... are both impervious to education.Trump Shared Call to Prosecute Obama in Christmas Day Post
— PatriotTakes 🇺🇸 (@patriottakes) December 27, 2025
Trump’s post urged Pam Bondi to bring chargeshttps://t.co/A4apIE1iSchttps://t.co/A4apIE1iSc
The Letitia James indictment was tossed, and then she was no-billed twice.
The Comey indictment was tossed, and isn’t likely to be reinstated. (Even Alito says the statute doesn’t allow Trump to circumvent the appointments clause.)
The DOJ is investigating the mortgage fraud investigation of Senator Adam Schiff. A grand jury is involved.
And Trump wants to indict Obama? On the “evidence” Trump couldn’t produce in 2020 in 60+ cases? Evidence he now says he has, but nobody’s seen? Sorta like the evidence he “found” in Hawaii that Obama’s birth certificate was a fake? Nobody ever saw that “evidence,” either.
And, of course, there’s the question of presidential immunity to be litigated….
(I have no opinion on how that would apply. The answer depends entirely on the facts alleged (there aren’t any right now), and on the court answers. Roberts set the immunity question up to be endlessly litigated and basically make the prosecution of any President a legal quagmire. It’s meant to bounce around in the lower courts until the sitting Supremes are all dead. Which works for Obama, and because Roberts feared a vindictive prosecution of a President. Turns out he had a point. Reality is ironic that way.)
No comments:
Post a Comment