Friday, October 30, 2026

Scheduling For Change

Meanwhile, back in Alaska: Clearly these people need to be thrown off the ballot, and everyone involved put in prison! From Ted’s lips to God’s ear.  (The GOP internals must be fucking brutal!)

Oh, yeah! The big news today!
SCHEDULING CHANGE: Trump rallies in Kansas, Iowa back on, per source familiar "Rallies are BACK ON! President Trump loves his supporters, and in addition to nearly 20 tele-rallies, he will hold back-to-back rallies in Kansas and Iowa on Sunday. No one works harder, fights harder, or loves the American people more than President Donald J. Trump!

The rallies were rearranged for scheduling purposes to accommodate dozens of additional tele-rallies that were recently added to the President’s schedule."
But that Alaska story really hurts Dems!

Well, They Weaponized Their Camera!🎥

ABOLISH ICE!

Connect The Dots

This guy 👆was escorted out of the venue shortly after that incident aired, by the Secret Service. He was there by invitation, he registered under his name, he got through the private security screening at the door.

He’s also hated Trump since the Central Park Five.

I really want to buy this guy a beer 🍻 

But now Trump has cancelled his rallies, and Vance has cancelled one in Minnesota. True, Trump doesn’t seem to be moving the needle (Quelle surprise!). And Vance is a disaster:
They threw this guy out because he wasn’t MAGA. Maybe that’s SOP for political rallies. But it strikes me as reactionary and paranoid.

Tell me again why the NYT story about Peltola (which seems poorly sourced and supported, and irrelevant given the ranked voting system there) is bad for Democrats, but this… 🦗🦗🦗

I’m Pretty Sure Our Long National Nightmare Is Over

 The DOJ sued California because…well, I guess because Trump carried the state in 2024, but California couldn’t admit it.

The DOJ sued California on Oct. 15, minutes after a 48-hour deadline it had given the state to review a list of more than 20,000 voters it called “likely noncitizens.” The list arrived on a thumb drive sent to the Los Angeles County registrar after roughly 5.9 million mail ballots had already gone out. The registrar concluded that the DOJ’s instructions were “legally prohibited” because the government provided no evidence for its claims.

Carter picked apart how the list was built. Homeland Security Investigations bought a California voter file, and it was run through federal immigration data and a third-party analytics platform. The government didn’t reveal until the night before the hearing that the platform was LexisNexis. Carter said the government never disclosed its matching rules, its confidence thresholds, what its “enrichment process” involved, or any error rates.
Because Trump never admits errors!
“The Court cannot conclude that Plaintiff’s process is credible,” Carter wrote. “Given that Plaintiff’s entire claim for relief rests on the sincerity of this allegation, Plaintiff’s lack of credibility weighs against a finding in their favor.”

He also pointed to the DOJ’s track record. The department “has filed at least thirty-one lawsuits in federal district courts across the country seeking complete voter rolls from the States. Out of the twenty-six decided cases, the DOJ has prevailed in precisely zero.”
I'm old enough to remember when the idea that the DOJ could mislead the courts, or not be trusted, was a hurdle the courts could not get over. Trump and Blanche have finally obliterated that obstacle.
The judge found the government likely lacks standing, and that its request would likely violate the National Voter Registration Act’s ban on systematic voter purges within 90 days of an election. He also said any emergency was of the government’s own making. It bought California’s voter rolls in May but waited until mid-October to sue.

“Plaintiff’s theoretical risk of imminent harm is solely due to its own neglect,” Carter wrote.

He warned that naturalized citizens were most at risk of losing their votes. He cited evidence that federal employees were given “only twelve minutes to determine if a subject is a U.S. citizen.”

“It is no surprise that citizens are wrongly identified as noncitizens,” he wrote.

Carter closed with a blunt warning.

“If the Executive can discount votes and threaten an ongoing election due to unproven allegations, then our democracy is in danger,” the judge wrote. “This Court declines to be a party to such process.”
Early voting in Texas ends today. I mention that because all windows to effect this election are closing. Tuesday is the last day. Any challenges to outcomes will require extraordinary evidence, and I would remind you that even the Roberts Court refused to get involved in Trump’s fantasies in 2020. This is the end, my beautiful friend, the end. Trump could drag the DOJ into another challenge in 2028, but it won’t involve him, so why should he?

As the court said in the California case:
“In bringing this lawsuit, the Executive would have this Court believe that it reigns as a sole sovereign,” he added. “But California and its people are sovereign, too.”
We’re all about to learn that lesson, again.

I’ll Retire To Bedlam

 My window on this is admittedly small, but Stephanie Ruhle yesterday morning went on and on about how “2 Dan Sullivans” hurt the Democrats (meaning the national party) because…reasons. 

Everyone ran for their fainting couch, ignoring the fact this issue had been adjudicated by the Alaska courts up to the state Supreme Court, which ruled it didn’t matter how many “Dan Sullivans” were on the ballot.

All that matters is the gossip.

The Republican Party has done this kind of thing hundreds of times for many years using dark money PACs. It’s part of their standard playbook going back decades. Their largest donor has also given out $1 million bonuses to voters. But two Dan Sullivans in AK is the crime of the century because Dems are held to a much different standard.
Following an order from a Travis County judge, the Republican Women’s Caucus (RWC) Fund and a man named John Braun have been identified as the names behind controversial text messages sent to Texans earlier this month purporting to offer resources to transgender students, seemingly confirming widespread speculation that the effort was a Republican political ploy. Some three million mailers containing similar information were also sent.

