Saturday, October 31, 2026

SMH 🤦‍♂️

CNN: Did it impact your vote at all?

Alaska Voter: Not a bit.

CNN: Can you tell who's who here?

AV: Absolutely. You've got Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. and then you have Sullivan Dan, who's a registered Republican and incumbent. And I don't even have my glasses on. It's pretty clear it's in black and white. It's very clear.
Okay, now did this have an impact? The federal judge has given the DOJ until noon Friday .(Alaska time) to respond to Alaska’s motion to dismiss, and Alaska until noon tomorrow to respond to the DOJ’s filing. Alaska is asking for the case to be dismissed before Election Day. That may happen.

Separately, the Justice Department — as part of a lawsuit it filed last week — asked a judge to order that state elections officials isolate ballots ranking Dan J. Sullivan to investigate potential voter "confusion" with the senator. The owner of a boat dealership in the candidate's hometown of Petersburg who had donated to his campaign told The Associated Press that an FBI agent visited the business and wanted to know whether he had been misled by Dan J. Sullivan's candidacy. He said he had not and that "Everybody knows who the incumbent is."
Evidence of “confused” voters will be a factor in criminal, or civil, cases. And about that civil suit:
Justice Department attorneys in the Alaska case said there is a "substantial risk" that Dan J. Sullivan's candidacy "will mislead voters and ultimately result in an electoral process that lacks integrity."

"To guard against this danger, the United States seeks an order directing Defendants to preserve and segregate all ballots ranking Daniel J. Sullivan for the purposes of investigating whether such ranking was the product of voter confusion, should such an investigation become necessary," the filing states. It requests a decision by Monday.

Attorneys for the state in response questioned how segregation would be possible, writing that voters' ballots are commingled in the ballot box on Election Day and that election workers couldn't segregate ballots ranking Dan J. Sullivan without violating ballot secrecy protections. Ballots segregated or not wouldn't reveal any voter's reason for voting for Dan J. Sullivan, they said.

They have asked a judge to dismiss the case and said Alaska elections officials already took steps to distinguish the two Sullivans on the ballot. The senator is listed as Dan S. Sullivan, Republican and incumbent, while the challenger is listed as Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., with no party affiliation. That's also how they appeared on the August open primary ballot.

Attorneys for the state also have argued that Alaska's ranked voting system further addresses concerns about potential confusion by allowing voters to rank both Sullivans.
Especially because of the ranked voting system, I don’t think DOJ ever gets what it’s asking for.

He Has A Very High IQ

"Where was I? Oh, yeah…” Fitting.
  He has a very high IQ.

Closing Arguments

Ken Paxton’s former top cop on why he’s voting for James Talarico:

I spent 2 hours with James Talarico. Number one, I saw no deception. He answered all my difficult questions. He didn’t dodge anything. He hit it head on.

I have been around politicians my entire life. I served 5 governors, I’ve met 4 presidents… And James Talarico is so different than other people I’ve encountered.

I think he’s the man who needs to go to Washington DC, and Ken Paxton needs to go home.
Sure looks like it. And how much did Elmo pay a political consultant to come up with that one and post it on the last day of early voting? Does he imagine this is outreach? How many people has Paxton ever gathered at one time? A tweet three days before Election Day is not likely to change the course of the election. 😈

Is He Talking About Trump?

Miller, I mean.

🎃🐈‍⬛🌾🥮👻 🎄?

 Well, yeah, kinda:

No social plans tonight but I might head out onto the balcony in a bit and start screaming "DID YOU KNOW HALLOWEEN IS IRISH ORIGINALLY?" as loud as I can
The connection between Samhain and All Hallow’s Even is a tenuous one, at best. 

AND I WARNED YOU THIS WOULD TAKE MANY WORDS TO EXPLAIN! 👻

I’ve already quoted the history of All Saints Day. The idea was floated as early as the late 4th century.  But Gregory III finally did something about it in the 8th century.Well, again, I’ll just quote the pertinent language:
Gregory III (731-741) consecrated a chapel in the Basilica of St. Peter to all the saints and fixed the anniversary for 1 November. A basilica of the Apostles already existed in Rome, and its dedication was annually remembered on 1 May. Gregory IV (827-844) extended the celebration on 1 November to the entire Church. The vigil seems to have been held as early as the feast itself
Alright, three things there. 1 May in Ireland was Beltane, about 6 months prior to (or after; either way) Samhain, on 1 November.  These were the two most important holy days on the Irish Celtic calendar. And yet no one ever argues the Roman Catholic dedication anniversary was connected to Ireland. Mostly because no one remembers it anymore, but the connection is as solid as the connection to All Saints. Which is to say, not solid at all. Besides, All Saints displaced Samhain to the vigil, or eve. And Gregory III set the date on November 1, but Gregory IV made it a date for the entire church almost 100 years later. At which point is it clear when the Church acted in response to the Irish holy day? Which was important in Ireland, but not really in Europe? 

The best information I can find indicates observance of Samhain was connected to stories of gods and heroes not dissimilar from the tales in the Elder Edda. But we don’t associate those stories with ghoulies and ghosties and things that go bump in the night, so, again, the connection to contemporary Hallowe’en (“contemporary” as of Robert Burns) is suspect. Well, except for the date.

Stick with me, I do have a point, and it’s not to rehash the Hallowe’en/Samhain confusion a third time. I’m actually interested in the connection between All Hallow’s Even and Christmas Eve, and what it tells us about our celebrations. For that, we need to dig down to the roots.

I’d read this book before*, so I must have forgotten this reference from the late 16th century. The reference is to the “Lord of Misrule” being chosen on All Hallow’s Eve, for a celebration that extended to Candlemas (February 2nd, observance of the presentation of the Christchild to Simeon at the Temple). This connects more with the reason the Puritans banned Christmas in the New World than with Ireland per se. The “Lord of Misrule” indicates a raucous Christmas celebration probably like the “Feast of Fools” on the Continent. You may have noticed this makes Hallowe’en the gateway to Advent and Christmas, as well as nearly a month of Epiphany. (Candlemas was not a small thing. The tradition in England persisted for centuries that the Yuletide greenery could not be removed until Candlemas, lest demons beset you. Come back on Candlemas. I have poems about it.) The gateway because raucous celebrations were a common feature of British Xmastide (the famous “12 Days of “). With idle time on their hands and most of the food going up to the lords, singing assaults on fine houses expecting a treat in recompense became a social pacifier. The Lord of Misrule was part of that. If it started around All Saints, and continued until Candlemas, All Hallows Eve opened door in October that didn’t close until February. At least not in the British Isles. 

Raucous celebrations may have Irish roots, too, but especially at year’s end, they’ve been popular in many European cultures that long ago abandoned the Feast of Fools. My father was old enough to remember when the emphasis in “Trick or Treat” was on the trick, not the treat. Hallowe’en was a sanctioned day for tricks, not unlike Christmas Day (come back in Advent and you’ll see what I mean). I heard stories of tricks and treats in my childhood, but by then Hallowe’en was entirely domesticated. This is just a reminder it wasn’t always so.

Is Hallowe’en still Samhain? Except for the dates, it’s hard to say so. Some think Gregory III set the date to take over Samhain. But it was almost 100 years later before Gregory IV made the date “universal.” Was the church indifferent to Ireland and its holy days before then? Well, maybe; but there’s no record of it. Gregory III was probably looking at the Church Calendar, not the Irish one. Gregory IV was just as likely thinking of the Church, not Ireland alone. So the date is as likely to be coincidental as intentional. Besides, Samhain didn’t disappear; it just changed dates (unlike Brigid, who was utterly transformed into a saint of the Church; as a Celtic goddess she disappeared until the recovery of Irish folklore in the 20th century). And looking at the church calendar in Gregory III’s day, is it really so hard to see the connection to the Christ Mass, which eventually gave us Xmas Eve?

Samhain became more associated with the Lord of Misrule than ghosts or Celtic heroes, before it became a holiday for children seeking candy. The Feast of Fools was finally banned in England (and on the Continent) in the 1600’s (the Puritans hated its remnant: raucous Xmas celebrations, which involved a lot of drinking.). Hallowe’en persisted as the Eve of All Saints, though Henry VIII and Elizabeth I both tried to suppress it because it was a “papal holiday” (they had their own, non-Puritanical, reasons). But it was a witch trial under James I (the same fervor that jumped the pond to Salem), linked to an alleged incident on Hallowe’en night, that connected the day to witches thereafter. And then the Victorians using the Romantics interest in folklore (as the Industrial Revolution swept that world away) to take new interest in ghost stories, well…

So, is that Irish? It’s more a series of accidents of history, but it didn’t wipe out the celebration, as the Burns poem shows (the Scots have more in common with the Irish than the English). It just added witches to it; and other thing later on (via James I, albeit accidentally). The celebration of the holiday, mostly along the lines Burns memorialized, continued in the British Isles, mostly excluding England; but the festivities in England and Europe shifted to Michaelmas (12 November) and the slaughter of livestock as part of the festival, for the winter. No candy, though. The Scots and the Irish did bring Hallowe’en to America in the second half of the 19th century, with the diaspora brought by the potato famines. (How the Irish saved civilization. Again.) But it was received as a celebration for children, which probably explains how we ended up with the holiday we have today.

The interesting contemporary part is that, again, it’s an eve celebrating a Christian holiday. Granted, these days more of us think of Dias de Los Muertos than think of All Saints Day. But we have three holiday eves on our civic calendar, and Hallowe’en is the first of them. It is the beginning of the revelry that once carried from this celebration through to at least Candlemas in England, and Ash Wednesday in Roman Catholic Europe. It’s our dour Puritan heritage that makes us denounce it as demonic, or relegate it to children; and then lament more recently that the celebrations of our childhood are gone, and adults have turned it (back, historically) into drunken revelry.

