Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Every Time You Think It Can’t Get Worse

🤬
Posted by at 1 comment:

A Copy Of A Parody

He wants to take it to Florida with him. (He also doesn’t have the first clue what it says.) "What? Me worry?” Prosecutor, judge and jury all in one. So much simpler that way. Oh, you’re no fun anymore! Trump’s autopen.
Posted by at No comments:

The Borowitz Report

Still trying to figure out what Biden’s cancer diagnosis has to do with anything.
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In a bombshell report that stirred controversy on Tuesday, a prominent conspiracy theorist claimed that Joe Biden concealed his health problems by making the American economy boom for four straight years.

“Biden thought he could hide his health issues by making the U.S. economy the envy of the world,” the conspiracist, Harland Dorrinson, said. “Low unemployment, a surging stock market, and a stable dollar all played their parts in the cover-up.”

Strengthening NATO and bolstering relationships with allies were also key components of Biden’s elaborate scheme to hide his health woes, Dorrinson said.

“Biden kept the media distracted by making the US trusted and respected around the world,” he said. “Trump would never do that.”
Who is he going to chastise for pointing out the Emperor has no clothes?

Now…
"No, and I understand your point there for certain," said Brown. "But now this information is coming out and there's a big question of when this started, right? We know it's an aggressive form that it spread to his bone. And so you just wait until someone who's like the president of the United States shows symptoms until you test them in a situation like this?"

"In older men, yeah ... this is the specific recommendation for this particular disease," said Reiner. "But one other point I do want to make ... I think this is really illustrative of what can happen when we elect very old people to office. When you're 80 years old, stuff happens. And it doesn't matter how you look one day, but 80-year-olds get heart attacks, and they get strokes, and they get prostate cancer. And it happens more frequently the older we get."

This, he added, is the reason "I've always felt super strongly about, when we're vetting candidates running for office, we should expect, as the voting public, the people who are putting these people in office, we should expect complete transparency. We should expect that the medications listed on these disclosures are the complete list, right? Not the partial list."
...do Trump. While it matters.*


*Although I think the election if Trump, again, proves nobody really cares. Campaigns don’t really matter. Most voters don’t pay attention, and vote for who they think they’re voting for. Medical reports won’t really change minds, unless the press decides there’s a book promotion in it. Otherwise it’s soon gone; and who’s going to release a book on the scandal in the middle of the scandal? What Tapper is doing now is creating that scandal in order to sell his book. He can control the narrative now, because he has an excuse to: he’s not making news, he’s peddling product.

See how easy it is? The market makes it alright. Even as it undoes our electoral process. The only time to talk about a President’s condition is when he’s safely out of office; and there’s a book in it. A “free press” doesn’t pay, after all. Writing a book is a meal ticket; and the only way to ride herd on the narrative.
I mean, honestly, who are these people talking to? Each other? At best it demands we recognize that old people are subject to rapid decline; and we need to recognize that Trump is old

If that’s what you call “soul-searching,” then we are speaking different languages.
Posted by at 1 comment:

ICE Barbie Doesn’t Know What She’s Talking About

🎶Fun, fun, fun ‘til her Daddy takes the T-bird away!🎶
G: Would you consistently be using it for travel?

NOEM: I have no idea

G: We've seen the Instagram photos. Some really bad weapons handling.
Fuck people! ICE Barbie needs a new jet! Well, at least she’s completely ignorant. And the check is in the mail. And China will pay for the tariffs. Like when we stopped testing for Covid, the number of cases went down. Or when you lower taxes, tax revenues skyrocket. Or something.
RUBIO: Your regret for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job
Little Marco thinks he has hair on his balls. He doesn’t. He’s just the same sad little man he’s always been.

And we close with Sen. Professor Warren doing her job:
Posted by at No comments:

How To (NOT) Win Friends And Influence People

TRUMP: I don't think Thomas Massie understands government ... I think he should be voted out of office
"Let’s just assume that Trump is already completely mentally incapacitated.” Because that’s the discussion they’re trying desperately to avoid.
Trump "weaponization czar" Ed Martin: "Many many people in this country are victims of what I call hoaxes that capture our imagination. The unselect committee of Liz Cheney -- they spent hundreds of millions of dollars with earned media to condition people to think something about J6 that we know was not true. So we have to unpack that, unravel it ... we have to go faster ... and then still have the trials and prosecutions."
I really want to know what his legal theories are, because the man doesn’t talk like a lawyer. He talks like a gibbering loon. (The congressional members of that committee all enjoy constitutional immunity from precisely the kind of prosecution Martin is talking about.)
Posted by at No comments:

But Joe Biden Is Old! 🤮

And lied about his cancer:
We're going to have a bill. The one big, beautiful bill. I think it's going to be, it's the biggest bill ever passed and we got to get it done. Tremendous tax cuts for people, tremendous incentives, tremendous regulation cuts, all these regulations that are so horrible," Trump said.

He then devolved into spewing theories about former President Biden and promising to investigate who signed legislation with the "autopen."

"And now you find out what happened. Because Biden — look, it's a very sad thing what happened," Trump said, presumably about Biden's recent stage-4 cancer revelation.

"But I really — we're going to start looking into this whole thing with who signed this legislation, who signed legislation opening our border. I don't think he knew! I said, there's nobody that could want an open border. Nobody. And now I find out that it wasn't him. He opened it. Who was operating the auto pen? This is a very serious thing. We had a president that didn't sign anything. He had almost everything. He opened the borders of the United States of America, and I kept saying, who would do such a thing? Allowing criminals to pour in from all over the world, not just South America — all over the world.

"They came in from Africa, they came in from Asia, they came from the Congo, the prisons in the Congo, in Africa. These are rough, rough people. The prisons from the Congo are empty. You know where they are? They're in this country. Who would sign this? Nobody would sign it. No sane person would sign it. You know who signed it? Radical left lunatics that were running our country and the autopen signed it.

"And they didn't want him," Trump said of Biden. "And they were disappointed in getting him because they wanted Bernie Sanders. And then after about two weeks, they said, 'Wait a minute, this is a gift. He'll do anything. We're going to use the autopen.' And they use the autopen and everything. He didn't approve this stuff because when Joe Biden was with it, he would never have approved that. You take a look. he would have never approved open borders."
And did Jake Tapper mention he has a book to sell?

I’m sure that’s all more important than reporting on this word vomit.🤮 

ADDING: Nope, no exaggeration. This is how CNN covered Trump’s spew:
"Remember, we had a majority of one for six months,” Trump said, “and that was a very frightening thing because the Democrats have really hurt our country, and we are going to go into this very much unified. Remember what I said, the auto pen, this government was illegally run for four years.”

Anchor Kate Bolduan summed up the almost 10-minute remarks by saying, “All right. So we've been listening to the president, his position, his messaging, going in. Kind of an exercise in manifestation, trying to say that the party is very unified.”

“Manu, you heard you were listening in. You heard the president as he's walking in. What is he heading into? He says the party's very unified," Bolduan said to correspondent Manu Raju, who was in Congress.

“Yeah. It's actually not very unified,” Raju said. “There's actually significant division, particularly between the more moderate members and the more conservative members, over some of the issues that Donald Trump just laid out there. One of which is the issue of Medicaid.”
Dare not tread on Tapper’s toes, eh? Or dare not mention the Emperor is a naked raving lunatic. Far safer to handicap the voting in a bill.

I’ll retire to Bedlam….
Posted by at No comments:

“President Coolidge say ‘Little fat man, idn’t it a shame/what the river have done to this poor crackers’ land?’”

Silence sometimes speaks volumes:
What we need right now is federal assistance,” declared St. Louis, Missouri Mayor Cara Spencer on MSNBC( video below) on Monday, “we need federal assistance.”

“This is where FEMA and the federal government has got to come in and help communities,” Mayor Spencer urged. “Our city cannot shoulder this alone. The State of Missouri cannot shoulder this alone. We need partners at the national level, at the federal level to step up and help.

Spencer said, “This is what the federal government is for. We need your help, we need the help of the broader community.”

“FEMA has not been on the ground—we do not have confirmed assistance from FEMA at this point,” Spencer said. “I do want to say, however, every other level of government has been on the ground with us, helping in every capacity possible. But when you have a disaster of this scale, eight miles of just pure destruction, this tornado didn’t just touch down and leave, this tornado ripped through our community for a full eight miles in the city of St. Louis, and this is an area that has needed help, that we need investment, you know, our North St. Louis has been neglected for a long time, and we need the help of our partners here.”

At a news conference, Spencer had called it “one of the worst storms,” ABC News reported. She said that “the devastation is truly heartbreaking—and let’s not forget people have lost their lives. We are continuing to make sure that we are identifying all those that are injured, in addition to the massive amount of property damage that has taken a huge toll.”

Tornadoes were reported in three more states, bringing the total to six states and 26 tornadoes.

“Over 462,000 customers were without power across multiple states, stretching from Michigan to Tennessee.”
And yet Trump has said not a word.
As of publication time, NCRM was unable to find anything from President Donald Trump on his Truth Social page about the tornadoes’ death and destruction. It does not appear he has offered support or guidance, nor has he suggested he will visit the areas.
I’m sure there are ideological reasons to defund FEMA, but I think Trump has personal ones, too. He doesn’t like disaster areas. They bore him, and he gets criticized for entertaining himself by throwing paper towels. So he doesn’t want to go. And without FEMA, there’s less attention paid to disasters, especially only a few days later.

So for Trump it’s a win-win. He can go pat himself on the back at the Kennedy Center, and Kristi Noem can, well…
This morning, I spoke with Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker to offer federal resources and action for the deadly tornadoes and storms impacting Missouri, Kentucky, and Illinois. We discussed how while emergency management is best led by local authorities, we reinforced that DHS stands ready to take immediate action to offer resources and support.

I also left a message with Indiana Governor Mike Braun as Indiana has been impacted by these storms.
...yeah, do that. After all, who wants to cosplay a recovery worker?
Posted by at No comments:

Media Whores Redefined

A) I had no idea it was this bad.

B) I’ve never felt better about cutting cable so many years ago. Ted Turner thought he had a good idea, setting up a 24 hour news channel. How very, very wrong he was.
Posted by at No comments:

Pardon Me?

 Let’s start here:

...Naomi Biden after reading Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book about her grandfather: “Just read a copy of this silly book, and if anyone is curious for a review from someone who lived it first-hand: this book is political fairy smut for the permanent, professional chattering class. The ones who rarely enter the arena, but profit from the spectacle of those that do. Put simply, it amounts to a bunch of unoriginal, uninspired lies written by irresponsible self promoting journalists out to make a quick buck. It relies on unnamed, anonymous sources pushing a self-serving false narrative that absolves them of any responsibility for our current national nightmare. All of this at the expense of a man so completely good and honest that it is impossible for these people to ever understand the why or how of it all.”
I don’t quote that as the last word on Tapper’s book. I’d expect no less from a loving grandchild, though it certainly resonates with my impression of Biden’s character (and I wasn’t a fan when he was in the Judiciary Committee approving Thomas). I bring it up because it neatly questions Tapper’s book, which leads into this:
… Trump’s new DOJ Pardon Attorney Ed Martin says the stuff in the Tapper book may be used by him to try to nullify Biden’s pardons: “The integrity of the American Pardon system requires that we examine the Biden pardons and who did what. We will get the bottom of it. Count on us.”
Again, outside the 25th Amendment, there isn’t the hint of a “diminished capacity” clause, else we could look forward to rescinding all of Trump’s J6 pardons (which don’t seem to have upset the public nearly as much as DOGE or tariffs;,sadly). Bill Clinton was accused of basically “selling” pardons, but nothing ever came of it. His pardons stood, they were never actually challenged. Because they can’t be. The pardon power is virtually absolute and unreviewable. As I’ve said, Poppy Bush pardoned himself by eliminating the charges against all the Iran/Contra defendants before the public investigation could get to him. Before Trump, that was about the most corrupt use of the power I know of. And yet now, it’s barely a footnote in popular history.

I mention Tapper’s book because that’s clearly where Martin is getting his ideas. Not from any information gathered by a legally valid investigative process,  but from gossip. Not that Martin is going to go to court, but he’s not even making a pretense of doing a lawyer’s work. Naomi Biden raises real questions about the validity of Tapper’s book. Martin treats that same book as gospel, just to score political points for his boss. He has no real legal purpose. He’s just being a shill.

The more legitimate question here is the wisdom of the pardons clause. Texas and most Reconstruction states gave the governor the pardon power, but set up a state board with final approval. In Texas, unfortunately, that Board is appointed by the Governor, and Abbott has used that power the way you’d expect Trump to. But the basic idea is sound because, at least since Ford pardoned Nixon, the power has not been wielded entirely wisely.

And a Pardon Attorney in this administration is a cruel joke anyway. Especially one as corruptly political as Ed Martin.
Posted by at No comments:

Monday, May 19, 2025

We Are Being Protected From Evil By Kindergartners

She finally watched the video?
But, you know, just keep on keepin’ on. Gotta get those pharmacy factories back! Says the man with a drinking problem. (And Biden is not the President, and never will be again, so WHO THE FUCK CARES?) There’s that, too.
I mean, he’s not a knife. He doesn’t get sharpened by age. But Joe Biden is old, and nobody knows how long he’s had cancer, and Jake Tapper has a book to sell! Priorities, people!

Speaking of which: 
This reminds me of lawyers who didn’t work on the trial critiquing how it was conducted based on news reports. Every good lawyer knows you don’t know enough about the details of the case your own firm members are working on. Without reviewing Biden’s medical records, you don’t know shit about his condition.

Conduct yourself accordingly. And start with not being a media whore.
Posted by at No comments:

And Trump Is 6’3” And Weighs 230 lbs

Trump: I think it’s very sad, actually. I’m surprised that it wasn’t—you know—the public wasn’t notified a long time ago, because to get to stage 9, that’s a long time. I just had my physical. You saw that. You saw the results of that particular test. I think that test is standard to pretty much anybody getting a physical—a good physical. We had the doctors at the White House and over at Walter Reed, which is a fantastic hospital, do it. I did a very complete physical, including a cognitive test. I’m proud to announce I aced it. I got them all right. You proud of me? Your husband would be proud of me for getting them all right. It’s a little risk. If I didn’t get them all right, these people would be after me. It would be not a good situation.

But I think, frankly, anybody running for president should take a cognitive test. They say it’s unconstitutional, but I would say in that particular case, having a cognitive test wouldn’t be so bad.

But when you take tests—medical, as a male—that test is very standard. I don’t know if it’s given to everybody, but it’s given just about. And it takes a long time to get to that situation… to get to a stage 9. I think that if you take a look, it’s the same doctor that said that Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. If it’s the same doctor, he said there was nothing wrong there. That’s been proven to be a sad situation.

And the autopen is becoming a very big deal. You know, the autopen is becoming a big deal because it seems that maybe it was the president—whoever operated the autopen. But when they say that was not good, they also—you have to look and you have to say that the test was not so good either. In other words, there are things going on that the public wasn’t informed [about], and I think somebody is going to have to speak to his doctor—if it’s the same or even if it’s two separate doctors.

Why wasn’t the cognitive ability—why wasn’t that discussed? And I think the doctor said he’s just fine, and it’s turned out that’s not so. It’s very dangerous… this is dangerous for our country. Look at the mess we are in.

You talk about all these questions on Ukraine and Russia. That would’ve never happened, as an example, if I were president. It would’ve never happened. The other thing—you have to say: Why did it take so long? I mean, this takes a long time. It can take years to get to this level of danger. It’s a very, very sad situation. I feel very badly about it. And I think people should try and find out what happened.

Because I’ll tell you, I don’t know if it had anything to do with the hospital. Walter Reed is really good. They’re some of the best doctors I’ve ever seen. I don’t even know if they were involved. But a doctor was involved in each case. Maybe it was the same doctor. And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.
$20 bucks says he doesn’t even know the initials of the test for signs of prostate cancer.

$100 says he doesn’t even know what “stage 9” means. (Mostly because Biden has stage 4 cancer.)

No signs of cognitive impairment here, wandering from Biden’s diagnosis to Athens to Ukraine/Russia which now he can’t solve before he takes office ;all Biden’s fault) to an inadvertent admission: 
And somebody is not telling the facts. That’s a big problem.
No shit, senile Sherlock.

BTW, if a “cognitive test” is unconstitutional, why has Trump had several of them? 

Looney as a clockwork orange.
Posted by at 2 comments:

It’s A Slow Day…

 So…

MAGA supporters lit up social media with calls for Jackson to be ousted from the court. Many argued that Biden lacked proper mental capacity to appoint her to the court in 2022.

Ketanji Brown Jackson should be removed from the Supreme Court… She was a DEI appointee by an invalid who had no idea what he was doing," wrote MAGA commentator Gunther Eagleman to his 1.5 million followers.

Eric Daugherty with FloridaVoice News posted, "Kentanji Brown Jackson was the ONLY Supreme Court Justice to rule against Trump in today's alien parole decision, which was 8-UNQUALIFIED! She proves it every time."

Author Juanita Broaddrick wrote, "Ketanji Brown is not a legitimate Supreme Court Justice. She should be removed," while right-wing podcaster Jack Posobiec offered his thoughts on the matter:

"I will ask this again: Was Ketanji Brown Jackson a legally-nominated Supreme Court Justice if the person who appointed her lacked capacity? Only a President can sign a commission officially nominating a Supreme Court Justice Not a staffer, not an autopen, a president with full mental capacity."

Former West Virginia House member Derrick Evans called on Congress to "Impeach Kentanji Brown Jackson. Biden was not mentally capable of appointing her to the position. She needs to be removed from the Supreme Court." While MAGA commentator Ian Jaeger commentator told his 300,000 followers, "Kentanji Brown Jackson is the only Justice to rule against President Trump canceling legal status for over 500,000 illegal immigrants that came in under President Biden’s 'parole' program. She’s totally unqualified to serve on the Supreme Court."
Art. II. Sec. 2, clause 2, in relevant part:
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law:
The appointments clause is not absolute, of course. Appointments are only made with the consent of the Senate.  Who’s is why, although "diminished capacity" is a statutory concept now, it’s not a Constitutional one.

The idea arose from the common law. I’m fairly certain it first came up in probate, as a matter of determining testamentary intent. It came to criminal law in the 19th century, in the M’Naghten case, where the defendant believed he was killing a man who threatened his life, but he was deluded about the threat (paranoid delusions would be the pop psy explanation, if that helps. The delusion was quite severe, IOW.) To be clear, the probate elements were established centuries before the rule in M’Naghten.

But in modern American jurisprudence diminished capacity is limited to the probate code or family law (minors do not have the capacity at law to make contracts, for example); to statutory exceptions, in other words, which must be proven in court.

A long-winded way of saying there is no “diminished capacity” clause in Article. II, nor any standard for establishing it in the Constitution. The closest is the 25th amendment:
Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
That’s section 3. Section 4 is the one most people think of:
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.
The standard is the same, but you can see the battle royale that would ensue to enforce it. Because it ain’t real clear what it means.

And the public record against Biden is pretty much George Clooney and a bad debate performance. Whereas the public record on Trump is…voluminous.

But the bottom line is, there is no language in the constitution, nor theory in Constitutional law, that allows for rescission of lawful Presidential actions based on a claim (or even evidence in court) of diminished capacity.

And even the Roberts court would never establish it.
Posted by at 1 comment:

Math Is Hard!

Arbeit Macht Frei. Or not.
HASSETT: No. There have been a whole bunch of deals. So you don't think the deal with China counts as a deal? We have an agreement in principle with India
So, “two” is a “bunch.” And one more is a concept. But one was mostly about Rolls-Royce and Bentley automobiles. And the one with China is only good for 90 days. And nobody’s ordering because it could be 90 days before they take delivery, who knows what the tariffs will be then?

And two is still not 15. Or 150. Or 200. Or whatever the moving target is.

Math is hard.
See? Math is hard. Reading is hard.
HASSETT: What's going to happen is there's going to be a lot of trade deals ... all of America knows that the golden age is coming.*
And Santa Claus is real!

*But it’s sure coming slow. Meanwhile, wish in one hand, and piss in the other! And see which one fills up faster! This advice brought to you by the Trump Administration II: Electric Boogaloo!
Posted by at No comments:

There’s A Reason People Are Cutting The Cord

Posted by at 1 comment:

A Cup Of Water


 

Matthew 25:31-46 (SV)

"When the Son of Adam comes in his glory, accompanied by all his messengers, then he will occupy his glorious throne. Then all peoples will be assembled before him, and he will separate them into groups, much as a shepherd segregates sheep from goats. He'll place the sheep to his right and the goats to his left. Then the king will say to those at his right, 'Come, you who have the blessing of my Father, inherit the domain prepared for you from the foundations of the world. You may remember, I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a foreigner and you showed me hospitality; I was naked and you clothed me; I was ill and you visited me; I was in prison and you came to see me.' Then the virtuous will say to him, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and fed you or thirsty and gave you drink? When did we notice that you were a foreigner and extend hospitality to you? Or naked and clothe you? When did we find you ill or in prison and come to visit you?

