgin Mother, just as he had described her, was glowing on the poor tilma. A great mural decoration in the renovated basilica commemorates the scene. The picture was venerated, guarded in the bishop's chapel, and soon after carried processionally to the preliminary shrine.

The coarsely woven stuff which bears the picture is as thin and open as poor sacking. It is made of vegetable fibre, probably maguey. It consists of two strips, about seventy inches long by eighteen wide, held together by weak stitching. The seam is visible up the middle of the figure, turning aside from the face. Painters have not understood the laying on of the colours. They have deposed that the "canvas" was not only unfit but unprepared; and they have marvelled at apparent oil, water, distemper, etc. colouring in the same figure. They are left in equal admiration by the flower-like tints and the abundant gold. They and other artists find the proportions perfect for a maiden of fifteen. The figure and the attitude are of one advancing. There is flight and rest in the eager supporting angel. The chief colours are deep gold in the rays and stars, blue green in the mantle, and rose in the flowered tunic. Sworn evidence was given at various commissions of inquiry corroborating the traditional account of the miraculous origin and influence of the picture. Some wills connected with Juan Diego and his contemporaries were accepted as documentary evidence. Vouchers were given for the existence of Bishop Zumárraga's letter to his Franciscan brethren in Spain concerning the apparitions. His successor, Montufar, instituted a canonical inquiry, in 1556, on a sermon in which the pastors and people were abused for crowding to the new shrine. In 1568 the renowned historian Bernal Díaz, a companion of Cortez, refers incidentally to Guadalupe and its daily miracles. The lay viceroy, Enríquez, while not opposing the devotion, wrote in 1575 to Philip II asking him to prevent the third archbishop from erecting a parish and monastery at the shrine; inaugural pilgrimages were usually made to it by viceroys and other chief magistrates. Processes, national and ecclesiastical, were laboriously formulated and attested for presentation at Rome, in 1663, 1666, 1723, 1750.


(I know the correct pronunciation of "Guadalupe."  But the street in Austin that bears the name is pronounced (by locals):  "Gwad-a-loop."  Do it any differently, and we know you're not from around here.  The Virgin of Guadalupe?  I don't think anyone mispronounces that, unless they're trying to be a mock yokel. It’s a way of distinguishing and honoring what is important.)

Thursday, December 11, 2025

“I don’t know. I’ve heard good things.”

Pretty sure that’s already obvious. Pretty damned sure. It’s not like Trump and Miller are hiding anything. (That EO,  by the way, is as worthless as tits on a boar hog. It can’t unify the country. It can’t do a damned thing. 10th amendment, and what Congress does. But POTUS has no legislative authority. That’s our “different system.”) Even Indiana sees it. And Trump’s DOJ has failed for a second time to indict Letitia James since the first indictment was thrown out. Word seems to be getting around.

🐱

I’m old enough to remember when this happened: Maybe he’s a paper tiger who’s all growl and no bite? He vowed doom and disaster. And now all he says is, he really didn’t care? He’s threatened primary challenges. Will he walk away from that, too?

Meow.🐱 
And he does this to try to hide the fact that he has no teeth. He doesn’t even have claws. Because Tina is in jail on state charges. Trump’s pardon is a paper tiger, too. It’s as powerless as his threats to Indiana. In fact, let’s take that up. Everybody take a beat. Peter’s is in jail for 8 more years. Or maybe she gets out early for good behavior. I have no idea; it’s a matter of Colorado law. Which is not an insignificant issue here.

Until the 14th amendment (actually subsequent to that, with cases that made the determination), not even the Bill of Rights applied to the states. “Congress shall make no law” doesn’t really imply a further application to the Texas Legislature. Many states included similar protections to the Bill of Rights in their constitutions for that very reason. After the 14th, the B of R was “read” through that amendment to apply to the states, just as states also had to provide due process of law and equal protection to all persons within their jurisdiction.

So Presidential pardon power has NEVER been thought, or construed, to apply to state law matters. I say that not as an expert, or even a researcher, on the question. I say it because only makes sense, given the broader legal and constitutional history. The 14th was a watershed. We were a different constitutional republic after it than we were before. It changed the relationship of the states to the federal government, and to the constitution. And that change is not going to be undone by even the Roberts Court.

