Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Criminal To Victim:

EISEN: I want to ask you about the WSJ report that a 49% stake in World Liberty was sold to an Emirati royal family member after your father was elected president so they could get access to AI chips

DON JR: We've been dealing with the conflict of interest stuff for years. Frankly, it's gotten old. They put us in this position. We just fought back.
"I’ve been dealing with this “criminal” stuff for years. If you’d just let me take your money without calling it a ‘crime,’ I wouldn’t have this problem.” As I understand it, Trump makes money at the point of purchase, when people buy his crypto. After that, the value of the coin is irrelevant to him. Which is why most of the purchases were people buying influence, not investments in the cryptocurrency. They can admit violations of law. Their father will just pardon them. Doing as good a job as the boys. Bezos is doing so well he can tank WaPo to curry favor with Trump. Meanwhile the country created the fewest jobs outside a recession in decades last year, and businesses are about to shift the cost of tariffs to consumers. Good question. Reflecting his family, basically.

No Wonder Trump Doesn’t Like Early Voting

I can only say I voted yesterday (first day of early voting. I’m retired, what else did I need to do?), and there were a sizable number of voters in the room. Long damned ballots, too (it’s Texas. I’m surprised we don’t vote for window washers.). No idea what the party breakdown was, but a fair number interested enough to get it done.

The ballot box is still where the power is.

Out On A Limb

 I never practiced criminal law; never even pretended to. My first encounter with law at all, in law school, was common law. The law of property, of torts, of contracts; all rooted in common law concepts. The same was true for criminal law: common law concepts like mens rea were paramount. But it was impressed upon me that there were no common law crimes; not in America. Assault might be a common law tort, but criminal assault was a statutory matter, or it wasn’t a crime at all. 

"Here’s what happened: After the FBI communicated with the Democratic lawmakers, prosecutors in Pirro’s office reached out to them to follow up," Sargent wrote. "Slotkin’s attorney, Preet Bharara, directly asked prosecutors what statute the Democrats had allegedly violated to prompt the criminal inquiry, according to sources familiar with these discussions. The prosecutors could not name any statute, the sources told me."

“'What is the theory of criminal liability?' is the question that was posed to the prosecutors, one source said, adding that 'no answer was forthcoming.'"

Prosecutors went forward in their attempt to indict the members of Congress without naming any violated statute, and Sargent said that it still hasn't been definitively confirmed what statue they used in their ultimately doomed grand jury hearing.

"The failure to name a relevant statute when directly asked to do so by the lawyers for the accused suggests prosecutors didn’t think a criminal prosecution was warranted or doubted there was probable cause to think the Democrats had committed a crime," Sargent wrote. "In fact, one source familiar with these discussions tells me the prosecutors’ general tone in them suggested they were making the sort of inquiry that normally comes at the very outset of the investigative process."

One of the sources said that prosecutors – neither of whom had much prior experience – seemed to be at the "very preliminary" stage in their investigation when they presented their evidence to a grand jury, and Sargent said that's a worrisome sign.

"For the DOJ to seek an indictment so soon after conversations like those suggests something or other prompted the rush to indict, perhaps a word from on high that — let’s go way out on a limb here — had little to do with facts and law," he wrote. "Legal experts tell me it’s odd for prosecutors to fail to state any theory of criminal liability and then attempt an indictment anyway so quickly."

While this effort, like others before it, collapsed in clumsy defeat, Sargent warned that Trump would continue abusing his authority to punish his enemies.

"There’s always bad news in the Trump era [but] a dynamic has kicked in that is oddly helpful to him," Sargent wrote. "Thanks to the knee-slapping, comic-relief-inducing nature of these failures, the authoritarian abuses underlying them risk being seen as less threatening than they actually are. That could potentially disarm us for the next round, which will surely come."
The first lesson I learned in law school was that even when the client said, “I’m in a bad mood and I want to sue,” that wasn’t enough. Most of my work was defense, and the first thing we analyzed was what violation of law was alleged. The classic scene is in “The Dark Knight,” when Batman has single-handedly extradited the mob’s money man, and prosecutors have to decide how to charge him. After a few questions of the prisoner, they hit upon it:  RICO. Now, that’s pure fiction, but it’s pretty much how it works. You can’t put someone in jail and just say “Judge, he’s bad man, and he done wrong.”

But that’s basically what these real life prosecutors did. They used the grand jury for a fishing expedition. They couldn’t even present a criminal statute violation. They just said, “Verdict first, trial afterwards!” I know I’ve quoted the Queen of Hearts before to mock a legal effort, but this time it’s the absolute truth. “Give us the indictment, and we’ll find the crime!” That is even less like due process than what the Queen of Hearts demanded.

You cannot accuse someone of a crime without having a criminal statute to show they violated. The common law tort of assault is an offensive contact (offensive to a reasonably prudent person). If I can prove that against you in court, I’ve proven a case for damages. But criminal assault requires proving the elements of the relevant statute for assault. Even if I sue for the tort, I have to allege the elements of the tort. I can’t just say you did something to me to be established as an undetermined tort at sometime in the future. That’s essentially what Trump days over 60 times in 2020: he alleged “fraud!”, but couldn’t establish even one element. He repeatedly said “Let me do discovery and I’ll find something!” And the courts repeatedly threw out the cases, because it doesn’t work that way. But Trump at least alleged fraud. Here, the prosecutors alleged a crime to be named later. That’s the very definition of a kangaroo court. Recall the @trial” scene in “The Dark Knight Rises, when Gotham City has devolved into chaos and anarchy. The charges are all “We don’t like you!,” and the verdict us “Because we can!” But the grand jury said: “No, you can’t.”

