Thursday, April 23, 2026

🤖

 I had an Amana Radarange. The original consumer microwave. The original original; the one with dials that set the timer and the power level. My brother took the second model, with a touch pad and LED readout. Mine lasted longer; his touchpad wore out years before mine gave up the ghost. 

If you don’t remember these things, they were huge by contemporary standards. Big enough for a 12 lb. turkey.🦃 Because the idea was, microwave ovens would replace everything but a range top.

Do you remember this? My Radarange even had a temperature probe. It plugged into an interior wall of the oven. There was a slide control, if I remember correctly, to set the temperature for, say, a turkey. They were really serious about this. Cooking turkeys, I mean.

We all know the problem, of course. No Maillard reaction. No browning. Not to mention a bird as dry as a stone, if you aren’t careful. But the failure to brown was what was really fatal.

They tried to remedy that. Special microwave cookware was sold, with plates in the bottom that heated up enough to simulate the Maillard reaction. I had one. My Radarange had a glass plate in the bottom. (The carousel came along much later.) The pan with the metal plate never really worked, and finally it got so hot (you had to preheat it) it broke the glass plate. I think it broke the ceramic it was embedded in, too. Either way, I threw it out. 

I have a countertop oven now. It’s the toaster, the oven. It makes cakes, it cooks fish (without the stench!), it even makes excellent cookies and pizzas. No, it’s not one of those pizza ovens that makes your kitchen a pizzeria (those are nice!), but it even thaws frozen waffles (homemade waffles; I freeze the excess). Best of all, it fits on my counter. The Radarange wouldn’t fit in my kitchen, and it’s the largest kitchen I’ve ever had. And it would do pretty much what it did before it crapped out. Reheat leftovers, usually badly, or boil water for a cup of tea. Also badly. (The water always seemed to cool off too rapidly after it came out.)  I reheat leftovers in the countertop oven. It works very nicely for that purpose, too.

When the Radarange finally died, we replaced it with a much smaller one. After all, everybody had a microwave oven. That one lasted about a year, and mostly heated water. The carousel was supposed to make it work better. It didn’t. We replaced that one with one that lasted about six months, maybe less. When we replaced it with a countertop oven, our daughter thought we were hippies. Because everyone had a microwave oven. 

I think she has one now, in the house they just bought. It’s a built in. I don’t think they use it. 

This is not a diatribe, but I’d have to look hard for a new microwave. They were once ubiquitous, but now I think they’re as rare as hen’s teeth. Maybe I’m wrong, but I stumble across pizzas ovens, espresso makers and coffee makers, and so many different electronic kitchen appliances I wouldn’t know how to use; but I don’t see microwaves anymore. If I could find them, I expect they’d be cheap pieces of crap, suitable for heating fish in an office. 🐡 The Radarange was very well made, built to last, built to serve the Thanksgiving meal. Microwave ovens just aren’t the essential kitchen appliance they were supposed to be 50 years ago.

And they didn’t cost society as much as AI is already costing. They didn’t make very rich individuals very much richer. Amana created the market, and soon lost it because the technology was fungible. Everybody could do it.  Which rapidly diminished the value; but the reality was, they didn’t really solve a problem no one had. Boil water. You can buy an electric kettle that will heat several cups of water at once. Useful at home or in an office. Takes up far less counter space, and prepares water for several people at one go. No waiting your turn at the oven door. It’s not much, but conventional technology has proven more useful than microwave technology.  My electric kettle actually has a variety of settings, which is computer technology. But my first one had a switch: on, or off. Simple, effective; no microwave involved. It wasn’t supposed to be this way, but who remembers the promises of 50 years ago? The ones that didn’t really pan out, I mean.

Will AI fail as the consumer microwave did? I dunno. 🤷‍♂️ Will it fulfill its promise the way the consumer microwave oven did? Most likely. The computer changed things. It was supposed to improve communication in the workplace. Instead it increased the amount of data you could pour onto one desk, at least a hundredfold. My wife used to talk about spending several hours every morning just catching up with email, and doing it again in n the late afternoon, only to be behind again by the next morning. Was all of that really necessary? Or was it just available? Was it just possible, to type one email and send it to hundreds, thousands, at once? She was the Admin. Assistant to a school district superintendent. She got emails from the state, and from hundreds of other parties. Some of it essential, some of it junk. And not delivered like “snail mail” by postal carrier once a day, but pouring in constantly, at all hours. And why? Because it could be done that way. Because it was easier than picking up the phone, faster than sending a letter. And you could spend a few hours typing, and let others do the job of responding. Although your time was spent on everybody else’s emails. Did computers make these jobs easier? In some ways, yes. In other ways, no. So it goes.

