In which I willingly play "data mule":
WE NEED JUSTICE IN OUR COUNTRY!
I'm pretty sure we've been getting it; especially in cases where you are the defendant.
This political hack judge, who values, Mar-a-Lago, the most spectacular parcel of real estate in Palm Beach, and perhaps all of Florida, at $18 million in order to reduce valuations on my financial statements, which are, in fact, lower than my actual net worth, must be stopped. I have had very unfair judges since entering politics, but nobody has been as unhinged as this guy. Mar-a-Lago is worth, perhaps, 100 times more than he values it.
The taxing authorities in Florida are very interested. The number cited in the Judge's order came from the Florida county official in charge of valuing property for tax purposes in the county where MAL is located. Maybe they should accept your valuation, and tax MAL accordingly.
You really aren't very good at this, are you?
Other properties are likewise worth substantially more. I am worth billions more than my very conservatively stated financial statements,
The taxing authorities of Florida, New York, and New Jersey, as well as the IRS, would be very interested to know this.
and therefore could not have defrauded the banks, who all made money & were all paid back, or are current, with no defaults or any other problem.
The NYS Martin Act doesn't require a showing of harm, or even reliance, on the fraud you were charged with. I know you don't understand that but, buddy, you're screwed.
Additionally, there is a powerful Disclaimer Clause on the first pages of the Financial Statements it states that nothing in the financial statement should be excepted as fact!
I think you meant "accepted," but "excepted" works just as well, since that "disclaimer clause" is not worth the paper it's printed on. Again, the judge knows the law; you don't. You lose.
Ya think he's ever gonna figure out the difference between the courtroom and the chatroom? Or are he and his children ever going to stop digging that hole they're already in?
Junior started out by saying that this decision was “the start of a Bolshevik Revolution.”
Does Jr. even know what a "Bolshevik revolution" is? 'Cause I'm pretty sure it didn't come from a courthouse; and I'm also pretty sure the "bolsheviks" in America aren't too upset at a rich guy like Trump getting what's coming to him. In fact, I can't think of a 19th century European revolution (Russia was a 19th century country at the time, let's be honest) that did start that way.
He then claimed “the biggest brokers” in Palm Beach disagreed with the judge, even though his father testified he never had Mar-a-Lago appraised.
Back to the issue of the evidence Trump's lawyers put forward in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Or, rather, failed to put forward.
Junior then repeated the lie that the judge said it was worth $18 million, which is not what the judge said at all. The judge simply noted that Trump's testimony that Mar-a-Lago was worth $1.5 billion was preposterous, and cited as just one example the fact that it was valued for property tax purposes at $18-27 million.
Incidentally, Trump in the past disputed that amount for being TOO HIGH in order to get his taxes reduced, but I guess they just decided not to talk about that.
At this point I don't think anyone can take their shovels away.
No comments:
Post a Comment