Sunday, December 01, 2019

The More You Know

Whish us why we rely on system a if justice, not persons. I'm thinking accountability is a bit less amorphous than that. And that if it takes a Constitutional amendment to put limits on the power of the Commander-in-Chief, and the Presidential pardon power, that's not a bad thing.

2 comments:

  1. It's a rather mindblowingly bad provision to give one man that kind of power to allow criminality, as I recently found out, George Mason was warning about exactly the kind of thing that Trump and Bush I did with the pardon power even before they adopted the damned thing. I think more and more finding out what those who rejected the Constitution noticed that made them reject it might be a good idea. The "founders" get all the time, their critics get very little.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It went through the office if a Pardon Attorney, which didn't stop Clinton or Poppy from stirring controversy with it. But Trump proves we need a Board of Pardons (as Texas has, though that experience is not a recommendation), not absolute power in one person.

    ReplyDelete