Or is everything old just new again? And rather than complain about Xmas overtaking Hallowe’en, maybe we could recognize the 10 weeks or so of holidays that are trying to return, if only because in order to rejoice, we need to construct something upon which to rejoice; and that something doesn’t need to be too much of an abstraction.

Hallowe’en does have an Irish root, if only in the keeping of it to the 19th century. But the celebration we observe today (and, ironically, sent back to Europe), wouldn’t be recognizable in pre-Christian, or even Christian, Ireland. Which is not to discount the Celtic connection; but it’s hardly an observance that’s come down to us unchanged through the ages, only lately bastardized by candy merchants. Though I am intrigued by that reference in New Advent to the vigil being attached to the feast day almost from the beginning. Was Ireland that influential in Europe in the 8th century? And for the centuries between the 8th century and the 12th (when the Feast of Fools began to appear), what was that vigil like? 👻 What is it about these multiple eves, anyway?

Maybe we’re trying to find out. We’ve certainly been keeping them long enough, even long after Protestantism removed the Roman Catholic connections. Maybe we should look at the reasons for that more carefully, and perhaps construct new reasons to rejoice, if we need them. Or find a few good old ones, for all of that.

After all, Christmas and Hallowe’en are our two holidays when we especially want to do things as they’ve always been done. And they’re both meant to be for fun.



*Aside from the link, I relied on Trick or Treat; A History of Hallowe’en, Reaktion Books, 2019, by Lisa Morton, for much of this post.




Friday, October 30, 2026

Do They Think They’re “G-Men” In A ‘40’s Mobster Movie?

You mean a place where a hamburger costs $5000? Or do you mean the White House?
A new filing from President Donald Trump’s Truth Social company shows it expects payment from Freedom 250, a National Park Service-backed group responsible for staging America’s 250th birthday events.

The filing lists the ad deal among the company’s related-party transactions involving company insiders. It notes that Trump Media board member Meredith O’Rourke also sits on the board of the National Park Foundation, which created and runs Freedom 250.
The White House, then. Trump just wants “a taste.”
Q: Trump has mentioned that there was billions and billions of dollars are fraud here, but the fraud that has been uncovered so far is well under that figure.

Bessent: Whether it is $500,000 or several million, it will continue to add up.

The real tragedy is these programs are being shut down. I heard from two parents, who the program for autistic children needed had been shut down.
Did DOGE do that? Or did Russell Vought? So is Bessent.  Even Don Corleonr knew that reality got a vote.

What The Meaning Of “Is,” Is

Or, how to destroy the DOJ in less than 2 years. "Me no Alamo." DOI official to Judge: "Make me!" DOI official: "English is my second or third language." When you’re trying to save your client from the judge…. It doesn’t matter, because the President’s social media posts are covered by executive privilege (wait for it…)
Asst Attorney General Stanley Woodward argues Trump's social media posts on Oct 18 and Oct 25 about the closure of the golf course on Nov 15 wasn't actually a "plan" to close the course

Judge: "You're telling me, that even now, that there was no plan.. . You're the 3rd ranking official at DOJ.. you're saying 'Do not believe the President!"
This is going well. Told ya! Hang on, it gets worse. So they abandoned that blind alley and went for conciliation. Woodward finally gets his head out of his ass.
Trump Admin officials are arguing they need to replace a seawall at East Potomac Park

Judge: "What's the safety issue?"

Asst Atty General won't answer. He questions why judge is engaging in this line of inquiry

Court filings indicate erosion issues. But judge wants to know if people are unsafe because of it

Trump Admin attorneys won't answer
And then regrets it. "Why would you assume that?” Head has retreated firmly back up ass. They done pissed off a federal judge. And saying “We would never defy a court order” is not pacification. Now there are two issues, and one is: who’s going to be held responsible for fucking the court around? Trump doesn’t have the authority to do what he’s doing, and the DOJ can’t even come with a prelude to a statute to give him just the ghost of some legal authority.

Unless Roberts can invent one. But by then I think Congress will have shut this farce down.

Scheduling For Change

Meanwhile, back in Alaska: Clearly these people need to be thrown off the ballot, and everyone involved put in prison! From Ted’s lips to God’s ear.  (The GOP internals must be fucking brutal!)

Oh, yeah! The big news today!
SCHEDULING CHANGE: Trump rallies in Kansas, Iowa back on, per source familiar "Rallies are BACK ON! President Trump loves his supporters, and in addition to nearly 20 tele-rallies, he will hold back-to-back rallies in Kansas and Iowa on Sunday. No one works harder, fights harder, or loves the American people more than President Donald J. Trump!

The rallies were rearranged for scheduling purposes to accommodate dozens of additional tele-rallies that were recently added to the President’s schedule."
But that Alaska story really hurts Dems!