So this idea that Ms. Peters can sue to get this pardon to apply to her? Laughable. First, the settled view that Presidents can’t pardon state crimes is what the convention meant when it wrote the constitution. It is the “fundamentalist” view. The 14th almost fundamentally rewrote the constitution, for the better. But it didn’t touch the pardon power, any more than it touched Congress’ power to levy taxes or allocate government spending. I’m trying to imagine how the pardon power could be read through the 14th amendment to place the POTUS above the sovereignty of the states. 

I don’t have that much imagination.

🎶 Lord, I Can’t Go Back There”🎶

Before, or after, the midterms, and the new Congress starts busting Trump’s balls? I love how he thinks that’s a threat. Please tell the state GOP to get on the wrong side of the voters. The national GOP is doing such a good job of that already. And that's starting from the top. (This thing is like verbal diarrhea. It’s still amazing nobody notices.)

All that, and Indiana still refused to be Texas (and I still think Texas is not going to work out the way they thought).

Homeland Follies

Now, why would she do that?
Magaziner: The US veteran behind you… His father, Narcisco Barranco, is a landscaper in California who has lived peacefully in our country for 30 years and has no criminal record. Last spring, while he was mowing the lawn at an ihop, ice agents tackled him in the street and imprisoned him for weeks. A peaceful, hard working man who raised three sons to be United States Marines. We need men of that character in this country again, as secretary, you have broad discretion. Will you consider his father for parole in place to stay in our country, owing to the fact that he has contributed to our country by raising three United States Marines?

Noem: This is an opportunity to remind everybody that every person that's in this country illegally has an opportunity to voluntarily go home and come back the right way
MAGAZINER: Will you thank Mr Brown for his service to our country?

NOEM: Thank you Mr Brown for your service

MAGAZINER: Now what explanation can there be for locking up his wife for 4 months when she has committed no crime other than writing a couple of bad checks for $80

NOEM: It is not my job to pick or choose which laws get enforced
It is, actually. It’s called “prosecutorial discretion.” It’s not just for prosecutors.
Goldman: Immigrants with ongoing asylum applications are legally in this country?

Noem: There are immigrants in this country with asylum applications

Goldman: And they are legally here because it’s a lawful pathway, correct?

Noem: It’s a lawful pathway

Goldman: If your department deports anyone with an ongoing application, you are violating the law, correct?

Noem: Joe Biden—

Goldman: I’m not asking you about Joe Biden
Justice Kavanaugh phoned in to say that was just fine. Quotas. The answer is: "Quotas."
THOMPSON: You blamed the shooting of Guardsmen solely on Joe Biden. Who approved the asylum for this same person?

KRISTI NOEM: This individual that came in---

THOMPSON: No. I want to know who approved----

NOEM: *keeps talking over Thompson*

T: I don't want to file perjury charges against you

Man. Woman. Camera. 5G

 Certainly nothing to see here:

"I was a leader on 5G, getting that down," Trump volunteered. "And now they're up to six. Let's do it again. What does that do? Give you a little bit deeper view into somebody's skin? See how perfect it is. I like the cameras from the old days. So they just had a nice feature.

“ICE WAS HERE”


 

(Story here) And in related news: Or, the law is the law, and it’s not supposed to change based on who feels victimized and who they think is responsible for their problems. I’m beginning to think every executive at Palantir is an idiot. But if they’re so rich, how come they’re not smart?

Second Thursday of Advent 2025

 

And along came John…

Matthew 3:1-12 

Prepare the way of the Lord 

3:1 In those days John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness of Judea, proclaiming, 

3:2 "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near." 

3:3 This is the one of whom the prophet Isaiah spoke when he said, "The voice of one crying out in the wilderness: 'Prepare the way of the Lord; make his paths straight.'" 

3:4 Now John wore clothing of camel's hair with a leather belt around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey. 

3:5 Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region around the Jordan were going out to him, 

3:6 and they were baptized by him in the River Jordan, confessing their sins. 

3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming for his baptism, he said to them, "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? 

3:8 Therefore, bear fruit worthy of repentance, 

3:9 and do not presume to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our ancestor,' for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. 
 
3:10 Even now the ax is lying at the root of the trees; therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. 

3:11 "I baptize you with water for repentance, but the one who is coming after me is more powerful than I, and I am not worthy to carry his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 

3:12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and will gather his wheat into the granary, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire."

Everything here goes backwards. John stays in the wilderness, and people come to him. Isaiah’s “voice crying out in the wilderness” is about reversal as the preparation for God’s justice. Valleys are raised, mountains lowered, so that the journey of the Lord down the straight highway will be readily visible to all the earth. 

I don’t mean Isaiah is being literal, any more than John means there’s an actual threshing floor and an actual winnowing fork, and that whole thing is about a grain harvest. Indeed, Matthew is taking the prophet metaphorically. John doesn’t show up as a road builder. The path he is making straight is conceptual. It’s a path to God through the fruits worthy of repentance. Actions, not words.

The Pharisees and the Sadducees think they’re on the right path. They’re reformers, for one thing, trying to move Israel beyond Temple worship. Yes, they are children of Abraham, but they want to guide those children forward towards God through the law. Paul was a Pharisee, after all. But John is telling them that’s not the story anymore. John tells them God could raise up children of Abraham from the stones. John means us. He means the Gentiles. We are not children of Abraham. But God could treat us as if we were. Here begins the distinction between the nascent Christians and the Hebrews, who are still not yet Jews (that comes a bit later). John is throwing the door open, in harmony with Isaiah’s holy mountain where the nations come to learn Israel’s peace and prosperity.

But yeah: we’re the stones in that metaphor. Feel special yet? 

And it is actions, not words, that matter:
Even now the ax is lying at the root of the trees; therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. 
More metaphor. I’m emphasizing that because the general impression still is that all of this is supposed to be taken literally. So: there is no fire, no chaff, no winnowing fork, no axe, no trees, no real fruit. John is not condemning, John is explaining. He’s givin’ ‘em that ol’ time religion, the stuff the prophets gave Israel, that God gave Israel.

2 Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth!
For the Lord has spoken:
“I reared children and brought them up,
but they have rebelled against me.

3 The ox knows its master,
the donkey its owner’s manger,
but Israel does not know,
my people do not understand.”

4 Woe to the sinful nation,
a people whose guilt is great,
a brood of evildoers,
children given to corruption!
They have forsaken the Lord;
they have spurned the Holy One of Israel
and turned their backs on him.

5 Why should you be beaten anymore?
Why do you persist in rebellion?
Your whole head is injured,
your whole heart afflicted.

6 From the sole of your foot to the top of your head
there is no soundness—
only wounds and welts
and open sores,
not cleansed or bandaged
or soothed with olive oil.

7 Your country is desolate,
your cities burned with fire;
your fields are being stripped by foreigners
right before you,
laid waste as when overthrown by strangers.

8 Daughter Zion is left
like a shelter in a vineyard,
like a hut in a cucumber field,
like a city under siege.

9 Unless the Lord Almighty
had left us some survivors,
we would have become like Sodom,
we would have been like Gomorrah.

Isaiah 1:2-9.  I think John sounds tame by comparison. And Jeremiah is harsher:

If a man divorces his wife
and she goes from him
and becomes another man’s wife,
will he return to her?
Would not such a land be greatly polluted?
You have played the whore with many lovers;
and would you return to me?
says the Lord.

2 Look up to the bare heights, and see!
Where have you not been lain with?
By the waysides you have sat waiting for lovers,
like a nomad in the wilderness.
You have polluted the land
with your whoring and wickedness.

3 Therefore the showers have been withheld,
and the spring rain has not come;
yet you have the forehead of a whore,
you refuse to be ashamed.

4 Have you not just now called to me,
‘My Father, you are the friend of my youth—

5 will he be angry for ever,
will he be indignant to the end?’
This is how you have spoken,
but you have done all the evil that you could.

