Monday, December 04, 2023

Fear Of A Brown Planet/🎄

[Republicans frantically trying to come up with a “War on Xmas” critique to level as Biden decorates a tree.] Ron DeSantis was asked about this on MTP, and said the was Trump’s problem. So, if Trump wins the nomination, that’s okay with Ron? 🤷🏻‍♂️ They deserve retribution, too? Or is Snopes going to tell me DeSantis didn’t say what he said? I think they’re a little too absolute on that one. Their alternative is that he said “in.” I suppose Snopes has a possible interpretation, but as a native speaker of English, it seems clear to me which vowel he used; especially since the alternative yields a sentence that makes no sense.

Or is that what we expect from Trump now?

War Breaks People’s Brains

QED.

First Monday of Advent 2023


Advent is the season of preparation.  In liturgical history it arose after Lent was established as the period of penance and preparation for Easter.  But unlike Lent, Advent doesn't carry the idea of self-denial, the tradition of giving up meat for the duration (little practiced anymore even for Lent), and it is almost lost in the secular race to Christmas Day in a frantic rush to buy gifts for "everyone on your list," or to attend and give as many parties as can be squeezed in between work and three weekends (most people having retreated home by the day before Xmas Eve).  There are a lot of misunderstandings about Yule and Xmas and their relationship to Christianity, and Advent threatens each year to disappear in the almost-manic need to make the "holidays perfect."

Advent is not about perfection.  It's not about getting "right with God," or "ready for God."  If you're part of a church community that observes Advent, it should be about preparing, as a community, for the celebration on December 25th.  When I was a pastor, I tried to keep "Christmas songs" out of the services in December so they were a special treat on Christmas Eve and the Sunday (or two) after Christmas Day until Epiphany Sunday.  Kind of a communal "giving up" for the period.  It never really worked out that way, and I usually included Christmas hymns in the services by Gaudete, and on the Sunday before Christmas Day.  

We rush to Christmas every year, anxious to have the joy and goodwill and memories of happiness we've known (well, most of us; some of us do need a "Blue Christmas") since childhood.  And more often than not we arrive at Xmas Day exhausted and drained, physically, spiritually, fiscally.  And then gear up to do it all again next year, because the lure of the day, the payoff for our anticipation, is so great in our hearts we can't see any other way than how "we've always done it before."

This is what I've always done before:  try to bring the sense of Advent here, because by the time I started this I didn't have a church anymore, and I soon lost connection to the church altogether.  I like to keep something alive, because I think it's worthwhile.  I also think we deserve more from December than a mad rush to balance the books of our year before we start a new one with resolutions meant, in large part, to wipe out (if never atone for) the year just ended.  And usually ended not with a bang, but a whimper.

Posting just snatches of poetry or scripture or essays, as I've done in the past, is to leave things, I think, a bit too out of context.  This isn't a drama or a comedy, but too much commentary is rather like "maid and butler dialogue:"  far more exposition than anyone wants to be burdened with.  So what we have here is not, I hope, a failure to communicate.  This is the start of the days of Advent, which are punctuated by the Sundays of Advent (which is truly how it is measured, much like Lent, which actually starts with the Sunday six weeks out from Easter Sunday; but we think of it as starting with Ash Wednesday.  Similarly, despite Advent Calendars with 24 slots on them, Advent isn't necessarily 24 days long, and it begins on the first Sunday to fall four Sundays before Christmas Day; which, unlike Easter, is always on December 25th, whatever day that is on the Julian calendar.)  It seemed appropriate, this year, to start the day with the topic of war; because, as Karl Barth said, a preacher should hold the Bible in one hand, and a newspaper in the other.  His times were even more fraught than ours, though we seem determined to either recreate his Germany, or declare our state of affairs to be even worse and more perilous.

Advent is never an escape from life; but it should be an alternative to what the world offers; whether that offering is war, or just getting and spending.

From Vatican II, The Church in the Modern World

"Peace is more than the absence of war.  It cannot be reduced to the maintenance of a balance of power between opposing forces nor does it arise out of despotic dominion, but it is appropriately called "the effect of righteousness" (Isaiah 32:17).  It is the fruit of that right ordering of things with which the divine founder has invested human society and which must be actualized by humans thirsting after an ever more perfect reign of justice.

"Peace cannot be obtained on earth unless human welfare is safeguarded and people freely and trustingly share with one another the riches of their minds and their talents.  A firm determination to  respect the dignity of others and other peoples along with the deliberate practice of  love are absolutely necessary for the achievement of peace.  Accordingly, peace is also the fruit of love, for love goes beyond what justice can ensure.

"Therefore, all Christians are earnestly to speak the truth in love (cf. Ephesians 4:15) and join with all who love peace in pleading for peace and trying to bring it about.  In the same spirit we cannot but express our admiration for all who forgo the use of violence to vindicate their rights and resort to those other means of defense which are available to weaker parties, provided it can be done without harm to the rights and duties of others and of the community.

"Insofar as all are sinners, the threat of war hangs over them and will so continue until the coming of Christ; but insofar as they can vanquish sin by coming together in charity, violence itself will be vanquished and they will make these words come true.  'They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not life up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.'  (Isaiah 2:4)."
Isaiah shows up a lot in Advent, for what seems like obvious reasons.  Sometimes, however, the reasons may not be as plain as we expect:

The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.

And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.

And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.

And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the LORD.

Therefore thou hast forsaken thy people the house of Jacob, because they be replenished from the east, and are soothsayers like the Philistines, and they please themselves in the children of strangers.

Their land also is full of silver and gold, neither is there any end of their treasures; their land is also full of horses, neither is there any end of their chariots:

Their land also is full of idols; they worship the work of their own hands, that which their own fingers have made:

And the mean man boweth down, and the great man humbleth himself: therefore forgive them not.

Enter into the rock, and hide thee in the dust, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty.

The lofty looks of man shall be humbled, and the haughtiness of men shall be bowed down, and the LORD alone shall be exalted in that day.

For the day of the LORD of hosts shall be upon every one that is proud and lofty, and upon every one that is lifted up; and he shall be brought low:

And upon all the cedars of Lebanon, that are high and lifted up, and upon all the oaks of Bashan,

And upon all the high mountains, and upon all the hills that are lifted up,

And upon every high tower, and upon every fenced wall,

And upon all the ships of Tarshish, and upon all pleasant pictures.

And the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of men shall be made low: and the LORD alone shall be exalted in that day.

And the idols he shall utterly abolish.

And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth.

In that day a man shall cast his idols of silver, and his idols of gold, which they made each one for himself to worship, to the moles and to the bats;

To go into the clefts of the rocks, and into the tops of the ragged rocks, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth.

Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils: for wherein is he to be accounted of?
--Isaiah 2 (KJV) 

When the time comes (and it will), remember Isaiah 2; and think of it when you hear Mary's song in Luke's nativity story.  Or when you read "The Waste Land" (does anyone read "The Waste Land" anymore?)


What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, 
You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock, 
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.



--T.S. Eliot, "The Waste Land"

Advent isn't all broken images and stony rubbish until Gaudete, or worse, Christmas Eve.  If it was, it would be unbearable.  It is alternative.  That's the best place to start with it: an alternative to what the world offers every year about this time.

Nothing that is worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime; therefore we must be saved by hope.

Nothing which is true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in any immediate context of history; therefore we must be saved by faith.

Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we must be saved by love.

No virtuous act is quite as virtuous from the standpoint of our friend or foe as it is from our standpoint.

Therefore we must be saved by the final form of love which is forgiveness.


--Reinhold Niebuhr

Sunday, December 03, 2023

First Sunday of Advent: 2023 “Oh, That You Would Come Down!”



This isn’t meant to be a sermon. My aim is more an exegesis of the lectionary texts.

Isaiah 64:1-9 
64:1 O that you would tear open the heavens and come down, so that the mountains would quake at your presence--
 64:2 as when fire kindles brushwood and the fire causes water to boil-- to make your name known to your adversaries, so that the nations might tremble at your presence! 
 64:3 When you did awesome deeds that we did not expect, you came down, the mountains quaked at your presence. 
 64:4 From ages past no one has heard, no ear has perceived, no eye has seen any God besides you, who works for those who wait for him.
 64:5 You meet those who gladly do right, those who remember you in your ways. But you were angry, and we sinned; because you hid yourself we transgressed. 64:6 We have all become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous deeds are like a filthy cloth. We all fade like a leaf, and our iniquities, like the wind, take us away. 
 64:7 There is no one who calls on your name, or attempts to take hold of you; for you have hidden your face from us, and have delivered us into the hand of our iniquity. 
 64:8 Yet, O LORD, you are our Father; we are the clay, and you are our potter; we are all the work of your hand. 
 64:9 Do not be exceedingly angry, O LORD, and do not remember iniquity forever. Now consider, we are all your people. 

Psalm 80:1-7, 17-19 
80:1 Give ear, O Shepherd of Israel, you who lead Joseph like a flock! You who are enthroned upon the cherubim, shine forth 
 80:2 before Ephraim and Benjamin and Manasseh. Stir up your might, and come to save us! 
 80:3 Restore us, O God; let your face shine, that we may be saved. 
 80:4 O LORD God of hosts, how long will you be angry with your people's prayers? 
 80:5 You have fed them with the bread of tears, and given them tears to drink in full measure. 
 80:6 You make us the scorn of our neighbors; our enemies laugh among themselves. 
 80:7 Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved.
 80:17 But let your hand be upon the one at your right hand, the one whom you made strong for yourself. 
 80:18 Then we will never turn back from you; give us life, and we will call on your name. 
 80:19 Restore us, O LORD God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved.

 1 Corinthians 1:3-9 1:3 
Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
 1:4 I give thanks to my God always for you because of the grace of God that has been given you in Christ Jesus, 
 1:5 for in every way you have been enriched in him, in speech and knowledge of every kind-- 
 1:6 just as the testimony of Christ has been strengthened among you-- 
 1:7 so that you are not lacking in any spiritual gift as you wait for the revealing of our Lord Jesus Christ. 
 1:8 He will also strengthen you to the end, so that you may be blameless on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.  1:9 God is faithful; by him you were called into the fellowship of his Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. 

 Mark 13:24-37 
13:24 "But in those days, after that suffering, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, 
 13:25 and the stars will be falling from heaven, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. 
 13:26 Then they will see 'the Son of Man coming in clouds' with great power and glory. 
 13:27 Then he will send out the angels, and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of heaven. 
 13:28 "From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near. 
 13:29 So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. 
 13:30 Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place. 
 13:31 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. 
 13:32 "But about that day or hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. 
 13:33 Beware, keep alert; for you do not know when the time will come. 
 13:34 It is like a man going on a journey, when he leaves home and puts his slaves in charge, each with his work, and commands the doorkeeper to be on the watch. 
 13:35 Therefore, keep awake--for you do not know when the master of the house will come, in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or at dawn, 
 13:36 or else he may find you asleep when he comes suddenly. 
 13:37 And what I say to you I say to all: Keep awake."

Trito-Isaiah speaks, or maybe more properly cries out, in the worst crisis in Israel’s history prior to the Holocaust (it’s not a contest; I’m just trying to shorthand the disaster of losing their homeland, the “Promised Land.” in the first place). It makes the perfect text for the First Sunday of Advent.

But not if you snatch it out of context and think it does refer to the Christian season of Advent. I don’t mean that at all. I mean the sentiment fits the Christian season, because the prophet is simultaneously looking forward and backward, and speaking to God for the people. And he’s angry and anxious and out of patience and making demands of God.

Always a good place to begin Advent.

Isaiah is recalling the story of Ezekiel, when the prophets of Baal called on their god to set a wooden pyre ablaze. When that didn’t happen, Ezekiel had the wood doused in water, and then called on God to burn it. The pyre erupted into a (pardon the term, I mean no historical allusion), a holocaust.

Isaiah is recalling this toward the end of the Exile. Israel has been so long away from Jerusalem they are beginning to lose their connection to the covenant; and the presence of God seems long ago and very far away. Even the great prophet of God needs a sign. In spirit, this is the ideal passage for the beginning of Advent. Because what Trito-Isaiah is calling for is apocalypse. No, not Armageddon; not the end of the world. “Apocalypse” means “revelation.” Isaiah wants something to be revealed, as God did in days of old. “Days of old,” looking back from the 6th century BCE. Let that sink in. This is a cry of frustration, of anguish, of anger. This is a demand for justice; or at least justification. “Tear open the heavens .” As if there were a barrier between God and Israel, and it needed to be torn apart. Oh, that God would come down, and save us from all this waiting and longing and suffering!

Isaiah wants God to prove God’s faithfulness, God’s fidelity to the covenant with Abraham. You may think “prove” too strong a term. It’s not a test of faith, as when the prophets of Baal meant to prove their god real and the God of Abraham false. Isaiah wants a sign to Israel, that their suffering has not been for nothing, that their trust and faith would be rewarded. The Exile was said by the prophets to have been due to Israel’s faithlessness. At what would be the end of that exile the people needed a reason to believe the covenant with Abraham still held. 

“O, that you would come down, as in days of old!”

Israel was restored to Jerusalem, under Cyrus.  But the fortunes of the nation under David, and Solomon, and the two kingdoms, was never restored. Israel’s scripture stop recording history sometime after that restoration, And Christian scripture starts long after Jerusalem and Judea, as the Romans called it, were under the rule of Rome. So we jump from the end of the Exile, to the rule of Rome. And actually, by the time Matthew writes his gospel, the oldest of the canonical four, Rome has already sacked Jerusalem; an assault so barbaric Josephus will record the blood in the streets reached the knees of the horses. Probably not to be taken as fact, so much as the Jewish historian reaching for metaphor to convey the horror of the destruction. I mention this because Matthew’s audience could well be asking Isaiah’s question, shouting Isaiah’s plea.

The other connection is looking to God in history to be the savior. Speaking for the people of Israel, Isaiah asks for delivery, for salvation; and recalls God’s wrath, which led to the Exile. “Do not be exceedingly angry, O LORD, and do not remember iniquity forever. Now consider, we are all your people.”