Well, They Weaponized Their Camera!🎥

ABOLISH ICE!

Connect The Dots

This guy 👆was escorted out of the venue shortly after that incident aired, by the Secret Service. He was there by invitation, he registered under his name, he got through the private security screening at the door.

He’s also hated Trump since the Central Park Five.

I really want to buy this guy a beer 🍻 

But now Trump has cancelled his rallies, and Vance has cancelled one in Minnesota. True, Trump doesn’t seem to be moving the needle (Quelle surprise!). And Vance is a disaster:
They threw this guy out because he wasn’t MAGA. Maybe that’s SOP for political rallies. But it strikes me as reactionary and paranoid.

Tell me again why the NYT story about Peltola (which seems poorly sourced and supported, and irrelevant given the ranked voting system there) is bad for Democrats, but this… 🦗🦗🦗

I’m Pretty Sure Our Long National Nightmare Is Over

 The DOJ sued California because…well, I guess because Trump carried the state in 2024, but California couldn’t admit it.

The DOJ sued California on Oct. 15, minutes after a 48-hour deadline it had given the state to review a list of more than 20,000 voters it called “likely noncitizens.” The list arrived on a thumb drive sent to the Los Angeles County registrar after roughly 5.9 million mail ballots had already gone out. The registrar concluded that the DOJ’s instructions were “legally prohibited” because the government provided no evidence for its claims.

Carter picked apart how the list was built. Homeland Security Investigations bought a California voter file, and it was run through federal immigration data and a third-party analytics platform. The government didn’t reveal until the night before the hearing that the platform was LexisNexis. Carter said the government never disclosed its matching rules, its confidence thresholds, what its “enrichment process” involved, or any error rates.
Because Trump never admits errors!
“The Court cannot conclude that Plaintiff’s process is credible,” Carter wrote. “Given that Plaintiff’s entire claim for relief rests on the sincerity of this allegation, Plaintiff’s lack of credibility weighs against a finding in their favor.”

He also pointed to the DOJ’s track record. The department “has filed at least thirty-one lawsuits in federal district courts across the country seeking complete voter rolls from the States. Out of the twenty-six decided cases, the DOJ has prevailed in precisely zero.”
I'm old enough to remember when the idea that the DOJ could mislead the courts, or not be trusted, was a hurdle the courts could not get over. Trump and Blanche have finally obliterated that obstacle.
The judge found the government likely lacks standing, and that its request would likely violate the National Voter Registration Act’s ban on systematic voter purges within 90 days of an election. He also said any emergency was of the government’s own making. It bought California’s voter rolls in May but waited until mid-October to sue.

“Plaintiff’s theoretical risk of imminent harm is solely due to its own neglect,” Carter wrote.

He warned that naturalized citizens were most at risk of losing their votes. He cited evidence that federal employees were given “only twelve minutes to determine if a subject is a U.S. citizen.”

“It is no surprise that citizens are wrongly identified as noncitizens,” he wrote.

Carter closed with a blunt warning.

“If the Executive can discount votes and threaten an ongoing election due to unproven allegations, then our democracy is in danger,” the judge wrote. “This Court declines to be a party to such process.”
Early voting in Texas ends today. I mention that because all windows to effect this election are closing. Tuesday is the last day. Any challenges to outcomes will require extraordinary evidence, and I would remind you that even the Roberts Court refused to get involved in Trump’s fantasies in 2020. This is the end, my beautiful friend, the end. Trump could drag the DOJ into another challenge in 2028, but it won’t involve him, so why should he?

As the court said in the California case:
“In bringing this lawsuit, the Executive would have this Court believe that it reigns as a sole sovereign,” he added. “But California and its people are sovereign, too.”
We’re all about to learn that lesson, again.

I’ll Retire To Bedlam

 My window on this is admittedly small, but Stephanie Ruhle yesterday morning went on and on about how “2 Dan Sullivans” hurt the Democrats (meaning the national party) because…reasons. 

Everyone ran for their fainting couch, ignoring the fact this issue had been adjudicated by the Alaska courts up to the state Supreme Court, which ruled it didn’t matter how many “Dan Sullivans” were on the ballot.

All that matters is the gossip.

The Republican Party has done this kind of thing hundreds of times for many years using dark money PACs. It’s part of their standard playbook going back decades. Their largest donor has also given out $1 million bonuses to voters. But two Dan Sullivans in AK is the crime of the century because Dems are held to a much different standard.
Following an order from a Travis County judge, the Republican Women’s Caucus (RWC) Fund and a man named John Braun have been identified as the names behind controversial text messages sent to Texans earlier this month purporting to offer resources to transgender students, seemingly confirming widespread speculation that the effort was a Republican political ploy. Some three million mailers containing similar information were also sent.