Jeremiah 3:1-5

And since I’m on a roll, Hosea eclipses them both:

2 When the Lord first spoke through Hosea, the Lord said to Hosea, ‘Go, take for yourself a wife of whoredom and have children of whoredom, for the land commits great whoredom by forsaking the Lord.’ 3 So he went and took Gomer daughter of Diblaim, and she conceived and bore him a son.

4 And the Lord said to him, ‘Name him Jezreel; for in a little while I will punish the house of Jehu for the blood of Jezreel, and I will put an end to the kingdom of the house of Israel. 5 On that day I will break the bow of Israel in the valley of Jezreel.’

6 She conceived again and bore a daughter. Then the Lord said to him, ‘Name her Lo-ruhamah, for I will no longer have pity on the house of Israel or forgive them. 7 But I will have pity on the house of Judah, and I will save them by the Lord their God; I will not save them by bow, or by sword, or by war, or by horses, or by horsemen.’

8 When she had weaned Lo-ruhamah, she conceived and bore a son. 9 Then the Lord said, ‘Name him Lo-ammi, for you are not my people and I am not your God.’

Hosea 1:2-9

John suddenly sounds kinda calm and good natured, doesn’t he? And you can see how Isaiah and Jeremiah and Hosea address the children of Abraham, and how John includes…us.

Now do you feel special? You should. John is not scolding you, or threatening you, or berating you. John is telling you the truth, just like the three prophets I quoted, did.  And just like them, he offers an out, a hope. After all, he’s just doing the work of Advent, which is…to prepare the way of the Lord.

“Therefore bear fruit worthy of repentance.” Easy, right?

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

A Hoax, A Scam, And A Con

If prices aren’t coming down by 1000%, I don’t want to hear about it. Well, there's no money in it before then, is there? There’s no money in tariffs, either. Reality to distract people from propaganda. Reality bearing down like a freight train. So far, nobody  is asking what the hell the Congressional GOP was thinking when they passed the OBUglyBill. But that was ages ago; and in another country. And those people are all dead. Or something. A fake card with no legal authority. It’s a hoax. And a scam. And a con. It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup. How big is the American interest in the World Cup? I guess a fake peace prize can't buy tourist visas? But what if people from Norway and Sweden want to come?
If they would rather die, . . . they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.
'Tis the season.(Pretty sure patients know what the “actual prices” are. Unlike Medicare/Congressional insurance clients, real people always see the bill, because insurance never covers anything it can wiggle out of. Not to mention high deductibles which make premiums low enough to be affordable, but mean patients almost always know what the actual cost of healthcare is. The entire GOP just proves how out of touch it is every time some Congresscritter opens her/his mouth.) Probably. But implementation will render the policy meaningless, so…

Oh, what else is new?

Redux?

Didn’t we do this in Trump 1?

We’re In Good Hands. Aren’t We?

This is the kind of thing that usually spikes oil prices.

Just saying….
Especially when the President has no fucking clue what he’s doing.

Reading Matter

Or this Politico interview. (I was going to excerpt parts of it, but…wow.) One gem there, as noted by Greg Sargent:
This is monumentally deranged stuff," Sargent wrote. "Note that Trump admits he knows next to nothing about Hernandez’s case, even though prosecutors won a conviction after alleging that he helped bring more than 500 tons of cocaine into the United States. Trump pardoned him with zero serious reflection on the impact he had on drug use in our country. This is by Trump’s own admission."

Or AI’s review of Trump’s latest screeds.
I’m not sure all the king’s horses and all the king’s men on the Supreme Court can put Humpty together again. I really wasn’t expecting Santa Claus to give me everything I asked for this year.

The New Math

Thinking Of St. Nicholas

For no particular reason….

We studied, lightly, in seminary, the wealth distribution of the 1st century Roman Empire. The graph looked like an inverted funnel, with a sharp peak at the top, rather than plateau. It was also a long, narrow “neck” from that peak down, with a very wide base. Basically the Emperor was at the top, and the wealth distribution was weighted towards that peak, with the vast majority in the bottom of the funnel, which spread wide to accommodate them all.

I wonder how different that is from what the Guardian article is referencing.


Pretty Soon They’ll Be Taking Our Children…

...and the food off our plates.

And then they’ll come for our wimmen…

Music For Advent: Old Waits Carol



Since Adam, being free to choose,
Chose to imagine he was free
To choose his own necessity,
Lost in his freedom, Man purues
The shadow of his images:
Today the Unknown seeks the known;
What I am willed to ask, your own
Will has to answer; child, it lies
Within your power of choosing to
Conceive the Child who chooses you.

--W.H. Auden


The threefold terror of love; a fallen flare
Through the hollow of an ear;
Wings beating about the room;
The terror of all terrors that I bore
The Heavens in my womb.

Had I not found content among the shows
Every common woman knows,
Chimney corner, garden walk,
Or rocky cistern where we tread the clothes
And gather all the talk?

What is this flesh I purchased with my pains,
This fallen star my milk sustains,
This love that makes my heart's blood stop
Or strikes a Sudden chill into my bones
And bids my hair stand up?

--W.B. Yeats


We do not pray that your birth according to the flesh shall be renewed as it once occurred upon this day.  Rather do we pray that your invisible Godhead may be grafted into us.  May that which was then accorded after the flesh to Mary alone now be granted in the spirit to the church:  that faith unquestioning may conceive you, the spirit free of all corruption may bear you, the soul overshadowed by the power of the Most High may quicken with you evermore.  Go not forth from us; spring forth rather from within us.

--Mozarabic Rite

Second Wednesday of Advent: Thomas Merton


The Advent mystery is the beginning of the end of all in us that is not yet Christ.

--Thomas Merton

Something from a then-frequent reader:
Almost from the time of his entry in 1941 into the Order of Cistercians of the Strict Observance (the Trappists) at the Monastery of Gethsemani, in Kentucky, Merton was obsessed with retreat from "the World," and from about 1952 onward he pressed for permission, heretofore unknown in the Order, to become a hermit with only limited contact with the monastic community; instead, in 1955 he was appointed Master of Novices, a position he held for the next nine years.

Merton, who has been described as "never having a thought he didn't write down," tended during this time to use the texts of his regular sessions within the novitiate as the basis for his later literary output, and it’s important to note that the temper of both his Introduction to as well as his selection from the writings of the Desert Fathers very probably had their basis in his sessions with his novices.

Wisdom of the Desert was published in 1960; in December of that year he was finally granted limited permission to reside in a small building on the monastery grounds, but was still required to sleep in the monastery and to participate in the activities of the community, including remaining Master of Novices. It wasn’t until 1964, just four years before his untimely death, that he was relieved of his position as novice master and permitted to remain exclusively in his hermitage.

From the fall of 1966 until early 1968, he had a remarkable exchange of correspondence (At Home in the World: The Letters of Thomas Merton and Rosemary Radford Reuther, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, N.Y. 1995). Reuther is a Catholic feminist theologian, then with a freshly minted Ph.D. In this exchange he attempted (in my view, ultimately unsuccessfully) to defend monastic solitude – the retreat from “the World” - as a necessary and viable alternative to active response to the challenges of contemporary secular society.

In her Introduction, written almost 30 years after the letters, Reuther says,

What I was looking for in initiating this conversation was neither a confessor, nor to be his confessor, but a genuine Catholic intellectual peer, one who would treat me as a peer, and with whom I could be ruthlessly honest about my own questions of intellectual and existential integrity. I was trying to test in this correspondence what was the crucial issue, for me, at that time: whether it was, in fact, actually possible to be a Roman Catholic and a person of integrity…. Could Catholics speak the truth and be Catholics? That Christians err, and even create monstrous idolatries, was in itself not scandalous to me. That would be only human. What was scandalous and insupportable was to be unable to admit error, to be incapable of repentance because you cannot entertain the possibility that you might be wrong. Worse still, to make such incapacity for self-questioning a dogma! That for me was the crux of the Catholic dilemma. [pp. xvi ff.]

