So the existence of previously-unknown intercepted foreign communications that identified Flynn has now been confirmed. But that information didn't come from any of the 30 US officials who requested unmasking.— Susan Simpson (@TheViewFromLL2) May 13, 2020
It came from Acting DNI @RichardGrenell — when he released it today.
Yeah, I know, false start: but emptywheel retweeted it, so it counts.
BREAKING!!!!— emptywheel (@emptywheel) May 13, 2020
JIM COMEY CONFESSED THE FBI UNMASKED THIS THREE YEARS AGO.
AND EVERY ONE OF YOU CHASING THIS NSA LIST JUST PROVED YOU DIDN'T READ LAST WEEK'S EXHIBITS.
The narrative can never fail; it can only be failed.
LOLOL.— emptywheel (@emptywheel) May 13, 2020
Flynn was named NSA on November 17 (and had tasked him to work with Russia on November 9). The earliest of these intercepts in November 30, almost 2 weeks later. https://t.co/II7ISoPxAx
Calendars, how do they work again?
Yeah, but nobody announced that today! You expect reporters to remember things? Trump doesn't have to!Here's Jim Comey admitting to Congress back in [checks date] 2017 that the FBI unmasked Flynn's name (and also saying they didn't put it into a finished intelligence report).— emptywheel (@emptywheel) May 13, 2020
We know they did so by 1/4/17. That means we can be virtually certain that list is totally unrelated. pic.twitter.com/c9BGr70f6J
Six months to go. The Trump people are going to unleash a blizzard of bullshit, including selective releases and declassifications and leaks, and if the media chases every one of these as bombshell, they're going to end up being a functioning arm of the Trump campaign. Again.— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 13, 2020
Not from emptywheel, but still: yeah, pretty damned much.
No comments:
Post a Comment