Will AI bring the inevitable future? It will bring wealth to some; very much at the loss of many of us. And I’m not sure it will do us all that well. After all, the internet was supposed to be the great democratizer, the leveler that would lower mountains and raise valleys. That prospect is still there, though it seems further away now than it was 30 years ago. But AI? Every Twitter feed I read includes someone asking “Grok, is this true?” What makes AI the final arbiter, the ultimate source of “truth”? Especially since Elmo has programmed it to spew racist, Nazi propaganda, because he thought it was originally too “woke.”

AI is still a computer program. And the rule about computer programs I learned more than 60 years ago, before there was a Radarange, still holds: garbage in, garbage out.

The problem with AI is: who’s feeding it what garbage?  That we can figure out, through education, the true democratizer. That’s not the final problem with AI. The final problem is, whose feeding it, and what control do they have to build data centers at our expense just to operate this thing and continue to do that feeding? What is the benefit that outweighs this cost? It seems the benefits all run to the owners. And there seem to be very few of them; and a lot of us.

The microwave at least didn’t take our jobs. Or our water, land, electricity, and quiet.

I don’t understand this bargain at all.

New Post! Because This Just Gets Worse….

Trump: That's where Martin Luther King gave his great speech, and he had a million people and I had the same exact crowd, maybe a little bit more. I have pictures of Martin Luther King’s crowd, the exact same, everything, but it was 70 years difference. The exact same crowd, but I actually had more people?
There shouldn’t be anything in that room sharper than a rubber ball. Or small enough that he could swallow it. Don’t… just, don’t ask.
Trump: I think it’s very interesting. We had flooring outside—it was coming to pieces. It's been there since the early 1940s. and it's a path to the Oval Office. It was broken, bad shape. We're putting magnificent new granite. It's called charcoal. We've stripped all of the paints off. We had 200 years of paint.

“Charcoal granite”? Or charcoal? 

He’s confusing the war with Ross and Rachel.  “We” have total control of the Strait, but Iran has shut down oil tankers traversing the Strait. And he doesn’t want Iran making $500 million a day because…? He likes the high price of gas? He wants to hobble the world economy? He thinks he’s making a deal? 

Help me out here.
🎶 Waist deep in the Big Muddy, and the big fool says….”🎶 Pics or it didn’t happen. Oh, and proof they aren’t AI.🤖 
Reporter: Does that mean Americans should anticipate spending more on gasoline for the foreseeable future?

Trump: For a little while. You know what they get for that? Iran without a nuclear weapon that's going to try and blow up one of our cities or blow up the entire Middle East. The stock market is at an all time high.

Reporter: —

Trump: Let me finish wise guy.
Now, wait a minute...
Trump: "Never allow the Traitor Democrats like Low IQ person Hakeem Jeffries, or Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, or the totally corrupt Fake News Media such as the phony and decaying Wall Street Journal, the Failing New York Times (Subscriptions way down!), or dying '60 Minutes,' to demean or criticize Operation Midnight Hammer, which totally obliterated the Nuclear Dust locations to the point where bloodthirsty Iran has been unable to get to it, or dig it out. Space Force has cameras on every inch of the 3 sites that were so brilliantly hit last June! Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT"
But Iran was two weeks away from…. You know what? Just…never mind. Just never mind. If every Democrat isn’t asking every GOP candidate to respond to that, I give up. Can’t imagine why.🙄 🫪 Remind me not to take any.

Is “Quagmire ” Really The Analogy You Want To Make?

Trump: I took a lot of heat. I'd say 500%, 600%, but we also say sometimes 50%, 60%, different kind of calculation and people understand that better, but there are two ways of calculating it, but either way it doesn't make any difference. It's also 500, 600, 700, depending on the way you want to look at. The way you word the calculation, it’s either way.
Never mind. He’s not going to know what the word “analogy” means. Makes you more confident, don’t it?

REGIME CHANGE!

The "moderates” are no longer in power.  The people who are keeping the ‘79 revolution alive are in charge.

John Bolton was on MS NOW this morning, arguing the only way out of this mess is through, with regime change that puts a “good” regime in Iran. I’m pretty sure we did that once before, and here we are, now.

The nation’s supply of idiots seems inexhaustible.

Some Of Us Are Still Asleep 😴

President Donald J. Trump has posted to his Truth Social account stating that there is a struggle between Iranian "hardliners" and "moderates" for control over the country. He then asserts that the U.S. Navy has the Strait of Hormuz "sealed up tight" and that no ships can enter or leave without their approval, despite the fact that the vast majority of ships transiting the Strait are using the Iranian traffic separation scheme and coordinating safe passage with the Iranians.

While We Were Sleeping….

How can dozens of ships defeat the US Blockade, as the FT repost below says is happening?

The map shows how a tanker can travel from Kharg Island to Mumbai while remaining within the territorial waters of Pakistan and India.

The US Blockade Rules and UNCLOS (UN Law of the Sea) give ships the right of innocent passage through a coastal state’s territorial sea, and it is the coastal state that will regulate that passage. waters 

Once in Pakistani or Indian waters, they can transfer their cargo or continue without entering international waters.
The secret is, the blockade only interdicts ships moving from Iranian territorial waters into Pakistani territorial waters. Which, apparently, is not 100% effective. Trump doesn’t understand this, so he tells himself (and us) that Iran is hermetically sealed and is starving to death. He thinks Iran is losing “$500 million a day.” But he also thinks he saved 8 Iranian women who may not even exist: Iran seems to be better informed than Trump is: Then again, the POTUS gets his information from the Intertoobs.

It’s not really that the blockade has to be perfect. It’s that Trump thinks it is. He thinks it’s one more way he’s “winning” this war. The problem is not the reality. The problem is his stupidity.

I Still Haven’t Figured Out The Benefit Of AI

And it begins

Sullivan & Cromwell just admitted to a federal judge its court filings contained AI hallucinations

The firm apologized to the federal judge as they had to submit multiple corrections focused around:

• Fictitious Case Names: The filing included names of legal cases that do not exist

• Fabricated Quotes: The document contained direct quotes that were never actually spoken or written

• Non-existent Statutes: The AI incorrectly analyzed or entirely invented provisions within the U.S. Bankruptcy Code

The primary team and secondary review all failed to catch these errors, meanwhile the firm's partners bill $2,000+ per hour
I’m not a Luddite, but this is why state and local governments need to allow the construction of “data centers” that consume resources (land, water, noise pollution) and electricity, and produce…?  Well, what benefits, exactly?

We need to pay these costs because we need to be on the bleeding edge of the future so we can do this?

Make it make sense.

I taught English for 20 years. Believe me, students desperate to not do the reading and thinking can come up with fake quotes and fill a paper with nonsense without any access to artificial intelligence. We don’t really need to outsource stupidity.*

*And I was teaching community college students, basically people who still needed a few more years of high school. Lawyers in elite law firms are supposed to be the best and the brightest. They certainly think they are. This is the revenge of the other 90% of law school graduates. But it still doesn’t explain what AI is good for.

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

I’ve Been Wondering About This All Day

And while I have you here: Is Trump only responsible for the stuff he makes up?
Developing....(I don’t trust the Iranian government; but neither do I trust Trump.) Every time you think it can’t get any worse…

No. The OG Hoax Is That The Earth Is Round

Go big, or go home. See?

Still The Trump Administration

RFK JR: The study says that the 80% in mortalities from chronic disease that took place in the 20th century—that almost none of it was attributable to vaccination. It was attributable to hygiene, sewer plants, better water supplies, engineering that got oranges—

Sanders: You’re entitled to your view.

RFK JR: That’s not my view. That’s CDC’s view.

Sanders: According to the WHO and scientists all over the world, vaccines have played an enormous role in saving lives.
RFK, Jr. disavows any knowledge of his actions. Sure. Let the Republicans run with that platform. It’s a double super secret.🤫  After all, look what he did in Venezuela. Whatever helps. Why did Virginia vote for redistricting, again? How close are we to the elections in VA? Let’s ask the Supremes if that matters….

“As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person….”

Trump: “A RIGGED ELECTION TOOK PLACE LAST NIGHT IN THE GREAT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA! All day long Republicans were winning, the Spirit was unbelievable, until the very end when, of course, there was a massive ‘Mail In Ballot Drop!’ Where have I heard that before — And the Democrats eked out another Crooked Victory! Six to five goes to ten to one, and yet the Presidential Election in November was very close to a 50-50 split. In addition to everything else, the language on the Referendum was purposefully unintelligible and deceptive. As everyone knows, I am an extraordinarily brilliant person, and even I had no idea what the hell they were talking about in the Referendum, and neither do they! Let’s see if the Courts will fix this travesty of ‘Justice.’ President DONALD J. TRUMP”
Very close to a 50/50 split in November? What’s changed since then? Will the courts “Fix This”? Signs point to: “Are you buggin’?”