The revelation, first reported here, comes in the final days of a tight Senate race between Democrat James Talarico and Republican Ken Paxton, whose former impeachment lawyer, Chris Hilton, appeared in court on behalf of the Texas Transgender Student Union (TTSU), a Wyoming-based LLC that was anonymously registered in September and was reportedly behind the mailers that directed readers to the website of the Transgender Education Network of Texas (TENT), a real LGBTQ+ advocacy group that swiftly denied sending the messages or mailers. TTSU said through its attorney in a court filing that the entity “is not going to engage in any further text or mail communications.”

On Tuesday, Travis County District Judge Jan Soifer ordered from the bench oral deposition of a representative of TTSU and denied the organization’s motion to dismiss. Soifer also ordered Infobip, a mass text-messaging company that sent the text messages on behalf of a client, to respond to written questions. Hilton, who represents both TTSU and Infobip’s client, argued that the push to reveal his clients’ identity before the election is politically motivated and would cause harm.
Meanwhile:
Well that was one hell of a closing argument tour by Trump on behalf of candidates. He salivated over men’s body parts, said high gas prices are good because oil companies are making billions, bragged about his ballroom, and said if he gave people $5k they still couldn’t afford to buy dinner at his club.

All Hallow’s Even




Some of my best childhood memories revolve around Hallowe'en.  My mother's youngest sister, the "crazy" aunt who came to our church Halloween party (this was when I was just barely too old to wander the streets at night with the "children"), put on makeup to look like a corpse in a coffin, and then joined us to bob for apples (probably the first time I'd done that, and I found out what hard, wet work it is.  And what absolutely foolish fun.).  Or just the freedom of wandering the streets at night without my parents in tow, joining all the neighborhood kids of the Baby Boom as we walked from house to house in clumps that gathered and broke again, passing stories of where to get the best candy, or the homemade stuff like popcorn balls and caramel apples, stuff always gone by the time you got there, or always from a house several streets over of undetermined location or ill-defined description.  And the story always included that house being "out" by the time you heard of it.  It prepared us for Christmases when we'd have to find the "IT" toy for our kids in an unforeseeable future.  A future that included my wife dressing up in black tights and leotard she wore in high school, to costume herself as a "cat" for our daughter's first Hallowe'en....oh, wait.  You don't need to hear about that one.

That aunt is gone this year, leaving me with the Peanuts Hallowe’en card I can’t send. For some reason I started sending her one in high school, and I kept it up as best I could year after year.  Now last year was the last year. Oddly, this year, I remember that Hallowe’en falls exactly three weeks after my brother’s birthday: October 10.  He’s been gone…5 years now? I should remember, you’d think…and for the over 6 decades I knew him, I never seem to have made the connection between the holiday and his birthday. I remember going out on Hallowe’en evening when we were both young enough, but old enough to escape parental supervision. But his birthday, in my mind, was connected to Columbus Day. I remember childhood Hallowe’ens with him, now more than ever. But I never made that 3-week connection before. Maybe this year it will be the return of my loved ones, as the days shorten and the nights deepen.

All the internet bluster about Hallowe'en and Samhain from years back seems to have faded now, as well as the business of Hallowe'en being "stolen" from "ancient practices."  Most of that is echoing remnants of the early 19th century, Romanticism turning into Victorianism.  It was the Romantic movement that began to preserve "folklore," as it came to be called.  "Came to be" not because it was illegitimate, but because it was ignored and despised before the Romantics, who saved it but didn't revive it.  The Victorians then supercharged it, along with fuzzy memories of medieval Europe.  Most of the ghost stories and "monsters" we know now (vampires, werewolves, ghosts, goblins, even witches) are products of the Victorian imagination, not remnants of stories told around campfires 3 millenia ago.  The Victorians tried to link them to an imagined past in order to make them "authentic" in a risingly scientific age, but the connections are horseshit.  Most of those stories are distinctly "modern." Frankenstein was a product of the Romantic beginning of the 19th century; Dracula came out of the late Victorian era, and is a novel at great pains to place itself in its contemporary setting by including what was then cutting edge technology to tell the story. But it’s told in the epistolary style of the novels of the…late 18th century. The 19th and early 20th centuries are the great era of our most prized ghost stories including, of course, the stories by Edgar Allan Poe (a man under-appreciated for his narrative gifts, and over-appreciated for his few poetic ones).

Poe's stories were “modern,” most of them conveniently set in a Europe of an indeterminate age when people dressed in what is now costume and ran around in castles and buildings that look more like something from a Disney theme park than reality.  (We hadn’t yet come to Twain’s Realism.) And Poe was writing those in the mid-19th century, in America. Again, the connection to an imagined past gave the stories the verisimilitude they required.

So most of our Hallowe'en is a matter of memory and conjecture, and the stories we tell ourselves.  But it isn't rooted in some "truth" we destroyed with our "enlightenment" or our "progress."  That Romantic nostalgia prompted by the Industrial Revolution which drove us to protect “folklore” became the “truth” we imbued those stories with, the “wisdom” our “modern” era lost. As with most things, our "truth" about these matters is what we say it is.

Hallowe’en began as the vigil for All Saints Day, making it the most well-known vigil for a feast day outside of Christmas Eve. Holy Saturday is the vigil for Easter, still the proper day of the Great Vigil, which can be the most powerful liturgy in Christianity. Literally speaking, Holy Saturday is Easter Eve. But popularly, we know only two vigils, and the only service widely known now is the Candlelight Christmas Eve Service, itself moved back from midnight to evening, the better to get us home early and away from church on Christmas Day, even on Sunday. 

Don’t get me started.

So Hallowe’en is actually the vigil for All Saint’s. But we’ve forgotten that.

