Thursday, October 29, 2026

Insert Coin, Pull Handle

Receive reply below.

North To Alaska

On the ballot, “Dan” is listed as “(Registered Republican, incumbent).”
In new court filing, Justice Dept defends its unprecedented suit seeking to block certification of next week's Senate race in Alaska

They claim the presence of a second candidate named "Dan Sullivan" will "mislead"

Filing: "Mr. Sullivan’s presence on the ballot threatens to mislead Alaskan citizens who want to vote for Senator Sullivan. Some supporters of Senator Sullivan likely will inadvertently vote for Daniel J. Sullivan"

Here's the ballot.. what do you think?
If you’re still confused, consult JD Vance: Who clearly thinks you’re an idiot.

I Want To Buy This Man A Beer 🍻

Yale Law School Is So Proud

JD Vance on ranked choice voting: "I don't understand it. It seems to me that you have an election, the person who wins the most votes should win. That seems to be not what happens with ranked choice voting. The fact that it's so confusing to a person who pays pretty close attention to politics I think suggests we should do our elections in, like, the normal way."
🤦‍♂️

Like A Snot Rag?

Or is God that angry with us?

First Rule Of Demons 😈

New in PN: The GOP’s endless culture war slop is a sign of desperation

"Republicans are offering a slop buffet because Trump ruined the economy and they have no policy achievements to tout. So they chose instead to demonize anyone who deviates from how white, male, Christians look, act, think, or pray, even if the demons must be invented."
And I don’t mean this in a theological or metaphysical sense, but in the psychological one:

Demons always have to be invented. It’s the way we try to escape responsibility.

“All The Gossip That Fits”

The NYT is so desperate to find an October surprise they bury the lede:

1) The staffer retracted her statement.

2) The staffer was a fired disgruntled employee.

3) They stuff this line in the article:

"Ballot-stacking tactics are common in politics and generally considered legal — and have been employed by both parties in Alaska."
That would be like this:
Seriously NYT?

"Last week, as The Times prepared to publish this article, Ms. Rios, who had been planning to file a wrongful termination lawsuit against the Peltola campaign, contacted The Times and said she wanted to take back her previous statements.

“As discussed on our call earlier today, I am confirming that I have retracted all statements made regarding the 2026 Alaska Senate Race in connection with any article you may or may not be writing,” Ms. Rios wrote. “I am not willing to be a source for any story in any capacity.”

It is rare for a source to seek to retract comments made in previous interviews, and The Times’s standards do not obligate reporters to comply with such requests. The Times had never agreed that those previous interviews could not be published, and informed Ms. Rios last week that they would be a part of this story."
Deja vu all over again:
But some Alaska voters said the Times report did little to change their views.

Keven Kleweno, a registered Republican planning to vote for Peltola, said he was unsurprised by the news, given Republicans’ prior claims of Democratic involvement in Dan J. Sullivan’s campaign.

“That's nothing that we haven't heard before,” he said.

But at the same time, he suggested that Elisa Rios, Peltola’s former campaign manager who spoke to the Times about the campaign’s involvement, was a disgruntled ex-employee who “didn’t like being laid off.”

“I just feel it's another way to, you know, slander Peltola and try to make sure Dan worthless Sullivan is reelected,” he said.
And maybe voters in Alaska ain’t that stupid:
Adam Lees of Anchorage is registered nonpartisan and supports Peltola. He said his opinions of the Senate race were already “mostly baked in.” Still, he said, the reported effort to stack the ballot is “not the best look.”

“It does give — I think as some of the kids would describe it — icky vibes,” he said. “But at the same time, I think voters are intelligent and can figure out how to rank and can figure out which Dan Sullivan is their person.”

Amber McClelland, a registered Democrat and former Libertarian living in Anchorage, said she agreed. Politics wasn’t always this “dirty,” she said — recruiting a candidate just to draw votes away from an opponent “should not be a thing.”

“It's kind of messed up,” she said. “But in the past, Republicans have done everything that they can do to win, including cheat.”
It really is a different world in the largest state:
In Petersburg, residents who have known Dan J. Sullivan for decades had a hard time reconciling the picture the Times painted with the man they know. Erica Kludt-Painter said she doesn’t believe he worked behind the scenes with the Democrats to stack the ballot.

“I just don't see him being involved in a national conspiracy,” she said. “I'm sorry, I just don't. I know him to be a man of integrity who cares about his community and the people in it.”

Petersburg Vice Mayor Jeigh Stanton-Gregor said the community knows Dan J. Sullivan is a man of “high character,” and he doesn’t see the Times story changing anyone’s opinion of him. He said he was disappointed in the article.

“I just wish at this stage of the game, the New York Times was talking about substantive issues that really impact people in Petersburg's lives and Alaskans' lives, whether it be gas prices, foreign wars, etc,” he said. “Things that have real-world consequences, as opposed to a distant three- or four-place candidate.”

D.J. McBride, an independent voter living in Willow planning to vote for Peltola, was taken aback by the suggestion that Alaskans couldn’t distinguish the senator from the retired teacher.

“Both sides play pretty dirty pool, and if you're stupid enough that you can't tell the difference between an incumbent and a non-incumbent, I don't have any patience for you,” she said. “Alaskans are smarter than that.”
Real news, v. gossip. The NYT tradition continues. 

And about that confusing ballot:
Icing the cake. And the real elephant in the room:

Once A Year Is (Still) Biblical 🎃

 My brother-in-law was over the other night. He often is these days. He’s eight years older than my wife; he was away to adulthood while she was a young girl, and we get to know each other more and more these days. We’re both in our 70’s now, he at one end, the Lovely Wife and I at the other. So we fell to talking about “the way things were,” as old people are wont to do. He argued that there were once social rules, and being ex-Green Beret, he used the military as his example. In the military, he said, the same rules apply to everyone. I didn’t point out that, under the UCMJ, the general gets much more deference than the private; and today, especially, the SOD (which the military is properly under, the SOD being a civilian), the rules have been tossed in a shredder as Hegseth fires general officers right and left. It’s a hegemonic move not unlike the white, male privilege he and I grew up under. Although we learned that hegemony as harmony, and Hegseth wields it to hide his weakness; much like the man who appointed him. My brother-in-law is an interesting (and not unusual) mix of conservative political values, and yet fully aware of the injustices done by white hegemony and economic power. Aware of it, and concerned by it. So this wasn’t an argument with a drunk uncle at Thanksgiving. It wasn’t an argument at all. He acknowledged his contradictions, even as he didn’t see any way to resolve them. I sympathize. It took seminary and years of work to change my self enough to eliminate some of the contrary. Even then, it was my adult daughter who pointed out she walked through a world of dangers (from sexual harassment to threats of assault) that I simply didn’t live in. It’s very hard for me to see such worlds; but I have to work to. There is always another perspective than that of the straight, white, middle class heterosexual male. And it’s hard to realize that perspective shouldn’t be normative.

Like other things we take for granted, such as the experiences of our youth. We talked about Hallowe’en as we remembered it. But we didn’t think about this:

Maybe it’s the corn syrup talking, but to me, Halloween will always be the quintessential American holiday. The Fourth of July and Thanksgiving don’t come close. Plenty of countries, dictatorships included, commemorate their nation’s founding and designate evenings to spend with relatives. Halloween is a night when kids visit strangers, people with no blood ties and no debt to their family, and receive gifts with no obligation in return. It is an exercise in civic trust, a belief in one’s neighbors regardless of religion, creed or political party. It’s a cheesy, cheery, schmaltzy, “Brady Bunch” optimism. My family and countless others have crossed oceans for it.
That’s the perspective of a young boy, a Russian immigrant, on his first Hallowe’en. So, add to my categories above, “American.” Growing up American, it never occurred to me that Hallowe’en was an act of civic trust. I know there’s “trunk or treat” parties, now, and the distinctly suburban neighborhoods of my childhood are not common even here in Houston. My street is a passageway. The street I grew up on was traveled only by neighbors. For three years after we moved here, we lived in a parsonage next to the church, on a busy four lane road. The nearest neighborhoods were miles down the road. We drove my daughter to friends’ neighborhoods. We certainly couldn’t let her walk out the front door, as I did when I was her age. Today there are barely any children in our neighborhood. We don’t buy candy, because no one comes to take it. But if they started up again, if children moved to the neighborhood, we’d open the door to them, without hesitation.  “Trick or treat!” 🎃