The vote was 51/48 (unofficially), which is still very close to a 50/50 split.  Except maybe in “Trump math.” And this was the ballot language:
Question: Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?
Yup. I’m confused.

The Trump Administration

And coal is clean! And windmills kill whales!🐳 
Shaheen: How does insulting our closest ally and neighbor help the businesses in my state and states all across this country who are hurting because of the loss of Canadian business and tourism?

Lutnick: Canada's economy leans on the incredible $30 trillion economy of America.

Shaheen: We have all those Canadian visitors who are not coming because of your comments and comments by the administration. How does that help our economy?

Lutnick: It is outrageous that Canada will not put U.S. Spirits on the shelf.

Shaheen: And they won't do it because of the insults from this president and comments like yours.
"It was meant for the babies of slaves, not the babies of Chinese billionaires.” Babies like Wong Kim Ark? (The distinction is that Ark’s parents were not billionaires.) He also says upholding Wong Kim Ark “will cost America its DIGNITY!” Whatever could he mean by that? 🧐

None Dare Call It Socialism

I still can’t figure out why.

And There Our Troubles Began…Anew….

 Speaking of history….

I stumbled across a Netflix documentary on the “debates” between William F. Buckley and Gore Vidal in 1968.  I remember this as an historical matter, not because I was keenly watching third-rated ABC News coverage of the 1968 conventions when I was 13. The background is, ABC needed to generate a reason for people to watch their coverage of the conventions, and Buckley had established himself as a TeeVee presence on PBS with “Firing Line.” ABC needed someone for Buckley to respond to, and asked him for suggestions. Buckley responded, basically: anybody but Gore Vidal. So ABC responded, quite appropriately: “Let’s get Gore Vidal.” And they did.

And invented the television we now all know and… love?

The advocates of Buckley insist he was the greatest debater of his time. Which makes me more and more dismissive of the concept of debate. James Talarico and Pete Buttigieg are excellent champions of their point of view, because they are very persuasive. Debate is not about persuasion, it’s about scoring points and appealing to the mob, usually via ad hominem. It’s about clever retort, not reasoning; and it’s about having about half the audience on your side before you start. It can work, in limited circumstances, but it usually doesn’t. It just sets everything in quick drying cement. Talarico or Buttigieg leave you thinking. Buckley just left you annoyed or, if you already agreed with him, impressed with his arrogance.

Buckley basically had a position, and insisted against the world and all comers, that his was the correct position. He hated the civil rights movement, (the documentary is about 1968, and I’m no Buckley scholar), probably hated the women’s liberation movement, certainly hated the gay rights movement (in anger at being called a “crypto-Nazi” by Vidal on camera, Buckley calls Vidal a “queer.” And there our media troubles began.), and generally had little regard for anyone who wasn’t an ultramontane Catholic. (I’m sure Leo has Buckley rolling in his grave.)  He actually said once that his purpose was to stand athwart history and yell “STOP!” If that isn’t fascistic, I honestly don’t know what is.

He was not a persuader, in other words. Talarico’s opponents fear him precisely because he is so persuasive. Reason actually is persuasion, when wielded correctly. Buckley never sought to persuade. Buckley merely insisted. His reasoning was, his opinions were right, and that was the end of it.

Vidal, in his own words (in the documentary), was an analyst of power. He thought people weren’t driven by sexual appetite or desire, but by the desire for power. It’s how he explained his thesis in Myra Breckenridge. A book, by the way, Buckley wrote about reading, but dismissed it out of hand. Not after a careful analysis, but just as a matter of personal distaste and a personal refusal to accept that such ideas could even exist in the world.* (There are noxious ideas that shouldn’t exist, but they do. Racism, for example. But if you think you can banish it, you actually just make it harder to recognize. Ideas can’t be killed, or banished.) For Buckley the personal was not just political, it was the only reality. As he thought, so should we all think; and if we didn’t, well, more fool us. In Buckley’s view, as is apparent from his “review” of Vidal’s most famous book, all ideas Buckley rejected should be expunged from the world, as evil. Not just bad or disappointing; actually evil. It is, ironically, a very Manichean vision. (His brother appears in the do, and argues, bizarrely, that more overt racist contemporaries of Bill were “gnostic” in their conservatism.) Vidal’s arguments about the nature, and importance, of power, make a great deal more sense. I don’t mean they are ultimately persuasive, or that Vidal is impressive as a thinker. But Vidal has ideas: Buckley just has a position.