The revelation, first reported here, comes in the final days of a tight Senate race between Democrat James Talarico and Republican Ken Paxton, whose former impeachment lawyer, Chris Hilton, appeared in court on behalf of the Texas Transgender Student Union (TTSU), a Wyoming-based LLC that was anonymously registered in September and was reportedly behind the mailers that directed readers to the website of the Transgender Education Network of Texas (TENT), a real LGBTQ+ advocacy group that swiftly denied sending the messages or mailers. TTSU said through its attorney in a court filing that the entity “is not going to engage in any further text or mail communications.”

On Tuesday, Travis County District Judge Jan Soifer ordered from the bench oral deposition of a representative of TTSU and denied the organization’s motion to dismiss. Soifer also ordered Infobip, a mass text-messaging company that sent the text messages on behalf of a client, to respond to written questions. Hilton, who represents both TTSU and Infobip’s client, argued that the push to reveal his clients’ identity before the election is politically motivated and would cause harm.
Meanwhile:
Well that was one hell of a closing argument tour by Trump on behalf of candidates. He salivated over men’s body parts, said high gas prices are good because oil companies are making billions, bragged about his ballroom, and said if he gave people $5k they still couldn’t afford to buy dinner at his club.

All Hallow’s Even




Some of my best childhood memories revolve around Hallowe'en.  My mother's youngest sister, the "crazy" aunt who came to our church Halloween party (this was when I was just barely too old to wander the streets at night with the "children"), put on makeup to look like a corpse in a coffin, and then joined us to bob for apples (probably the first time I'd done that, and I found out what hard, wet work it is.  And what absolutely foolish fun.).  Or just the freedom of wandering the streets at night without my parents in tow, joining all the neighborhood kids of the Baby Boom as we walked from house to house in clumps that gathered and broke again, passing stories of where to get the best candy, or the homemade stuff like popcorn balls and caramel apples, stuff always gone by the time you got there, or always from a house several streets over of undetermined location or ill-defined description.  And the story always included that house being "out" by the time you heard of it.  It prepared us for Christmases when we'd have to find the "IT" toy for our kids in an unforeseeable future.  A future that included my wife dressing up in black tights and leotard she wore in high school, to costume herself as a "cat" for our daughter's first Hallowe'en....oh, wait.  You don't need to hear about that one.

That aunt is gone this year, leaving me with the Peanuts Hallowe’en card I can’t send. For some reason I started sending her one in high school, and I kept it up as best I could year after year.  Now last year was the last year. Oddly, this year, I remember that Hallowe’en falls exactly three weeks after my brother’s birthday: October 10.  He’s been gone…5 years now? I should remember, you’d think…and for the over 6 decades I knew him, I never seem to have made the connection between the holiday and his birthday. I remember going out on Hallowe’en evening when we were both young enough, but old enough to escape parental supervision. But his birthday, in my mind, was connected to Columbus Day. I remember childhood Hallowe’ens with him, now more than ever. But I never made that 3-week connection before. Maybe this year it will be the return of my loved ones, as the days shorten and the nights deepen.

All the internet bluster about Hallowe'en and Samhain from years back seems to have faded now, as well as the business of Hallowe'en being "stolen" from "ancient practices."  Most of that is echoing remnants of the early 19th century, Romanticism turning into Victorianism.  It was the Romantic movement that began to preserve "folklore," as it came to be called.  "Came to be" not because it was illegitimate, but because it was ignored and despised before the Romantics, who saved it but didn't revive it.  The Victorians then supercharged it, along with fuzzy memories of medieval Europe.  Most of the ghost stories and "monsters" we know now (vampires, werewolves, ghosts, goblins, even witches) are products of the Victorian imagination, not remnants of stories told around campfires 3 millenia ago.  The Victorians tried to link them to an imagined past in order to make them "authentic" in a risingly scientific age, but the connections are horseshit.  Most of those stories are distinctly "modern." Frankenstein was a product of the Romantic beginning of the 19th century; Dracula came out of the late Victorian era, and is a novel at great pains to place itself in its contemporary setting by including what was then cutting edge technology to tell the story. But it’s told in the epistolary style of the novels of the…late 18th century. The 19th and early 20th centuries are the great era of our most prized ghost stories including, of course, the stories by Edgar Allan Poe (a man under-appreciated for his narrative gifts, and over-appreciated for his few poetic ones).

Poe's stories were “modern,” most of them conveniently set in a Europe of an indeterminate age when people dressed in what is now costume and ran around in castles and buildings that look more like something from a Disney theme park than reality.  (We hadn’t yet come to Twain’s Realism.) And Poe was writing those in the mid-19th century, in America. Again, the connection to an imagined past gave the stories the verisimilitude they required.

So most of our Hallowe'en is a matter of memory and conjecture, and the stories we tell ourselves.  But it isn't rooted in some "truth" we destroyed with our "enlightenment" or our "progress."  That Romantic nostalgia prompted by the Industrial Revolution which drove us to protect “folklore” became the “truth” we imbued those stories with, the “wisdom” our “modern” era lost. As with most things, our "truth" about these matters is what we say it is.