All Saint's Day, per New Advent, started in...well, here, let me just give you the whole magilla:

In the early days the Christians were accustomed to solemnize the anniversary of a martyr's death for Christ at the place of martyrdom. In the fourth century, neighbouring dioceses began to interchange feasts, to transfer relics, to divide them, and to join in a common feast; as is shown by the invitation of St. Basil of Caesarea (379) to the bishops of the province of Pontus. Frequently groups of martyrs suffered on the same day, which naturally led to a joint commemoration. In the persecution of Diocletian the number of martyrs became so great that a separate day could not be assigned to each. But the Church, feeling that every martyr should be venerated, appointed a common day for all. The first trace of this we find in Antioch on the Sunday after Pentecost. We also find mention of a common day in a sermon of St. Ephrem the Syrian (373), and in the 74th homily of St. John Chrysostom (407). At first only martyrs and St. John the Baptist were honoured by a special day. Other saints were added gradually, and increased in number when a regular process of canonization was established; still, as early as 411 there is in the Chaldean Calendar a "Commemoratio Confessorum" for the Friday after Easter. In the West Boniface IV, 13 May, 609, or 610, consecrated the Pantheon in Rome to the Blessed Virgin and all the martyrs, ordering an anniversary. Gregory III (731-741) consecrated a chapel in the Basilica of St. Peter to all the saints and fixed the anniversary for 1 November. A basilica of the Apostles already existed in Rome, and its dedication was annually remembered on 1 May. Gregory IV (827-844) extended the celebration on 1 November to the entire Church. The vigil seems to have been held as early as the feast itself. The octave was added by Sixtus IV (1471-84).

So, mid-9th century, it got set as a date on the Church's calendar.  That led, later, to All Soul's on November 2.  The connections to Ireland, especially jack o' lanterns (turnips in Ireland, only after a long period exclusively pumpkins, which are as American as corn and tobacco) didn't really come until the 19th century.  Attempted connections between the Irish Samhain and All Saint's are all pretty much retrojection, especially as an attempt to connect Hallowe'en to Irish practices it supposedly overtook. Gregory was a long way from Ireland in the 9th century and Christianity only reached the island in that century.  It's a pretty small tail wagging a pretty large dog to imagine Gregory picked the date for the entire church just to appeal to an Irish pagan festival. I think Patrick was the better evangelist to the island.

The vigil that became Hallowe’en appears in the literature as early as Shakespeare, where the practices of the Roman church were slowly being turned Anglican; but that's another story.  Curiously, most of the literature on Hallowe'en begins in the late 18th century with Robert Burns in Scotland (call it Pre-Romanticism. Burns was just writing about what he knew, but accepting it and recognizing it, was down to the Romantics). Hallowe’en literature continues in the early 19th century with Walter Scott.  It jumps the pond to Washington Irving's story of Ichabod Crane, where Disney (?; or someone before them) transforms the pumpkin into a jack o' lantern, which made the tale into a Hallowe'en story.  It’s a grand irony that the persecution of single women and elderly widows in 16th century Puritan Salem became inextricably connected to Hallowe’en by Disney, too (“Hocus Pocus”). Thus do we domesticate our worst history and invent our monsters. 👹 

And then we get Poe.  The iconic black cat 🐈‍⬛ of Hallowe'en decorations arguably stems from Poe's story of the same name.  By Poe's time, of course, especially in Puritan tinctured America, the holiday has nothing to do with the Roman Catholic vigil. Poe never set any story at Hallowe’en, and as late as 1937 Edith Wharton sets her last ghost story (she wrote several) on the eve of All Saint’s without ever mentioning the word “Hallowe’en.” But we’ve found great value ($) in doing it in the past half-century, so that now it rivals Xmas Eve and whets our consumer appetite for the year’s end.

Interestingly, the Aztecs and Mayans (and even less remembered groups in Mexico) had festivals honoring the return of the dead.  I can't say for sure the dates of the observances didn't shift after Christians changed the culture, but George Frazer found the Irish expecting the return of the dead around the end of October, which makes sense as people left the fields (farmers first, herdsman as it got too cold finally for the herds) and went indoors to survive the winter.  Thinking of those lost is a likelier custom as winter sets in, especially in Europe.  It seems to be have been as true in tropical Mexico, where the current Dias de los Muertos has very distinct roots in the culture of Mexico.  Many of the practices of the days extend into pre-colombian times, including the idea that the children who have departed return on November 1, the adults on November 2.  Did they adopt the Catholic dates?  Maybe.  It is certainly a festival that is far more "pagan" than it is "Christian."  Not that there's anything wrong with that!

I noted one year long ago now, that there's still no concerted "War on Hallowe'en," even as Hallowe’en has become more and more an adult celebration. (I’ve also had reason to notice that Hobby Lobby starts selling Xmas and (less so) Thxgiving merchandise in September; but ignores Hallowe’en altogether. It’s an interesting lacunae for a store that sells Marvel superhero merchandise, and jigsaw puzzles with scenes from “National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation.” Their tolerance for Xmas merchandise makes up for the dearth of Hallowe’en merchandise. I suspect the owners refuse to truck with demons and devilry. Even if it only means selling Spider-Man costumes for little kids.) The idea that the vigil marks the “thin place” where the dead and the living can meet and walk together is, in this post-Victorian world, sadly turned into a time of terror, not comfort. Dias de Los Muertos is a time of celebration because the dead, the loved ones we have lost, are again close to us. Hallowe’en is a time of terror, because the dead are again close to us. We used to visit graveyards and put them near the churches we’d visit at least once a week. Now we avoid cemeteries because they remind us our death is inevitable. 

I doubt the vigil of All Saint’s started as a night of deepest darkness to be dispelled by the light of day, as in Fantasia’s “Night on Bald Mountain.” (The roots of modern Hallowe’en show in that depiction of Walpurgisnacht. The “thin time” from Irish culture that brought back the beloved ancestors, now brings back the demons. And corresponds to the Ancient Greek idea of the balance of opposing forces: chaos and logos. It’s truly superstition, and ironic because the Puritans denounced such ideas, and now their religious descendants are terrified by them all over again. Such, as Carroll observed, is human perversity.) I’m sure like Christmas Eve, the vigil was looking forward to the feast day, anticipating one of the joyous feast days of the year. There’s a reason it’s one of two popular vigils, even as both are now almost wholly divorced from their religious roots. The popular explanation today is that we like to be scared at least once a year. But scared of what? The dead? The reminder of our mortality? Of the evil people (and only people) do?  Of the memories of our loved ones? Or the example of the saints?

I have lamented the changing face of Hallowe'en. (Pro tip:  when you can link to posts that are over 15 years old, you've been at this too long.)  I have layered Hallowe'en into the more important rituals/holy days of our modern American calendar.   I still think some reasonable connections can be made there.  But I’m more inclined to see Hallowe’en as the gateway to Advent, making it the first of the many “eves” that line up as gateways to the days after, from October to February. Our dreary months, that we learned long ago to find reasons to lighten. I've commented on the "razor blades in apples" stories, though I think the reference there (to a Salon article, of all things) is less reliable than other information I have which provides a more specific date to the origin of all those stories.

As I said, one of the earliest full mentions of Hallowe'en and its attendant celebrations is the poem by Robert Burns that I've posted before on October 31.  I'll continue that tradition this year.  Consider this just prelude, as Hallowe'en itself is prelude to All Saint's which, I would argue, is prelude to the end of Pentecost (the season of, I mean), and in that way preparation, itself, for Advent.  And then Christmas and Epiphany, the preparation for Lent; which is the preparation for…

But there I go, getting ahead of myself again.

Mostly, Hallowe'en is for fun.




Thursday, October 29, 2026

Every Twitter Tells The Story

Kamala Harris: These folks cut Medicaid by $1 trillion. Medicaid covers half the births in America through the health care resources it provides. Medicaid provides the majority of maternal health care in America.

They cut SNAP benefits. SNAP benefits are to feed hungry children, to help make sure our elders don’t go hungry.

Yet these are the same hypocrites who walk around talking about their family values. And they think we’re not paying attention.

Election time is it time to let them know: We’re too busy watching what you’re doing to listen to what you’re saying.
He ran into the tape. And fell down. Ending the day on an up note.

Warrior Mentality

Right. And everything is just fine. Newsmax turns on Paxton.

Nobody Knows How To Do It Like He Does

Trump In South Carolina

That’s Michigan (Ilhan Omar Texas (Talarico). Muchigan again. Some kind of reference to the GOP Senate candidate.

Insert Coin, Pull Handle

Receive reply below.

North To Alaska

On the ballot, “Dan” is listed as “(Registered Republican, incumbent).”
In new court filing, Justice Dept defends its unprecedented suit seeking to block certification of next week's Senate race in Alaska

They claim the presence of a second candidate named "Dan Sullivan" will "mislead"

Filing: "Mr. Sullivan’s presence on the ballot threatens to mislead Alaskan citizens who want to vote for Senator Sullivan. Some supporters of Senator Sullivan likely will inadvertently vote for Daniel J. Sullivan"

Here's the ballot.. what do you think?
If you’re still confused, consult JD Vance: Who clearly thinks you’re an idiot.

I Want To Buy This Man A Beer 🍻

Yale Law School Is So Proud

JD Vance on ranked choice voting: "I don't understand it. It seems to me that you have an election, the person who wins the most votes should win. That seems to be not what happens with ranked choice voting. The fact that it's so confusing to a person who pays pretty close attention to politics I think suggests we should do our elections in, like, the normal way."
🤦‍♂️

Like A Snot Rag?

Or is God that angry with us?

First Rule Of Demons 😈

New in PN: The GOP’s endless culture war slop is a sign of desperation

"Republicans are offering a slop buffet because Trump ruined the economy and they have no policy achievements to tout. So they chose instead to demonize anyone who deviates from how white, male, Christians look, act, think, or pray, even if the demons must be invented."
And I don’t mean this in a theological or metaphysical sense, but in the psychological one:

Demons always have to be invented. It’s the way we try to escape responsibility.

“All The Gossip That Fits”

The NYT is so desperate to find an October surprise they bury the lede:

1) The staffer retracted her statement.

2) The staffer was a fired disgruntled employee.

3) They stuff this line in the article:

"Ballot-stacking tactics are common in politics and generally considered legal — and have been employed by both parties in Alaska."
That would be like this:
Seriously NYT?

"Last week, as The Times prepared to publish this article, Ms. Rios, who had been planning to file a wrongful termination lawsuit against the Peltola campaign, contacted The Times and said she wanted to take back her previous statements.

“As discussed on our call earlier today, I am confirming that I have retracted all statements made regarding the 2026 Alaska Senate Race in connection with any article you may or may not be writing,” Ms. Rios wrote. “I am not willing to be a source for any story in any capacity.”

It is rare for a source to seek to retract comments made in previous interviews, and The Times’s standards do not obligate reporters to comply with such requests. The Times had never agreed that those previous interviews could not be published, and informed Ms. Rios last week that they would be a part of this story."
Deja vu all over again:
But some Alaska voters said the Times report did little to change their views.

