👀🌮👀☠️🤡

The audacity of seeing what is right in front of your eyes.👀 

So you are working on a plan B right now?" one correspondent asked.

"Plan A encompasses all strategic options," he insisted. "We are not naive about rogue justices in the judiciary and Democrats filing lawsuits. This has got to stop, by the way. This weaponization of the judiciary."

A second reporter's question vexed the White House adviser.

"How much of that is because every time you get a court decision you don't like, you and your colleagues come out here and rail against rogue judges?" the reporter wondered.

"See, who is this guy?" Navarro demanded to know.

The reporter identified himself as Andrew Feinberg of The Independent.

"Okay, so that is such a biased question," Navarro huffed. "That is not a journalist question. That was like an op-ed, sir. So I don't even respond to that."

When plain truth is too ideological.

Meanwhile:

Hassett: What this judge tried to do is upended these deals, many of them are about to be signed, and the fact that the appeals court is giving us more time means we will have time to finish those deals. It's good news for American workers and farmers. pic.twitter.com/Acq0HYi9iE

— Acyn (@Acyn) May 29, 2025

Well, until the court lifts the stay. Which could be fairly soon. And then it can’t go to the Supremes until there’s a final decision. And their year ends July 4. Which means they wouldn’t hear an appeal until late this year at the earliest. But more likely, next year.  And then rule…? 🤷🏻‍♂️ 

It could happen.