Arroyo: Newsom posted this on X and it shows you the level he’s at. He’s suggesting the president has dementia! I’m not even going to read it. Does this grow his base at all? Who is this appealing to?!? pic.twitter.com/GCy2IGMFot
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 30, 2025
Satire in the wrong hands can be dangerous, I suppose.Arroyo: Whatever anybody thinks of Trump, it’s authentically him. He created this brand—the caps in the Twitter posts—that’s him. Trying to replicate that is dangerous pic.twitter.com/RtO50umite
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 30, 2025
See? GNC is hardly Swift, but Swift (and satire, which dates back to the Romans) has faced that criticism before. Things are still “normal,” and satire is still here. Only a fool thinks he can control what “normal” is. I’ve noticed fools aren’t fond of satire, either.Only danger in replication is exposing how absurd it is that we’ve normalized it, which is exactly what @GavinNewsom has done https://t.co/Y5Pe42fu3z
— Dan Koh (@dank) August 31, 2025
π― πΉπΉThey never *just pray* when it comes to things they actually care about.
— Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) August 30, 2025
Like the Cracker Barrel logo. https://t.co/zd10x6EaNB
π―, again!Jones: I want to bring theology into this because you have all these people want to give thoughts and prayers. But I was a minister, and that is a form of theological malpractice—when you pray for something you have the power to change. pic.twitter.com/yx1BAjeTTc
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 30, 2025
This story from Politico is journalistic malpractice. But it's more than that: it's a foreign influence operation meant to hurt the administration and one of our most effective members.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) August 29, 2025
Notice how all of the people attacking Steve are on background? That means it's two or three… https://t.co/LsPmTpZfqy
Notice how all of the people attacking Steve are on background? That means it's two or three deep staters who are angry that Witkoff has succeeded where they've failed.And if “we” don’t make peace, it’s Europe’s fault.
You know what this "reporter" left out to make room for anonymous quotes?
The full quote from the sitting vice president, on the record.
A quote from the secretary of the state, on the record.
A quote from Jared Kushner, on the record.
The full quote from the UK's Jonathan Powell, one of the most respected national security people in the Western World, who defended Steve vigorously from these malicious smears.
The person who wrote this garbage is @felschwartz. Aside from the failure to include on the record information directly contradicting her reporting, I wonder if she ever asked herself why these anonymous sources came to her at this moment with this particular story. They have an agenda to blow up the president's efforts to make peace, and they saw her as a useful vessel to launder garbage into the conversation, truth be damned.
There are two possible explanations: Felicia is just not very smart, and allowed herself to be used by deep state con men. Or she's in on it, and used her position to willingly participate in a literal foreign influence operation. Either way, it's disgraceful.
To set the record straight: Steve Witkoff is an invaluable member of our team. He did not mislead anyone on what the Russians told him and what the Russians conceded. (Trust me, I've seen the intel.) The fruits of his negotiations are that we have narrowed the list of open issues in the Russia-Ukraine war to a set of clearly defined issues--specifically, security guarantees and territorial concessions.
Maybe we make peace, and maybe we don't. If we do, it will be because Steve Witkoff and the President of the United States worked their tails off, in the face of outright lies from the mainstream press.
Or he’s thinking about the courts undoing the tariffs. Same energy, anyway.There was nothing to "undo," Trump made zero progress. https://t.co/6jXYGcA1Ep
— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) August 30, 2025
https://t.co/w7jpIE94xJ pic.twitter.com/zKnidlE9Na
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) August 30, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment