Reading The Fine Print

This makes sense.

— George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 (@gtconway3d) November 15, 2026

Apologies for the small print.

NTodd understands this technology better than I ever will, so the above may be crap. But if it isn’t, it’s a far better answer than this:

Duffy: "Now we know who did the install. A good American patriot we believe, a veteran, so we don't think that someone tried to sabotage the network on the install. But we don't actually have the root cause." https://t.co/2MmKVzTwky

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) November 15, 2026

Or this:

Doocy: Isn't it possible that bad actor could have flooded these routers in Arkansas with data to shut things down? Mullin: So is it a possibility? Possibly. But the fact is, it isn't. It really appears to be with 98% certainty that this was, this is because of a 50-year-old system…

— Acyn (@Acyn) November 15, 2026

These clowns don’t inspire the confidence that they should be in charge of a two-car funeral procession. Then again, neither does the POTUS.

 (And waiting for the “root cause” is just chasing a shiny object you can’t catch. There are more than enough producing causes to go around. Mullin and Duffy are two of them.)