Merton’s early response was to say,

“I do wonder at times if the Church is real at all. I believe it, you know. But I wonder if I am nuts to do so. Am I part of a great big hoax? I don’t explain myself as well as I would like to: there is a real sense of and confidence in an underlying reality, the presence of Christ in the world which I don’t doubt for an instant. But is that presence where we are all saying it is? We are all pointing (in various directions), and my dreadful feeling is that we are all pointing wrong. Could you point someplace for me, maybe? Thanks, and I am sorry to bother you. I have to write a book on monasticism, and I wonder if I can make it relevant – or may any sense with it at all. (I have no problem with my vocation.)[pp.17-18]

Never one to shirk a challenge, Reuther replied,
"You say you have no trouble with your vocation, but, if that is really true, maybe you should be having some trouble with your vocation. I love the monastic life dearly (I am a Third Order Benedictine) but today it is no longer the eschatological sign and witness in the church. For those who wish to be at the “kingdom” frontier of history, it is the steaming ghetto of the big city, not the countryside that is the place of the radical overcoming of this world, the place where one renews creation, disposes of oneself and does hand to hand combat with the demons. I don’t see how anyone who is tuck in the old moribund (once eschatological) structures and is at the same time alive to the times cannot be having some trouble with his vocation. But perhaps for you more important: more reading and thinking about Word and Church will not help. I think you will have to find some new way of having Word and Church happening for you….” [p.20]
Merton spends the rest of his time in this correspondence trying to explain his attitude toward his own solitude, and Reuther keeps shooting down his arguments. Finally, as the conversation begins to wind down, he writes,

"I don’t think I am rationalizing or evading when I say I think I owe it to you to pursue my own way and stand on my own in this sort of marginal and lost position I have. I am sometimes terribly hit by its meaning which is something I just cannot explain, because it is something you are not supposed to explain and must get along without explaining.” [p.62]

A rapprochement of sorts is reached in a concluding exchange. In December, 1967 Reuther writes,

"Dear Brother: You are really a shocking and dissolute fellow. Didn’t anyone ever tell you that the one thing a good son of the church never, never does, especially in ecclesiastical assemblies, is to state the bald and unregenerate truth? Surely someone must must have pointed this elementary fact out to you sometime during your novitiate.

She then quotes a fragment of a friend’s poem, applicable, she says, to Merton:

I suppose that with such views I shall be
left quite alone
To mumble plain truths like a dog
mumbling a bone… [pp.94-95]

Merton responds, 'Dear Rosemary: Ah, yes, I have become very wicked. This is due in great part to my hanging around with these women theologians. What a downfall. Let others be warned in time. Young priests can never be too careful. Tsk. Tsk.' [p. 96]

On December 10, 1968, at a conference of Asian monastic orders in Bombay, Merton finished his morning presentation with these words:

'I will conclude on that note. I believe the plan is to have all the questions for this morning’s lectures this evening at the panel. So I will disappear.'

"So he went to his room, and while taking a shower, was accidentally electrocuted."

December 10 marks the day of Merton's death. 

MERTON'S most important experience in his whole Asian trip came at Polonnaruwa. He went to visit the giant Buddhas and took a series of superb photographs of them.

I am able to approach the Buddhas barefoot and undisturbed, my feet in wet grass, wet sand. The silence of the extraordinary faces. The great smiles. Huge and yet subtle. Filled with every possibility, questioning nothing, knowing everything, rejecting nothing, the peace not of emotional refutation. . . that has seen through every question without trying to discredit anyone or anything-without refutation-without establishing some other argument. For the doctrinaire, the mind that needs well-established positions, such peace, such silence, can be frightening. I was knocked over with a rush of relief and thankfulness at the obvious clarity of the figures. . . . Looking at these figures I was suddenly, almost forcibly, jerked clean out of the habitual, half-tied vision of things, and an inner clearness, clarity, as if exploding from the rocks themselves, became evident and obvious. . . . I don't know when in my life I have ever had such a sense of beauty and spiritual validity running together in one aesthetic illumination. Surely, with Mahabalipuram and Polonnaruwa my Asian pilgrimage has come clear and purified itself. I mean, I know and have seen what I was obscurely looking for. I don't know what else remains but I have now seen and have pierced through the surface and have got beyond the shadow and the disguise.

That was on December 4. . . . [On December 10, after addressing the conference in Bangkok,] Merton had lunch and did disappear to his room, commenting to a colleague on the way about how much he was looking forward to having a siesta. In a long letter later written by the delegates at the Conference to Dom Flavian what then occurred was expressed in the following words: "Not long after he retired a shout was heard by others in his cottage, but after a preliminary check they thought'they must have imagined the cry.

"He was found at the end of the meridian (afternoon rest) and when found was lying on the floor. He was on his back with the electric fan lying across his chest. The fan was still switched on, and there was a deep burn and some cuts on his right side and arm. The back of his head was also bleeding slightly."

Perhaps any death brings with it both a sense of surprise and a sense of its inevitability. There are always those, and there were many after Merton's death, who feel that it somehow "had to be like that." Merton had, from time to time, both spoken and written comments that suggested that his death might come early. Some of his friends commented on the extraordinary, almost Zen-like way that death had come to him. Fewer people than one might expect noted that he died on the same day as the great Protestant theologian Karl Barth, and it was a measure of the ecumenism in Louisville, which Merton had been instrumental in promoting, that Catholics and Protestants there united in a joint memorial service for both of them.

Many years before Naomi Burton had made the suggestion, humorously, that Merton was accident-prone. "I couldn't help noticing that it's your visitors who get locked out of the church, and your server who forgets things, and your vestments that get caught in the folding chair. . . . I find your incredible adventures with nature and with publishing extremely endearing." Perhaps Merton was accident-prone; perhaps, like many intellectuals, he tended to get lost in his thinking, and absentmindedly forgot about the dangers of touching electrical equipment with wet hands; perhaps the fan was merely faulty. Perhaps, however, he had finished his life six days before at Polonnaruwa and was called to the God he had loved and served so well.

--Monica Furlong

The sermon I gave [at the conference on monasticism the morning after Merton's death] was a moment of talkinga bout Merton's search for God.  When a monk enters a monastery, what is asked of him is "Are you truly seeking God?"  The question isn't "Have you found God?"  The question is "Is he seeking God?  Is his motivation highly involved in that search of who and what God is in relationship to us?"  It's not philosophical--its' existential.  And Merton, to me, was a great searcher.  He was constantly unhappy, as all great searchers are.  He was constantly ill at ease, he was constantly restless, as all searchers are--because that's part of the search.  And in that sense he was the perfect monk.  Contemplation isn't satisfaction--it's search.

--Rembert Weakland

That reference to being barefoot, above, is not incidental. Merton was a Cistercian. The order is “discalced.” Shoeless. Merton penned an encomium on the pleasure of going to worship barefoot, walking and standing on a cold stone floor. He found is hard to imagine having the same experience of the Almighty (which is what worship should be), without being barefoot.

I paid a brief visit to Abbey Gethsemani over 40 years ago, now.  When I'm seeking a quiet place in memory for meditation and prayer, I conjure up the grounds there.  Something about the enforced silence of the monks profoundly suffuses the place.  There was also the recognition that my wife and my friend's wife (all friends from high school) couldn't go in with us (her husband and I).  So I was separated, divided , present in two worlds. I felt a persistent tug between the monastic life and the life of the world in that short visit.  I've felt it ever since.

Charm with your stainlessness these winter nights,
Skies, and be perfect!
Fly vivider in the fiery dark, you quiet meteors,
And disappear.
You moon, be slow to go down,
This is your fill!

The four white roads make off in silence
Towards the four parts of the starry universe.
Time falls like manna at the corners of the wintry earth.
We have become more humble than the rocks,
More wakeful than the patient hills.

Charm with your stainlessness these nights in Advent, holy spheres,
While minds, as meek as beasts,
Stay close at home in the sweet hay;
And intellects are quieter than the flocks that feed by starlight.

Oh pour your darkness and your brightness over all our solemn valleys,
Your skies:  and travel like the gentle Virgin,
Towards the planets' stately setting,

O white moon full as quiet as Bethlehem!

--Thomas Merton