Buckley is largely forgotten these days. His show has been resurrected by Margaret Hoover, who does a much better job being reasonable and seeking insight, than Buckley ever did. He has, like Barry Goldwater, vanished into history; which is ironic because, as the documentary notes, the fall of Goldwater spurred the reactionary movement in American politics which is always present, if sometimes moribund, and has produced the present moment (which is prompting the counter-counterrevolution; but, ‘twas ever thus.). His debates with Vidal really did create the modern media culture Twitter knows and loves to hate (what would we do without CNN’s panel “discussions” to complain about?). Especially because they weren’t debates. But then, we don’t really want those. Exchanges of ideas aimed at achieving some kind of consensus are… dull television. 📺  And, according to Twitter, shouldn’t even be a part of our politics.

But then, unsocial media is a product of the Buckley-Vidal debates, too.


*Buckley could have been insightful and countered the ideas he disliked in the book. Instead, he just discards it. It was, at the time, a very popular book. Telling people they shouldn’t accept its existence, is hardly an argument, much less a debating strategy, for why they should reject it. But Buckley’s “method” was:,if he couldn’t accept it, it was rejected, no further explanation necessary. This is what passed for intelligent debate. Buckley’s supporters didn’t want to listen to Vidal. They didn’t see any reason to bother. This, too, is as American as cherry pie.

Just A Reminder 😈

Yes, Texas did start this. They did it on the basis that Hispanics in Texas were now solidly MAGA. So they created several Hispanic districts, solely on the basis of race, which the Supremes said was just fine, because it was too close to the primary elections for the Court to interfere. 😈

Then came 🧊.😈

Now Texas is stuck with several districts that lump together people who really, really don’t like Donald Trump. And there’s not a damned thing they can do about it.  

BTW, Dan Patrick, the Lite Guv (courtesy of the late, great Molly Ivins), is sounding the alarm that Democrats might take the Lege this November. Which has nothing whatsoever to do with federal redistricting.

ETTD.

😈

“Their Entire Navy Is At The Bottom Of The Sea”

The UK Office of Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) is reporting an attack on container ship this morning in the Strait of Hormuz, 15NM off the coast of Oman, by a gunboat operated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N), resulting in heavy damage to the ship’s bridge. All of the crew onboard the vessel are reported to be safe.
In a notable development, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy (IRGC-N) has said that they seized two vessels, the MSC Francesca and the Epaminodes, in the Strait of Hormuz and brought them back to the Iranian coast. This, as U.S. President Donald J. Trump announced the indefinite extension of the ceasefire just yesterday.
United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) Centre Reported two separate incidents earlier today, likely the MSC Francesca and the Epaminodes, between 8nm and 15nm west of Oman, before the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy (IRGC-N) announced that both vessels were stopped and directed towards Iranian waters.
Is the IRGC wading into the Strait?

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

The Wheels On The Bus Go ‘Round And ‘Round

I should just post this over and over:
Trump said Friday that the Strait of Hormuz situation was "over." It very obviously wasn't.

Trump said Friday that Iran agreed "to never close the Strait of Hormuz again.” The next day, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again.

Trump said yesterday that Vance isn't going to Pakistan for the talks. Officials quickly said Vance is going to Pakistan for the talks.

Trump said this morning that Vance had left and would be there tonight Islamabad time. Officials quickly said Vance is actually leaving tomorrow.

Trump said Iran has no military anymore and that "everything's gone." Iran continues to have a military with destructive capabilities.

Trump said the pope issued a statement saying Iran can have a nuclear weapon. That never happened.

Trump said nobody expected Iran to retaliate against Gulf countries. That was widely expected.

Trump said the only planes the US has really lost in the war have been to friendly fire. He said this at the same event at which he had spoken at length about what happened after Iran shot down a US plane.

Story on the president's ever-growing number of false claims on big and small matters related to the war – and his triumphant claims about supposed Iranian concessions that we just can't assume are based in reality:
Or this one:
Trump on Iran:
2/6-“They want to make a deal badly”
3/2-“They want to make a deal badly”
3/16-“They want to make a deal badly"
3/24-“They want to make a deal badly”
3/25-“They want to make a deal badly”
4/1-“They want to make a deal badly”
4-13-“They want to make a deal badly”
4/14-“They want to make a deal badly”

Todd Blanche Has Always Relied On The Kindness Of Strangers

So that means it’s true? Or does that mean you don’t want your name on this turkey?
REPORTER: Obviously you've read The Atlantic article that's now the subject of a defamation lawsuit

BLANCHE: I absolutely did not read that article

REPORTER: Have you heard any concerns given your supervision over the FBI about any problems with drinking?

