Wednesday, April 22, 2026

I’ve Been Wondering About This All Day

And while I have you here: Is Trump only responsible for the stuff he makes up?
Developing....(I don’t trust the Iranian government; but neither do I trust Trump.) Every time you think it can’t get any worse…

No. The OG Hoax Is That The Earth Is Round

Go big, or go home. See?

Still The Trump Administration

RFK JR: The study says that the 80% in mortalities from chronic disease that took place in the 20th century—that almost none of it was attributable to vaccination. It was attributable to hygiene, sewer plants, better water supplies, engineering that got oranges—

Sanders: You’re entitled to your view.

RFK JR: That’s not my view. That’s CDC’s view.

Sanders: According to the WHO and scientists all over the world, vaccines have played an enormous role in saving lives.
RFK, Jr. disavows any knowledge of his actions. Sure. Let the Republicans run with that platform. It’s a double super secret.🤫  After all, look what he did in Venezuela. Whatever helps. Why did Virginia vote for redistricting, again? How close are we to the elections in VA? Let’s ask the Supremes if that matters….

“As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person….”

Trump: “A RIGGED ELECTION TOOK PLACE LAST NIGHT IN THE GREAT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA! All day long Republicans were winning, the Spirit was unbelievable, until the very end when, of course, there was a massive ‘Mail In Ballot Drop!’ Where have I heard that before — And the Democrats eked out another Crooked Victory! Six to five goes to ten to one, and yet the Presidential Election in November was very close to a 50-50 split. In addition to everything else, the language on the Referendum was purposefully unintelligible and deceptive. As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person, and even I had no idea what the hell they were talking about in the Referendum, and neither do they! Let’s see if the Courts will fix this travesty of ‘Justice.’ President DONALD J. TRUMP”
Very close to a 50/50 split in November? What’s changed since then? Will the courts “Fix This”? Signs point to: “Are you buggin’?”

The vote was 51/48 (unofficially), which is still very close to a 50/50 split.  Except maybe in “Trump math.” And this was the ballot language:
Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?
Yup. I’m confused.

The Trump Administration

And coal is clean! And windmills kill whales!🐳 
Shaheen: How does insulting our closest ally and neighbor help the businesses in my state and states all across this country who are hurting because of the loss of Canadian business and tourism?

Lutnick: Canada's economy leans on the incredible $30 trillion economy of America.

Shaheen: We have all those Canadian visitors who are not coming because of your comments and comments by the administration. How does that help our economy?

Lutnick: It is outrageous that Canada will not put U.S. Spirits on the shelf.

Shaheen: And they won't do it because of the insults from this president and comments like yours.
"It was meant for the babies of slaves, not the babies of Chinese billionaires.” Babies like Wong Kim Ark? (The distinction is that Ark’s parents were not billionaires.) He also says upholding Wong Kim Ark “will cost America its DIGNITY!” Whatever could he mean by that? 🧐

None Dare Call It Socialism

I still can’t figure out why.

And There Our Troubles Began…Anew….

 Speaking of history….

I stumbled across a Netflix documentary on the “debates” between William F. Buckley and Gore Vidal in 1968.  I remember this as an historical matter, not because I was keenly watching third-rated ABC News coverage of the 1968 conventions when I was 13. The background is, ABC needed to generate a reason for people to watch their coverage of the conventions, and Buckley had established himself as a TeeVee presence on PBS with “Firing Line.” ABC needed someone for Buckley to respond to, and asked him for suggestions. Buckley responded, basically: anybody but Gore Vidal. So ABC responded, quite appropriately: “Let’s get Gore Vidal.” And they did.

And invented the television we now all know and… love?

The advocates of Buckley insist he was the greatest debater of his time. Which makes me more and more dismissive of the concept of debate. James Talarico and Pete Buttigieg are excellent champions of their point of view, because they are very persuasive. Debate is not about persuasion, it’s about scoring points and appealing to the mob, usually via ad hominem. It’s about clever retort, not reasoning; and it’s about having about half the audience on your side before you start. It can work, in limited circumstances, but it usually doesn’t. It just sets everything in quick drying cement. Talarico or Buttigieg leave you thinking. Buckley just left you annoyed or, if you already agreed with him, impressed with his arrogance.