I would say the expectation of the Messiah, of the deliverance of Israel once and for all, began with the Exile. It’s not a coincidence that Christians connected the prophets of Exile to Jesus, and turned their declarations of God’s coming justice and faithfulness to the covenant with Abraham into predictions of the future that pointed to Jesus of Nazareth.

 So we go to the classic first Sunday of Advent text: Mark 13:24-37.

It’s debatable whether, and how much, the prophets of Israel were understood as predicting the future, and how much they were simply understood as speaking for God. Milton’s phrase “explaining the ways of God to man,” is appropriate here (if dated). Christianity taught us all to read the prophets as seers of the future. Before that, they were understood as simply telling the truth. Nobody looks to Ezekiel for the anticipation of the Messiah in Advent; and yet Ezekiel is understood to be a prophet because Ezekiel spoke for God. 

The most often repeated phrase in the books of the prophets is “The Word of the Lord.” In the prophets, this phrase distinguishes the prophets’s words from declarations by God. In the Christian liturgy that is a phrase used for the gospel reading, both by Catholics and Protestants. How many in the congregation think it transforms the sayings if Jesus, or a parable, or the nativity stories, into pronouncements about far-future events? Well, I suppose for Mark 13:24-37, they might.

Which is ironic, because Jesus is mocking the expectation of knowing the future. If anything, he’s saying that’s precisely what the Hebrew prophets are not. They are not soothsayers and divinationists and fortune tellers. 🔮 

And this is one of those passages where I always want to ask the biblical literalists: is Jesus telling us to never fall asleep? 😴 

More likely, of course, Jesus is telling us to be “woke.”

So: “But about that day or hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” One can be a good Trinitarian and still understand that as saying some things are simply beyond human knowledge; but not beyond God. Because God is omniscient? Or because God is in history, but beyond time? One answer is true to Greek metaphysics; the other is true to the Hebrew revelation. But about the future there is no revelation, except: be awake, or you’ll sleep through it. 🛌 

Think about that. The future comes, and you miss it. How does that work? Are we talking Rip Van Winkle here, who slept through the American Revolution and missed the whole thing? Well, something like that. But how do you sleep through the future and miss it when it comes? RipVan Winkle, after all, is a fantasy, not a parable. He literally falls asleep, for decades. Which takes us back to my question: does Jesus mean we should never fall asleep? 💤 

Pretty sure he doesn’t. But what does sleep mean, here? For that matter, what future are we expecting? What future is Jesus being asked about?

Jesus has just darkly hinted at calamity in the future, and Peter, James, John, and Andrew have just asked him what to expect. His answer is used by Biblical scholars to date the Gospel of Mark as coming shortly after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 C.E., because Jesus describes the destruction of the Temple (which Mark’s audience could see first-hand), and the “abomination in the place of desecration “: the statue of Caesar raised in the holy if holies after the pig was slaughtered on the altar there. Mark’s audience knows this as history; placed in Jesus’s mouth some 35 years earlier, it becomes prophecy. And then Jesus insists on undoing the idea of prophecy.

The idea of prophecies as describing the future, anyway. What Jesus was doing was telling the truth; the truth about Roman rule and its incompatibility with Jewish life and Temple worship. Pilate, after all, killed Jesus because he cleansed the Temple at Passover and raised political tensions beyond what Pilate thought was politic. Jesus was telling the truth; but truth is often inconvenient.

So Jesus tells the truth about the future (Mark’s past), and goes on to tell the truth about expecting the future: you can only do it if you stay awake.

Consider where he starts;
But in those days, after that suffering, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, 13:25 and the stars will be falling from heaven, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken. 13:26 Then they will see 'the Son of Man coming in clouds' with great power and glory. 13:27 Then he will send out the angels, and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of heaven.
Good, cosmic, Cecil B. DeMille, wide-screen spectacle stuff! But then he turns to metaphor:
28 "From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near. 13:29 So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates.
So, wait, we’re going to know all that is coming the way a fig tree…knows to put out leaves?🍃 What?

I knew an old farmer’s daughter (no jokes, please; she was a kindly, saintly person) who said he father always said the last chance for frost wasn’t over until the pecan trees began to bud out again. Pecans are native to Texas; they were one of the trees Europeans found in profusion when they first came here. And, she said, her father was right. And so, from my observations, has he proved to be. But if it hadn’t been pointed out to me, would I have ever thought to notice? To look, to see, to be aware? Or awake?

Does changing one letter change anything?

But the pecans budding out don’t presage a cosmic event; just a very ordinary one. But is the changing of the seasons cosmic? Or quotidian? Or is it both?

