Adventus

"The central doctrine of Christianity, then, is not that God is a bastard. It is, in the words of the late Dominican theologian Herbert McCabe, that if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you."--Terry Eagleton

"It is impossible for me to say in my book one word about all that music has meant in my life. How then can I hope to be understood?--Ludwig Wittgenstein

“The opposite of poverty is not wealth; the opposite of poverty is justice."--Bryan Stevenson

Thursday, April 06, 2017

Dead children in Syria are sad. Syrian children who are refugees are a clear and present danger

JMM, earlier today:

Are we going to launch one painful attack which may not have strategic consequences but signals that we will exact a price for any use of chemical weapons? Are we now going to intervene with the intention of shifting the course of the war - a pretty tall proposition now that Assad holds the whip hand in the conflict and has forces thoroughly intermingled with the Russian army? Are we going to try to create a global coalition to oust Assad? Given the reality on the ground that seems quite hard to figure. Or are we just going to blow a lot of shit up because we are horrified by the pictures we're seeing?

Was it ever really a serious question?

After two days of deliberation, President Donald Trump authorized the military to launch 59 cruise missiles at the Shayrat Air Base in Syria, Pentagon spokesman Capt. Jeff Davis said. The move was conducted in retaliation for a chemical weapon attack in the opposition-held town of Khan Sheikhoun on Tuesday, allegedly carried out by Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime. The chemical weapon attack, which killed at least 70 people, was conducted from the Shayrat base, Davis said.

“Assad choked out the lives of helpless men, women and children,” Trump said Thursday at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. “Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered at this very barbaric attack. No child of God should ever suffer such horror.”

Trump said the attack was in the “national security interest of the United States to prevent and deter the spread and use of deadly chemical weapons.” He called on “civilized nations” to join in seeking to “end the slaughter and bloodshed” in Syria.

Pardon my French, but what the fuck is this supposed to accomplish?  Basically we have an intemperate clown who hasn't been paying attention to the slaughter in Syria now confronting the deaths of children and taking it seriously, and having the power to retaliate with missiles.

Oh, wait, there's more:

It is not clear what ― if any ― legal authority Trump is claiming to strike the Assad regime. The U.S. has claimed authority to bomb ISIS in Syria under the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force by claiming that ISIS is an offshoot of al Qaeda. But there is no war authorization from Congress that could be interpreted to allow military action against the Syrian government, nor can the U.S. claim it is defending itself. When former President Barack Obama considered a similar retaliatory strike against the Assad regime in 2013, he made it clear he would first seek approval from Congress. 

Well, what's the point of being Commander in Chief if you can't blow shit up when you're upset?

This will not end well.

2 Comments:

Blogger The Thought Criminal said...

No, it won't. It would be a lot less crazy if Trump wasn't a major asset for Vladimir Putin and we could be sure of anyone's motives in any of it.

I can think of at least a dozen scenarios leading up to this and though some of them seem crazy, or should be crazy, I can't really know they're crazy because of the many, intertwining conflicts of interest. I mean, maybe Putin is deciding to let Donald Trump have a little military engagement to take pressure off of the Russian stealing of our election being investigated? I imagine he and his fellow kleptocrats expect to get more from Trump than he does Assad, though I doubt Assad is put in real danger from this.

Did Assad consult with Putin before launching the chemical attack? Did Putin OK it? Who knows? Maybe he had no direct involvment and thi is entirely on the Assad regime or maybe they're right and the terrorists who are known to have chemical weapons used them or a depot was hit as I read claimed.

By the way, better living through chemistry, huh?

5:40 AM  
Blogger trex said...

At a rally last year Trump malignantly boasted that he would look Syrian children in the face and tell them they couldn't come to America because they might be "Trojan horses," and his sick supporters cheered him on. "Clear and present danger" indeed - until the most urgent danger is dropping poll numbers, then these kids become the excuse for an air strike.


Trump has still banned from escaping their hellish war zone and finding sanctuary in America - but by golly he's gonna give a black eye to one of the bad men, kids, don't you worry.

What a miserable goddam fuck this guy is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/donald-trump/12147515/After-tomorrow-Donald-Trump-could-be-unstoppable.html





10:05 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home