BLANCHE: I have a lot of concerns. And my concerns are completely around the anonymous reporting that comes forth constantly
From an article you absolutely did not read? 🤔 Pro tip:  whenever someone asserts “there is no dispute,” it means they very much don’t want to argue about the disputed point. Usually because they can’t. Issues that involve a sitting president suing the government as a private individual, while overseeing a DOJ that Blanche has admitted is there to serve… that individual?  (See why he doesn’t want to argue the dispute?)
REPORTER: Can you say definitively that you have not been intoxicated or absent during your tenure as FBI director?

KASH PATEL: I can say unequivocally that I never listen to the fake news mafia. This FBI director has been on the job twice as many days as every director before me. I've taken half as many days off.
Probably the worst non-answer answer ever offered in public.
Kash Patel: "I'm like an everyday American who loves his country, loves the sport of hockey, and champions my friends when they raise a gold medal and invite me in to celebrate. I've never been intoxicated on the job, and that's why we filed a $250 million lawsuit. Any one of you who wants to participate -- bring it on. I'll see you in court."
How many average Americans can fly to Italy on a government plane and get into the locker room of the Olympic hockey team? Being drunk on the job, alone, is not what the article describes (nice try. That won’t work in court.) The greater concern is your apparent alcoholism and the impact on the security of the nation. See me in court? I’ll be the one silently (respect for the court) laughing my ass off as the court hands you, yours.
REPORTER: Can you explain the computer log in issue? Your lawsuit contends you were not able to log into the system

KASH PATEL: Let's have a survey. How many of you people believe that's true?

REPORTER: Did you communicate with anyone you thought you were fired?

PATEL: It's an absolute lie. It never happened. You are lying.

REPORTER: The lawsuit says the opposite!
The lawsuit as well as the article:
News of his emotional outburst ricocheted through the bureau, prompting chatter among officials and, in some corners of the building, expressions of relief. The White House fielded calls from the bureau and from members of Congress asking who was now in charge of the FBI.
Is the White House lying? Is this all fiction? And how long do you want us to talk about it?
Q: Joe diGenova said 'there's no doubt that John Brennan was the progenitor of this whole counterintelligence investigation.' Isn't there a conflict of interest in having him oversee this investigation?

BLANCHE: I'm not sure what the conflict would be. I just completely disagree with the premise
I guess we’ll see if the courts agree with you. Star chambers are the best way to get done what you want done. I guess.

…not the hole….

Not what Washington is saying:
Talks with Iran have collapsed before they even began.

Iran says it won’t negotiate while the U.S. naval blockade continues—and as Trump keeps threatening strikes on infrastructure. Meanwhile, Trump says he expects bombing to resume once the ceasefire ends.

U.S. forces reportedly boarded another Iranian-linked vessel, escalating tensions even further.

Now, with the ceasefire deadline approaching, Iran is warning it will retaliate if attacked—and planned talks in Pakistan appear dead.

This situation is spiraling fast.
But that doesn’t mean “the situation is spiraling fast.” Nor that Iran is blowing smoke.

Trump’s idea of negotiation is to bellow loudly while crawfishing quietly and calling it “art” and how he makes “deals.”
Yeah; like that.

Talks are definitely off:
But don’t be surprised if Trump gets them back on again. I suspect the UAE’s very public complaint is being echoed more privately by other countries in the region, and Trump is not anxious to give Iran a reason to strike our allies again. Nor is he really oblivious to the pressure from Europe and elsewhere about the continued closure of the Strait. He wants something from Iran to allow him to lift the blockade, but Iran has no reason to give it to him.  Trump, in his favorite metaphor, is running out of cards.

I fully expect him to lift the naval blockade by Friday, as soon as he can figure out a way to claim success. Probably something like saying he won, Iran is coming back to the negotiations….

I wrote (and published) the above, then saw this:
And remembered it was Tuesday: Trump will end the naval blockade before Iran agrees to anything more than a ceasefire.

History Is A Flat Circle The Size Of A Dime

 NYTPitchbot drops the mask:

(1/X) People sometimes wonder how things got so crazy in this country. Well, look back at the '90s: for Clinton impeachment, you had Alan Dershowitz on Geraldo arguing against impeachment and Jon Turley arguing for it. All three of course became Trumpers.