Certainly it’s as expected as sunrise; but it’s cosmic, isn’t it? Caused by the earth’s tilt and elliptical solar orbit? And the plants respond to that, season after season, year after year, millennium in millennium. What revelation is this? I mean really; how is a fig tree a harbinger of apocalyptic times?

Jesus loves to do this; talk in every day terms about perfectly extraordinary ideas. He does it with parables when he says the kingdom of heaven is like, well, a fig tree. But how is the kingdom of heaven like that? Or how is the budding fig like the sun and moon going dark and the stars falling out of the sky?🌌 

Or maybe it isn’t meant to be. Maybe that’s the point of the metaphor. Which doesn’t mean Jesus is lying; it just means he may not be telling you what you think he’s telling you. You’ve got to keep that option open. Because it may be this is paradox, and these two simply don’t fit together.

Because whatever is coming, however it’s coming, it’s coming in history, in time. And be awake, or you’ll miss it.
13:34 It is like a man going on a journey, when he leaves home and puts his slaves in charge, each with his work, and commands the doorkeeper to be on the watch. 13:35 Therefore, keep awake--for you do not know when the master of the house will come, in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or at dawn, 13:36 or else he may find you asleep when he comes suddenly.
Or at least you certainly won’t be doing what you should be doing. And what you shouldn’t be doing is sleeping, when you should be awake. Don’t be sleeping on the job!

Paul says:
...for in every way you have been enriched in him, in speech and knowledge of every kind-- 1:6 just as the testimony of Christ has been strengthened among you-- 1:7 so that you are not lacking in any spiritual gift as you wait for the revealing of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1:8 He will also strengthen you to the end, so that you may be blameless on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1:9 God is faithful; by him you were called into the fellowship of his Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. 
Spiritual gifts and strength and called into fellowship… Isn’t there something you should be doing with that? Is that what you should use in your job?

Wait! What job? The job of watching fig trees? Pretty sure Jesus wasn’t using that metaphor as an analogy. You aren’t called into the fellowship Paul is talking about to be as passive as that. It’s more likely he was using it as a warning. After all, Jesus asks why we worry about what we will eat and drink and wear, because the birds are given what they need and will we not be? If we don’t need to worry about our daily needs, why do we need to worry about the future? Four apostles have asked Jesus what to expect, and he has told them: more of the same, until it changes. And when it will changes, no one knows. So do your jobs, because the Master is coming home, but you don’t know when. And what is your job? Why, looking out for everyone else, obviously. The first of all will be last of all and servant of all. Which is job enough for everyone.

I came across a headline as I was finishing this. It read: “No one is coming to save us.” You might think that sentiment too dour, too pessimistic. But I think that’s what Jesus is getting at. Why do you worry about what you will eat or what you will drink or what the far future holds? It doesn’t hold salvation from the present! It only holds the assurance that the arc of the universe bends towards justice. Any salvation won’t come in spite of you, it will only come through you. So keep awake! Wake up! Be woke to the injustice you benefit from, live by, live with. Pay attention to what is needed, here and now! The signs of the times point to what is coming  It’s up to you to shape them to good or bad; to see that the fig tree is fruitful, and not fruitless. 


Okay, so it turned into a sermon. What’d you expect? 🤷🏻‍♂️ 

Saturday, December 02, 2023

Donald Trump Is A People Person

And a man of deep faith: Well, they’re on the right track.

Our Man On Their Side

Sure, that happened:

 And so did that:

This, however, actually did: This won’t:
"If the judges allow us --- somebody's gotta allow this thing to be prosecuted," Trump said at his campaign event. "We wanna show how we won the election, not for the purposes of... what we want to do, is we want to win this one that's coming up because it's a lot simpler. Think to the future. But you have to learn from history. If you don't learn from history, you're a fool."
Fortunately, courts have learned from history. They are not peopled by fools. They will not allow this non-defense to the criminal charges to be presented to juries.
"So I hope that's going to happen because we have so much evidence. We know it and they know it. The only thing they don't want to talk about is the election because they're guilty as hell," he claimed. "They cheated."
Hope, as the military says, is not a plan. I do think this, however, is more than hopeful: Trump is practically writing their motions now. And, especially after Chutkan’s rejection of Trump’s “Presidential immunity” defense, there’s no hope of this defense being allowed at trial.

Aside from that, he’s fruity as a nut cake:
At least we can quit worrying about Trump’s state of mind. He’s as mad as the proverbial hatter. A year from now he’ll be broke, a loser (again), and a convicted felon. And unlike a broken clock, not even right twice a day.

December 2: The Martyrs of El Salvador


I repeat this every year.  Maybe it’s because I was only 25 in 1980, and the past disappears if you don’t remind people of it. Year after year, the story of Marisela and the soon to be martyred Archbishop never fails to move me. I'm now committed to doing repeating it, just so we remember.

