The frame is wrong, but it’s not the frame Ms. Haberman posited. I don’t think her argument is right, but it isn’t wrong because you didn’t read the interview. And all I’m seeing here, with Ornstein and Pitchbot, is people who have read about the interview on Twitter. But can’t be bothered to read the actual interview; or draw their own conclusions (this ain’t vaccine science).This is a must-read thread. Unlike many on this site, I believe Maggie Haberman has done some terrific work on Trump, and is unjustly ripped because not every piece fits the narrative. But her frame here is simply wrong. 1/ https://t.co/XiIVZTn5nZ
— Norman Ornstein (@NormOrnstein) September 22, 2024
So basically, they’re knocking down their scarecrows. You can do that if you want to; but you’re just trying to sit with the kewl kids. Honestly, there are more important issues to worry about.
Although the rule is: never go to Twitter for a good argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment