To this day, it's not clear whether we'd even know about the Trump docs investigation if @PeterSchorschFL hadn't broken the story.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 11, 2023
All those people assigned the Mar-a-Lago beat full time didn't tell us.
I mean, the blogger got it.It's not super fair that several major media outlets pay for a full-time Trump Court reporter and those people never got a whiff of this for 6 months?
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 11, 2023
Accountability? Right…full Qanon basically https://t.co/IifHkiCFoV
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 11, 2023
Fake arguments are the best kind! Especially when they’re based on willful ignorance!Elise Stefanik, who has served on HPSCI, confesses that she 1) has missed EVERY public detail about the Trump investigation and 2) hasn't read the EO on classification. https://t.co/efFr4jeqBS
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 11, 2023
Also funded by communist China. Right? Besides that argument is as false as water:peak gop: fake argument from trump compared to an argument biden hasn't made because he has no need to. remember. we don't need to pretend that any of this is remotely comparable to Trump's criminal conduct https://t.co/olVexjOCdw
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 11, 2023
And back to the topic of "both sides:"I'm too tired to do it right now, but some of these assholes MUST have been making the argument in 2007 that the VP had authority to declassify -- I just can't remember who is that old right now.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 11, 2023
I admit I find all of this amusing. The House GOP is inevitably (and soon) gonna say “Hold mah beer,” and nobody will remember (or care) about that time Biden found documents that he quickly returned to NARA.For some reason CNN decides to quotes Trump's lawyers at length, without pointing out that 3 arguments they made about TRUMP, which were not true, apply to the known fact set about Biden.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) January 11, 2023
For example, Trump says POTUS (and VP) cannot be charged with 1924. https://t.co/VA8jYWQbsR
So do they think a sitting president can be indicted now?
ReplyDelete