On various topics around feminism...
(2/X) the debate was between Camille Paglia and Naomi Wolf. Also both Trumpers now.

An enormous percentage of the self-promoting gasbags of 90s political/"culutural" tv became Trumpers.

There's a reason why things are so fucked up now.

And just to be clear, all of these people were always crazy assholes. They may have positioned themselves as moderate or liberals or whatever but they were always insane assholes. And they dominated a lot of popular discourse.
"Dominated” is a bit extreme. Who remembers Turley anymore? He was a clown then, too. Dershowitz is a joke (he was once, can you believe it, respected). Paglia had a best seller (which wasn’t that good, or insightful), so that was her 15 minutes. I’m surprised she’s still around; but not that she’s a Trumper.

None of those people were even Elizabeth Warren/AOC  adjacent, so their “turn” is no surprise. They were really just reactionary about things the reactionaries were reacting to. Contrarians for the sake of attention. They never dominated popular discourse, any more than Bill Maher ever has. 

Things are so fucked up now because things are always so fucked up “now.” Trump has a pointless war in Iran. Kennedy/LBJ/Nixon had Vietnam; and a draft that only college students could easily avoid. Guess who went to war? Dogs and water cannons and sadists with state authority went after protesters in the streets. Hell, J. Edgar Hoover was running the FBI and keeping his job by blackmailing any official who dared whisper the question: “Why is he still there?”

A handful of blowhards who would reliably pontificate on TeeVee are the reason we have 2026? Sure; and Trump would have easily won the Vietnam war. Look what he did in Venezuela!

I’ll retire to Bedlam….

I Hate It When Sen. Foghorn Leghorn Makes Sense

Well, When You Put It That Way….

Trump said Friday that the Strait of Hormuz situation was "over." It very obviously wasn't.

Trump said Friday that Iran agreed "to never close the Strait of Hormuz again.” The next day, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again.

Trump said yesterday that Vance isn't going to Pakistan for the talks. Officials quickly said Vance is going to Pakistan for the talks.

Trump said this morning that Vance had left and would be there tonight Islamabad time. Officials quickly said Vance is actually leaving tomorrow.

Trump said Iran has no military anymore and that "everything's gone." Iran continues to have a military with destructive capabilities.

Trump said the pope issued a statement saying Iran can have a nuclear weapon. That never happened.

Trump said nobody expected Iran to retaliate against Gulf countries. That was widely expected.

Trump said the only planes the US has really lost in the war have been to friendly fire. He said this at the same event at which he had spoken at length about what happened after Iran shot down a US plane.

Story on the president's ever-growing number of false claims on big and small matters related to the war – and his triumphant claims about supposed Iranian concessions that we just can't assume are based in reality:
OPINION: Imagine it was someone other than President Donald Trump. Suppose a different leader were posting deranged rants in the small hours, insulting the spiritual leader of 1.3 billion Catholics, threatening entire civilizations with annihilation, and comparing himself to God. What would be the reaction?
I’ve gotta say, having lived through Trump and Covid, this all sounds very familiar.

He’s Done Enough Damage For One Day

It is currently 3.3%. And you’ve won the war with Iran; almost once a week since you started it. And yet…. I guess this is the only way to get Trump on your show.
Trump: "Never allow the Traitor Democrats like Low IQ person Hakeem Jeffries, or Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, or the totally corrupt Fake News Media such as the phony and decaying Wall Street Journal, the Failing New York Times (Subscriptions way down!), or dying '60 Minutes,' to demean or criticize Operation Midnight Hammer, which totally obliterated the Nuclear Dust locations to the point where bloodthirsty Iran has been unable to get to it, or dig it out. Space Force has cameras on every inch of the 3 sites that were so brilliantly hit last June! Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT"
So Iran wasn’t two weeks away from a nuclear device? Or they were nowhere near having one? Which is it?
Trump: "The market is up. We're gonna be at 50,000. That's where we were just a little while ago, and when I hit 50,000 on the Dow, I said, 'Well, I hate to do this to everybody, but I'm gonna have to journey down to a place called Iran.' You want to see a bad stock market? Try blowing up the Middle East."
Totally worth it! Amirite? When it hits 50,000 again, what does he blow up next? South America?
KERNEN: Is there some type of currency swap possible with UAE to help if they need it? And do you think there'd be backlash?