And the king will respond to them, 'I swear to you, whatever you did for the most inconspicuous members of my family, you did for me as well.'

Next, he will say to those on his left, 'You, condemned to the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his messengers, get away from me! You too may remember, I was hungry and you didn't give me amything to eat; I was thirsty and you refused me a drink; I was a foreigner and you failed to extend hospitality to me; naked and you didn't clothe me; ill and in prison and you didn't visit me.'

Then they will give him a similar reply: 'Lord, when did we notice that you were hungry or thirsty or a foreigner or naked or weak or in prison, and did not attempt to help you?'

He will then respond: 'I swear to you, whever you didn't do for the most inconspicuous members of my family, you didn't do for me.'

The second group will then head for everlasting punishment, but the virtuous for everlasting life.

Whenever I preached on this passage I emphasized that this parable was about how easy it is to be among the virtuous. All you have to do is give someone some clothes; a cup of water; help the foreigner or visit prisoners.*

We all know nursing homes can be bad places if no one is visiting frequently. But prisons? Well, we figure they deserve it, right? What would happen if we paid attention?


*Or maybe just support prison programs. I watched a 30 minute Netflix documentary on a program in a Missouri maximum security prison. A small group of prisoners there make quilts from donated fabrics, which are then given to foster children in the area. It is as decent, humane, and heartwarming as you can imagine. These men take great pride in their work, each designing a quilt themselves and making sure it is done right before they let it go. As I said, the fabrics they use are donated. There are probably opportunities like that around you, if you just look for them. Consider it a cup of water.
Posted by at No comments:

First Rule Of Holes, Or…

...Jr. will always prove he’s dumber than you think he is. The title of “Dr.” for a Ph.D (Dr. Biden is an Ed.D.) predates the title for medical doctors by centuries. Ph.D.’s were around when surgery was performed by barbers.💈 

But part of the mental disorder of being a Trump is being stone ignorant.
Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, May 18, 2025

Well, I Was Through Playing With It Anyway…

ew:
There are things those who oppose fascism should be talking abt now if they want to defeat it.

Calling the fact that every reporter spent months reporting on Joe Biden old WHILE IGNORING Trump's own unfitness, his bribes from foreign countries, & his fascism is ... maybe #100 on a list by urgency.

You may still be harboring anger about Old Joe Biden. And that makes you the plaything of fascists, so long as you can't put your anger aside and do something productive.

Indeed, this is literally how we lost the election.
Aw, shucks! I never git to have any fun! (Although my anger is directed at the press. And George Clooney. Not a big fan of Jake Tapper, either.) But yeah: this shit is inside baseball and entre nous intertoobers. We really gotta get over ourselves.

I’m still looking at you, Clooney!
Posted by at No comments:

How Do Retail Sales Work, Again?

Because they don’t want their customers to scream and run away. They’ll eat some of the tariffs but, as competitors don’t, WalMart will slowly raise the temperature of the water, so the frogs don’t jump out.

They may eat enough of 30% to stay below the competition, but they won’t be able to for long. Especially as supplies dry up, in a month or two 
Posted by at No comments:

“T” Is For…”Tanking”?

Back in the day:
In December 2024, Musk announced that Tesla would start rolling out its long-awaited robotaxis in June 2025, exciting fans of the company. However, experts have claimed that these electric vehicles (EVs) won’t be fully self-driving, as they will be assisted by a remote human operator.
Like his ground breaking robots, which were just people in costumes? (Tee-hee! Elmo is just a little boy at heart.)?
Now Musk is facing a new obstacle, this time from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Tesla’s attempts to copyright the name Robotaxi have run up against roadblocks, as the government agency argues that the name is too generic to trademark.
Is “RoboCop”available? Can it be? How about just “taXi”? Can Trump help with this? I know! “Brand X”!
But that’s not the only obstacle the company is facing in the self-driving car market. Tesla rival Waymo has successfully put self-driving vehicles on the road and partnered with Uber, establishing itself as an early leader in the space.

As TheStreet’s Tony Owusu reports, “Waymo's current fleet features over 1,500 vehicles spread across its four current host cities, but by next year, it expects to more than double its fleet with more than 2,000 new additions.”

Tesla may have a difficult time trademarking the names Robotaxi and Cybercab, but it will likely have an even harder time catching up to Waymo.
Can they just put it on the road with “Name to Follow,”or “Working Title”?

Tesla sold a brand-new 2024 Cybertruck AWD Foundation Series for $100,000. Now, with only 6,000 miles on the odometer, Tesla is offering $65,400 for it – 34.6% depreciation in just a year.

Pickup trucks generally lose about 20% of their value after a year and 34% after about 3-4 years.
Other used car dealers are depreciating the “truck” by 45%.

Elmo remains a genius:
The company created no scarcity with the Foundation Series. They built as many as people wanted. In fact, they built too many and ended having to “buff out” the Foundation Series badges on some units to sell them as regular Cybertrucks and as of last month, Tesla still had some Cybertruck Foundations Series in inventory – meaning they have been sitting around for up to 6 months.

Now, Tesla is stuck with thousands of Cybertrucks, early owners are already getting rid of their vehicles at an impressive rate, and the automaker had to slow production to a crawl.
Posted by at No comments:

“Let’s Take Our Wins Where We Can Find Them”

 If I didn’t know better:

Ex-prosecutor Glenn Kirschner over the weekend published a video entitled, "The Supreme Court AGAIN Tells Trump NO UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPORTATIONS Of Venezuelan Immigrants," in which the legal analyst highlighted a pattern in which at least seven Supreme Court justices have been standing up to the president.

Kirschner zeroed in on the most recent example, which saw seven of nine justices ruling that immigrants are entitled to due process.

According to Kirschner, that particular point was one of the most direct in the entire judicial ruling.

The passage of the opinion, he says, "sounds like it might be a direct rebuke, refutation of Stephen Miller's assertion that due process doesn't really apply to immigrants, particularly immigrants that may be here without status."

After quoting Miller saying due process isn't to protect "an illegal alien," Kirschner flags "one of the most direct assertions" in the seven-justice opinion.

"The Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law," the justices wrote. That led Kirschner to conclude, "That sure feels like the Supreme Court directly communicating 'F--- you, Stephen Miller." [emphasis added]
I’d say somebody was reading my shit.

Oh well, what the hell. Coincidence is hardly an impossibility. 
Posted by at No comments:

May The Healing Grace Of The Holy Spirit Be With And With His Loved Ones

Sidebar to Jake Tapper: your 15 minutes of Presidential biographer fame are over. Kindly leave the spotlight.

And James Comey and your continuing Biden witch hunt: kindly have the dignity to go fuck yourself, and follow Mr. Tapper off the stage.

Whatever happens to Mr. Biden, and we hope it is good news, you two should show the decency to treat him like a human being, now. As we are all reminded of his, and our, mortality.
Posted by at No comments:

🛩️🛩️, Baby!


 Trump is now saying the “gift” is going to the DOD. Which is fine, because they will not accept it without Congressional approval (I would think). And even if they do, or if Congress does approve it, it won’t be fit to use for Presidential flights for at least 5 years.

And I still don’t think the Congress will be excited to approve the funding necessary to maintain (it’s due for basically its 100,000 mile overhaul; millions of dollars there) and refurbish it for use (billions more for that).  Free, this “gift” isn’t.

Trump is talking like he gets the fancy plane immediately, so he can show off to his friends. Reality has other plans.

Posted by at 3 comments:

Reality Is A Harsh Mistress

 Congress can broadly establish the jurisdiction of Art. III courts. Which is not to say Congress can arbitrarily limit the equitable powers and inherent power to enforce rulings of Article III courts. Separation of powers works both ways.

Tucked deep in the thousand-plus pages of the multitrillion-dollar budget bill making its way through the Republican-controlled U.S. House is a paragraph curtailing a court’s greatest tool for forcing the government to obey its rulings: the power to enforce contempt findings.

It’s unclear whether the bill can pass the House in its current form — it failed in a committee vote Friday — whether the U.S. Senate would preserve the contempt provision or whether courts would uphold it.
 I’d give odds even Thomas and Alito would strike it.

I’m not a constitutional or federal law expert, but I can come up with a few legal theories off the top of my head for striking such an overreach from the law. In the end, all the Supremes have to do is strike it down, with reasoning most of the lower courts would be comfortable with. It’s not like the ruling would be the subject to a plebiscite. Dobbs wasn’t, but it’s still law of the land. Though I would hope for a more well reasoned opinion than that. All the Supremes really have to do is give the lower courts enough cover to feel comfortable about following the ruling.

This is just more of the little dogs yap-yapping because they think Trump is the leader of the pack. Reality is gonna mess them up something fierce.
While skirmishes over whether the federal government is complying with court orders are not unusual, it's the intensity of the Trump administration's pushback that is, legal experts say.

“It seems to me they are walking as close to the line as they can, and even stepping over it, in an effort to see how much they can get away with,” said Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown law professor. “It’s what you would expect from a very clever and mischievous child.”
Well, mischievous, anyway. But here’s the thing about mischievous kids: people get tired of  ‘em real quick.

Especially courts.
Posted by at No comments:

Now With 900% More Label!


 

What is Fentanyl?

Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an analgesic (pain relief) and anesthetic. It is approximately 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin as an analgesic.
That would be why Canada is manufacturing it and shipping it to the United States. Kool-Aid consumption in the White House is rising. And moving to Las Vegas? So the 86 47 prosecution is a no-go?

As Charlie Pierce often said, the Pauls say three sensible things, and then one crazy one. Here’s two:
Rand Paul: "Tariffs are taxes & when you put a tax on a business it's always passed through as a cost, so there will be higher prices ... there's an economic fallacy here that trade deficits actually mean anything. They are an artificial accounting. The only trade that means anything is the individual who buys something."
Why have a DOJ if it isn’t the President’s personal law firm?
Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, May 17, 2025

War Of The Roses 🌹

Watched the Netflix documentary series on the Vietnam War. Not bad; a little sketchy on details; not the equal to the PBS series from 1983. But that was 13 episodes and this was 8, so…

Salient bits I had forgotten:

1) Kent State Massacre happened in March, 1970. A group of Guardsmen knelt and opened fire on kids protesting the war, some of whom were throwing rocks. A guardsman in historic footage said it was his job to shoot kids who were responsible for protesting the war. Four students died, 5 were wounded. None of the dead were protesters.

🎶”What if you knew her and/found her head on the ground?/How can you run when you know?”🎶*

The national response was mostly “They deserved it.” Nixon said, privately (it was on tape. Remember? He taped everything.) that it was a good thing because it might give the protesters pause. He hoped more protesters would get shot, to slow down the protests.

2) LBJ and McNamara knew by ‘67 that they couldn’t win the war; but the sunk cost fallacy and the fear of failure kept them from trying to end it. They started peace talks, but during the ‘68 campaign Nixon secretly intervened to convince North Vietnam to keep fighting so he could offer a “secret plan to end the war” if he won the election. So they did, even as soldiers in the field wondered why peace talks were not producing at least a ceasefire.

3) Nixon won, and expanded the war into Laos and Cambodia, ushering in the killing fields of Pol Pot. He also upped the bombing campaign, ultimately dropping more bombs (by tonnage) than were dropped in WWII.

And peace talks continued.

Nixon wanted to end the war, too. But he also wanted to get re-elected, and he and Kissinger (may his name be a sign of evil) knew “losing” the war was no way to win an election. So they postponed peace and prolonged the war until 1973, when an agreement to end the war was signed. 

I remember it well. It was the last year of the draft lottery (every year they selected balls from a spinning cage and used them to rank birthdays. All I remember is mine was very high on the list, well above the midpoint, below which you were more likely to be drafted, above which you weren’t. I was going to college anyway: automatic deferment. But I was relieved nonetheless. And then the war ended, as did the draft. All so Nixon could be re-elected.

He resigned in disgrace in 1974, to avoid being the first President to be removed from office.

This doesn’t even consider the tracks Nixon laid that Reagan rode to power in ‘80 through ‘88, and then Reagan’s people under W after 4 years of Poppy and his self-pardon from Iran/Contra (and Ronnie manipulating the mullahs to hold the hostages until he took office, to secure the defeat of Carter); all of which leads us to Trump The Relentlessly Incompetent. With Biden playing Carter’s (undeservedly) “hapless” role again.

History rhyming? Or repeating itself? I don’t know, but don’t be surprised I’m not that afraid of Trump. I’ve seen real American authoritarians and ruthless leaders.

Trump is a piker who’s so stupid he shits his own bed and calls it roses. He has nobody like Kissinger, much less Cheney or Rumsfeld, not even McNamara, in his entourage. On a clear and present danger scale, Trump is so far down he has to look up to see those guys. He’s a toddler with a shotgun when it comes to the economy, right now. Otherwise, he’s a clown. And clowns are…mostly harmless.


*Someday I’ll tell you what that song means to me, still. No, I probably won’t. I’m not nearly that good with words. I don’t think I even know the words for it.



Posted by at No comments:

It’s The Stupidity, Stupid!

If Trump administration were serious about deporting as many illegal aliens as possible, it would be doing everything it could to improve and expedite the ordinary deportation processes, not wasting its time on probably illegal Alien Enemies Act proclamation that would apply to 1/10,000 of the illegal aliens, all of whom could be deported through other means. It's almost as if it's looking for excuses for failure and scapegoats to blame.
First: assumes facts not in evidence. Trump’s DOJ fired  more than 30 immigration judges, either because they weren’t ruling the way he liked, or because he wanted to gum up the system to pressure Art. II judges to ditch due process and just DEPORT!

The answer is: probably both and a little bit of neither.

Trump also gets rid of lawyers who don’t tell him what he wants to hear. So he’s left with spam Bondi and Alina Habba and Janine Pirro. And mostly Stephen Miller, who plays at being judge, jury, and the whole damned Supreme Court, all in one. But he’s not even a lawyer.

Second: Trump is failure personified. He doesn’t have to look for excuses to fail: that’s hard-wired into the program. If the measure of success was Trump falling out of a boat, he’d miss the water. He’s the beneficiary of a system that supports kleptocracy, venality, and cruelty.

The very proof he doesn’t know what he’s doing is the analysis that recognizes the failure, but can’t come to the logical conclusion: Trump is a very stupid man who, in redux, has surrounded himself with very stupid people.
Posted by at No comments:

EAT THE RICH TARIFFS!

What does Trump think his attention does? Trump may grudgingly concede reality. But he’ll never take responsibility for it.
Posted by at No comments:

Another Thing That Never Happened The Most

Josh Blackman tries to use this tale from Texas history to counter Justice Sotomayor’s shredding of the Solicitor General in oral arguments yesterday. He does about as well as the SG.
We have a similar story in Texas history. During the Texas Revolution, the Mexican Army demanded that the Texians in the City of Gonzales surrender their cannon. What did the Texians say? Come and Take It! The remedy here was not equitable; it was belligerent. The Texians did not reply with a canon of construction; they replied with a cannon of destruction. This was the Lexington of Texas. And the Battle of Gonzales led to the Battle of the Alamo, which led to Texas Independence. Sensing a pattern of what happens when the government tries to disarm the people?
Yeah...no. That’s not what happened at all.  Here, I’ll just quote myself:

Here, I'll quote from Forget The Alamo, a book I'm sure Cruz has never read:
The nearest cannon in American hands was at Gonzales, seventy miles east [of San Antonio]; it had been given to the town to ward off Comanche attacks years earlier. Ugartechea sent a squad to fetch it, but the American alcalde refused to hand it over and buried it.  On October 1, a Mexican force of two hundred arrived, upping the ante.  Texas militiamen, smelling a fight, were already pouring into Gonzales.  There was a lot of yelling back and forth.  Some smart-aleck American made a flag with a picture of the cannon and the words "Come and Take It." Thus was born the Texas T-shirt industry; to this day, it's hard to spend a half hour in Dallas or Houston without seeing a "Come and Take It" tee.