Hallowe’en began as the vigil for All Saints Day, making it the most well-known vigil for a feast day outside of Christmas Eve. Holy Saturday is the vigil for Easter, still the proper day of the Great Vigil, which can be the most powerful liturgy in Christianity. Literally speaking, Holy Saturday is Easter Eve. But popularly, we know only two vigils, and the only service widely known now is the Candlelight Christmas Eve Service, itself moved back from midnight to evening, the better to get us home early and away from church on Christmas Day, even on Sunday. 

Don’t get me started.

So Hallowe’en is actually the vigil for All Saint’s. But we’ve forgotten that.

All Saint's Day, per New Advent, started in...well, here, let me just give you the whole magilla:

In the early days the Christians were accustomed to solemnize the anniversary of a martyr's death for Christ at the place of martyrdom. In the fourth century, neighbouring dioceses began to interchange feasts, to transfer relics, to divide them, and to join in a common feast; as is shown by the invitation of St. Basil of Caesarea (379) to the bishops of the province of Pontus. Frequently groups of martyrs suffered on the same day, which naturally led to a joint commemoration. In the persecution of Diocletian the number of martyrs became so great that a separate day could not be assigned to each. But the Church, feeling that every martyr should be venerated, appointed a common day for all. The first trace of this we find in Antioch on the Sunday after Pentecost. We also find mention of a common day in a sermon of St. Ephrem the Syrian (373), and in the 74th homily of St. John Chrysostom (407). At first only martyrs and St. John the Baptist were honoured by a special day. Other saints were added gradually, and increased in number when a regular process of canonization was established; still, as early as 411 there is in the Chaldean Calendar a "Commemoratio Confessorum" for the Friday after Easter. In the West Boniface IV, 13 May, 609, or 610, consecrated the Pantheon in Rome to the Blessed Virgin and all the martyrs, ordering an anniversary. Gregory III (731-741) consecrated a chapel in the Basilica of St. Peter to all the saints and fixed the anniversary for 1 November. A basilica of the Apostles already existed in Rome, and its dedication was annually remembered on 1 May. Gregory IV (827-844) extended the celebration on 1 November to the entire Church. The vigil seems to have been held as early as the feast itself. The octave was added by Sixtus IV (1471-84).

So, mid-9th century, it got set as a date on the Church's calendar.  That led, later, to All Soul's on November 2.  The connections to Ireland, especially jack o' lanterns (turnips in Ireland, only after a long period exclusively pumpkins, which are as American as corn and tobacco) didn't really come until the 19th century.  Attempted connections between the Irish Samhain and All Saint's are all pretty much retrojection, especially as an attempt to connect Hallowe'en to Irish practices it supposedly overtook. Gregory was a long way from Ireland in the 9th century and Christianity only reached the island in that century.  It's a pretty small tail wagging a pretty large dog to imagine Gregory picked the date for the entire church just to appeal to an Irish pagan festival. I think Patrick was the better evangelist to the island.

The vigil that became Hallowe’en appears in the literature as early as Shakespeare, where the practices of the Roman church were slowly being turned Anglican; but that's another story.  Curiously, most of the literature on Hallowe'en begins in the late 18th century with Robert Burns in Scotland (call it Pre-Romanticism. Burns was just writing about what he knew, but accepting it and recognizing it, was down to the Romantics). Hallowe’en literature continues in the early 19th century with Walter Scott.  It jumps the pond to Washington Irving's story of Ichabod Crane, where Disney (?; or someone before them) transforms the pumpkin into a jack o' lantern, which made the tale into a Hallowe'en story.  It’s a grand irony that the persecution of single women and elderly widows in 16th century Puritan Salem became inextricably connected to Hallowe’en by Disney, too (“Hocus Pocus”). Thus do we domesticate our worst history and invent our monsters. 👹 

And then we get Poe.  The iconic black cat 🐈‍⬛ of Hallowe'en decorations arguably stems from Poe's story of the same name.  By Poe's time, of course, especially in Puritan tinctured America, the holiday has nothing to do with the Roman Catholic vigil. Poe never set any story at Hallowe’en, and as late as 1937 Edith Wharton sets her last ghost story (she wrote several) on the eve of All Saint’s without ever mentioning the word “Hallowe’en.” But we’ve found great value ($) in doing it in the past half-century, so that now it rivals Xmas Eve and whets our consumer appetite for the year’s end.

Interestingly, the Aztecs and Mayans (and even less remembered groups in Mexico) had festivals honoring the return of the dead.  I can't say for sure the dates of the observances didn't shift after Christians changed the culture, but George Frazer found the Irish expecting the return of the dead around the end of October, which makes sense as people left the fields (farmers first, herdsman as it got too cold finally for the herds) and went indoors to survive the winter.  Thinking of those lost is a likelier custom as winter sets in, especially in Europe.  It seems to be have been as true in tropical Mexico, where the current Dias de los Muertos has very distinct roots in the culture of Mexico.  Many of the practices of the days extend into pre-colombian times, including the idea that the children who have departed return on November 1, the adults on November 2.  Did they adopt the Catholic dates?  Maybe.  It is certainly a festival that is far more "pagan" than it is "Christian."  Not that there's anything wrong with that!