Buckley basically had a position, and insisted against the world and all comers, that his was the correct position. He hated the civil rights movement, (the documentary is about 1968, and I’m no Buckley scholar), probably hated the women’s liberation movement, certainly hated the gay rights movement (in anger at being called a “crypto-Nazi” by Vidal on camera, Buckley calls Vidal a “queer.” And there our media troubles began.), and generally had little regard for anyone who wasn’t an ultramontane Catholic. (I’m sure Leo has Buckley rolling in his grave.)  He actually said once that his purpose was to stand athwart history and yell “STOP!” If that isn’t fascistic, I honestly don’t know what is.

He was not a persuader, in other words. Talarico’s opponents fear him precisely because he is so persuasive. Reason actually is persuasion, when wielded correctly. Buckley never sought to persuade. Buckley merely insisted. His reasoning was, his opinions were right, and that was the end of it.

Vidal, in his own words (in the documentary), was an analyst of power. He thought people weren’t driven by sexual appetite or desire, but by the desire for power. It’s how he explained his thesis in Myra Breckenridge. A book, by the way, Buckley wrote about reading, but dismissed it out of hand. Not after a careful analysis, but just as a matter of personal distaste and a personal refusal to accept that such ideas could even exist in the world.* (There are noxious ideas that shouldn’t exist, but they do. Racism, for example. But if you think you can banish it, you actually just make it harder to recognize. Ideas can’t be killed, or banished.) For Buckley the personal was not just political, it was the only reality. As he thought, so should we all think; and if we didn’t, well, more fool us. In Buckley’s view, as is apparent from his “review” of Vidal’s most famous book, all ideas Buckley rejected should be expunged from the world, as evil. Not just bad or disappointing; actually evil. It is, ironically, a very Manichean vision. (His brother appears in the do, and argues, bizarrely, that more overt racist contemporaries of Bill were “gnostic” in their conservatism.) Vidal’s arguments about the nature, and importance, of power, make a great deal more sense. I don’t mean they are ultimately persuasive, or that Vidal is impressive as a thinker. But Vidal has ideas: Buckley just has a position.

Buckley is largely forgotten these days. His show has been resurrected by Margaret Hoover, who does a much better job being reasonable and seeking insight, than Buckley ever did. He has, like Barry Goldwater, vanished into history; which is ironic because, as the documentary notes, the fall of Goldwater spurred the reactionary movement in American politics which is always present, if sometimes moribund, and has produced the present moment (which is prompting the counter-counterrevolution; but, ‘twas ever thus.). His debates with Vidal really did create the modern media culture Twitter knows and loves to hate (what would we do without CNN’s panel “discussions” to complain about?). Especially because they weren’t debates. But then, we don’t really want those. Exchanges of ideas aimed at achieving some kind of consensus are… dull television. 📺  And, according to Twitter, shouldn’t even be a part of our politics.

But then, unsocial media is a product of the Buckley-Vidal debates, too.


*Buckley could have been insightful and countered the ideas he disliked in the book. Instead, he just discards it. It was, at the time, a very popular book. Telling people they shouldn’t accept its existence, is hardly an argument, much less a debating strategy, for why they should reject it. But Buckley’s “method” was:,if he couldn’t accept it, it was rejected, no further explanation necessary. This is what passed for intelligent debate. Buckley’s supporters didn’t want to listen to Vidal. They didn’t see any reason to bother. This, too, is as American as cherry pie.

Just A Reminder 😈

Yes, Texas did start this. They did it on the basis that Hispanics in Texas were now solidly MAGA. So they created several Hispanic districts, solely on the basis of race, which the Supremes said was just fine, because it was too close to the primary elections for the Court to interfere. 😈

Then came 🧊.😈

Now Texas is stuck with several districts that lump together people who really, really don’t like Donald Trump. And there’s not a damned thing they can do about it.  

BTW, Dan Patrick, the Lite Guv (courtesy of the late, great Molly Ivins), is sounding the alarm that Democrats might take the Lege this November. Which has nothing whatsoever to do with federal redistricting.

ETTD.

😈

“Their Entire Navy Is At The Bottom Of The Sea”

The UK Office of Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) is reporting an attack on container ship this morning in the Strait of Hormuz, 15NM off the coast of Oman, by a gunboat operated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N), resulting in heavy damage to the ship’s bridge. All of the crew onboard the vessel are reported to be safe.
In a notable development, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy (IRGC-N) has said that they seized two vessels, the MSC Francesca and the Epaminodes, in the Strait of Hormuz and brought them back to the Iranian coast. This, as U.S. President Donald J. Trump announced the indefinite extension of the ceasefire just yesterday.
United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) Centre Reported two separate incidents earlier today, likely the MSC Francesca and the Epaminodes, between 8nm and 15nm west of Oman, before the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy (IRGC-N) announced that both vessels were stopped and directed towards Iranian waters.
Is the IRGC wading into the Strait?