This is just such egregiously bad legal practice I’m surprised these people got law licenses (well, actually, I’m not. Licensure is not so much a way of controlling entry as it is controlling practice. In any case, it does neither very well.). I am surprised they weren’t fired, but then Trump has put Bondi and Pirro in charge, and fought to keep Halligan and Habba in office. The saving grace is that he already has a DOJ that can’t accomplish anything. For the country, however, that’s a very bad situation, indeed.

Which is where Sargent is wrong, however . The damage I mean is to the administration of justice, something government, through Art. II of the Constitution, is uniquely charged to do. There is no “next round” where matters get worse, except in the failure to administer justice. Trump can’t do any more harm to the DOJ, or through it. The authoritarian abuses are real enough, but those aren’t being ignored because the DOJ is now operating as the Three Stooges. It’s not “odd” to do what prosecutors tried to do here; it’s a violation of legal ethics and due process of law, at least. The only people “out on a limb” here is the Administration. And that limb is going to break. When the bough breaks, the cradle will fall.

And all the king’s horses, and all the king’s men, won’t be able to put Trump back together again.

Trump Is Typhoid Mary

New details are emerging about a heated meeting on Saturday afternoon at the Bayerischer Hof hotel in Munich between several senators and members of Congress and Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, along with Greenland’s Premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen.

It was during this meeting that Senator Lindsey Graham reportedly went completely off the rails.

The American outlet Puck had previously described how so-called “f-bombs” (f short for the word “fuck,” ed.) were thrown around the room.

“Imagine Graham on his worst day,” a source told Puck.

But Berlingske can now reveal that events unfolded even more violently than previously reported — and that Graham’s outburst was directed in particular at Mette Frederiksen and Jens-Frederik Nielsen.

“He called her ‘little lady,’” a source who was in the room told Berlingske.

However, the prime minister did not appear affected by what everyone present perceived as extremely degrading and outright sexist.

“She seemed cool,” the source said.

When Graham had finished, Frederiksen simply responded:

“When you’re done with that, the meeting can continue.”

Earlier, Graham had also stressed to Frederiksen and Nielsen that Donald Trump was the President of the United States — and thus the most powerful man in the world.

The implication: neither Denmark nor Greenland should believe they are anything in comparison with the mighty United States.

This “rant,” as a Danish source who was present in the room described it, came across as extremely demeaning toward Denmark and Greenland — particularly after the “little lady” remark directed at Mette Frederiksen.

Graham’s behavior was described by a source as outright “disturbing,” “shocking,” and “extremely inappropriate.”

An almost theatrical scene also unfolded between Graham and Premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen.

“Graham yawned directly in his face in a way that could only be interpreted as mocking,” the source told Berlingske.

It became too much for some of the American participants at the meeting, and Senator Elissa Slotkin (Democrat) was reportedly so shocked that she stood up and left the meeting.

In a sense, the meeting marked the culmination of Graham’s angry outbursts.

Already on Friday, he had stunned observers on live television when asked about Greenland.

“Who the hell cares who owns Greenland?” Graham said, according to CSPAN.

Participants at the meeting described his conduct as “completely out of line.”

According to Berlingske’s information, there was quiet speculation afterward as to whether the senator from South Carolina had lost his composure entirely — whether he was not in his right mind when meeting the Danish and Greenlandic leaders.

Only Graham himself likely knows the answer to that.

—Berlingske
And the contagion is stupid, blind arrogance. 

But it’s also clear that the old people need to leave the halls of power in D.C. en masse.  They’ve just lost it.

“Because I Do Not Hope”

"(Bless me father)"


Every year I return to Eliot’s  poem, because it was my first introduction to the idea of "Ash Wednesday"  The first I remember, anyway.  As I said last year:

This was Eliot publicly turning to Christianity.  Back to Christianity?  Most likely.  I don't know that he was ever that public an atheist.  He was turning to the establishment church, too, as he joined the Church of England at about this time, a church that, liturgically, is more or less properly called "Catholic lite."  So the language here may seem distinctly Catholic, to non-Catholics like me, anyway.  But it is also distinctly Anglican.

This was my first encounter, in high school where I first read Eliot, with the idea of Ash Wednesday.  Needless to say this poem was not terribly enlightening on the liturgical calendar for this observance.  But I return to it every year because it challenges me to understand, much in the same way I try to understand my relationship to God, and to everyone else.  I don't mean because I am so far removed from people, or even in some teen-angst sense from myself.  But every year I start over, "Because I do not hope to turn/Because I do not hope/Because I do not hope to turn again/[Still] Desiring this man's gift or that man's scope."  I tell myself I no longer strive to strive toward such things; but my self knows better than I.

Is that odd? 

I was going to (finally!) explicate the poem today. Maybe I will.  Maybe I'll even connect "Burnt Norton" and The Four Quartets" to Xmas and Advent, now that Lent has begun.  My penance for never finishing what I started.

Maybe.  But right now, I just want to leave you with this, which maybe has nothing to do with Eliot at all.  Or maybe I can connect nothing with nothing.

Maybe.

But then, how is that different from most of us?

ASHES, ashes, all fall down. How could I have forgotten? Didn't I see the heavens wiped shut just yesterday, on the road walking? Didn't I fall from the dark of the stars to these senselit and noisome days? The great ridged granite millstone of time is illusion, for only the good is real; the great ridged granite millstone of space is illusion, for God is spirit and worlds his flimsiest dreams: but the illusions are almost perfect, are apparently perfect for generations on end, and the pain is also, and undeniably, real. The pain within the mill-stones' pitiless turning is real, for our love for each other-for the world and all the products of extension-is real, vaulting, insofar as it is love, beyond the plane of the stones' sickening churn and arcing to the realm of spirit bare. And you can get caught holding one end of a love, when your father drops, and your mother; when a land is lost, or a time, and your friend blotted out, gone, your brother's body spoiled, and cold, your infant dead, and you dying: you reel out love's long line alone, stripped like a live wire loosing its sparks to a cloud, like a live wire loosed in space to longing and grief everlasting.

--Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm, HarperCollins, 1977.

IN some monastic communities, monks go up to receive the ashes barefoot. Going barefoot is a joyous thing. It is good to feel the floor or the earth under your feet. It is good when the whole church is silent, filled with the hush of people walking without shoes. One wonders why we wear such things as shoes anyway. Prayer is so much more meaningful without them. It would be good to take them off in church all the time. But perhaps this might appear quixotic to those who have forgotten such very elementary satisfactions. Someone might catch cold at the mere thought of it.

--Thomas Merton, Seasons of Celebration  

I can't see Dillard and Merton ever getting along; but maybe they would surprise me.  Dillard's despair is as firm and real as Merton's faith and confidence.  Two sides of the same coin?  No.  Two feet on the same path.

I am an older man than I was when I first encountered Dillard's words (long before I read any of Merton's),  Couldn't have been earlier than 77.  I was a feckless ignorant child of 21 when that year began; 22 and married and wholly unprepared for adulthood by the time the year turned to '78.  I didn't understand what she meant then; lord, do I understand now.  And I understand it is only for understanding, not for explication. Sometimes analysis is increase and insight; but sometimes it is decrease, and willful blindness.  Sometimes you just need to leave it at the realm of spirit bare, of longing and grief everlasting, and let that be reality for even a moment. It is good to have a day, ritually, for that.

Ash Wednesday 2026

Ash Wednesday by T. S. Eliot

I
Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the agèd eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?

Because I do not hope to know
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power

Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is
nothing again
Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place
I rejoice that things are as they are and
I renounce the blessèd face
And renounce the voice
Because I cannot hope to turn again
Consequently I rejoice, having to construct something
Upon which to rejoice

And pray to God to have mercy upon us
And pray that I may forget
These matters that with myself I too much discuss
Too much explain
Because I do not hope to turn again
Let these words answer
For what is done, not to be done again
May the judgement not be too heavy upon us

Because these wings are no longer wings to fly
But merely vans to beat the air
The air which is now thoroughly small and dry
Smaller and dryer than the will
Teach us to care and not to care Teach us to sit still.

Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death
Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.

II 

Lady, three white leopards sat under a juniper-tree
In the cool of the day, having fed to sateity
On my legs my heart my liver and that which had been
contained
In the hollow round of my skull. And God said
Shall these bones live? shall these
Bones live? And that which had been contained
In the bones (which were already dry) said chirping:
Because of the goodness of this Lady
And because of her loveliness, and because
She honours the Virgin in meditation,
We shine with brightness. And I who am here dissembled
Proffer my deeds to oblivion, and my love
To the posterity of the desert and the fruit of the gourd.
It is this which recovers
My guts the strings of my eyes and the indigestible portions
Which the leopards reject. The Lady is withdrawn
In a white gown, to contemplation, in a white gown.
Let the whiteness of bones atone to forgetfulness.
There is no life in them. As I am forgotten
And would be forgotten, so I would forget
Thus devoted, concentrated in purpose. And God said
Prophesy to the wind, to the wind only for only
The wind will listen. And the bones sang chirping
With the burden of the grasshopper, saying

Lady of silences
Calm and distressed
Torn and most whole
Rose of memory
Rose of forgetfulness
Exhausted and life-giving
Worried reposeful
The single Rose
Is now the Garden
Where all loves end
Terminate torment
Of love unsatisfied
The greater torment
Of love satisfied
End of the endless
Journey to no end
Conclusion of all that
Is inconclusible
Speech without word and
Word of no speech
Grace to the Mother
For the Garden
Where all love ends.
Under a juniper-tree the bones sang, scattered and shining
We are glad to be scattered, we did little good to each
other,

Under a tree in the cool of day, with the blessing of sand,
Forgetting themselves and each other, united
In the quiet of the desert. This is the land which ye
Shall divide by lot. And neither division nor unity
Matters. This is the land. We have our inheritance.


III 

At the first turning of the second stair
I turned and saw below
The same shape twisted on the banister
Under the vapour in the fetid air
Struggling with the devil of the stairs who wears
The deceitul face of hope and of despair.

At the second turning of the second stair
I left them twisting, turning below;
There were no more faces and the stair was dark,
Damp, jaggèd, like an old man's mouth drivelling, beyond
repair,
Or the toothed gullet of an agèd shark.

At the first turning of the third stair
Was a slotted window bellied like the figs's fruit
And beyond the hawthorn blossom and a pasture scene
The broadbacked figure drest in blue and green
Enchanted the maytime with an antique flute.
Blown hair is sweet, brown hair over the mouth blown,
Lilac and brown hair;
Distraction, music of the flute, stops and steps of the mind
over the third stair, 
Fading, fading; strength beyond hope and despair
Climbing the third stair.

Lord, I am not worthy
Lord, I am not worthy
but speak the word only. 

IV 

Who walked between the violet and the violet
Whe walked between
The various ranks of varied green
Going in white and blue, in Mary's colour,
Talking of trivial things
In ignorance and knowledge of eternal dolour
Who moved among the others as they walked,
Who then made strong the fountains and made fresh the springs

Made cool the dry rock and made firm the sand
In blue of larkspur, blue of Mary's colour,
Sovegna vos

Here are the years that walk between, bearing
Away the fiddles and the flutes, restoring
One who moves in the time between sleep and waking, wearing

White light folded, sheathing about her, folded.
The new years walk, restoring
Through a bright cloud of tears, the years, restoring
With a new verse the ancient rhyme. Redeem
The time. Redeem
The unread vision in the higher dream
While jewelled unicorns draw by the gilded hearse.

The silent sister veiled in white and blue
Between the yews, behind the garden god,
Whose flute is breathless, bent her head and signed but spoke
no word

But the fountain sprang up and the bird sang down
Redeem the time, redeem the dream
The token of the word unheard, unspoken

Till the wind shake a thousand whispers from the yew

And after this our exile




If the lost word is lost, if the spent word is spent
If the unheard, unspoken
Word is unspoken, unheard;
Still is the unspoken word, the Word unheard,
The Word without a word, the Word within
The world and for the world;
And the light shone in darkness and
Against the Word the unstilled world still whirled
About the centre of the silent Word.

O my people, what have I done unto thee.

Where shall the word be found, where will the word
Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence
Not on the sea or on the islands, not
On the mainland, in the desert or the rain land,
For those who walk in darkness
Both in the day time and in the night time
The right time and the right place are not here
No place of grace for those who avoid the face
No time to rejoice for those who walk among noise and deny
the voice

Will the veiled sister pray for
Those who walk in darkness, who chose thee and oppose thee,
Those who are torn on the horn between season and season,
time and time, between
Hour and hour, word and word, power and power, those who wait
In darkness? Will the veiled sister pray
For children at the gate
Who will not go away and cannot pray:
Pray for those who chose and oppose

O my people, what have I done unto thee.

Will the veiled sister between the slender
Yew trees pray for those who offend her
And are terrified and cannot surrender
And affirm before the world and deny between the rocks
In the last desert before the last blue rocks
The desert in the garden the garden in the desert
Of drouth, spitting from the mouth the withered apple-seed.

O my people.

VI 

Although I do not hope to turn again
Although I do not hope
Although I do not hope to turn

Wavering between the profit and the loss
In this brief transit where the dreams cross
The dreamcrossed twilight between birth and dying
(Bless me father) though I do not wish to wish these things
From the wide window towards the granite shore
The white sails still fly seaward, seaward flying
Unbroken wings

And the lost heart stiffens and rejoices
In the lost lilac and the lost sea voices
And the weak spirit quickens to rebel
For the bent golden-rod and the lost sea smell
Quickens to recover
The cry of quail and the whirling plover
And the blind eye creates
The empty forms between the ivory gates
And smell renews the salt savour of the sandy earth

This is the time of tension between dying and birth
The place of solitude where three dreams cross
Between blue rocks
But when the voices shaken from the yew-tree drift away
Let the other yew be shaken and reply.

Blessèd sister, holy mother, spirit of the fountain, spirit
of the garden,
Suffer us not to mock ourselves with falsehood
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still
Even among these rocks,
Our peace in His will
And even among these rocks
Sister, mother
And spirit of the river, spirit of the sea,
Suffer me not to be separated

And let my cry come unto Thee. 

This was Eliot publicly turning to Christianity.  Back to Christianity?  Most likely.  I don't know that he was ever that public an atheist.  He was turning to the establishment church, too, as he joined the Church of England at about this time, a church that, liturgically, is more or less properly called "Catholic lite."  So the language here may seem distinctly Catholic, to non-Catholics like me, anyway.  But it is also distinctly Anglican.

This was my first encounter, in high school where I first read Eliot, with the idea of Ash Wednesday.  Needless to say this poem was not terribly enlightening on the liturgical calendar for this observance.  But I return to it every year because it challenges me to understand, much in the same way I try to understand my relationship to God, and to everyone else.  I don't mean because I am so far removed from people, or even in some teen-angst sense from myself.  But every year I start over, "Because I do not hope to turn/Because I do not hope/Because I do not hope to turn again/[Still] Desiring this man's gift or that man's scope."  I tell myself I no longer strive to strive toward such things; but my self knows better than I.

Is that odd?

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

The Whims Of Rich Old Men

That’s in the Second amendment! You can’t argue with that! A/k/a the welcome wagon in Hell. He does not worship the God I worship, he does not read the Bible I read. “Never share my hearth, never think my thoughts, whoever does such things.” Considering the success rate of the Trump DOJ, I’m pretty comfortable that, since Congress hasn’t addressed this, the states are welcome to. There’s also the fact that states regulate gambling within their borders. Wow. No wonder:
"When the cameras are on, senior members of the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s administration are well-trained to say that conservatives predicting a 'bloodbath' in the 2026 midterms are hysterical bed-wetters and doomsayers, underestimating the raw power of Trump’s draw among the American electorate," according to Zeteo. "Behind closed doors, those same senior members of the party are often the ones doing the heavy bed-wetting."

Trump has seen mounting disapproval in polls over the last several weeks due to his harsh immigration policies, ICE enforcement actions and the economy. Now, even insiders have expressed some doubt over how Republicans will maintain power.

"It would be one thing if the only people making this determination were employed at the major nonpartisan polling firms and legacy-media organizations that the Trump White House would have you believe are all 'Fake' losers," Zeteo reported. "But some of the most pro-Trump pollsters in the business are coming to similar conclusions, warning of a likely 'disaster' or 'blue wave' in November, administration officials and others in the MAGA elite tell Zeteo."
You don’t need a Daniel to tell you what this handwriting on the wall means. Never seen anything like it. Nobody has. Nor like this: All you need is lots of free time and a very well appointed workout space. And money to buy “real food,” which, yes, is better for you but also more expensive. Which means some people in Trump’s America, the ones who don’t have family money and lifestyles of the rich and famous, aren’t really accessing this “government advice;” nor could they follow it, anyway.

That’s why government used to run by committee and research and even argument and discussion and finally consensus, rather than by the whims of rich old men.
. @JamesTalarico : For 50 years, the religious right convinced our fellow Christians that the most important issues were abortion and gay marriage—two issues that aren't mentioned in the Bible.

Jesus tells us exactly how we're going to be judged: by feeding the hungry, by healing the sick, and by welcoming the stranger.

Don’t tell me what you believe. Show me how you treat other people, and I’ll tell you what you believe. Jesus gave us two commandments: love God and love neighbor.

There was no exception to that second commandment regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or religious affiliation.
I voted today in the Democratic primary. Early voting, something else Trump wants to eliminate. I voted for Talarico. I’m inordinately proud of that, and I hope the pundits who think this interview and the Streisand effect will boost his chances, are correct.

And think about the fact this is what CBS was afraid of. Maybe they were right to be; and maybe their fear was not purely political, or just for legal consequences. There’s a Peanuts strip where Lucy is chasing Linus, furious with him. Suddenly Linus turns, and begins to reason his sister out of her anger. At that point she slugs him and, her anger sated, walks away. She tells another character in explanation: “I had to hit him quick. He was beginning to make sense.”

Such is the way of the world.

About That, Idiot

My btother lay dying, in Chucago. I needed to fly there to see him. I had just renewed my drivers license, and needed the new one because it conformed to the then new federal law that indicated I was, in fact, a U.S. citizen. (I had to get a copy of my birth certificate to renew my license, which I’d held for over 60 years without anyone ever questioning my citizenship.) Had it come in the mail in time, it would not have been a problem. But the postal service delayed delivery for almost two weeks. I finally decided to make the two day trip to drive to Chicago.

My new license arrived the day before I left.

My brother was in a coma when I arrived. But he knew I was there. He died early the next morning after I saw him, for the last time, upon arriving in Chicago.

So fuck you, Sen. Rounds, and your “unlikely” scenarios. The SAVE Act isn’t meant to make voting more secure. It is simply meant to make it more difficult.

Air travel is not a right guaranteed to anyone in the Constitution. Voting is guaranteed to every eligible person in this country. That’s why requiring a driver’s license in order to vote is a poll tax.
I.e., it’s unconstitutional. He really is a world class idiot. (That requirement would violate the 14th Amendment (equal protection).The truth is, if the law even passed, the courts would not allow it to apply to the 2026 midterms (too disruptive), and it wouldn’t pass constitutional muster on several grounds. But that doesn’t mean it should pass.)

Or, And Hear Me Out…

It’s a 5000% increase if you look at it the right way and do Trump math. We also just need to deport enough immigrants. I guess? Um, never mind. The stupidity in the administration is clearly contagious; or required. Hard to see the difference at this point.

If This Child Dies, Trump Is Responsible

The man can’t organize a two car funeral procession, much less oversee the U.S. government.

Getting What You Asked For

As Colbert pointed out, the FCC never took any action. Which means CBS told its lawyers to tell Colbert the interview violated the Fairness Doctrine, and couldn’t be seen by anybody.

 Oops:

"As of 12 PM ET, view counts on the most-watched Colbert clips on his FCC-censored Talarico interview: YouTube: 1.3M; Instagram: 1.6M; TikTok: 2.4M; Twitter: 5.1M," wrote energy policy analyst Jessy Han. "For context, Colbert's show averages 2.3 million viewers on linear TV."

Under Secretary

"When Lewandowski was informed that some of Noem's personal items had been left behind, including her heated blanket, he yelled at the Coast Guard flight staff and threatened to fire them, according to the two U.S. officials, the Coast Guard official and the former Coast Guard official.

The Coast Guard pilot came out of the cockpit to see what was happening, and Lewandowski insisted the plane return to where the broken-down jet was located to collect the secretary’s items, the U.S. official, the current Coast Guard official and the former Coast Guard official said.

When the pilot refused, Lewandowski announced the pilot was relieved of his duty, according to the U.S. official, the current Coast Guard official and the former Coast official. The pilot explained that if he was fired, he would need to land the plane immediately while another pilot was found to continue the mission to Washington, the U.S. official, the current Coast Guard official and the former Coast Guard official said."
Waste, fraud, and abuse.

🏴‍☠️ Set Aside The Act Of Piracy

That’s half of what Venezuela was producing. Absolutely nothing has changed about Venezuelan infrastructure, nor could it have even if Exxon had pledged to invest trillions back in that White House meeting. This is nothing more than more of the same: ETTD.

And where is the money actually going? That story seems to change weekly. And on what legal grounds (governments operate by law) is the U.S. entitled to a penny of it?

Canceling Cancel Culture

Actually, this is the interview. For technical reasons apparently arising from recent updates, I can’t embed YouTube videos at the moment.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly urged the FCC, which approves mergers in the media and telecommunications industry, to crack down on American broadcasters. In his letter, Carr wrote that “programming motivated by partisan purposes” should comply with the equal time rules.

“Let’s just call this what it is: Donald Trump’s administration wants to silence anyone who says anything bad about Trump on TV, because all Trump does is watch TV, OK?” Colbert said. He added that Carr merely said in the Jan. 21 guidance that he was considering dropping the exemption for talk shows.

“He hasn’t done away with it yet, but my network is unilaterally enforcing it as if he had,” Colbert said.
And :
In the interview, which was posted on YouTube, Talarico called the guidance by the Trump administration and the decision by CBS to preemptively comply as a “threat to all of our First Amendment rights.”

“Donald Trump is worried that we’re about to flip Texas,” Talarico said. “This is the party that ran against cancel culture, and now they’re trying to control what we watch, what we say, what we read. And this is the most dangerous kind of cancel culture — the kind that comes from the top.”

Talarico noted that the FCC opened an investigation into ABC’s “The View” after he sat for an interview this month, casting it as part of a pattern of government overreach dating back to when the agency “went after” Jimmy Kimmel for a joke he made about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Kimmel’s show was briefly suspended by ABC in September after the FCC threatened the network.

Talarico added that CBS canceled Colbert’s show after the late-night host told “the truth about Paramount’s bribe to Donald Trump.”

“Corporate media executives are selling out the First Amendment to curry favor with corrupt politicians, and a threat to any of our First Amendment rights is a threat to all of our First Amendment rights,” he said.

The interview also covered Talarico’s Christian faith, Democratic hopes of retaking Texas this year and recent blowback Talarico faced for allegedly referring to Colin Allred, a former Dallas congressman and Democratic Senate candidate, as a “mediocre Black man.” Talarico said he called Allred’s campaigning mediocre but “would never attack him on the basis of race.”
Which may also explain why CBS canceled the interview. Apparently it’s a pretty good one: The questions answer themselves, don’t they?  And have you noticed MAGA no longer talks about “cancel culture”? Why is that…?

I also appreciate the point that CBS lawyers told Colbert his interview would run afoul of the FCC if it was aired. As Colbert points out, Carr was never that definitive. Which means CBS told the lawyers to make it so, and they did. Hey, lawyers are paid to do what the client wants, unless it’s illegal or violates professional ethics.

Conduct yourself accordingly.

The Greatest Economy Ever!

Well, for Trump, anyway.

Monday, February 16, 2026

So This Is Why…

... he keeps saying this: His endorsement is the hand of God the full load of the Augean stables on the shoulders of the chosen candidate. When I was teaching, I had students who’d never heard of Noah. The weren’t stupid, they just weren’t raised in a church.  I think most of them knew who Jeanne d’Arc was, though. Although I never taught them “St. Joan” or Leonard Cohen’s beautiful song. More’s the pity. I really love that song.

Other unforeseen uses of AI:
And the temple to free speech that is Twitter: Finally, in this greatest economy in the history of America, the price of housing is going down because so many immigrants are being forced out: Housing prices will be going down any minute now.  

I thought I should follow up:
A 2-month-old baby detained at Dilley’s South Texas Family Residential Center has fallen ill and has been described as “choking on his own vomit,” according to Univision reporter Lidia Terrazas.

The child had a medical episode at approximately 3 a.m. Saturday, Terrazas reported in an Instagram video after speaking with the infant’s mother.

“His life is in danger,” U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro said in a live video shared to Instagram Monday afternoon about the child, named Juan Nicolás.

In addition to vomiting, Castro said the baby was “having respiratory issues.”

Nicolás has been detained at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility about an hour southwest of San Antonio for more than three weeks, or approximately half of his young life, according to Castro.

The congressman first learned of the youngest detainee at Dilley when visiting the facility on Jan. 28. At the time, he said the baby had been in the facility for four or five days.

“An infant’s immune system doesn’t mature until they’re about two to three months old,” pediatrician Dr. Camille Sabella told the Cleveland Clinic in a report about the development of immune systems in newborn babies.

“This baby in particular is very vulnerable,” Castro added in his live video.

The baby, already vulnerable to the many germs that may circulate in confined carceral setting, is made even more vulnerable thanks to a lack of on-site medical care, Castro says.

“They couldn’t take him to a doctor, because there weren’t any doctors in the early morning hours at Dilley,” Castro said in the clip, adding that when he toured the medical wing on his visit, no staff were present inside.

“They are on notice that this baby is sick and they don’t have the medical capacity to care for him,” Castro said.

“I have been pressing ICE hard to let Juan Nicolás go free,” Castro added.
No state in the union would allow a child held by its government to be housed in these conditions. Especially an infant only two months old.