I noted one year long ago now, that there's still no concerted "War on Hallowe'en," even as Hallowe’en has become more and more an adult celebration. (I’ve also had reason to notice that Hobby Lobby starts selling Xmas and (less so) Thxgiving merchandise in September; but ignores Hallowe’en altogether. It’s an interesting lacunae for a store that sells Marvel superhero merchandise, and jigsaw puzzles with scenes from “National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation.” Their tolerance for Xmas merchandise makes up for the dearth of Hallowe’en merchandise. I suspect the owners refuse to truck with demons and devilry. Even if it only means selling Spider-Man costumes for little kids.) The idea that the vigil marks the “thin place” where the dead and the living can meet and walk together is, in this post-Victorian world, sadly turned into a time of terror, not comfort. Dias de Los Muertos is a time of celebration because the dead, the loved ones we have lost, are again close to us. Hallowe’en is a time of terror, because the dead are again close to us. We used to visit graveyards and put them near the churches we’d visit at least once a week. Now we avoid cemeteries because they remind us our death is inevitable. 

I doubt the vigil of All Saint’s started as a night of deepest darkness to be dispelled by the light of day, as in Fantasia’s “Night on Bald Mountain.” (The roots of modern Hallowe’en show in that depiction of Walpurgisnacht. The “thin time” from Irish culture that brought back the beloved ancestors, now brings back the demons. And corresponds to the Ancient Greek idea of the balance of opposing forces: chaos and logos. It’s truly superstition, and ironic because the Puritans denounced such ideas, and now their religious descendants are terrified by them all over again. Such, as Carroll observed, is human perversity.) I’m sure like Christmas Eve, the vigil was looking forward to the feast day, anticipating one of the joyous feast days of the year. There’s a reason it’s one of two popular vigils, even as both are now almost wholly divorced from their religious roots. The popular explanation today is that we like to be scared at least once a year. But scared of what? The dead? The reminder of our mortality? Of the evil people (and only people) do?  Of the memories of our loved ones? Or the example of the saints?

I have lamented the changing face of Hallowe'en. (Pro tip:  when you can link to posts that are over 15 years old, you've been at this too long.)  I have layered Hallowe'en into the more important rituals/holy days of our modern American calendar.   I still think some reasonable connections can be made there.  But I’m more inclined to see Hallowe’en as the gateway to Advent, making it the first of the many “eves” that line up as gateways to the days after, from October to February. Our dreary months, that we learned long ago to find reasons to lighten. I've commented on the "razor blades in apples" stories, though I think the reference there (to a Salon article, of all things) is less reliable than other information I have which provides a more specific date to the origin of all those stories.

As I said, one of the earliest full mentions of Hallowe'en and its attendant celebrations is the poem by Robert Burns that I've posted before on October 31.  I'll continue that tradition this year.  Consider this just prelude, as Hallowe'en itself is prelude to All Saint's which, I would argue, is prelude to the end of Pentecost (the season of, I mean), and in that way preparation, itself, for Advent.  And then Christmas and Epiphany, the preparation for Lent; which is the preparation for…

But there I go, getting ahead of myself again.

Mostly, Hallowe'en is for fun.




Thursday, October 29, 2026

Every Twitter Tells The Story

Kamala Harris: These folks cut Medicaid by $1 trillion. Medicaid covers half the births in America through the health care resources it provides. Medicaid provides the majority of maternal health care in America.

They cut SNAP benefits. SNAP benefits are to feed hungry children, to help make sure our elders don’t go hungry.

Yet these are the same hypocrites who walk around talking about their family values. And they think we’re not paying attention.

Election time is it time to let them know: We’re too busy watching what you’re doing to listen to what you’re saying.
He ran into the tape. And fell down. Ending the day on an up note.

Warrior Mentality

Right. And everything is just fine. Newsmax turns on Paxton.

Nobody Knows How To Do It Like He Does

Trump In South Carolina

That’s Michigan (Ilhan Omar Texas (Talarico). Muchigan again. Some kind of reference to the GOP Senate candidate.

Insert Coin, Pull Handle

Receive reply below.

North To Alaska

On the ballot, “Dan” is listed as “(Registered Republican, incumbent).”
In new court filing, Justice Dept defends its unprecedented suit seeking to block certification of next week's Senate race in Alaska

They claim the presence of a second candidate named "Dan Sullivan" will "mislead"

Filing: "Mr. Sullivan’s presence on the ballot threatens to mislead Alaskan citizens who want to vote for Senator Sullivan. Some supporters of Senator Sullivan likely will inadvertently vote for Daniel J. Sullivan"

Here's the ballot.. what do you think?
If you’re still confused, consult JD Vance: Who clearly thinks you’re an idiot.

