Tuesday, July 01, 2025

The Cruelty Is The Point

 


As well as the commodity.
There’s no way to look at what the US government is doing here and not think of it more as Auschwitz than Alcatraz. The parallels are unmistakable: hastily constructed camps in remote locations, euphemistic naming designed to obscure their true purpose, and—most tellingly—officials proudly touring the facilities while discussing plans to build “a system” of such camps nationwide.

But here’s where today’s American concentration camps differ from their 20th-century predecessors: the Trump regime isn’t trying to hide what they’re doing. They’re merchandising it. They’re selling t-shirts celebrating human suffering as if it were a sports team or a vacation destination.

The United States government is literally selling branded merchandise to celebrate putting human beings in cages surrounded by dangerous predators. This isn’t just about policy—it’s about turning cruelty into a consumer product. It’s about making the suffering of others into something you can wear to own the libs.

This commodification of human rights violations represents something uniquely American and uniquely horrifying: the gamification of genocide. Previous authoritarian regimes at least had the decency to be ashamed of their concentration camps. Trump is selling tickets to the show.
Reservations for Native Americans. The Oklahoma Territory. The Japanese Internment Camps. Eugenics laws. (We were the model the Nazis learned from. That, and our segregation laws, which were older.) Small slices of ignominious American hi

Everything old is new again. It’s just a matter of who is being affected this time. Oh, and what we think of it. Or do about it.

Even the merchandising isn’t wholly new. Lynchings were memorialized in the early 20th century by picture postcards. “Wish you were here.” We don’t condone (or do, on such a widespread basis) lynching anymore. Thanks to government; and what good people, moral people, made government do about it.

Government merchandising is a new angle. It can be an incentive to make government change this situation. If the moral people, the good people, make it one. The government has always been on the wrong side of good people. Some good people. The struggle against that is real. And worthwhile.
In case you’re wondering how much it costs to go full Nazi, this one concentration camp will cost the American taxpayer nearly half a billion dollars a year. That money will come from FEMA, the organization that Trump (with an assist from former friend Elon Musk and DOGE) stripped budget from, meaning there will be even less to pay for actual emergencies, because all of that money will be used to jail people Trump doesn’t like in a swamp.
Maybe we should start with Congress, and what they’re letting Trump do. By the time hurricane season is over, there may be half the country interested in answers.

Dept. Of “That’s Right, You’re Not From Texas”

Real BlueSky post:
I'm at the State surplus store, and I need someone to explain to me why Texas has so many gravy boats for sale
Texas wants you, anyway! You bring the gravy boat, we’ll supply the gravy. Hell, we’ll supply it anyway.

(Only thing I don’t understand is why they’re considered “surplus”? 🤷🏻‍♂️)

ICEBlock, ICEBlock, Baby

 ICEBlock:

Sorry, there will not be an Android version because there is no way to provide 100% anonymity. Each person's device ID would have to be stored and that information becomes discoverable should the government issue a subpoena.

Only iOS made this possible and completely protects the users.
If I’m reading that right (I told you! I’m an old guy!), this app only works on iPhone. Which means it’s available on the App Store.

Curious why Trump isn’t threatening Tim Cook…🤔

If I ever shopped at Home Depot, I’d feel compelled to download this. Not too many ICE raids at the “Y” or the grocery store (old guy! Remember?!). Still, better safe than sorry….

ICEblock, which allows users to alert others to the geographical location of ICE officers, is the top social networking app in the App Store right now after Karoline Leavitt condemned it from the podium yesterday.
These people are really not very bright,

It Wasn’t The Chainsaw…

...that lacked empathy.

A Payment For Fundraising

What crime?  He’s already planning the cages for CNN. The Roberts Court has already emailed their approval. I’d have thought she’d rather take on ProPublica.
In 2023, while Kristi Noem was governor of South Dakota, she supplemented her income by secretly accepting a cut of the money she raised for a nonprofit that promotes her political career, tax records show.

In what experts described as a highly unusual arrangement, the nonprofit routed funds to a personal company of Noem’s that had recently been established in Delaware. The payment totaled $80,000 that year, a significant boost to her roughly $130,000 government salary. Since the nonprofit is a so-called dark money group — one that’s not required to disclose the names of its donors — the original source of the money remains unknown.

Noem then failed to disclose the $80,000 payment to the public. After President Donald Trump selected Noem to be his secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, she had to release a detailed accounting of her assets and sources of income from 2023 on. She did not include the income from the dark money group on her disclosure form, which experts called a likely violation of federal ethics requirements.

Experts told ProPublica it was troubling that Noem was personally taking money that came from political donors. In a filing, the group, a nonprofit called American Resolve Policy Fund, described the $80,000 as a payment for fundraising. The organization said Noem had brought in hundreds of thousands of dollars.

A/K/A The “Papers, Please” Act

And it will have bugger all to do with elections. Or  House apportionment. Section 2 of the 14th Amendment has entered the chat.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
The phrase "counting the whole number of persons in each State" has traditionally been understood to include non-citizens for purposes of apportionment.
Until the Roberts Court finds some way to rewrite that part of the 14th, too.

What is “proof of citizenship,” anyway? A birth certificate? Obama had one of those….

Perfect Distillation Of How Unrepresentative NYC Is

 Ummmm…

Voters who supported Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso in their most recent general elections = 440,734

NYC voters who ranked Zohran #1 in the *primary* = 432,305

Perfect distillation of how unrepresentative the Senate is
Sure. Whatever lets you sleep at night.

The Senate was never meant to be representative. Until 1913 (17th amendment), Senators were appointed by state legislatures. 

And yes, each state gets two Senators, regardless of population. I c     Also, yes, NYC is more populous than several states of the Union combined. 

But Zohran isn’t even the mayor if NYC, yet. And last I checked, NYC Mayors don’t fare well outside of NYC. Or after being mayor. And my memory goes back to John Lindsay. He was a U.S. representative; then mayor of NYC. After that? Nothing; despite being heavily touted as a Presidential candidate. Once. Sort of like…Rudy Giuliani. The man the NYC-centric press dubbed “America’s mayor.” Michael Bloomberg was supposed to be Presidential material, too. But: bupkis.

So it is a somewhat representative government after all. It just represents more than the people who voted in the NYC democratic primary. Because there are 322 million people who DON’T live in NYC, but do live in America.

Signed—one if the 4 million in the nation’s fourth largest city. With, yes, a population larger than some states. And a blue city, in a deep red state. Deal with it. The rest of us do.

(Pro-tip: with Trump touting his new line of fragrances, maybe avoid metaphors related to perfume, huh?)

I’m Old Enough To Remember…

 When our world was run by arrogant, but competent, adults.

Now it’s incompetent, squabbling children.

Monday, June 30, 2025

“We Can’t Be Hurting Anyone!”

"No one deserves to be on Medicaid!”

Problem solved!

I’m An Old Man

 …and I learned about this on the internet.

Raw Story, to be exact (quelle surprise, eh?). CNN is on cable, which I’m pretty sure only old people and old politicians watch anymore. I’m old, but I cut the cord a decade ago. I only watch CNN via Rupar and Acyn. I am not, on the other hand, a denizen of the intertoobs. I heard about this by reading an article on Raw Story about the CNN report. By modern standards, I am hopelessly out of touch. 

IOW (as the kids say), I don’t think that, because it’s on CNN, it is now known to the world. That’s like thinking Jake Tapper is using the latest street slang, and everyone goes to him to get it. If CNN knows about this app, it’s already widely known. CNN is not announcing this to the world. CNN is playing catch up with the world; at least the world to whom this app matters.
That response is especially delicious, because it’s ridiculously over the top, and there’s fuck-all he can do about it. And because he thinks CNN matters.

And no, this app is not “doxxing” ICE agents. That’s old people trying to use slang they don’t understand; the only person they speak to, are other old people. It’s like Jake Tapper thinking he’s discovered something that will go down in history, while ignoring what’s right in front of all our eyes.

Besides, do you really need an app to know where ICE is? You can just go to your local Home Depot and hang out in the parking lot. Or would that be doxxing?

😈

🤡 To The Left Of Me, 🃏 To The Right

 About 35 years ago:

We're not cutting Medicaid for those that Medicaid was designed for," Mullin insisted. "There's 35 million people that live below the poverty line inside the United States. There's over 70 million people signed up for Medicaid."

That, he suggested, means half of those signed up are not eligible.

"Now, you're going to tell me there's not room to make cuts to actually have it in place, Medicaid in place for those that it was actually designed for," he added. "There's plenty of room there."
When I was still practicing at law, I had a friend who needed to get on Medicaid. Unlike Medicare, the states partner with the federal government in the program; so some states are more generous than others. Texas is as stingy as possible; I imagine Oklahoma is the same. My friend had to divorce her husband of long standing, and, if I recall, sell her house, to qualify for Medicaid. To be, in point of fact, poor enough.

