Public opinion is a bitch. And, as usual, it is fighting the wrong battles:UPenn President has just resigned. pic.twitter.com/xZAgjY2dii
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) December 9, 2023
NUANCE WARNING!
— Lee Kovarsky (@lee_kovarsky) December 6, 2023
I'm pretty reluctant to weigh in here because of the ecosystemic climate for Jewish identity generally, but it seems like the outrage here is ... probably overdone and *certainly* rewarding bad faith actors.
Take Magill (Penn). She is asked DIRECTLY
1/ https://t.co/mpxZCs5yOe
I confess that I do not understand what answer other than *it depends* is reasonable and can be given in sworn testimony.
— Lee Kovarsky (@lee_kovarsky) December 6, 2023
3/
But it's *extremely* clear that this is not punishable under the Penn policy.
— Lee Kovarsky (@lee_kovarsky) December 6, 2023
And this business about how speech is punishable when it "crosses into action" is not about when speech "crosses into genocide."
5/
Look, I'm deeply sympathetic to the argument that campus speech practices are awful right now and that Jewish identity is particularly precarious. I've made that argument over and over on this shitty site.
— Lee Kovarsky (@lee_kovarsky) December 6, 2023
7/
As i was saying: there are few signs of intelligent life on Twitter. Or in Congress, for that matter.But it seems to me that folks can't just keep retweeting and accepting at face value outrage porn produced by Elise Stefanik and signal boosted by Bill Ackman - at least not if they want to be taken seriously by people who might not be predisposed to agree with them.
— Lee Kovarsky (@lee_kovarsky) December 6, 2023
/end.
Context is all; which means, it was a Congressional hearing:Wrong. She was asked a legal question.
— Lee Kovarsky (@lee_kovarsky) December 7, 2023
Really better to stay away from those things.Exactly - Gay tried to give the same answer she would later give about the genocide question, and Stefanik cut her off twice.
— James Surowiecki (@JamesSurowiecki) December 6, 2023
No comments:
Post a Comment