TRUMP: It is. It's been a good country, a good ally of ours. It was shocking because we didn't think they'd get hit. I'm surprised, because they are really rich.
Connect that answer to that question, if you can. Trump has no idea what Keenan is talking about. He’s right, it’s not correct. Wait for it....
SORKIN: There's a whole number of very large companies, including Apple and Amazon, that have not sought reimbursements yet for the tariffs. From what I understand, part of the reason is they're worried about offending you.

TRUMP: I think it's brilliant. They got to know me very well. I'm honored.
Does he think the companies getting refunds (which is just a windfall for them) hate America? And Apple and Amazon, who probably don’t want the negative publicity, are “honoring Trump”? How? How the fuck does that work? He’s done enough damage today, Joe.

Probably Because They Were Completely Unaware Of It

During talks between U.S. and Iranian delegations in Pakistan, the topic of Ukraine unexpectedly came up.

While discussing U.S. guarantees in the event that Iran halts uranium enrichment and abandons the development of nuclear weapons, the Iranian side asked how the United States is fulfilling the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which it pledged to respect and protect Ukraine’s sovereignty.

The U.S. delegation left the question unanswered.
I mean, the negotiating team is Kushner, Vance, and Witkoff. All of them selected by Trump.

It’s ignorance all the way down.

Monday, April 20, 2026

All The Way Down

The full investigative power of the federal government can’t find anything, so we’re going to believe the guy who replaces Powell as the Chair? While Powell is still on the Board, and with the entire Board NOT backing up the lies of the new Chairman? A new Chairman who can’t get approved until January, if then?

And now that you’ve let that plan out of the bag, what are the odds Tillis ever changes his mind? Or that any Trump nominee gets approved? Or that you haven’t just triggered very heavy Congressional oversight of any Trump nominee? Especially if that nominee goes on the Board and starts giving Trump the “evidence” Trump wants? That’ll be as transparent as glass. 
Powell can say that and have credibility. The Chairman of the Fed doesn’t replace the entire Board; or command it. She (or he) is the credible spokesperson for the Board. Destroy that, and what do you have?Now, after this silly outburst, the Trump Fed Chair will have zero credibility. Unless he renounces Trump and all his works, for the sake of the U.S. economy. At least.

Fucking with the Chair of the Fed is when you really start meddling with primal forces. Especially if he remains loyal to Trump.

You guys really aren’t very good at this, are you?

Bold Prediction

According to Al Arabiya, Pakistani Prime Minister Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has asked the U.S. and Iran to extend the nominal ceasefire, set to expire in the next 48 hours, two extra weeks, as both sides find it increasingly hard to find points of convergence that would enable a more long-term ceasefire framework to be implemented. This, as negotiations in Islamabad, Pakistan, set for the next 24 hours continue to shape out.
Trump will take that option.

Who Told Us We Needed AI?🤖

I’m pretty sure I know….

“I Promised Six Weeks To Defeat Iran…”

"...and actually, from the Military standpoint, it was far faster than that.” It will end automatically.

Say What?

Trump v. WSJ:
The Complaint also alleges that President Trump told Defendants that the Letter was a fake before they ran the Article. President Trump argues that this allegation shows that Defendants acted with serious doubts about the truth of their reporting and, therefore, with actual malice. The Court disagrees. To establish actual malice, “a plaintiff must show the defendant deliberately avoided investigating the veracity of the statement in order to evade learning the truth.” Reed, 2025 WL 1874638, at *3. The Complaint comes nowhere close to this standard. Quite the opposite. The Article explains that, before running the story, Defendants contacted President Trump, Justice Department officials, and the FBI for comment. President Trump responded with his denial, the Justice Department did not respond at all, and the FBI declined to comment. In short, the Complaint and Article confirm that Defendants attempted to investigate. The Article also states that the WSJ reviewed the Letter. [ECF No. 35-2]. Accordingly, President Trump’s conclusory allegation that Defendants had contradictory evidence and failed to investigate is rebutted by the Article and is insufficient to establish actual malice. See Michel, 816 F.3d at 704 (holding that plaintiff did not adequately allege malice where record “indicate[d] that the reporters conducted some outreach and engaged in due diligence”).
I would not call that dispositive (for one thing, it’s a trial court opinion, which doesn’t establish precedent).  But I would cite this as an example of where Patel’s suit is likely headed. With a little help from the Complaint. Because this was in The Atlantic article:
The FBI responded with a statement, attributed to Patel: “Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court—bring your checkbook.”
"In short, the Complaint and Article confirm that Defendants attempted to investigate."

I think we’re done, here.