Markwayne Mullin can go to hell.  Ryan Zinke can go with him:
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that nationally, the Senate version of Trump's agenda bill would leave 11.8 million more people without health insurance by the year 2034," Brown began, then asked, "How do Republicans explain this to their constituents?"

Zinke answered, "Well, living paycheck to paycheck is on the premise that you're working. But look, if you're an able-bodied male and you choose to sit on the couch, not work, and you're getting Medicaid, that's taking benefits from someone else who needs it...I would say, look, get a job."

Brown clarified that the Senate version of the bill would limit federal funding, raising concerns that "people are going to lose out on Medicaid coverage as a result."

Zinke said he agreed that states needed to pick up more of the burden, before reverting back to his argument about jobs.

"Remember we had Obamacare that was supposed to be the end-all for insurance. That didn't work. And so a lot of people choose not to work, and they're still getting Medicaid...and look, when the federal government is picking up the tab at little from the states, what's going to happen is you're going to expand, expand, expand. That's why we have the budget."

Bondi Brown pushed back, saying, "A small percentage of those receiving Medicaid don't work. And so, you know, a majority work at least part-time when it comes to Medicaid. So, can you say for certain that no one who is eligible for Medicaid who works or works part-time will not be impacted by this? Are you comfortable with that?"

Zinke conceded that if someone is only working "five hours a month, yeah, you're not going to be able to have access to Medicaid."

"But there's reasons, because people are caregivers and that kind of thing," Brown interjected

"The House version, which I understand is going to be pretty close to what the Senate is, that the standard is 80 hours. But look, you could work at a food pantry and get 80 hours," Zinke maintained.
Although Pam Bondi is my new favorite person in the Administration, because she is so stupid. She prates about suing everyone in the country, and might do some real damage prosecuting people who can’t afford to defend themselves and have baseless cases finally dismissed. Instead, she takes on L.A.:
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that she is suing the city of Los Angeles, claiming that it's discriminating against ICE agents.

Fox News is reporting that President Donald Trump's Department of Justice has found a way to go after L.A.'s sanctuary city policy by alleging that it treats federal immigration officers differently from other law enforcement, reported national correspondent Bill Melugin.

"Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles. Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level – it ends under President Trump," Fox cited Bondi as saying in a statement.

The lawsuit alleges that the "sanctuary city laws and policies are designed to deliberately impede federal immigration officers’ ability to carry out their responsibilities in those jurisdictions. The Los Angeles Ordinance and other policies intentionally discriminate against the Federal Government by treating federal immigration authorities differently than other law enforcement agents through access restrictions both to property and to individual detainees, by prohibiting contractors and sub-contractors from providing information, and by disfavoring federal criminal laws that the City of Los Angeles has decided not to comply with.

"The Supremacy Clause prohibits the City of Los Angeles and its officials from singling out the Federal Government for adverse treatment—as the challenged law and policies do—thereby discriminating against the Federal Government. Accordingly, the law and policies challenged here are invalid and should be enjoined."
There’s a legal term for Bondi’s statement: irrelevant bullshit, which might well taint the jury. It’s no sounder than the legal argument. The state of California and the city of Los Angeles cannot discriminate against ICE agents. They cannot positively interfere (that would be obstruction), but they have no affirmative duty to aid the federal government in enforcing federal law. The states are separate sovereigns. The Supremacy Clause does not make them subjects of the federal government or the POTUS.

There is absolutely no support at law for a claim that “the City of Los Angeles and its officials [are] singling out the Federal Government for adverse treatment…thereby discriminating against the Federal Government.” Discrimination is a legal term of art. It is defined in law, based on the statutes that ban discrimination. There is no statute, certainly no cause of action at common law, regarding discrimination against the federal government. The very concept is a joke. And Los Angeles has the wherewithal to prove it in court.

Which is why Pam Bondi is my new favorite person in the Administration. She makes Hegseth look almost capable of doing his job.

Almost. Really, nobody can do that.

🙀

Being forced to come to work and do your job? In the summer?

O, the humanities!

In Which I Make A Funny

Or...

We could let the Trump tax cuts expire, further raise taxes on the 1% (like banks, it’s where the money is), and eliminate the income cap on the Social Security tax. And maybe add a Medicaid payroll tax and take all of that (SS, Medicare, Medicaid) out the budget.