Keven Kleweno, a registered Republican planning to vote for Peltola, said he was unsurprised by the news, given Republicans’ prior claims of Democratic involvement in Dan J. Sullivan’s campaign.

“That's nothing that we haven't heard before,” he said.

But at the same time, he suggested that Elisa Rios, Peltola’s former campaign manager who spoke to the Times about the campaign’s involvement, was a disgruntled ex-employee who “didn’t like being laid off.”

“I just feel it's another way to, you know, slander Peltola and try to make sure Dan worthless Sullivan is reelected,” he said.
And maybe voters in Alaska ain’t that stupid:
Adam Lees of Anchorage is registered nonpartisan and supports Peltola. He said his opinions of the Senate race were already “mostly baked in.” Still, he said, the reported effort to stack the ballot is “not the best look.”

“It does give — I think as some of the kids would describe it — icky vibes,” he said. “But at the same time, I think voters are intelligent and can figure out how to rank and can figure out which Dan Sullivan is their person.”

Amber McClelland, a registered Democrat and former Libertarian living in Anchorage, said she agreed. Politics wasn’t always this “dirty,” she said — recruiting a candidate just to draw votes away from an opponent “should not be a thing.”

“It's kind of messed up,” she said. “But in the past, Republicans have done everything that they can do to win, including cheat.”
It really is a different world in the largest state:
In Petersburg, residents who have known Dan J. Sullivan for decades had a hard time reconciling the picture the Times painted with the man they know. Erica Kludt-Painter said she doesn’t believe he worked behind the scenes with the Democrats to stack the ballot.

“I just don't see him being involved in a national conspiracy,” she said. “I'm sorry, I just don't. I know him to be a man of integrity who cares about his community and the people in it.”

Petersburg Vice Mayor Jeigh Stanton-Gregor said the community knows Dan J. Sullivan is a man of “high character,” and he doesn’t see the Times story changing anyone’s opinion of him. He said he was disappointed in the article.

“I just wish at this stage of the game, the New York Times was talking about substantive issues that really impact people in Petersburg's lives and Alaskans' lives, whether it be gas prices, foreign wars, etc,” he said. “Things that have real-world consequences, as opposed to a distant three- or four-place candidate.”

D.J. McBride, an independent voter living in Willow planning to vote for Peltola, was taken aback by the suggestion that Alaskans couldn’t distinguish the senator from the retired teacher.

“Both sides play pretty dirty pool, and if you're stupid enough that you can't tell the difference between an incumbent and a non-incumbent, I don't have any patience for you,” she said. “Alaskans are smarter than that.”
Real news, v. gossip. The NYT tradition continues. 

And about that confusing ballot:
Icing the cake. And the real elephant in the room:

Once A Year Is (Still) Biblical 🎃

 My brother-in-law was over the other night. He often is these days. He’s eight years older than my wife; he was away to adulthood while she was a young girl, and we get to know each other more and more these days. We’re both in our 70’s now, he at one end, the Lovely Wife and I at the other. So we fell to talking about “the way things were,” as old people are wont to do. He argued that there were once social rules, and being ex-Green Beret, he used the military as his example. In the military, he said, the same rules apply to everyone. I didn’t point out that, under the UCMJ, the general gets much more deference than the private; and today, especially, the SOD (which the military is properly under, the SOD being a civilian), the rules have been tossed in a shredder as Hegseth fires general officers right and left. It’s a hegemonic move not unlike the white, male privilege he and I grew up under. Although we learned that hegemony as harmony, and Hegseth wields it to hide his weakness; much like the man who appointed him. My brother-in-law is an interesting (and not unusual) mix of conservative political values, and yet fully aware of the injustices done by white hegemony and economic power. Aware of it, and concerned by it. So this wasn’t an argument with a drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. It wasn’t an argument at all. He acknowledged his contradictions, even as he didn’t see any way to resolve them. I sympathize. It took seminary and years of work to change my self enough to eliminate some of the contrary. Even then, it was my adult daughter who pointed out she walked through a world of dangers (from sexual harassment to threats of assault) that I simply didn’t live in. It’s very hard for me to see such worlds; but I have to work to. There is always another perspective than that of the straight, white, middle class heterosexual male. And it’s hard to realize that perspective shouldn’t be normative.

Like other things we take for granted, such as the experiences of our youth. We talked about Hallowe’en as we remembered it. But we didn’t think about this:

Maybe it’s the corn syrup talking, but to me, Halloween will always be the quintessential American holiday. The Fourth of July and Thanksgiving don’t come close. Plenty of countries, dictatorships included, commemorate their nation’s founding and designate evenings to spend with relatives. Halloween is a night when kids visit strangers, people with no blood ties and no debt to their family, and receive gifts with no obligation in return. It is an exercise in civic trust, a belief in one’s neighbors regardless of religion, creed or political party. It’s a cheesy, cheery, schmaltzy, “Brady Bunch” optimism. My family and countless others have crossed oceans for it.
That’s the perspective of a young boy, a Russian immigrant, on his first Hallowe’en. So, add to my categories above, “American.” Growing up American, it never occurred to me that Hallowe’en was an act of civic trust. I know there’s “trunk or treat” parties, now, and the distinctly suburban neighborhoods of my childhood are not common even here in Houston. My street is a passageway. The street I grew up on was traveled only by neighbors. For three years after we moved here, we lived in a parsonage next to the church, on a busy four lane road. The nearest neighborhoods were miles down the road. We drove my daughter to friends’ neighborhoods. We certainly couldn’t let her walk out the front door, as I did when I was her age. Today there are barely any children in our neighborhood. We don’t buy candy, because no one comes to take it. But if they started up again, if children moved to the neighborhood, we’d open the door to them, without hesitation.  “Trick or treat!” 🎃

It occurs to me that the two great civic occasions in America are founded on Xian holidays (holy days), but they are both exercises in civic trust. Xmas may be uncomfortable, even oppressive, to non-Xians, but the secular observance has nothing to do with Xianity. Maybe the Xmas tree is the ancestor of the Paradeisbaum from German passion plays, but who is really aware of that? The shapes and sizes and colors that go up in public, from trees to abstract streamers wrapped around a missing cone, are simply symbols of a public holiday. Is Santa Claus really St. Nicholas, or just a jolly old elf in a red coat? Separated entirely from Epiphany, gifts on Xmas morning are practically a private, civic duty. The culture tells us to never disabuse children of the “truth” about Santa, and even if we never fully live up to it, once a year it’s another civic creed that it is better to give than to receive. If any of this is oppressive to non-Xians, it isn’t meant to be. The season is so secular everyone is invited to join, and almost nobody wants to go to church when Xmas is on a Sunday (except the Catholics, who started it. The religious descendants of the Puritans who banned Christmas now, more often than not, close church that one Sunday every seven years or so.) Thanksgiving is purely secular, but private (Christmas morning is, too). July 4th, especially in these times, could easily be jingoistic and mean, when “patriotism” is confined to “true patriots,” which may not include you. But Xmas? That’s the season (a whole month!) when we’re supposed to open our hearts and welcome the stranger and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. Or at least think about doing it. As Charles Dickens so famously put it:
"At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge," said the gentleman, taking up a pen, "it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and Destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir."
Dickens wouldn’t recognize our Xmas celebrations at all; but he’d recognize that we still pay attention to that sentimen, and still try to apply it at least one month in the year.

Hallowe’en is not as big as that;  but maybe that makes it the gateway to Xmas; a smaller civic celebration that really is an act of civic trust, to get us ready to open our doors to friends (for parties), and, at least a little bit, to strangers, to whom we offer a bit more than candy. Every year I get appeals, starting in October, from charities pointing out that Xmas is coming. It’s the time of year we are expected, and expect, to give.

As the Russian immigrant said, reflecting on his childhood and his then confused grasp of English:
Triko-reet once a lifetime was very good. Triko-reet once a year was biblical.
Hallowe’en is when we open our doors, no longer to waits and a’soalers seeking free holiday treats, then to children seeking a bit of free candy, or, if they are very lucky, a homemade popcorn ball. We have just displaced the Yuletide practice four weeks, and are showing charity to children. Not because the first day of Dias de Los Muertos is for the return of the dead children, but…why not? We can make of our holidays what we will.  Instead of cursing the darkness, light a candle!🕯️ Preferably in a jack o’ lantern. 🎃

Our late year eves are the connectors between our civic holidays. Even Mardi Gras is the day before Ash Wednesday. Hallowe’en (Walpurgisnacht in “Fantasia”) gives way to All Saints; Xmas Eve yields st midnight to Xmas Day (“Christ is born, Christ is born, Christ is born,” whispered among the believers); New Year’s Eve to New Year’s Day; and Mardi Gras stops dead at midnight, yielding to Ash Wednesday and the preparation for Easter. All of these eves mean something to us, and the effect is cumulative. We celebrate Easter, but not like Mardi Gras. We celebrate July 4th, but not like Hallowe’en. It starts at Hallowe’en, and ends at Ash Wednesday, and we don’t do anything closely similar to those 12 or so weeks the rest of the year. The eves are the gateway to the great celebrations, and have become the great celebrations themselves. Are these things good, or bad? “what do I know, except what everyone knows - /if there when Grace dances, I should dance.”

Surely Grace is dancing in the season of our eves. And if Grace dances, we should….

Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Will The “Truth” Exceed 1300 Words?

Abdul El-Sayed: “We are being actively bullied by the dumbest people in the room. Donald Trump is an idiot. He has one genius which is getting attention. Because his dad never gave him enough, because he was a nepo baby, he craved attention and used the bullying tactics to get it. But the man is an idiot. Just a fool”
Will there even be a response at all?

Vivek Ramaswamy Didn’t Give One Thought To This Possibility

He still doesn’t. Neither do Trump or Vance.

Act accordingly.

Remembering John Kennedy’s Presidential Campaign

I grew up among people who didn’t think Catholics were Christians. Not like they were.

Our Long National Nightmare Is Over

OBAMA: I heard Trump when I joked over the weekend that he's got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory. I am the father of two daughters. Do you think I could have survived their childhood without going to the Cheesecake Factory. That was my jam for a decade.
OBAMA: The White House even called the Secretary of the Treasury. This is the man who is in charge of the economy—they told him he should. Hold a press conference in front of The Cheesecake Factory. He happens to be a former hedge fund manager worth half a billion dollars, and he was out there in front of the Cheesecake Factory explaining how he ordered the delicious French dipped cheeseburger.
(Which I still think is an abomination before the Lord. God respects the cheeseburger 🍔 more than that.)
OBAMA: I inherited this major financial crisis. I never called my Treasury Secretary and said, “You've got to go to Arby's. Order roast beef. No cheese though that may look elitist.”

They don't have solutions to actual problems, so they'd rather have the media and you talking about the Cheesecake Factory.
Meanwhile...

“Three Generations Of Imbeciles Is Enough!” Again.

 Crime a problem? Try the Final Solution!

Last week, one of the department’s top prosecutors argued that, in the pursuit of cracking down on criminals, eugenics could be a useful tool.

The prosecutor in question was Ellis Boyle, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Boyle was appearing on a local conservative livestream, NC Chats, to discuss—among other things—the administration’s investigation of Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as the indictments of a handful of noncitizens for having allegedly voted illegally in the 2024 elections in North Carolina. Eventually, however, the conversation turned to crime, the supposed enabling of it by liberals, and how frustrating it is to see violent criminals get off on an insanity defense.
Let me stop here to say that no one “gets off” on successful application of the insanity defense.  The convicted is consigned to a mental healthcare facility. No one walks away scot-free for asserting an insanity defense.
“I’ve suffered with PTSD for most of my life,” host Cassie Clark said in the October 21 episode. “I also disassociate with it whenever it hits real bad. And you know what I’ve never done? I’ve never hurt anybody. Not one single time. It’s never even crossed my mind to hurt anyone, even at the worst of it, because I know right from wrong.”

Boyle seemed persuaded.

“What I’ve observed is, you know—it occurs to me, and this is not a new thought, I heard someone else say it, and I started looking, and if you look, you see it,” he replied. “Five percent of the population cause 90 percent of the crime.”

So far, so whatever—it’s true that most violent crimes are carried out by a proportionally small segment of the population. But Boyle didn’t stop there:

I think there’s a big component—if you took out [the] 5 percent of the population that’s bad and removed them from society, so they don’t create mayhem and create, you know, babies with the gene pool of more bad, then I think, in two, maybe three generations, think of how great this population would be.

“But,” he finished, “that’s something that takes willpower.”
Would we apply this to the Trumps? Why not? And who decides who the “5%” are? And do we forcibly sterilize them? Again?

We’ve done this before, you know. Pretty sure we’re not going to do it again. Not after the Nazis took our eugenics laws and created the Holocaust. But that’s what Boyle wants to do again.

The DOJ is going to be the new Augean stables.

Old Man Shouts At Clouds 🌧️

Trump: "It has just been determined that the Democrats in Alaska illegally searched for, and recruited, a man named Dan Sullivan to run against our distinguished Republican Senator, Dan Sullivan, in order to defraud, confuse, and obfuscate the Election, thereby taking votes away from the REAL Senator, Dan Sullivan. The New York Times reports that, 'Democrats have insisted they have nothing to do with the other Dan Sullivan on Alaska’s Senate ballot. But aides with the Mary Peltola campaign and DSCC were part of a monthslong secret plan to recruit him to run — as well as other candidates.' The Democrats’ false statements were made under oath in Federal Court. Therefore, they perjured themselves, and should be liable for very serious consequences. Mary Peltola should suffer the Legal and Political consequences for what she has done, A FRAUD ON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, and Dan Sullivan should be allowed to run without either Mary Peltola or FAKE Dan Sullivan on the Ballot. President DONALD J. TRUMP"
It has not ”been determined,” it has been reported. By the NYT, the same paper that missed most of Watergate, credulously reported on Whitewater (the corruption in Arkansas that led to the Lewinsky stuff), and swallowed “WMD” in Iraq hook, line, and sinker. Remind me, did they ever find any?

Did Peltola recruit Sullivan? SO FUCKING WHAT?

Statements were made in Federal Court under oath? When? There was a case in state court, but I don’t know how Peltola campaign workers can be hailed into the newly filed federal case before the Court has heard arguments for dismissal for failure to state a cause of action. (And false statements don’t = perjury, especially when your evidence us the NYT.)

And will someone please explain to the dunderhead in the Oval Office what “fraud” is. He’s committed enough of it, he ought to know by now.
The law of “DEMOCRATS ARE UNFAIR!!” (Trump’s DOJ can’t even make a civil case out of this.) That, and he really thinks he’s got something with this “perjury” claim. (No, those aren’t scare quotes. This isn’t perjury.) Then he had to beat that dead horse one more time, perhaps expecting it to finally get legs: Again, not election fraud. Not even close. As for “lying to the court,” is he switching to the state case? Probably not, but the Peltola campaign doesn’t have a dog in either court fight (the finished state one, or the nascent federal one).  Those cases go to the state authority responsible for ballots. I can’t imagine a reason a representative of the Peltola campaign would testify in the state court proceedings. And I’m quite sure Trump hasn’t read whatever trial court transcripts went up on appeal, looking for evidence of “cheating.” This is just an old man shouting at clouds because he didn’t get his vanilla pudding at the evening meal in the home.

His DOJ has no grounds, nor mechanism, to disqualify Peltola or Sullivan. Blanche has admitted as much:
What he’s asking for is an advisory opinion. Courts don’t do advisory opinions. DOJ can come back after the election, when (if) they have valid grounds for a valid (legal) concern. That’s right. So far, they don’t have anything.

Maybe Peltola’s campaign did it, and it’s dirty politics. But even Trump recognizes it isn’t really criminal, because he keeps trying to shoehorn it into a perjury charge. And that’s because he watched too many fake courtroom dramas for too many years. Yes, he’s “threatening serious consequences.” But his threats are as empty as his head.

Lubbock Or Leave It

In the late ‘70’s, as the ‘60’s were finally ebbing, and Willie and Waylon and the boys were starting up “outlaw country music” in Austin, the phrase in that title was a play on the ‘60’s bumper sticker “America: Love It or Leave It.” The joke was that Lubbock was a redneck oasis everyone wanted to leave anyway. The phrase usually concluded with: “Last one out, please turn off the light.”💡 

Trump was in Lubbock when Talarico was. He drew about 4000 attendees. Trump brags about his overflow whether it’s there or not. Talarico had lines stretching several blocks. The campaign had to change venues to accommodate them. In Lubbock: a ruby red city in a ruby red area of a ruby red state.

Or is it, now? 🤔

The Sky Is Falling! The Sky Is Falling!

So, here’s what happens when a new Congress begins, in rather excruciating detail:

Although no officers of the House will have been elected when the House first convenes, officers from the previous Congress perform certain functions. The previous Clerk of the House calls the House to order and presides over the chamber until the Speaker is elected and sworn in. In the absence of the Clerk, the Sergeant at Arms performs this duty.

After the Clerk calls the Representatives-elect to order, the Chaplain offers a prayer. The Clerk leads the Members-elect and their guests in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. The Clerk then directs a reading clerk to call the roll of all Members-elect to establish that a quorum is present. In current practice, the roll is not called by a clerk; rather, the Members-elect record their presence by inserting their official voting cards (obtained prior to or on opening day) in the chamber's electronic voting machines. Once the call of the roll is completed, a majority having registered their names, a quorum (218, if no vacancies) is indicated. This action fulfills the requirements of Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution that a quorum be present to conduct business.

The Clerk then announces the election of the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico (when applicable, since the Resident Commissioner's term is four years) and of the Delegates—one person from the District of Columbia and one person from each of the territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. The Clerk also reports any deaths or resignations since the election.

A quorum being present, the first order of official business is the election of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Election of the Speaker

The candidates for Speaker are nominated from the floor by the leaders of their respective parties. Traditionally, there is one candidate from the majority party and one from the minority party, selected by the Republican Conference and the Democratic Caucus at their early organizational meetings. Individual Members-elect may place other names in nomination. Nominations are followed immediately by a "viva voce" roll-call vote, that is, a vote in which the Members-elect respond orally to the calling of their names. In this vote, the Members-elect call out the last name of their choice for Speaker when their names are called by a reading clerk. The Clerk appoints Members-elect to serve as majority and minority tellers, usually two each, to ascertain the vote. The Speaker is elected by a majority, not a plurality, of votes cast by Members-elect. So long as nearly all the majority party's members vote for its candidate, the majority party can assure its candidate's election because the vote is likely to be almost exclusively along party lines. The candidates themselves, however, sometimes vote "present" or do not vote.
You can see all of that assumes an accepted set of new representatives, which includes re-elected incumbents, and the newly elected. They are all, at this point, “new.”But certification precedes seating the new Congress:
Importantly, certification is not optional; it is mandatory and must be completed by the deadlines established by law. If an election official fails to certify, they can be compelled to do so by a court order.

Likewise, certification is not an opportunity to question results or attempt to resolve any potential issues or irregularities. Depending on state rules and the closeness of the race, recounts, audits or court challenges may occur before certification to address those concerns. But once the certification step is reached, it is the duty of state or local officials to simply provide an official certificate naming the winner based on the official tally.

What happens after certification?

For congressional elections, certification establishes who has won races for the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. Each state then sends its list of election winners, formally known as certificates of election, to the House and Senate. In the House, these certificates are specifically sent to the clerk, a nonpartisan official who compiles the state lists into the full roll of members-elect of the next Congress. The winning candidates then begin preparing to take office.
Okay, now let's look at the law:
Before the first meeting of each Congress the Clerk of the next preceding House of Representatives shall make a roll of the Representatives-elect, and place thereon the names of those persons, and of such persons only, whose credentials show that they were regularly elected in accordance with the laws of their States respectively, or the laws of the United States. In case of a vacancy in the office of Clerk of the House of Representatives, or of the absence or inability of the Clerk to discharge the duties imposed on him by law or custom relative to the preparation of the roll of Representatives or the organization of the House, those duties shall devolve on the Sergeant at Arms of the next preceding House of Representatives.
That’s the statute behind the details of the procedure above. "Shall,” there, is a very specific word.  It means the act of the clerk, or the Sergeant at Arms, is ministerial. It is not subject to judgement or consideration, except insofar as state certification is lacking. And then the clerk must seek certification from the appropriate state. But everyone else is seated. 

Now, if the clerk refuses to seat all the Democrats; or just all the new Democrats? (Or just everyone, to be “fair”?) Well, shit hits the fan. Arguably, Congress can’t operate. Representatives could challenge the quorum call; and the courts (presumably the D.C. Circuit) could order the clerk, or the sergeant at arms, to do their ministerial duty.(This would not be interference with House rules and operations. There’s a federal statute to enforce. The clerk and the sergeant at arms are employees of the House, not elected officials.)

And then the majority sets about punishing anyone in the minority who thought this was a clever idea. 

Remember, Trump is a lame duck now. So why would Johnson pursue this Pyrrhic victory? To make life even more miserable for the House, and Trump, for the next two years?

Yes, Trump sent a crowd to the Capitol to disrupt the certification of Biden as President. What happened? Nothing Trump wanted. What happens if Trump persuades Johnson to put in a crooked clerk? More serious and immediate payback than he faced in 2021. Maybe even removal. I don’t think Congress 
will be happy to see its prerogatives interfered with. 

The Polls Are Fake!

I mean, this can’t be right. There’s no mention of Arnold Palmer’s schlong, or Jon Husted’s ass, or windmills! Not even anything about the Cheesecake Factory!

🎃 Hallowe’en At The Cheesecake Factory 🏭

BTW: I’ve never been to a Cheesecake Factory, but based on recent reports, spending Hallowe’en there is my newest worse nightmare.