Possibly on Trump's mind? Lauder recently launched a $25 million effort to combat anti-semitism. That effort employs...BLoomberg's pollster.— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 6, 2020
So, is it the pollster Trump objects to? Or the subject of the campaign? Or the fact the money isn't being spent on him?
Or all three?
In the context of a conversation where he insists he will destroy cultural treasures of value to the entire human species, it's a relevant question. The man has set himself apart from humanity. That doesn't mean we have to; but we shouldn't have him making the decisions.
Some senior US officials say they are deeply opposed to the idea of targeting cultural sites in Iran - CNNPolitics https://t.co/2lMT2kGfZq— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) January 5, 2020
Uncomfortable enough to refuse an illegal order? Or comfortable with the fact the pilot would expect a "Gallagher"?
When is enough, enough?
Listen to @gtconway3d, GOP Senators. This is only going to get worse. https://t.co/6BpZRY4yve— Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) January 6, 2020
Is the complete loss of our international status worth a few more judicial appointments? Because honestly, the 2020 election is a foregone conclusion at this point.
No comments:
Post a Comment