I’ll just be over here grumbling into my coffee ☕️ 

The Surprise Inside

Protect Our Care:
Republican Senator Thom Tillis: What do I tell 663,000 people and two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid. Trump's advisers in the White House are not telling him that the effect of this bill is to break a promise.
Popehat replies:
Tell them they got what they voted for.
So who voted for this?
A Washington Post review found that in at least seven major departments or agencies, DOGE secured the power to view records that experts say could benefit Elon Musk’s businesses for years.

Who The GOP Represents, II

The folks back in Georgia didn't vote for that. They voted for me and they voted for Donald Trump, but they didn't vote for that.

Ordinary folks don't want this. These ordinary everyday people who don't pay attention to politics, they don't want this.

Even a Fox News poll, and you won't often hear me say that, but even a Fox News poll from this month found that Americans don't support this big ugly bill.
This is socialism for the rich.

And when the people hear about it, guess what, they don't like it.

That's why they're trying to pass it and they haven't even finished writing it.

And so if the people do not want this bill, but they are trying to pass it, here's the question you've got to ask yourselves at home. You have to ask yourselves, well, who are they working for? Who are they fighting for?

Who do they think matters? Do you think they are working for you?
He’s not wrong; but there are also lessons there about seed sown on rocky ground, and pearls fed to swine, too.

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Who The GOP Represents

Energy Crisis

It's clear as a sunny day that all the talk from Trump and Republicans about American energy dominance was just a fraud. Nothing but a hollow campaign slogan
The 500 gigawatts less energy in the next decade is pretty much exactly the amount of energy that we're going to need to meet rising demand. We are going to have energy shortages as a result of this legislation.

Energy demand is soaring for the first time in decades, largely, not exclusively but largely because of A.I. data centers. And our best chance of meeting it in the next few years is with wind and solar, not oil and gas, even nuclear and geothermal are going to take awhile.

Addressed to: “Mr. Japan, General Delivery, Japan

Signed: Mr. Art of the Deal, A Very Stable Genius 

💸

Murray: If you think you can look the American people in the face and tell them we have to bring down the debt after passing what might be the most expensive bill in history, if you think you can do that and then be taken seriously, you know what, if you believe that, maybe you are foolish enough to think that zero and a trillion are the same.

I can tell you right now, if this happens we will all laugh you out of the room because we have never seen anything like this, not in my time here in the senate, not in my time on this planet. We are not going to let anyone forget that you're track the rules in order to pass this egregious bill.
These are the additional deficits from tax cuts, starting here in year 2029, 2030, you'll see that they actually do start going down. Why is that? It's because the tax cut that President Trump promised for no tax on tips -- they phase those out.
So we're adding $2 trillion this year, but they're anticipating, the authors of the bill are anticipating adding more than $2 trillion next year. That doesn't sound at all conservative to me and that's why I'm a no.
I still expect the OBBBA to pass, in one form or another. But the GOP will be cannon fodder in the midterms. So there’s always that.

As My Late Father, The CPA, Put It

"A bookkeeper says "1+1=2."
Adopting a current policy baseline in reconciliation would be a dangerous and reckless move, especially given our near-record debt, exploding interest costs, and out-of-control borrowing trajectory. Our deficit is projected to total almost $2 trillion this year, and we’re on course to borrow $22 trillion over the decade before any tax extensions. Any new legislation enacted by Congress should improve that trajectory, not make it worse.

While employing a current policy baseline may be tempting to justify the current tax extensions, it would set a dangerous precedent for future actions. For example, if the temporary measures of the American Rescue Plan had been characterized as current policy, lawmakers could have extended them and added trillions of dollars to the debt with a $0 score.

Adopting a current policy baseline for TCJA extension would allow lawmakers to borrow $4 trillion or more without ever recognizing the impact, and using it in reconciliation would be a clear accounting gimmick to end-run the choices required in budgeting. Remember, the original 2017 tax bill was made to be temporary to keep its reported deficit impact down. Since the impact of extension wasn’t accounted for back in 2017, it needs to be accounted for now.

Pretending the TCJA is permanent now wouldn’t reduce its price tag; it would just hide it. The money still has to be borrowed.

Showing a $0 impact on paper by changing the rules doesn’t actually prevent the $4 to $5 trillion of additional borrowing from taking place. And it doesn’t stop that borrowing from pushing up interest rates, slowing economic growth, and putting our debt sustainability at risk.
An accountant asks: “What do you want it to be?”

The CBO, by the way, says the Senate OBBA would add $3.9 trillion to the national debt. Thune wants to use a current policy baseline to say it won’t. GOP big money donors got to get their ROI.