Forget The Alamo: The Rise and Fall of An American Myth, by Bryan Burrough, Chris Tomlinson, and Jason Stanford.  Penguin, 2021.  p. 61.

As for the battle, there wasn't one.  On October 2 the "Texians" opened fire on the Mexican troops.  200 Mexican troops were soon 800, but they withdrew to San Antonio.  The Texians took that as a victory.  No surprise; to this day they think the Battle of the Alamo was a victory, instead of an almost useless massacre.

Santa Anna eventually bypassed Gonzales on his way to San Jacinto. You’ll note the alcalde in Gonzales buried the small gun. It’s never been found. Blackman includes a picture of it at the Gonzales museum. He probably doesn’t realize it’s a replica. And no, nobody in Texas fought for independence because of a small cannon the town of Gonzales buried rather than use in battle.

Mexico eventually marched from San Antonio (after the battle at the Alamo) to San Jacinto, bypassing Gonzales, but the army slaughtered 3000 down the road, in Goliad. It was that massacre that actually prompted Texans to fight back for independence. Not for a gun; for the people.

Like Alito, Blackman prefers to make up facts that support an opinion, rather than consider ordinary human motivations like anger at gross injustice, or just consequence of actions on human beings. His argument against Sotomayor’s questions is about as effective as that buried cannon was.
Posted by at 2 comments:

Friday, May 16, 2025

Just Two Weeks Now!

When the two week period starts remains unspecified. In a similar vein: if you’re wearing a $12,000 coat and a $30,000 watch, why would you lean against anything? Much less post about it.

Meanwhile:
"It’s” and “better” both shrugged as if to say, “We don’t know what he means, either.”
Some psychological terms on display here: tangential thinking, circumstantiality, flight of ideas, slurred speech - all concerning behaviors in an elderly person
Trump: It's secondary sanctions it's called. And I just did it with Venezuela…

Baier: Why not do it with Russia?

Trump: Well, I will.. If we're not going to make a deal. This is turkey time. This is now we are talking turkey

Baier: It would change the dynamic—

Trump: Okay, Biden is incompetent..
Posted by at 1 comment:

Supremes Remind Stephen Miller Who’s In Charge

 Remember when the Supreme Court stepped in at 1:00 in the morning to stop a bus load of Venezuelans from being put on a plane without due process? Yeah, that one. The one that outraged Stephen Miller so much he mooted getting Trump to suspend habeas corpus. Well, today in that case the majority* said to Stephen Miller: “Fuck you.”

Not literally; maybe not even figuratively. But it’s easy to read the opinion that way. Especially when the majority cites its previous unanimous opinion in this case: “The Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in the context of removal proceedings.” Neither Miller nor Trump understand what that means; nor do they like it:

"THE SUPREME COURT WON’T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!" Trump posted.
"Criminal" is a status determined by due process of law. The same due process that prevented Trump from going to trial on criminal charges in Florida and D.C., but found him guilty of 34 felony counts in Manhattan. So maybe we should get criminals out of our country. But they are entitled to further due process before that “remedy.” That is settled law in America.

It is also settled law that no one is a criminal without due process of law making that determination. Nor can anyone, adjudicated criminal or not, be forcibly deported without due process of law.

Otherwise the next administration could just declare Stephen Miller a criminal and deport him to Libya just because…well, shit, who wants him around here, amirite?



*The dissent is Alito’s, joined by Thomas. Alito’s argument is highly technical: he argues against the injunction itself (which the Court grants, returning the case to the 5th Circuit), and the issue of granting habeas relief to a class. His objection to the injunction is that the trial court didn’t have information that ICE was putting people on busses for the airport as the court was trying to determine what ICE was doing with the detainees. The majority points out the government has already said people deported are beyond their reach (true if they are simply returned to their country; far more dubious if they go to a facility like CECOT; but that’s all another matter), and the trial court moved so slowly on the issue of granting or denying the injunction, it effectively denied it. Especially since busses were headed for the airport when the Court ruled the first time.

Alito’s arguments are basically that the government should be allowed to do what it wants until the court has a clear record of what’s going on, and if by then it’s too late, well…that’s the way it goes.

It’s a minority of two, even on this Court. I’m not so sure the majority on the injunction/citizenship case will be any thinner. Well, not thin enough to go the wrong way.  Hope is the thing with feathers, though. And in these matters I am certainly featherless.

Professor Vladeck has a fuller analysis of the ruling, including Alito’s dissent. He points out that the majority expresses clear frustration with the lower courts (trial and appeals) for not taking the problem here (imminent unlawful deportation) more seriously. Which effectively suspends AEA deportations until the Court finally disposes of this case (not soon; it goes back to the Fifth Circuit, first). The majority also took space, in a curiam decision, to chew up Alito’s dissent with far more than “we respectfully disagree.” As the professor points out, Alito is a lot less concerned with the people in this case than the majority is. Which is not a surprising comment on Alito.

I’m skipping entirely over the class certification/habeas argument Alito makes and the majority tacitly discards. Read Vladeck’s analysis if you want to know more about that.
Posted by at 2 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)