It occurs to me that the two great civic occasions in America are founded on Xian holidays (holy days), but they are both exercises in civic trust. Xmas may be uncomfortable, even oppressive, to non-Xians, but the secular observance has nothing to do with Xianity. Maybe the Xmas tree is the ancestor of the Paradeisbaum from German passion plays, but who is really aware of that? The shapes and sizes and colors that go up in public, from trees to abstract streamers wrapped around a missing cone, are simply symbols of a public holiday. Is Santa Claus really St. Nicholas, or just a jolly old elf in a red coat? Separated entirely from Epiphany, gifts on Xmas morning are practically a private, civic duty. The culture tells us to never disabuse children of the “truth” about Santa, and even if we never fully live up to it, once a year it’s another civic creed that it is better to give than to receive. If any of this is oppressive to non-Xians, it isn’t meant to be. The season is so secular everyone is invited to join, and almost nobody wants to go to church when Xmas is on a Sunday (except the Catholics, who started it. The religious descendants of the Puritans who banned Christmas now, more often than not, close church that one Sunday every seven years or so.) Thanksgiving is purely secular, but private (Christmas morning is, too). July 4th, especially in these times, could easily be jingoistic and mean, when “patriotism” is confined to “true patriots,” which may not include you. But Xmas? That’s the season (a whole month!) when we’re supposed to open our hearts and welcome the stranger and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. Or at least think about doing it. As Charles Dickens so famously put it:
"At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge," said the gentleman, taking up a pen, "it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and Destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir."
Dickens wouldn’t recognize our Xmas celebrations at all; but he’d recognize that we still pay attention to that sentimen, and still try to apply it at least one month in the year.

Hallowe’en is not as big as that;  but maybe that makes it the gateway to Xmas; a smaller civic celebration that really is an act of civic trust, to get us ready to open our doors to friends (for parties), and, at least a little bit, to strangers, to whom we offer a bit more than candy. Every year I get appeals, starting in October, from charities pointing out that Xmas is coming. It’s the time of year we are expected, and expect, to give.

As the Russian immigrant said, reflecting on his childhood and his then confused grasp of English:
Triko-reet once a lifetime was very good. Triko-reet once a year was biblical.
Hallowe’en is when we open our doors, no longer to waits and a’soalers seeking free holiday treats, then to children seeking a bit of free candy, or, if they are very lucky, a homemade popcorn ball. We have just displaced the Yuletide practice four weeks, and are showing charity to children. Not because the first day of Dias de Los Muertos is for the return of the dead children, but…why not? We can make of our holidays what we will.  Instead of cursing the darkness, light a candle!🕯️ Preferably in a jack o’ lantern. 🎃

Our late year eves are the connectors between our civic holidays. Even Mardi Gras is the day before Ash Wednesday. Hallowe’en (Walpurgisnacht in “Fantasia”) gives way to All Saints; Xmas Eve yields st midnight to Xmas Day (“Christ is born, Christ is born, Christ is born,” whispered among the believers); New Year’s Eve to New Year’s Day; and Mardi Gras stops dead at midnight, yielding to Ash Wednesday and the preparation for Easter. All of these eves mean something to us, and the effect is cumulative. We celebrate Easter, but not like Mardi Gras. We celebrate July 4th, but not like Hallowe’en. It starts at Hallowe’en, and ends at Ash Wednesday, and we don’t do anything closely similar to those 12 or so weeks the rest of the year. The eves are the gateway to the great celebrations, and have become the great celebrations themselves. Are these things good, or bad? “what do I know, except what everyone knows - /if there when Grace dances, I should dance.”

Surely Grace is dancing in the season of our eves. And if Grace dances, we should….

Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Will The “Truth” Exceed 1300 Words?

Abdul El-Sayed: “We are being actively bullied by the dumbest people in the room. Donald Trump is an idiot. He has one genius which is getting attention. Because his dad never gave him enough, because he was a nepo baby, he craved attention and used the bullying tactics to get it. But the man is an idiot. Just a fool”
Will there even be a response at all?

Vivek Ramaswamy Didn’t Give One Thought To This Possibility

He still doesn’t. Neither do Trump or Vance.

Act accordingly.

Remembering John Kennedy’s Presidential Campaign

I grew up among people who didn’t think Catholics were Christians. Not like they were.

Our Long National Nightmare Is Over

OBAMA: I heard Trump when I joked over the weekend that he's got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory. I am the father of two daughters. Do you think I could have survived their childhood without going to the Cheesecake Factory. That was my jam for a decade.
OBAMA: The White House even called the Secretary of the Treasury. This is the man who is in charge of the economy—they told him he should. Hold a press conference in front of The Cheesecake Factory. He happens to be a former hedge fund manager worth half a billion dollars, and he was out there in front of the Cheesecake Factory explaining how he ordered the delicious French dipped cheeseburger.
(Which I still think is an abomination before the Lord. God respects the cheeseburger 🍔 more than that.)
OBAMA: I inherited this major financial crisis. I never called my Treasury Secretary and said, “You've got to go to Arby's. Order roast beef. No cheese though that may look elitist.”

They don't have solutions to actual problems, so they'd rather have the media and you talking about the Cheesecake Factory.
Meanwhile...

“Three Generations Of Imbeciles Is Enough!” Again.

 Crime a problem? Try the Final Solution!

Last week, one of the department’s top prosecutors argued that, in the pursuit of cracking down on criminals, eugenics could be a useful tool.

The prosecutor in question was Ellis Boyle, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Boyle was appearing on a local conservative livestream, NC Chats, to discuss—among other things—the administration’s investigation of Rep. Ilhan Omar, as well as the indictments of a handful of noncitizens for having allegedly voted illegally in the 2024 elections in North Carolina. Eventually, however, the conversation turned to crime, the supposed enabling of it by liberals, and how frustrating it is to see violent criminals get off on an insanity defense.
Let me stop here to say that no one “gets off” on successful application of the insanity defense.  The convicted is consigned to a mental healthcare facility. No one walks away scot-free for asserting an insanity defense.
“I’ve suffered with PTSD for most of my life,” host Cassie Clark said in the October 21 episode. “I also disassociate with it whenever it hits real bad. And you know what I’ve never done? I’ve never hurt anybody. Not one single time. It’s never even crossed my mind to hurt anyone, even at the worst of it, because I know right from wrong.”

Boyle seemed persuaded.

“What I’ve observed is, you know—it occurs to me, and this is not a new thought, I heard someone else say it, and I started looking, and if you look, you see it,” he replied. “Five percent of the population cause 90 percent of the crime.”

So far, so whatever—it’s true that most violent crimes are carried out by a proportionally small segment of the population. But Boyle didn’t stop there:

I think there’s a big component—if you took out [the] 5 percent of the population that’s bad and removed them from society, so they don’t create mayhem and create, you know, babies with the gene pool of more bad, then I think, in two, maybe three generations, think of how great this population would be.

“But,” he finished, “that’s something that takes willpower.”
Would we apply this to the Trumps? Why not? And who decides who the “5%” are? And do we forcibly sterilize them? Again?

We’ve done this before, you know. Pretty sure we’re not going to do it again. Not after the Nazis took our eugenics laws and created the Holocaust. But that’s what Boyle wants to do again.

The DOJ is going to be the new Augean stables.

Old Man Shouts At Clouds 🌧️

Trump: "It has just been determined that the Democrats in Alaska illegally searched for, and recruited, a man named Dan Sullivan to run against our distinguished Republican Senator, Dan Sullivan, in order to defraud, confuse, and obfuscate the Election, thereby taking votes away from the REAL Senator, Dan Sullivan. The New York Times reports that, 'Democrats have insisted they have nothing to do with the other Dan Sullivan on Alaska’s Senate ballot. But aides with the Mary Peltola campaign and DSCC were part of a monthslong secret plan to recruit him to run — as well as other candidates.' The Democrats’ false statements were made under oath in Federal Court. Therefore, they perjured themselves, and should be liable for very serious consequences. Mary Peltola should suffer the Legal and Political consequences for what she has done, A FRAUD ON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, and Dan Sullivan should be allowed to run without either Mary Peltola or FAKE Dan Sullivan on the Ballot. President DONALD J. TRUMP"
It has not ”been determined,” it has been reported. By the NYT, the same paper that missed most of Watergate, credulously reported on Whitewater (the corruption in Arkansas that led to the Lewinsky stuff), and swallowed “WMD” in Iraq hook, line, and sinker. Remind me, did they ever find any?

Did Peltola recruit Sullivan? SO FUCKING WHAT?

Statements were made in Federal Court under oath? When? There was a case in state court, but I don’t know how Peltola campaign workers can be hailed into the newly filed federal case before the Court has heard arguments for dismissal for failure to state a cause of action. (And false statements don’t = perjury, especially when your evidence us the NYT.)

And will someone please explain to the dunderhead in the Oval Office what “fraud” is. He’s committed enough of it, he ought to know by now.
The law of “DEMOCRATS ARE UNFAIR!!” (Trump’s DOJ can’t even make a civil case out of this.) That, and he really thinks he’s got something with this “perjury” claim. (No, those aren’t scare quotes. This isn’t perjury.) Then he had to beat that dead horse one more time, perhaps expecting it to finally get legs: Again, not election fraud. Not even close. As for “lying to the court,” is he switching to the state case? Probably not, but the Peltola campaign doesn’t have a dog in either court fight (the finished state one, or the nascent federal one).  Those cases go to the state authority responsible for ballots. I can’t imagine a reason a representative of the Peltola campaign would testify in the state court proceedings. And I’m quite sure Trump hasn’t read whatever trial court transcripts went up on appeal, looking for evidence of “cheating.” This is just an old man shouting at clouds because he didn’t get his vanilla pudding at the evening meal in the home.

His DOJ has no grounds, nor mechanism, to disqualify Peltola or Sullivan. Blanche has admitted as much:
What he’s asking for is an advisory opinion. Courts don’t do advisory opinions. DOJ can come back after the election, when (if) they have valid grounds for a valid (legal) concern. That’s right. So far, they don’t have anything.

Maybe Peltola’s campaign did it, and it’s dirty politics. But even Trump recognizes it isn’t really criminal, because he keeps trying to shoehorn it into a perjury charge. And that’s because he watched too many fake courtroom dramas for too many years. Yes, he’s “threatening serious consequences.” But his threats are as empty as his head.

Lubbock Or Leave It

In the late ‘70’s, as the ‘60’s were finally ebbing, and Willie and Waylon and the boys were starting up “outlaw country music” in Austin, the phrase in that title was a play on the ‘60’s bumper sticker “America: Love It or Leave It.” The joke was that Lubbock was a redneck oasis everyone wanted to leave anyway. The phrase usually concluded with: “Last one out, please turn off the light.”💡 

Trump was in Lubbock when Talarico was. He drew about 4000 attendees. Trump brags about his overflow whether it’s there or not. Talarico had lines stretching several blocks. The campaign had to change venues to accommodate them. In Lubbock: a ruby red city in a ruby red area of a ruby red state.

Or is it, now? 🤔

The Sky Is Falling! The Sky Is Falling!

So, here’s what happens when a new Congress begins, in rather excruciating detail:

Although no officers of the House will have been elected when the House first convenes, officers from the previous Congress perform certain functions. The previous Clerk of the House calls the House to order and presides over the chamber until the Speaker is elected and sworn in. In the absence of the Clerk, the Sergeant at Arms performs this duty.

After the Clerk calls the Representatives-elect to order, the Chaplain offers a prayer. The Clerk leads the Members-elect and their guests in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. The Clerk then directs a reading clerk to call the roll of all Members-elect to establish that a quorum is present. In current practice, the roll is not called by a clerk; rather, the Members-elect record their presence by inserting their official voting cards (obtained prior to or on opening day) in the chamber's electronic voting machines. Once the call of the roll is completed, a majority having registered their names, a quorum (218, if no vacancies) is indicated. This action fulfills the requirements of Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution that a quorum be present to conduct business.

The Clerk then announces the election of the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico (when applicable, since the Resident Commissioner's term is four years) and of the Delegates—one person from the District of Columbia and one person from each of the territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. The Clerk also reports any deaths or resignations since the election.

A quorum being present, the first order of official business is the election of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Election of the Speaker

The candidates for Speaker are nominated from the floor by the leaders of their respective parties. Traditionally, there is one candidate from the majority party and one from the minority party, selected by the Republican Conference and the Democratic Caucus at their early organizational meetings. Individual Members-elect may place other names in nomination. Nominations are followed immediately by a "viva voce" roll-call vote, that is, a vote in which the Members-elect respond orally to the calling of their names. In this vote, the Members-elect call out the last name of their choice for Speaker when their names are called by a reading clerk. The Clerk appoints Members-elect to serve as majority and minority tellers, usually two each, to ascertain the vote. The Speaker is elected by a majority, not a plurality, of votes cast by Members-elect. So long as nearly all the majority party's members vote for its candidate, the majority party can assure its candidate's election because the vote is likely to be almost exclusively along party lines. The candidates themselves, however, sometimes vote "present" or do not vote.
You can see all of that assumes an accepted set of new representatives, which includes re-elected incumbents, and the newly elected. They are all, at this point, “new.”But certification precedes seating the new Congress:
Importantly, certification is not optional; it is mandatory and must be completed by the deadlines established by law. If an election official fails to certify, they can be compelled to do so by a court order.

Likewise, certification is not an opportunity to question results or attempt to resolve any potential issues or irregularities. Depending on state rules and the closeness of the race, recounts, audits or court challenges may occur before certification to address those concerns. But once the certification step is reached, it is the duty of state or local officials to simply provide an official certificate naming the winner based on the official tally.

What happens after certification?

For congressional elections, certification establishes who has won races for the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. Each state then sends its list of election winners, formally known as certificates of election, to the House and Senate. In the House, these certificates are specifically sent to the clerk, a nonpartisan official who compiles the state lists into the full roll of members-elect of the next Congress. The winning candidates then begin preparing to take office.
Okay, now let's look at the law:
Before the first meeting of each Congress the Clerk of the next preceding House of Representatives shall make a roll of the Representatives-elect, and place thereon the names of those persons, and of such persons only, whose credentials show that they were regularly elected in accordance with the laws of their States respectively, or the laws of the United States. In case of a vacancy in the office of Clerk of the House of Representatives, or of the absence or inability of the Clerk to discharge the duties imposed on him by law or custom relative to the preparation of the roll of Representatives or the organization of the House, those duties shall devolve on the Sergeant at Arms of the next preceding House of Representatives.
That’s the statute behind the details of the procedure above. "Shall,” there, is a very specific word.  It means the act of the clerk, or the Sergeant at Arms, is ministerial. It is not subject to judgement or consideration, except insofar as state certification is lacking. And then the clerk must seek certification from the appropriate state. But everyone else is seated. 

Now, if the clerk refuses to seat all the Democrats; or just all the new Democrats? (Or just everyone, to be “fair”?) Well, shit hits the fan. Arguably, Congress can’t operate. Representatives could challenge the quorum call; and the courts (presumably the D.C. Circuit) could order the clerk, or the sergeant at arms, to do their ministerial duty.(This would not be interference with House rules and operations. There’s a federal statute to enforce. The clerk and the sergeant at arms are employees of the House, not elected officials.)

And then the majority sets about punishing anyone in the minority who thought this was a clever idea. 

Remember, Trump is a lame duck now. So why would Johnson pursue this Pyrrhic victory? To make life even more miserable for the House, and Trump, for the next two years?

Yes, Trump sent a crowd to the Capitol to disrupt the certification of Biden as President. What happened? Nothing Trump wanted. What happens if Trump persuades Johnson to put in a crooked clerk? More serious and immediate payback than he faced in 2021. Maybe even removal. I don’t think Congress 
will be happy to see its prerogatives interfered with. 

The Polls Are Fake!

I mean, this can’t be right. There’s no mention of Arnold Palmer’s schlong, or Jon Husted’s ass, or windmills! Not even anything about the Cheesecake Factory!

🎃 Hallowe’en At The Cheesecake Factory 🏭

BTW: I’ve never been to a Cheesecake Factory, but based on recent reports, spending Hallowe’en there is my newest worse nightmare. 

The Big Idea Can Never Fail

It can only be failed. That would be the Russian diesel that is sanctioned and illegal to sell in America. Right? 

And this is the guy they are propping up:
That Tweet is 16 minutes old as I post. What time is it in Pennsylvania? As I post, it’s shortly after 11 a.m. in PA.

“The Corruption Is So Pervasive”

A Brazilian Supreme Court justice has ordered an investigation into JD Vance’s billionaire donor network over alleged efforts to assist Flávio Bolsonaro’s failed presidential campaign.

The Rockbridge Network has ties to Peter Thiel, Rebekah Mercer, and other powerful MAGA donors.
The Brazilian Supreme Court also calls for an investigation into:

— Allegations that influencers were paid to promote pro-Bolsonaro Polymarket predictions.

— Whether Meta’s algorithms unfairly boosted Bolsonaro and restricted Lula.

— Reports of paid AI-generated fake accounts, deepfakes, and coordinated disinformation operations.
I’m beginning to think we need a constitutional amendment establishing an independent Department of Justice that can do things like this regardless of who sits behind the Resolute Desk.

No Wonder Trump Admires Putin

Birds of a feather… 🪶 

Uh-Huh

A) No. B) I question where that number came from. C) Because he says utterly stupid things like this:

Feral Cunning 🤷‍♂️

So, high gas prices are a choice? Yup. That’s what he said. He’s standing in the state with the most windmills in the country. In the region of that state with the most windmills in the state.

Feral cunning.

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Is There Reason To Expect Trump To Do This In December?

The Apotheosis Of The Cheesecake Factory Matter 🏭

No, not that one.👆 This one.👇 Damn, I miss having cats around.

Clearly, The Owners Are Elitists…

... who just want to enjoy a cheeseburger on a brioche bun with au jus for $24, and now they won’t be able to. Well, there’s that. Frat boys across the country are wondering what’s wrong with the old guy, and whether he’s going to mention Husted’s ass. Fifth graders across the country are wondering what’s wrong with the old guy, and wondering whether he’s gonna mention the $24 cheeseburger 🍔 at Cheesecake Factory. 🏭  People around the country are wondering what’s wrong with the old guy.
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo's son:

The government has taken away my dad and countless other people. They have taken away people's liberties by detaining them. They have taken away our pursuit of happiness by splitting families apart. For those of you who haven't voted, there's still time left.
(4000 people in Lubbock fucking Texas??!???) I think I will be. I don’t think Trump will be.

Suicide Squad

 This will take some annotating:

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter signaled Tuesday that he would reject the Trump administration's emergency bid to stop California from counting mail ballots from more than 20,000 registered voters the DOJ alleges are likely noncitizens, according to posts from Politico legal affairs reporter Kyle Cheney, who tracked the hearing in Los Angeles.

Carter made clear he was "deeply skeptical" of the government's position, Cheney wrote. The judge asked why, if prosecutors suspected people were illegally registered to vote, they weren't charging them.
Three guesses, first two don't count. (I’ll explain that below.) Or, more likely, they lack the evidence to establish probable cause. This is where I remind you proving election fraud is very difficult, and illegally registering to vote without voting is a very minor crime, indeed. Not the sexy charge DOJ wants right now. More critically, they probably lack evidence that the people on their list are not citizens. And they don’t want to prove that in court.
"Let's get busy," Carter said.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who argued the case for the government, replied, "We're very busy."

"Get busier," Carter shot back.
Remember Lindsey Halligan? The courts determined her appointment was invalid, and that unzipped everything she’d touched? Forced it all to be dismissed without prejudice and started again, if at all, under a properly appointed USA. That’s the position Essayli’s in, except Trump is pissed at the law, and is having none of it.

Essayli was appointed because of a similar situation. There was a vacancy that couldn’t be filled by regular appointment, so the court of the district, per the statute, appointed a new USA. Trump promptly fired him and appointed Essayli. The trial court ruled he was invalidly appointed. That case is on appeal. Essayli is standing pat (as Halligan did, IIRC). That makes all cases he works on subject to dismissal, on this “technicality.”  DOJ knows this; but they don’t care. Like the 28 cases in LA they released on recognizance days before the election, they just want the headlines, here. Oh, and to fuck with California. And yes, this should be grounds for Bar discipline (despite what Blanche thinks, government attorneys are subject to Bar discipline); whether it will be, is another matter. An unlikely matter.

By these cases are going to be tossed, and DOJ doesn’t really care.
Cheney reported that Carter called the request a "monumental change" and said the issue needed a slower timeline with expert testimony, not rushed filings that would "have the court just wing it with a ruling." The judge then appointed a special master to dig deeper into the issue, a move Cheney described as effectively a win for California.

Carter closed the hearing with a warning aimed squarely at the Justice Department.

"This court believes it would be wise that any threats to state and county elected employees cease immediately. Good night," he said. He's expected to issue a formal ruling Wednesday.

The warning follows mounting pressure on local officials. Trump's Justice Department cautioned election workers across California that they could face federal scrutiny if they refused to help flag suspected noncitizens, and it handed state officials a list of 20,000 names, NBC News reported.

California's lawyers fought back in court. Anne Bellows, an attorney for the state, argued the department leaned on what she called "mysterious database methods" and said meeting its demands would risk stripping eligible voters of their ballots, Reuters reported.
So that case is DOA, too. Again, DOJ doesn’t care. The cases are all to give Trump something to suck his thumb over. Because that’s all they can possibly be. I’m quite serious that the lawyers signing the DOJ filings risk a referral to their Bars for investigation and disciplinary action. This stuff is that out of line. 

And DOJ doesn’t care.

Is Anyone Keeping Track?

How many no-bills is that? In 22 months (or less?). Somebody should be keeping the record, for posterity.

With maybe an asterisk for the third case against Comey. Charged on the last day of the 10 year period for limitations under the Espionage Act; but without an indictment, which the Act requires in order to use the 10 (versus general statutory five) year period. Hence, the asterisk.*️⃣ 

Two more years of this. That record is going to grow; and hopefully stand for a very long time. Although the damage to the DOJ , and so the nation, is going to be very long term, and not soon repaired. The institutional knowledge alone will take decades to rebuild.

So you take the wins where you can.

“Caaaameealaaa, Koomaaala, Kamaleeee, Kumalaaaa"

Last week: Corpus Christi today: He was told that often in his criminal prosecutions. But that doesn’t explain why it’s now part of his repertoire. This one’s also a new repeat. And this. Also this one. This one is not. This one is also too familiar. Permian Basin production is 6.5 million barrels. Per day. Of sweet light, which doesn't require the special refining Venezuelan crude does.