And fuck Jake Tapper. Dilly, Texas is the site of a concentration camp.

As The (Trump) World Turns

Ossoff: "Among today's false prophets are the election deniers who indulge this president's obsession with overturning the 2020 election. Hear me when I say this -- they tell a lie so absurd, and therefore so debasing to tell, that the act of telling it proves the teller's total and humiliating submission."
Obama: "When I was president, I suppose I could have simply unilaterally ordered the military to go into some red state and harass and intimidate, or cut off funding, but that's contrary to how I think our democracy is supposed to work. We shouldn't get discouraged by the fact we have a tougher job"
Alternatively: Or maybe we just want to leave it to state law; you know, the way the Constitution does. Damn that Constitution! It just gets in the way! If a social security card is ID, how about a library card? Or just a driver’s license? (Neither of which establishes citizenship sufficient to comply with the SAVE Act. Is Emmer just that stupid?)

It won’t require Congressional approval. Though I think we could get it. Behold the power of AI. Behold the most corrupt Administration in American history. Which is a GOP feature, not a bug.

AOC Threatens The Status Quo…

All I see on my timeline is a bunch of Republicans and legacy media reporters parsing every quote and comment from AOC in Germany, trying to mock them for incoherence or inaccuracy, meanwhile a ranting demented old man who can’t string sentences together, stay awake, or identify Germany on a map sits in the Oval Office, re-elected, while the legacy media happily sanewashes his ridiculous garbled quotes on a daily basis while refusing to ever question his total ignorance on every issue. Remarkable.
...that is legacy media’s bread and butter. 🍞🧈

Dept. Of Nothing To See Here

See? Everything’s fine!

Context Is All

The super villains in the comic books are scarier because they are all trying to take over the world (and sometimes succeed). And in the context of the comic book world, that’s a real threat, the kind of ultimate threat that readers are supposed to take seriously. 

I still remember a “Fantastic Four” from my childhood that ended with our heroes thwarting Dr. Doom’s latest attempt to take over the world. As he fled defeat to fight another day, Reed Richard’s noted they had to let him go because trying to take over the world wasn’t, after all, a crime. (Huh?) And the other running conceit was that Doom was the head of a sovereign nation (the fictional kingdom of Latveria), so he had diplomatic immunity (which, by the way, doesn’t protect Putin from arrest in certain countries, which is why he almost never travels outside Russia).

There’s a reason live action comic book movies don’t track the comic books religiously. You can put real people in costumes and silly scenarios, but you expose how ludicrous comic books are if you try to make real people act like that.

Alex Karp is a comic book character who escaped to the real world.  He thinks money gives him great power. That’s where he fails, fundamentally.

He’s also kind of a dimwit who, like most of his ilk, thinks the old jibe “If you’re so smart, how come you’re not rich,” is commutative and so reversible: “If you’re so rich, you must be smart.”

Funny how nobody ever notices the smartest people in human history were seldom rich in the monetary sense.

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Being A Pope Francis

I would amend this slightly. We don’t live in a world of Epsteins and Bannons. They would like us to think we do; as they would like to be. But the truth is duller, and more comforting.

Nobody had heard of Jeffrey Epstein before Q made the Epstein files a force to be reckoned with. There’s no mistake that Epstein was a monster. He was mysteriously rich, and knew how to ingratiate himself to rich people (and steal from them, it strongly appears).  But what power did he have, that money didn’t give him?

That’s not a small thing,  and I’m not being glib. But for all his wealth and contacts, Epstein was not a mover or a shaker. He had contacts with many people, famous and behind the scenes, and he cultivated influence. To what end? He died in a jail cell which he was unlikely to leave again, except for another one. His name is now anathema, his memory a curse, his associations with anyone making them pariahs. This is a power, extending beyond death, but hardly one that others envy. If this is a world of Epsteins, why is his almost as despised as Hitler’s?

And Bannon? Bannon is a toady no one knew until Trump ran for office. In the record left behind, Epstein wasn’t too interested in the plan to attack Pope Francis through a spurious documentary. It was proposed while Epstein was imprisoned for the last time; he had other things on his mind. Bannon wanted Epstein to produce it (and provide the money). No one ever accused Bannon of being able to read the room. Or of being independently important, or powerful.

This is not a world of Epsteins and Bannons; it is a world much more closely aligned with Pope Francis. Bannons and Epsteins think they run the world because they associate with people with money; very large amounts of money. These people all think money makes the world go ‘round. And who can doubt it? Except the people with all the money are more convinced of their power and authority and importance, than the vast majority of the world which doesn’t have that money. Money is power, but it is not in any sense the only power, or even the ultimate power. The real power in this world is what Francis represented, the reason Bannon reacted so strongly to Francis, and why he wanted to ruin Francis in scandal if he could (he couldn’t). What Francis knew was the power of powerlessness.

And that’s what Bannon is really afraid of.

Because what Epstein (and in many ways, Francis) is that, if we give the people with the most money the most power, why are we doing that?
If the elite are that rotten, why do we tolerate them as powerful and elite? What are we tolerating, and why are we tolerating it? Far more dangerous questions than Francis led us to ask. Or are they? Take three stories from the gospels seriously, treat them as important, and where does the value system of money = power, stand?

The three I mean are Matthew’s parable of the sheep and the goats: “Lord, when did see you?” Luke’s beatitudes: “Congratulations, you poor!” And John’s sacrament that wasn’t, when John replaces the communion of Mark, Matthew, Luke and Paul, with Jesus playing servant to his disciples, and washing their feet. Serving the least among us are when we serve God. The poorest among us (the least also? Is that the measure?) will have God’s domain. And the first of all is literally the last and servant of all.

Pope Francis powerfully represented that ideal, that teaching, that spirit. No wonder Bannon was afraid.

It’s not a world of Bannons and Epsteins; and that’s what scares them the most. That the power they put so much importance in, isn’t that powerful after all. There is a greater power, and it is expressed in powerlessness.

“Surrounded By Agitators”

You can’t undermine something that no longer exists. DOJ has suspended the 4th Amendment? Good to know. Wonder what that undermines? This is why I left the room when the Lovely Wife had this on. Homan is a lying sack of shit whom I won’t grace with my attention. Besides, we just bought that TeeVee. "Me no Alamo!" But he is happy to talk about things that never happened long before he had his feet on the ground in Minnesota: So the outside agitators aren’t really leaving? Just most of  ‘em?  Yeah, that’ll improve things.

“Irrespective Of The Data”? 🤷🏻‍♂️

$50,000? Golly gee whiz! Are Hershey bars 2 for a nickel again? The Dow Jones average was 49,500 points on February 15. And is still not a leading economic indicator. Jobs are, however. But don’t let that get in the way of the propaganda: 🤷🏻‍♂️

Don’t “Think” Like Trump

 The irony of “flooding the zone with bullshit” is that it’s effective only because so many people think it must not be bullshit. And not all those people are true believers in who’s shipping the bull.

Case in point: SAVE. No, not the SAVE Act that’s passed the House. Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, a “tool” (like a broken fingernail is a screwdriver) DHS uses which Trump ordered be available to states to determine eligibility if voters. A way to check their citizenship status.  Except it’s useless, because once again: Garbage In, Garbage Out.

In Texas, news reports began emerging about voters being mistakenly flagged as noncitizens soon after state officials announced the results of running the state’s voter roll through SAVE in October.

Our reporting showed these errors were more widespread than previously known, involving at least 87 voters across 29 counties. County election administrators suspect there may be more. Confusion took hold when the Texas secretary of state’s office sent counties lists of flagged voters and directed clerks to start demanding proof of citizenship and to remove people from the rolls if they didn’t respond.

“I really find no merit in any of this,” said Bobby Gonzalez, the elections administrator in Duval County in South Texas, where SAVE flagged three voters, all of whom turned out to be citizens.

Even counting people flagged in error, the first bulk searches using SAVE haven’t validated the president’s claims that voting by noncitizens is widespread. At least seven states with a total of about 35 million registered voters have publicly reported the results of running their voter rolls through the system. Those searches have identified roughly 4,200 people — about 0.01% of registered voters — as noncitizens. This aligns with previous findings that noncitizens rarely register to vote.
The devil is in the details, and as usual, Pro Publica provides them. (It’s worth noting the Texas Secretary of State disavowed any responsibility for SAVE data being crap, claiming they are not “an investigative agency.” But it also has no power to override county level decisions.) The tl;dr is:

Only 27 states have tried to use SAVE to purge voter rolls 

Texas and Missouri, the two states reported on in the article, have found more errors in the data than accuracy 

The Sinister Six and Trump may believe in a “unitary executive,” but power in America does not extend from the crown downwards, it truly rises from the bottom, up. Voter registration in Missouri and Texas, at least, is a matter handled at the county level. And in both states, the data provided by SAVE is not being embraced wholeheartedly and gleefully by the officials responsible. More often than not, they recognize crap when they see it. Trump wants them to purge voters who don’t show up in SAVE as citizens if they don’t present proof of citizenship within 14 days of notification. Almost no county official is doing that. And Trump can’t force them to. 

He can’t, in other words, take over federal elections with an executive order. 

The article is worth reading for the details (including that SAVE now includes confidential SSA data (thanks, DOGE!), which is one reason it’s supposed to be used for a purpose it was never designed for.). But it also illustrates government in America is a great deal more complex, with a great many more people beyond MAGA’s reach, than news or the internet might tell you. So when Trump says he’s going to take over elections, or Noem says they’re going to make sure the “right people” vote, they are just spitting into a hurricane. They don’t have the power. We, the people, do.

It’s past time we recognized that.

Because We Elected The Idiot Who Said He’d Release The Epstein Files

And the majority of the electorate was stupid enough to believe him?

Just a guess. 

I am pretty damned sure if Harris had won you’d have heard less about Epstein. Or perhaps more; which would be a whole other kind of poetic justice. Because Harris would probably have just dumped it all, without Congressional involvement. And protecting only the victims.

Saturday, February 14, 2026

This Is Aging Well

Host: What's most shocking is the age of some of the models at the parties [with Trump].

Pilling: There were girls, I would say 14, 15 years old from Europe. The European girls.

Host: They were 14?

Pilling: There were girls that were 14, 15 years old, for sure. I mean, I didn't run up and say, "How old are you?" But they looked younger than I was and I was 17. You just knew because of what they were wearing and how they would hold themselves.

Male Witness: And these girls are all like, you know, anywhere from 14, 15, 16 years old. There were very few girls above the age of 19 there.

Host: And you saw Donald Trump with these girls who were that young, 15, 16.
All of this is aging well.