I Want To Buy This Man A Beer 🍻

Yale Law School Is So Proud

JD Vance on ranked choice voting: "I don't understand it. It seems to me that you have an election, the person who wins the most votes should win. That seems to be not what happens with ranked choice voting. The fact that it's so confusing to a person who pays pretty close attention to politics I think suggests we should do our elections in, like, the normal way."
🤦‍♂️

Like A Snot Rag?

Or is God that angry with us?

First Rule Of Demons 😈

New in PN: The GOP’s endless culture war slop is a sign of desperation

"Republicans are offering a slop buffet because Trump ruined the economy and they have no policy achievements to tout. So they chose instead to demonize anyone who deviates from how white, male, Christians look, act, think, or pray, even if the demons must be invented."
And I don’t mean this in a theological or metaphysical sense, but in the psychological one:

Demons always have to be invented. It’s the way we try to escape responsibility.

“All The Gossip That Fits”

The NYT is so desperate to find an October surprise they bury the lede:

1) The staffer retracted her statement.

2) The staffer was a fired disgruntled employee.

3) They stuff this line in the article:

"Ballot-stacking tactics are common in politics and generally considered legal — and have been employed by both parties in Alaska."
That would be like this:
Seriously NYT?

"Last week, as The Times prepared to publish this article, Ms. Rios, who had been planning to file a wrongful termination lawsuit against the Peltola campaign, contacted The Times and said she wanted to take back her previous statements.

“As discussed on our call earlier today, I am confirming that I have retracted all statements made regarding the 2026 Alaska Senate Race in connection with any article you may or may not be writing,” Ms. Rios wrote. “I am not willing to be a source for any story in any capacity.”

It is rare for a source to seek to retract comments made in previous interviews, and The Times’s standards do not obligate reporters to comply with such requests. The Times had never agreed that those previous interviews could not be published, and informed Ms. Rios last week that they would be a part of this story."
Deja vu all over again:
But some Alaska voters said the Times report did little to change their views.

Keven Kleweno, a registered Republican planning to vote for Peltola, said he was unsurprised by the news, given Republicans’ prior claims of Democratic involvement in Dan J. Sullivan’s campaign.

“That's nothing that we haven't heard before,” he said.

But at the same time, he suggested that Elisa Rios, Peltola’s former campaign manager who spoke to the Times about the campaign’s involvement, was a disgruntled ex-employee who “didn’t like being laid off.”

“I just feel it's another way to, you know, slander Peltola and try to make sure Dan worthless Sullivan is reelected,” he said.
And maybe voters in Alaska ain’t that stupid:
Adam Lees of Anchorage is registered nonpartisan and supports Peltola. He said his opinions of the Senate race were already “mostly baked in.” Still, he said, the reported effort to stack the ballot is “not the best look.”

“It does give — I think as some of the kids would describe it — icky vibes,” he said. “But at the same time, I think voters are intelligent and can figure out how to rank and can figure out which Dan Sullivan is their person.”

Amber McClelland, a registered Democrat and former Libertarian living in Anchorage, said she agreed. Politics wasn’t always this “dirty,” she said — recruiting a candidate just to draw votes away from an opponent “should not be a thing.”

“It's kind of messed up,” she said. “But in the past, Republicans have done everything that they can do to win, including cheat.”
It really is a different world in the largest state:
In Petersburg, residents who have known Dan J. Sullivan for decades had a hard time reconciling the picture the Times painted with the man they know. Erica Kludt-Painter said she doesn’t believe he worked behind the scenes with the Democrats to stack the ballot.

“I just don't see him being involved in a national conspiracy,” she said. “I'm sorry, I just don't. I know him to be a man of integrity who cares about his community and the people in it.”

Petersburg Vice Mayor Jeigh Stanton-Gregor said the community knows Dan J. Sullivan is a man of “high character,” and he doesn’t see the Times story changing anyone’s opinion of him. He said he was disappointed in the article.

“I just wish at this stage of the game, the New York Times was talking about substantive issues that really impact people in Petersburg's lives and Alaskans' lives, whether it be gas prices, foreign wars, etc,” he said. “Things that have real-world consequences, as opposed to a distant three- or four-place candidate.”

D.J. McBride, an independent voter living in Willow planning to vote for Peltola, was taken aback by the suggestion that Alaskans couldn’t distinguish the senator from the retired teacher.

“Both sides play pretty dirty pool, and if you're stupid enough that you can't tell the difference between an incumbent and a non-incumbent, I don't have any patience for you,” she said. “Alaskans are smarter than that.”
Real news, v. gossip. The NYT tradition continues. 

And about that confusing ballot:
Icing the cake. And the real elephant in the room: