In his speech, the president called for "immediate negotiations" on the acquisition of the Arctic territory.Later that same day:
Trump ruled out the use of military force in his speech, a commitment Lange described as a "small positive element."
However, Lange said the proposed 10% to 25% tariffs remain on the table, adding that, until the threat of them is over, "there will be no possibility of compromise."
"We will hold on the procedure ... until there is clarity regarding Greenland and the threats," he said.
"There was a breaking of the Scotland deal by President Trump," Lange said, referring to the trade pact agreed by the EU and the U.S. at Trump's Turnberry golf resort last year.
Lange said Trump is "using tariffs as an instrument of political pressure" as a way to buy Greenland, and described the move as "an attack against the economic and territorial sovereignty of the European Union."
He added that the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade, or INTA, would on Monday discuss the use of the EU's Anti-Coercion Instrument, or ACI — a far-reaching measure variously described as a "trade bazooka" — which would allow the EU to substantially restrict U.S. companies' access to its single market, block them from tenders, reduce the flow of goods and capital, and curb foreign direct investment in the bloc.
"This was created exactly for such a case when a foreign country [uses] tariffs and investment for political and coercive pressure," Lange said of the ACI.
And later than that:Reporter: What prompted you to say military off the table for Greenland?
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 21, 2026
Trump: We’ll see what happens. The military is not on the table. I don’t think it will be necessary pic.twitter.com/ucqR1wOIJK
Trump: We have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and the entire Arctic Region. This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the US, and all NATO Nations. Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs…. pic.twitter.com/2VN2QygZGu
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 21, 2026
MacCallum: Now you have President Trump posting this major progress in the push to take control of Greenland pic.twitter.com/Ck4xJ5NLHi
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 21, 2026
He’s going to claim he ended ten wars now because he didn’t invade Greenland
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 21, 2026
Collins: Does the deal still include the United States having ownership of Greenland, like you've said you wanted?
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 21, 2026
Trump: Uhh it’s a long term deal pic.twitter.com/VHB0Hu20UD
Is it just a deal on paper? Or is it not even that? (There is a U.S. treaty with Denmark where we recognized their claim to Greenland in exchange for what are now the U.S. Virgin Islands. But it’s just a piece of paper, right?)Collins: How long wil the deal be?
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 21, 2026
Trump: Infinite pic.twitter.com/wZOuLgXMzN
Because of course it isn’t. And, of course he did.The is not a new deal - this is Trump surrendering. For now. They have always said that the US & NATO is free to do what it wants in Greenland from a military perspective. Trump said that wasn’t good enough because he needs the US to “own” it. So this is simply Trump backing down pic.twitter.com/5S74f9Wfl1
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) January 21, 2026
I have an update on Greenland. pic.twitter.com/fzgm010OlH
— Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) January 21, 2026
Tennessee’s own @algore: “To take a wrecking ball to our alliances is insane.”
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) January 21, 2026
He notes Denmark helped us and sacrificed lives after 9/11, and Trump appears to have backed off his Greenland threats when the stock market dropped. pic.twitter.com/5VRew6uiG6
Assign ICE to Greenland instead of Minnesota with orders to win friends and influence people. Authorize them to promulgate the teachings of Andrew Carnegie. Keep them busy building libraries devoted to the royal families of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and the British Isles. Require them to memorize and recite Hamlet's soliloquy to obtain R&R in Iceland.
ReplyDelete