GOV. WALZ: “Now that Minnesota has been taken out of the investigation, it feels very difficult that we will get a fair outcome. And I say that only because people in positions of power have already passed judgment. They have stood and told you things that are verifiably false.” pic.twitter.com/tQDPgbjbG6
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) January 8, 2026
Who you gonna believe? Vance? Or your lyin’ eyes?In case facts still matter.. pic.twitter.com/Kt2wj4OSbn
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) January 8, 2026
Is the FBI gonna report that?It appears that the ICE agent who killed Renee Good was recording with a cell phone in the split second before drawing his weapon.
— Rogue POTUS Staff (@RoguePOTUSStaff) January 8, 2026
How can he possibly have had the attention to determine she was a threat while using a smartphone?
ICE must release the recording. pic.twitter.com/82zNwG7y9M
Yeah, probably not. But rest assured, the FBI investigation will be as reliable as Trump’s word.Minnesota shooter, named by the Minnesota Star Tribune as Jonathan Ross deleting the video he was making.#Minnesota #Minneapolisprotests #Minneapolis pic.twitter.com/R76fc98MRe
— Sander (@SanderRegter) January 8, 2026
I know this becomes dangerously repetitious, but YOU CANNOT BELIEVE ANYTHING THIS ADMINISTRATION SAYS. Like this:Must watch: NYT just released a damning forensic analysis of the ICE shooting in Minneapolis.
— Matt McDermott (@mattmfm) January 8, 2026
It flatly refutes Trump administration claims — confirming the motorist was driving away, not toward the officer, and the officer was not hit by the vehicle.https://t.co/n8opkxbtmU pic.twitter.com/jJ0ttyr34R
DHS Official McLaughlin: Immediately, our officers got medics, there was an ambulance on the scene which is where the individual was pronounced dead. No pulse but that individual was immediately given aid pic.twitter.com/Ytd2nIjLKl
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 8, 2026
Nothing this Administration says can be taken at face value."A doctor at the scene attempted to help the woman who was shot, but was kept away by federal agents. When an ambulance finally arrived, it was blocked from reaching her by law-enforcement vehicles, and paramedics had to reach her on foot." https://t.co/oaOctFWfEr
— McKay Coppins (@mckaycoppins) January 8, 2026
Spoke on background with two attorneys who have defended officer involved shootings.
— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) January 8, 2026
Both have always taken their cases to trial.
After reviewing the events today, both said if it were their client they’d advise:
-Seek a plea deal
-Be willing to plead guilty to a lesser crime… https://t.co/Zyp6OtGQFz
Spoke on background with two attorneys who have defended officer involved shootings.Any questions about why the US Attorney decided this case is exclusive jurisdiction of the Feds? Because he never wants it to get to trial.
Both have always taken their cases to trial.
After reviewing the events today, both said if it were their client they’d advise:
-Seek a plea deal
-Be willing to plead guilty to a lesser crime or a lower sentence
-Accept anything that isn’t de jure LWOP (life with out parole)
In other words, the guys who defend police officers shooting for a living, think this case is unwinnable.
They would try to defend his actions, they’d just try and lower the impact of the outcome.
Their main sticking point were:
-“I could argue shot number one and hope for an acquittal or a hung jury - but I can’t get there on shots 2 and 3”
-“A jury will not get passed the turning of the wheels”
-“Denying medics throws self defense out the window”
Fair trials for them, not for us.You keep your life only at the regime's discretion is as clear as could be. I remember pointing out the difference between officially sanctioned police brutality in Russia versus George Floyd, where the officer had a fair trial and was jailed. The WH reaction here is Russian. https://t.co/91CAM0DFkg
— Garry Kasparov (@Kasparov63) January 9, 2026
No comments:
Post a Comment