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

The Wheels On The Bus Go ‘Round And ‘Round

I should just post this over and over:
Trump said Friday that the Strait of Hormuz situation was "over." It very obviously wasn't.

Trump said Friday that Iran agreed "to never close the Strait of Hormuz again.” The next day, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again.

Trump said yesterday that Vance isn't going to Pakistan for the talks. Officials quickly said Vance is going to Pakistan for the talks.

Trump said this morning that Vance had left and would be there tonight Islamabad time. Officials quickly said Vance is actually leaving tomorrow.

Trump said Iran has no military anymore and that "everything's gone." Iran continues to have a military with destructive capabilities.

Trump said the pope issued a statement saying Iran can have a nuclear weapon. That never happened.

Trump said nobody expected Iran to retaliate against Gulf countries. That was widely expected.

Trump said the only planes the US has really lost in the war have been to friendly fire. He said this at the same event at which he had spoken at length about what happened after Iran shot down a US plane.

Story on the president's ever-growing number of false claims on big and small matters related to the war – and his triumphant claims about supposed Iranian concessions that we just can't assume are based in reality:
Or this one:
Trump on Iran:
2/6-“They want to make a deal badly”
3/2-“They want to make a deal badly”
3/16-“They want to make a deal badly"
3/24-“They want to make a deal badly”
3/25-“They want to make a deal badly”
4/1-“They want to make a deal badly”
4-13-“They want to make a deal badly”
4/14-“They want to make a deal badly”

Todd Blanche Has Always Relied On The Kindness Of Strangers

So that means it’s true? Or does that mean you don’t want your name on this turkey?
REPORTER: Obviously you've read The Atlantic article that's now the subject of a defamation lawsuit

BLANCHE: I absolutely did not read that article

REPORTER: Have you heard any concerns given your supervision over the FBI about any problems with drinking?

BLANCHE: I have a lot of concerns. And my concerns are completely around the anonymous reporting that comes forth constantly
From an article you absolutely did not read? 🤔 Pro tip:  whenever someone asserts “there is no dispute,” it means they very much don’t want to argue about the disputed point. Usually because they can’t. Issues that involve a sitting president suing the government as a private individual, while overseeing a DOJ that Blanche has admitted is there to serve… that individual?  (See why he doesn’t want to argue the dispute?)
REPORTER: Can you say definitively that you have not been intoxicated or absent during your tenure as FBI director?

KASH PATEL: I can say unequivocally that I never listen to the fake news mafia. This FBI director has been on the job twice as many days as every director before me. I've taken half as many days off.
Probably the worst non-answer answer ever offered in public.
Kash Patel: "I'm like an everyday American who loves his country, loves the sport of hockey, and champions my friends when they raise a gold medal and invite me in to celebrate. I've never been intoxicated on the job, and that's why we filed a $250 million lawsuit. Any one of you who wants to participate -- bring it on. I'll see you in court."
How many average Americans can fly to Italy on a government plane and get into the locker room of the Olympic hockey team? Being drunk on the job, alone, is not what the article describes (nice try. That won’t work in court.) The greater concern is your apparent alcoholism and the impact on the security of the nation. See me in court? I’ll be the one silently (respect for the court) laughing my ass off as the court hands you, yours.
REPORTER: Can you explain the computer log in issue? Your lawsuit contends you were not able to log into the system

KASH PATEL: Let's have a survey. How many of you people believe that's true?

REPORTER: Did you communicate with anyone you thought you were fired?

PATEL: It's an absolute lie. It never happened. You are lying.

REPORTER: The lawsuit says the opposite!
The lawsuit as well as the article:
News of his emotional outburst ricocheted through the bureau, prompting chatter among officials and, in some corners of the building, expressions of relief. The White House fielded calls from the bureau and from members of Congress asking who was now in charge of the FBI.
Is the White House lying? Is this all fiction? And how long do you want us to talk about it?
Q: Joe diGenova said 'there's no doubt that John Brennan was the progenitor of this whole counterintelligence investigation.' Isn't there a conflict of interest in having him oversee this investigation?

BLANCHE: I'm not sure what the conflict would be. I just completely disagree with the premise
I guess we’ll see if the courts agree with you. Star chambers are the best way to get done what you want done. I guess.

…not the hole….

Not what Washington is saying:
Talks with Iran have collapsed before they even began.

Iran says it won’t negotiate while the U.S. naval blockade continues—and as Trump keeps threatening strikes on infrastructure. Meanwhile, Trump says he expects bombing to resume once the ceasefire ends.

U.S. forces reportedly boarded another Iranian-linked vessel, escalating tensions even further.

Now, with the ceasefire deadline approaching, Iran is warning it will retaliate if attacked—and planned talks in Pakistan appear dead.

This situation is spiraling fast.
But that doesn’t mean “the situation is spiraling fast.” Nor that Iran is blowing smoke.

Trump’s idea of negotiation is to bellow loudly while crawfishing quietly and calling it “art” and how he makes “deals.”
Yeah; like that.

Talks are definitely off:
But don’t be surprised if Trump gets them back on again. I suspect the UAE’s very public complaint is being echoed more privately by other countries in the region, and Trump is not anxious to give Iran a reason to strike our allies again. Nor is he really oblivious to the pressure from Europe and elsewhere about the continued closure of the Strait. He wants something from Iran to allow him to lift the blockade, but Iran has no reason to give it to him.  Trump, in his favorite metaphor, is running out of cards.

I fully expect him to lift the naval blockade by Friday, as soon as he can figure out a way to claim success. Probably something like saying he won, Iran is coming back to the negotiations….

I wrote (and published) the above, then saw this:
And remembered it was Tuesday: Trump will end the naval blockade before Iran agrees to anything more than a ceasefire.

History Is A Flat Circle The Size Of A Dime

 NYTPitchbot drops the mask:

(1/X) People sometimes wonder how things got so crazy in this country. Well, look back at the '90s: for Clinton impeachment, you had Alan Dershowitz on Geraldo arguing against impeachment and Jon Turley arguing for it. All three of course became Trumpers.

On various topics around feminism...
(2/X) the debate was between Camille Paglia and Naomi Wolf. Also both Trumpers now.

An enormous percentage of the self-promoting gasbags of 90s political/"culutural" tv became Trumpers.

There's a reason why things are so fucked up now.

And just to be clear, all of these people were always crazy assholes. They may have positioned themselves as moderate or liberals or whatever but they were always insane assholes. And they dominated a lot of popular discourse.
"Dominated” is a bit extreme. Who remembers Turley anymore? He was a clown then, too. Dershowitz is a joke (he was once, can you believe it, respected). Paglia had a best seller (which wasn’t that good, or insightful), so that was her 15 minutes. I’m surprised she’s still around; but not that she’s a Trumper.

None of those people were even Elizabeth Warren/AOC  adjacent, so their “turn” is no surprise. They were really just reactionary about things the reactionaries were reacting to. Contrarians for the sake of attention. They never dominated popular discourse, any more than Bill Maher ever has. 

Things are so fucked up now because things are always so fucked up “now.” Trump has a pointless war in Iran. Kennedy/LBJ/Nixon had Vietnam; and a draft that only college students could easily avoid. Guess who went to war? Dogs and water cannons and sadists with state authority went after protesters in the streets. Hell, J. Edgar Hoover was running the FBI and keeping his job by blackmailing any official who dared whisper the question: “Why is he still there?”

A handful of blowhards who would reliably pontificate on TeeVee are the reason we have 2026? Sure; and Trump would have easily won the Vietnam war. Look what he did in Venezuela!

I’ll retire to Bedlam….

I Hate It When Sen. Foghorn Leghorn Makes Sense

Well, When You Put It That Way….

Trump said Friday that the Strait of Hormuz situation was "over." It very obviously wasn't.

Trump said Friday that Iran agreed "to never close the Strait of Hormuz again.” The next day, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again.

Trump said yesterday that Vance isn't going to Pakistan for the talks. Officials quickly said Vance is going to Pakistan for the talks.

Trump said this morning that Vance had left and would be there tonight Islamabad time. Officials quickly said Vance is actually leaving tomorrow.

Trump said Iran has no military anymore and that "everything's gone." Iran continues to have a military with destructive capabilities.

Trump said the pope issued a statement saying Iran can have a nuclear weapon. That never happened.

Trump said nobody expected Iran to retaliate against Gulf countries. That was widely expected.

Trump said the only planes the US has really lost in the war have been to friendly fire. He said this at the same event at which he had spoken at length about what happened after Iran shot down a US plane.

Story on the president's ever-growing number of false claims on big and small matters related to the war – and his triumphant claims about supposed Iranian concessions that we just can't assume are based in reality:
OPINION: Imagine it was someone other than President Donald Trump. Suppose a different leader were posting deranged rants in the small hours, insulting the spiritual leader of 1.3 billion Catholics, threatening entire civilizations with annihilation, and comparing himself to God. What would be the reaction?
I’ve gotta say, having lived through Trump and Covid, this all sounds very familiar.

He’s Done Enough Damage For One Day

It is currently 3.3%. And you’ve won the war with Iran; almost once a week since you started it. And yet…. I guess this is the only way to get Trump on your show.
Trump: "Never allow the Traitor Democrats like Low IQ person Hakeem Jeffries, or Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, or the totally corrupt Fake News Media such as the phony and decaying Wall Street Journal, the Failing New York Times (Subscriptions way down!), or dying '60 Minutes,' to demean or criticize Operation Midnight Hammer, which totally obliterated the Nuclear Dust locations to the point where bloodthirsty Iran has been unable to get to it, or dig it out. Space Force has cameras on every inch of the 3 sites that were so brilliantly hit last June! Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT"
So Iran wasn’t two weeks away from a nuclear device? Or they were nowhere near having one? Which is it?
Trump: "The market is up. We're gonna be at 50,000. That's where we were just a little while ago, and when I hit 50,000 on the Dow, I said, 'Well, I hate to do this to everybody, but I'm gonna have to journey down to a place called Iran.' You want to see a bad stock market? Try blowing up the Middle East."
Totally worth it! Amirite? When it hits 50,000 again, what does he blow up next? South America?
KERNEN: Is there some type of currency swap possible with UAE to help if they need it? And do you think there'd be backlash?

TRUMP: It is. It's been a good country, a good ally of ours. It was shocking because we didn't think they'd get hit. I'm surprised, because they are really rich.
Connect that answer to that question, if you can. Trump has no idea what Keenan is talking about. He’s right, it’s not correct. Wait for it....
SORKIN: There's a whole number of very large companies, including Apple and Amazon, that have not sought reimbursements yet for the tariffs. From what I understand, part of the reason is they're worried about offending you.

TRUMP: I think it's brilliant. They got to know me very well. I'm honored.
Does he think the companies getting refunds (which is just a windfall for them) hate America? And Apple and Amazon, who probably don’t want the negative publicity, are “honoring Trump”? How? How the fuck does that work? He’s done enough damage today, Joe.

Probably Because They Were Completely Unaware Of It

During talks between U.S. and Iranian delegations in Pakistan, the topic of Ukraine unexpectedly came up.

While discussing U.S. guarantees in the event that Iran halts uranium enrichment and abandons the development of nuclear weapons, the Iranian side asked how the United States is fulfilling the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which it pledged to respect and protect Ukraine’s sovereignty.

The U.S. delegation left the question unanswered.
I mean, the negotiating team is Kushner, Vance, and Witkoff. All of them selected by Trump.

It’s ignorance all the way down.

Monday, April 20, 2026

All The Way Down

The full investigative power of the federal government can’t find anything, so we’re going to believe the guy who replaces Powell as the Chair? While Powell is still on the Board, and with the entire Board NOT backing up the lies of the new Chairman? A new Chairman who can’t get approved until January, if then?

And now that you’ve let that plan out of the bag, what are the odds Tillis ever changes his mind? Or that any Trump nominee gets approved? Or that you haven’t just triggered very heavy Congressional oversight of any Trump nominee? Especially if that nominee goes on the Board and starts giving Trump the “evidence” Trump wants? That’ll be as transparent as glass. 
Powell can say that and have credibility. The Chairman of the Fed doesn’t replace the entire Board; or command it. She (or he) is the credible spokesperson for the Board. Destroy that, and what do you have?Now, after this silly outburst, the Trump Fed Chair will have zero credibility. Unless he renounces Trump and all his works, for the sake of the U.S. economy. At least.

Fucking with the Chair of the Fed is when you really start meddling with primal forces. Especially if he remains loyal to Trump.

You guys really aren’t very good at this, are you?

Bold Prediction

According to Al Arabiya, Pakistani Prime Minister Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has asked the U.S. and Iran to extend the nominal ceasefire, set to expire in the next 48 hours, two extra weeks, as both sides find it increasingly hard to find points of convergence that would enable a more long-term ceasefire framework to be implemented. This, as negotiations in Islamabad, Pakistan, set for the next 24 hours continue to shape out.
Trump will take that option.

Who Told Us We Needed AI?🤖

I’m pretty sure I know….

“I Promised Six Weeks To Defeat Iran…”

"...and actually, from the Military standpoint, it was far faster than that.” It will end automatically.

Say What?

Trump v. WSJ:
The Complaint also alleges that President Trump told Defendants that the Letter was a fake before they ran the Article. President Trump argues that this allegation shows that Defendants acted with serious doubts about the truth of their reporting and, therefore, with actual malice. The Court disagrees. To establish actual malice, “a plaintiff must show the defendant deliberately avoided investigating the veracity of the statement in order to evade learning the truth.” Reed, 2025 WL 1874638, at *3. The Complaint comes nowhere close to this standard. Quite the opposite. The Article explains that, before running the story, Defendants contacted President Trump, Justice Department officials, and the FBI for comment. President Trump responded with his denial, the Justice Department did not respond at all, and the FBI declined to comment. In short, the Complaint and Article confirm that Defendants attempted to investigate. The Article also states that the WSJ reviewed the Letter. [ECF No. 35-2]. Accordingly, President Trump’s conclusory allegation that Defendants had contradictory evidence and failed to investigate is rebutted by the Article and is insufficient to establish actual malice. See Michel, 816 F.3d at 704 (holding that plaintiff did not adequately allege malice where record “indicate[d] that the reporters conducted some outreach and engaged in due diligence”).
I would not call that dispositive (for one thing, it’s a trial court opinion, which doesn’t establish precedent).  But I would cite this as an example of where Patel’s suit is likely headed. With a little help from the Complaint. Because this was in The Atlantic article:
The FBI responded with a statement, attributed to Patel: “Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court—bring your checkbook.”
"In short, the Complaint and Article confirm that Defendants attempted to investigate."

I think we’re done, here.

Attacking People v. Attacking Rrpresentations Of People

So this 👇 is out of line, how? Asking for a friend.

What Leo Was Getting At

The vision concerning Judah and Jerusalem that Isaiah son of Amoz saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

2 Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth!
For the Lord has spoken:
“I reared children and brought them up,
but they have rebelled against me.
3 The ox knows its master,
the donkey its owner’s manger,
but Israel does not know,
my people do not understand.”
4 Woe to the sinful nation,
a people whose guilt is great,
a brood of evildoers,
children given to corruption!
They have forsaken the Lord;
they have spurned the Holy One of Israel
and turned their backs on him.
5 Why should you be beaten anymore?
Why do you persist in rebellion?
Your whole head is injured,
your whole heart afflicted.
6 From the sole of your foot to the top of your head
there is no soundness—
only wounds and welts
and open sores,
not cleansed or bandaged
or soothed with olive oil.
7 Your country is desolate,
your cities burned with fire;
your fields are being stripped by foreigners
right before you,
laid waste as when overthrown by strangers.
8 Daughter Zion is left
like a shelter in a vineyard,
like a hut in a cucumber field,
like a city under siege.
9 Unless the Lord Almighty
had left us some survivors,
we would have become like Sodom,
we would have been like Gomorrah.
10 Hear the word of the Lord,
you rulers of Sodom;
listen to the instruction of our God,
you people of Gomorrah!
11 “The multitude of your sacrifices—
what are they to me?” says the Lord.
“I have more than enough of burnt offerings,
of rams and the fat of fattened animals;
I have no pleasure
in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.
12 When you come to appear before me,
who has asked this of you,
this trampling of my courts?
13 Stop bringing meaningless offerings!
Your incense is detestable to me.
New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations—
I cannot bear your worthless assemblies.
14 Your New Moon feasts and your
appointed festivals
I hate with all my being.
They have become a burden to me;
I am weary of bearing them.
15 When you spread out your hands in prayer,
I hide my eyes from you;
even when you offer many prayers,
I am not listening.
Your hands are full of blood!

16 Wash and make yourselves clean.
Take your evil deeds out of my sight;
stop doing wrong.
17 Learn to do right; seek justice.
Defend the oppressed.
Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.
 
18 “Come now, let us settle the matter,”
says the Lord.
“Though your sins are like scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow;
though they are red as crimson,
they shall be like wool.
19 If you are willing and obedient,
you will eat the good things of the land;
20 but if you resist and rebel,
you will be devoured by the sword.”
For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.

21 See how the faithful city
has become a prostitute!
She once was full of justice;
righteousness used to dwell in her— but now murderers!

22 Your silver has become dross,
your choice wine is diluted with water.
23 Your rulers are rebels,
partners with thieves;
they all love bribes
and chase after gifts.
They do not defend the cause of the fatherless;
the widow’s case does not come before them.
24 Therefore the Lord, the Lord Almighty,
the Mighty One of Israel, declares:
“Ah! I will vent my wrath on my foes
and avenge myself on my enemies.
25 I will turn my hand against you;
I will thoroughly purge away your dross
and remove all your impurities.
26 I will restore your leaders as in days of old,
your rulers as at the beginning.
Afterward you will be called
the City of Righteousness,
the Faithful City.”
27 Zion will be delivered with justice,
her penitent ones with righteousness.
28 But rebels and sinners will both be broken,
and those who forsake the Lord will perish.
29 “You will be ashamed because of the sacred oaks
in which you have delighted;
you will be disgraced because of the gardens
that you have chosen.
30 You will be like an oak with fading leaves,
like a garden without water.
31 The mighty man will become tinder
and his work a spark;
both will burn together,
with no one to quench the fire.”

Isaiah 1.

Real wrath of God stuff. And why? Because Israel has turned its back on justice. Not because Israel stopped worshipping God, but because it did not take care of the orphan and the widow and the oppressed. Orphans and widows, here, are both literal, and symbolic: they are people who need help. Justice in the system, the people, the nation, is justice for them. Ignore them, take care of yourself first, and you have blood on your hands. And God does not want your prayers and your rituals and your sacrifices become meaningless. God doesn’t need your prayers and your worship and your praise. What does the Lord require of you? Do justice, love mercy, walk humbly with your God.

Or pay the wages of injustice.

Justice is done to people. Mercy is shown to people. Walking humbly with God means putting people first, by doing justice, by loving mercy. Do this, and you can be the City of Righteousness. Anything less, and you become tinder, and your work a spark.

Dese are de conditions dat prevail.

Isaiah speaks within the terms of the covenant Israel has with God. We can remove that provision, and still see that this truth applies to us. The City of Righteousness is the place of justice, and justice means care for the least among us. It means not having leaders who partner with thieves and who love all bribes and chase after gifts.  We can all see the wisdom in that. The final vision of Isaiah, the apotheosis of this teaching, is an Israel that all the nations will want to learn to emulate. Not by becoming members of the covenant, but by seeing the wisdom of the practical application of justice and mercy applied to the least and the most helpless, which allows us all to live in righteousness.

It is the ultimate inclusion, not exclusion. 

Sunday, April 19, 2026

The Pope REALLY Needs To Stay Out Of Politics

NEW: The families of more than 100 school children killed in the U.S. bombing of an Iranian school have written a letter of gratitude to Pope Leo XIV.

In it, they thank him for being a champion of peace and a voice for their deceased children.

The White House has yet to apologize for the incident.

🧐

And they didn’t even have to meet in Islamabad! It’s magic? 🪄
Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh has stated that no date has been set for the next round of peace negotiations between Iran and the United States, following last weekend’s talks in Islamabad which failed to achieve an agreement, despite claims by U.S. President Donald J. Trump that there would be more direct talks this weekend in Pakistan.

“We are now focusing on finalising ⁠the framework of understanding between two sides. We don't want to enter into any negotiation or meeting which is doomed to fail and which can be a pretext for another round of escalation,” Khatibzadeh told reporters on the sidelines of a diplomacy forum Saturday in Turkey.
Has anyone told Iran?
Iranian state news agency Tasnim has posted a lengthy statement to X describing what Iran sees as continued U.S. preparations to continue the war while publicly stating they are willing to negotiate. The statement goes on to say that Iran is prepared to "abandon restraints" shown in the first phase of the war to unleash "unforgettable hellish hours right from the outset of renewed conflict with America and Israel" while explicitly stating that the Bab al Mandeb Strait, Saudi Aramco facilities, the port of Yanbu in Saudi Arabia, and the city of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates will all enter the conflict.
Or Trump saw that already… Regarding the sagacity of the market, I lived through the ‘80’s being told the market was a great, green god whose wisdom was boundless and needed only to be allowed to operate unfettered, because governments were stupid and the people were sheeple whom the market could better care for. And now we have Polymarket for betting on the and market being stupid enough to continuously take Trump’s blather at face value. The people are not sheeple, but all flesh is grass. And a fool and his money are still soon parted. Trump’s announcement is making more sense all the time.

How “Our BLOCKADE Has Already Closed It!” Is Working Out

So much...winning? Well, that explains that (sort of). But it doesn’t explain this:
WELKER: Why is the US rewarding Russia by extended these sanctions waivers? Russia is working with Iran

MIKE WALTZ: That's oil that was going to market. Now, instead of just going to China, it can go to some of our other allies and partners.

WELKER: It's a reversal of what the Treasury Secretary said on Wednesday
So, in reverse order: a) we’re listening to the bankers, not the people; b) our policy depends on which way the wind blows; c) cheap travel!

Oh, and Trump promising “obliteration,” again.

10 days (by my rough calculation) until Congress has to call it and approve this shit, or order a withdrawal.

57% STRONGLY disapprove of this war.  What will the GOP do…? (Three guesses, first two don’t count.)

Here Come Da 👩‍⚖️

Good luck with that.
I don’t think the suit survives its first encounter with reality.  Like the WSJ libel suit Trump lost, this is likely to be thrown out before discovery can even get started.

And in libel cases, truth is an absolute defense. There’s also that.

“Which Is Strange Because Our BLOCKADE Has Already Closed It!”

U.S. President Donald J. Trump states that his representatives will be leaving soon for Islamabad, Pakistan, to attend the second round of peace negotiations with Iran, expected to take place Monday evening, adding that, “We're offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they take it because, if they don't, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY! They'll come down fast, they'll come down easy and, if they don't take the DEAL, it will be my Honor to do what has to be done, which should have been done to Iran, by other Presidents, for the last 47 years.”
TAPPER: What did you think when President Trump threatened to obliterate the entire Iranian civilization?

ELISE STEFANIK: He was focusing on the Iranian regime. It brought them to the table. We know he has very strong statements when he comes to his tweets

TAPPER: He said 'the entire civilization will die.' It's interesting that a 20 year old on a college campus yelling 'from the river to the sea' is worthy of condemnation, but a presiden--

STEFANIK: *starts talking over Tapper*
STEFANIK: President Trump didn't call for genocide, Jake. You are putting those words in his mouth

TAPPER: 'Your entire civilization will die'?

STEFANIK: It's the terrorist regime, Jake. He's targeting the terrorist regime

TAPPER: You're changing his words!
Not seeing the difference between bombing Iran “back to the Stone Age,” and doing “what has to be done, which should have been done to Iran, by other Presidents, for the last 47 years,” and destroying the civilization; but I’ll have to leave that to the subtler insights of cable TeeVee talking heads.

Whatever happened to “open the fucking Strait you crazy bastards!”? No longer a viable strategy?
Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh has stated that no date has been set for the next round of peace negotiations between Iran and the United States, following last weekend’s talks in Islamabad which failed to achieve an agreement, despite claims by U.S. President Donald J. Trump that there would be more direct talks this weekend in Pakistan.

“We are now focusing on finalising ⁠the framework of understanding between two sides. We don't want to enter into any negotiation or meeting which is doomed to fail and which can be a pretext for another round of escalation,” Khatibzadeh told reporters on the sidelines of a diplomacy forum Saturday in Turkey.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance will lead a delegation, which will once again include Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, for another round of direct peace talks with Iran in Islamabad, Pakistan on Monday, before the current two-week ceasefire is scheduled to end Tuesday, two U.S. officials tell Axios.
Or, you know, not.
According to ABC News, U.S. Vice President JD Vance will not be leading the diplomatic delegation to Islamabad, despite reports from Axios and several other outlets, with President Trump telling Jonathan Karl that the issue is security, the Secret Service couldn’t do it on 24 hours notice. “It’s only because of security. JD’s great.”
Or, you know, not not. Or, you know, not not not.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance will attend the next round of Iran talks in Pakistan along with Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, the White House has told CNN, after President Trump told ABC News that Vance would not be attempting the talks in Islamabad. In response to the conflicting messages over the U.S. delegation, a White House official said: “things changed.”
In a phone interview with morning with Fox News’ Trey Yingst, President Donald J. Trump stated regarding this week’s next round of peace talks with Iran in Islamabad, “If they don't sign this deal, the whole country is going to get blown up,” adding that bridges and power plants will be targeted throughout Iran.
I’m pretty sure the issue here is not “signing the deal,” but both parties keeping to its terms. Blockading the Strait to blockade their blockade is not exactly the terms of the last agreement.