Putz.

Or if the president decided just to go on vacation indefinitely and conduct no official business, to the detriment of the nation.

The parliamentary history of “high crimes or misdemeanors” makes clear it covers non-criminal breaches of official duties. https://t.co/lHW2qFZYwP

— George Conway (@gtconway3d) December 4, 2019

Listening to Nadler question the other professors about Turley's testimony is calling up the image of large metal forks shredding cooked pork.

It's that brutal, especially with Professor Karlan citing Johnson's 1792 dictionary defining "bribery" just as she did in her testimony about the common law definition of bribery at the time the Constitution was being drafted.

And later came the panel on NPR, which shredded him even more.  Turley really didn't have an argument to make.

Awkward https://t.co/HBvcZM5XAe

— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) December 4, 2019

The GOP’s hand-picked expert witness is testifying that the impeachment of Andrew Johnson is “the closest” precedent for the current proceedings. That is in fact a slam-dunk argument … for impeaching Donald Trump: https://t.co/s9Y6UMQVCn

— Yoni Appelbaum (@YAppelbaum) December 4, 2019