I Missed The Fruity Context

 When RFK, Jr. made his ignorant and racist (but I repeat myself) remarks about Arabs, he did so at a campaign rally for Sen. Mike Rogers in Michigan. A state with the highest number of Arab Americans in the country.

Next, he’s coming to Texas Border to tell us how little Mexicans are worth.

Oh. Great.

We’ll just pay for it with more respiratory illnesses. 😷

RFK, Jr. Tries To Go Richard Dawkins

It works as well as it did for Dawkins.

Remembering When Immigrants Were Taking Up All The Houses

Mission accomplished.

Monday, October 26, 2026

Mythmaking

Reporter: Bethel, Alaska is an isolated town that can only be reached by plane or boat. People living there say they're used to higher gas and grocery prices, but now both gas and heating oil hover around $8 a gallon. Residents are worried that "if we don't get relief, some of our villages are going to disappear."
Farm subsidies go largely to corporate farms. Less gets to individual farmers.

Message from the White House; “Fuck the farmers. Fuck the rural people. We got ours.”

It’s one week to Election Day.

John Roberts Wants You To Know This Is Fine

Trump sets the stage to interfere in Minnesota's elections: "Let's all get behind Michele Tafoya in Minnesota. She's running a great race. Don't allow them to play with the Votes after the race is over. The Federal Government will be watching closely. The only way she can lose is if they cheat by playing games with the Ballots as they come in. We can't allow that to happen, because I won Minnesota three times, but they didn't give me the Victories, and Minnesota hasn't been 'won' since 1972, when Richard Nixon claimed the trophy. Michele Tafoya has my Complete and Total Endorsement to be the next Senator from the Great State of Minnesota — She will not let you down! President DONALD J. TRUMP"
Because it’s an “official act,” and therefore protected by the Presidential immunity he totally made up. Or maybe it isn’t an official act. But it will take years of appeals and review before the Supreme Court can decide whether or not this, right here, this thing, was an official act. Years. Of reviews. And appeals. And reviews. And then there’s all the people doing what Trump told them to do. Could be covered by immunity. Everyone of them. More years if reviews. And appeals. But the Justices are there for life, so…

No hurry. It’s fine.

The October Surprise Is…

... Grandpa’s meds aren’t working anymore. (Stephanie Ruhle interviewed a builder this morning who can’t build houses because even though the workers are legal, they fear ICE and won’t come to work. He described lumber on job sites warping and going to ruin, which only drives the cost of construction higher.) It’s like he wants to be arrested in Georgia. Or take a pratfall:
In 2020, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick set up a $1 million fund for voter fraud tips. His first payout, $25,000 in 2021, went to Eric Frank, a progressive Pennsylvania poll worker whose tip led to the conviction of a Republican who voted twice, the Dallas Morning News reported. “This kind of blew up in their face,” Frank said.
Again: one week until Election Day. Pointing and laughing will go on far into the week.
Trump appears hurt by Obama's Cheesecake Factory joke:

I've taken care of the White House. I have fixed it with the finest artisans in the world. The exterior plaster was broken, cracked. And the painting was terrible. I've re-skinned the building beautifully. The White House is beautiful.
I honestly don’t think he got it. I also honestly think his fee-fees were hurt.

As I said, laughing and pointing will go on. 😹

“Listen To Yourself”

And what Obama said: More of a comment on Saddam's aesthetic, really. Meanwhile: BTW, JD Vance is a Yale lawyer. And yet Trump has no trouble doing business with them.
EL-SAYED: I get that the President takes personal offense to my first name. He doesn't mind as much when it's the Saudis who are funding his son-in-law's private equity. Doesn't seem to mind as much when it's the Qataris who are giving them a $400 million private jet. He just seems to have trouble pronouncing it when it's my name.

I don't care how he pronounces my name. I don't even care that he remembers my whole name. Because he can just go on and call me senator after November.
Same difference. Ooops. That makes things MUCH better! (He knows Election Day is next Tuesday, right?) And the crowd of old people with nothing else on a Monday afternoon, goes mild.
Cheesecake Factory populism is so weird to me because the rise of chain restaurants created over-the-top, replicable dining experiences, which eventually put the final squeeze on mom-and-pop restaurants, such as the US version of trattorias. I would argue those family-owned neighborhood businesses made the dining experience feel more special and pulled communities together. The shift to chain restaurants homogenized American life and concentrated corporate power. Strange to frame corporate consolidation as "populism."
I’m guessing most of those people know the “Cheesecake Factory” from “Big Bang Theory;” and nothing else. And they work for corporations, so they are quite content.