This is from Memory of Fire: Volume III, Century of the Wind, by Eduardo Galeano, tr. Cedric Balfrage, Pantheon, 1988.

"ARCHBISHOP Romero offers her a chair. Marianela prefers to talk standing up. She always comes for others, but this time Marianela comes for herself. Marianela Garda Vilas, attorney for the tortured and disappeared of EI Salvador, does not come this time to ask the archbishop's solidarity with one of the victims of D'Aubuisson, Captain Torch, who burns your body with a blowtorch, or of some other military horror specialist. Marianela doesn't come to ask help for anyone else's investigation or denunciation. This time she has something personal to say to him. As mildly as she can, she tells him that the police have kidnapped her, bound, beat, humiliated, stripped her-and that they raped her. She tells it without tears or agitation, with her usual calm, but Archbishop Romero has never before heard in Marianela's voice these vibrations of hatred, echoes of disgust, calls for vengeance. When Marianela finishes, the archbishop, astounded, falls silent too.

"After a long silence, he begins to tell her that the church does not hate or have enemies, that every infamy and every action against God forms part of a divine order, that criminals are also our brothers and must be prayed for, that one must forgive one's persecutors, one must accept pain, one must. . . Suddenly, Archbishop Romero stops.

"He lowers his glance, buries his head in his hands. He shakes his head, denying it all, and says: 'No, I don't want to know.'

" 'I don't want to know,' he says, and his voice cracks.

"Archbishop Romero, who always gives advice and comfort, is weeping like a child without mother or home. Archbishop Romero, who always gives assurances, the tranquilizing assurance of a neutral God who knows all and embraces all-Archbishop Romero doubts.

"Romero weeps and doubts and Marianela strokes his head."




"THERE are so many deaths everywhere that it is incredible.

"The 'death squadron' strikes in so many poor homes. A family of seven, including three small children, was machine gunned to death in a nearby town just last week. It is a daily thing- death and bodies found
everywhere, many decomposing or attacked by animals because no one can touch them until they are seen by a coroner. It is an atmosphere ofdeath.

"The organized, as they call the left, are made up of some of those simple courageous, suffering farmers. In the Pastoral de Asistencia [Pastoral Assistance] work that Ita began in Chatelango, one comes in contact with so many poor refugees-women and childrenespecially, who have lost husbands, brothers, fathers.

"It has become an ordinary daily happening. Two lovely young women were cut into pieces by machetes in a community nearby where so many of the people
have been killed. The brave mother of one of these young women is also the mother-in-law of the other and she was here with us taking refuge. We are trying to help the refugees-bringing them to shelters and getting food to places where it is desperately needed.

"Archbishop Romero [murdered while he said Mass in San Salvador on March 23] and all the martyrs of this little violent land must be interceding for a new day
for Salvador.

"I am beginning to see death in a new way, dearest
Katie. For all these precious men, women, children struggling in just laying down their lives as victims, it is surely a passageway to life or, better, a change of life. . . .

"I don't know what tomorrow will bring. I am at peace here and searching-trying to learn what the Lord is asking. Ita is a beautiful, faith-filled young woman. I am learning much from her. At this point, I would hope to be able to go on, God willing. . . . This seems what he is asking of me at this moment. The work is really what Archbishop Romero called "acompanamiento"
[accompanying the people], as well as searching for ways to bring help.

"Write to me soon. Know that I love you and pray for you daily. Keep us in your heart and prayers, especially the poor forsaken people."

--Maura Clarke

Maura Clarke was a Maryknoll sister working with the poor in El Salvador when she wrote this letter in October 1980. On December 2 of that year, Maura Clarke, Ita Ford, Jean Donovan and Dorothy Kazel were brutally murdered.

Keep awake.  Tomorrow begins the First week of Advent.

Friday, December 01, 2023

George Santos Leaves The House

No time or love lost.

This guy is going to be a credible witness?

I expect even his dirt is artificial.

Trump Has Bad Lawyers

QED.

Trump? Biden? What’s The Difference?

Asking for a friend.

Adding: this explains the support of Trump, who also did nothing but shouts he did more than anyone:

Advent Approaches


Matthew 25:31-46  (SV)

25:31 "When the Son of Adam comes in his glory, accompanied by all his messengers, then he will occupy his glorious throne. Then all peoples will be assembled before him, and he will separate them into groups, much as a shepherd segregates sheep from goats. He'll place the sheep to his right and the goats to his left. Then the king will say to those at his right, 'Come, you who have the blessing of my Father, inherit the domain prepared for you from the foundations of the world.  You may remember, I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a foreigner and you showed me hospitality; I was naked and you clothed me;  I was ill and you visited me;  I was in prison and you came to see me.'

Then the virtuous will say to him, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and fed you or thirsty and gave you drink? When did we notice that you were a foreigner and extend hospitality to you? Or naked and clothe you? When did we find you ill or in prison and come to visit you?

And the king will respond to them, 'I swear to you, whatever you did for the most inconspicuous members of my family, you did for me as well.'

Next, he will say to those on his left, 'You, condemned to the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his messengers, get away from me! You too may remember, I was hungry and you didn't give me amything to eat; I was thirsty and you refused me a drink; I was a foreigner and you failed to extend hospitality to me; naked and you didn't clothe me; ill and in prison and you didn't visit me.'

Then they will give him a similar reply: 'Lord, when did we notice that you were hungry or thirsty or a foreigner or naked or weak or in prison, and did not attempt to help you?'

He will then respond: 'I swear to you, whever you didn't do for the most inconcpicuous members of my family, you didn't do for me.'

The second group will then head for everlasting punishment, but the virtuous for everlasting life.



Abba John the Little said: “We have abandoned a light burden, namely self-criticism, and taken up a heavy burden, namely self-justification.”

Thursday, November 30, 2023

The Nicest Thing I Can Say About Henry The K Is That He Won’t Be Missed

People who don’t remember the’60’s are doomed to repeat it:
From yet another vantage point, Kissinger is at the heart of bookshelves of books that a generation of baby boomers wrote about Vietnam and Watergate, two of the three formative events of their generational memory (the third being the Kennedy assassination). Many of those books are quite good. If you haven’t read Time of Illusion by Jonathan Schell, absolutely go read it. Everybody may hate the baby boomers now. But in their day, with their admittedly sometimes self-obsessed wrestling with the things that happened in their 20s, the early baby boomers generated quite a lot of literary and popular culture heat. Kissinger managed to do enough when relatively young enough to be at the center of a lot of that heat and then live enough into the age of social media for all that heat surrounding him to … well, splatter all over everything in a new way before he finally died. 
The other part of the story is that from the start of his time on the national political stage, Kissinger inserted himself into the popular culture in ways that were then and remain now all but unheard of. Kissinger was a single man from 1964 and 1974 and he made sure you knew it. His personal life was the topic of the gossip columns and intrigue. Late last night The Washington Post published this article, The surprising dating life of Henry Kissinger, a West Wing ‘playboy’. He reputedly dated countless high profile actresses and female celebrities. He made appearances at Studio 54. He’s publicly credited with originating the phrase “power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.”
How you can get through an entire article (as Josh does) without mentioning realpolitik is simply astounding. Joy Reid tonight noted that Jimmy Carter lived long enough “to outlive that SOB,” if only because Carter introduced human rights to American foreign policy. Kissinger had no time for such mamby-pamby nonsense. At least that’s the way he saw it.
In a numerical body count as a measure of criminal evil, the rightly infamous and reviled Pol Pot comes somewhat after Kissinger in the millions of deaths attributable to him because Kissinger and Nixon share responsibility for the illegal expansion of the Vietnam war into Cambodia which brought Pol Pot to power. The duly elected president, Richard Nixon and his appointee, Kissinger share in that alongside the millions murdered through the action and encouragement of Nixon and Ford and Kissinger in East Timor, East Pakistan (Bangladesh), the fascist takeovers in Chile and Argentina (Kissinger complained to the generals in the "Dirty War" that they weren't killing People fast enough) and in many other places. Especially after he cashed in on his governmental climb over millions of bodies, Kissinger had a business career and among the things he and his associates did was arm many murderous regimes and movements in Africa and, of course Latin America and Asia.
Yeah, but Josh points out at least Chile and Argentina didn’t go Commie. Domino theory, donchaknow. Or Monroe Doctrine, I could never be sure in the’60’s.

Kissinger does prove that if you live long enough, you escape your critics because you leave them behind, and newer generations never know what they did. Josh cites a book by Christopher Hitchens from 2002, and Anthony Bourdain’s critique from the same year. Almost 30 years after Kissinger’s last job in official D.C. And neither of them are foreign policy experts or serious historians. Need I also note Josh doesn’t remember Nixon in the White House, or Vietnam?

Henry Kissinger earned the enmity, decision by decision.

I do find it funny Josh and WaPo have to underline that Kissinger was the Playboy of the Western World for a decade. It’s only surprising to those who only know Kissinger since 2000.  Those of us older remember Kissinger coining the famous phrase “Power is an aphrodisiac,” and applying it to himself. It was also Kissinger who wielded power to go from Nixon’s National Security Adviser to his, and then Ford’s, Secretary of State. Kissinger wanted to be the power behind the throne, and he did so as ruthlessly as he directed Nixon’s, and then Ford’s, foreign policy. After Nixon was deposed, he said Nixon had a “meatball mind.” Being a publicly arrogant figure never wins hearts and minds. Being the man unapologetically responsible for ramping up Vietnam just made it worse. Even Robert McNamara recanted his cheerleading of that war, and apologized for his responsibility for it. Kissinger just cashed in.

Dorothy Day--November 29

Yes, I should have done this yesterday!

 

A brother said to an old man:  There are two brothers.  One of them stays in his cell quietly, fasting for six days at a time, and imposing on himself a good deal of discipline, and the other serves the sick.  Which one of them is more acceptable to God?  The old man replied:  Even if the brother who fasts six days were to hang himself by the nose, he could not equal the one who serves the sick.

--Desert Wisdom

"After 1976 Dorothy [Day] virtually withdrew from the affairs of the world of the Worker movement.  Her lot, as she knew, was to await death.  Content to spend as much time as she could in the company of her daughter and grandchildren, she remained in her room at Maryhouse, coming downstairs only for the even Mass that was said at the house.  In her room, which overlooked Third Street, she could look out onto the dismal prospect of a narrow street, shadowed by five-story buildings, shoulder to shoulder, whose unkempt and desolate appearance suggested that they, like the people who passed before them, felt that their existence mattered not at all.  In front of these buildings, parked cars at the curbs were jammed against one another.  One structure, ugly with shattered windows and an aspect of grotesque garishness, was fronted by motorcycles--powerful brutish machines with signs and symbols that proclaimed their  owners' defiance of civilized norms.  The building was the home of the Hell's Angels, a motorcycle gang about whose doings fearful stories were told.

"It was in this part of New York that Dorothy had spent a half-century of her own life, where just blocks away she had lived in 1917 as the acting editor of the Masses and where in that cold winterof 1918 she had whiled away the nights with Eugene O'Neill and the young radicals and artists of the Village.  A few blocks to the west and south was New York's Lower East Side, the home of the Jews.  She had never left them.  Mott Street was two blocks away, the street of the Italians.  She remembered sitting on the front steps of the Mott Street house, watching them celebrate the feast of San Gennaro.  Perhaps she remembered that night soon after the war had begun, the cool clear air and the half-moon shining brightly over Mott Street.

"Dorothy died on November 29, 1980, just as night began to soften the harshness of the poverty and ugliness of Third Street.  Her daughter, Tamar, was in the room with her.  There was no struggle.  The last of the energy that sustained her life had been used.

"The funeral was on December 2 at the Nativity Catholic Church, a half block away from Maryhouse.  An hour before the service, scheduled for 11 o'clock in the morning, people began to assemble in the street.  Some were curious onlookers, the hollow-eyed people and stumbling people who roam the streets of lower New York, but others were drawn there by some sense of propriety of paying their last respects to the woman who had clothed and fed them.  There were American Indians, Mexican workers, blacks and Puerto Ricans.  There were people in eccentric dress, apostles of causes who had fealt a great power and truth in Dorothy's life.

"At the appointed time, a procession of these friends and fellow workers came down the sidewalk.  At the head of it Dorothy's grandchildren carried the pine box that held her body.  Tamar, Forster, and her brother John followed.  At the church door, Cardinal Terence Cooke met the body to bless it.  As the procession stopped for this rite, a demented person pushed his way through the crowd and bending low over the coffin peered at it intently.  No one interfered, because, as even the funeral directors understood, it was in such as this man that Dorothy had seen the face of God."

--William D. Miller


This morning to ward off the noise I have my radio on---Berlioz, Schubert, Chopin, etc.  It is not a distraction, it is a pacifier.  As St. Teresa of Avila said as she grabbed her castanets and started to dance during the hour of recreation in her unheated convent, "One must do something to make life bearable!"

...

I feel that all families should have the conveniences and comforts which modern living brings and which do simplify life, and give time to read, to study, to think, and to pray.  And to work in the apostolate, too.  But poverty is my vocation, to live as simply and poorly as I can, and never to cease talking and writing of poverty and destitution.  Here and everywhere.  "While there are poor, I am of them.  While men are in prison, I am not free," as Debs said and as we often quote.

--Dorothy Day 

Wednesday, November 29, 2023

Elmo Watch

Today, in a public conversation with Andrew Ross Sorkin at the New York Times DealBook Summit, Twitter CEO Elon Musk was asked about his thoughts about the many companies and brands that have stopped advertising on Twitter following Musk's antisemitic comments on the platform recently. His response was simple: the companies can go f*ck themselves.
Oh, he meant it:
As you can tell from the clip, Sorkin was extremely uncomfortable as Musk repeatedly chanted go f*ck yourself to the advertisers, motioning to the crowd. At one point, Musk even called out Bob Iger, the CEO of Disney, by name. During this enter conversation, Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino was in the audience, although he camera did not capture her reaction.
The NYT is on the case: Funny they missed him cursing his advertisers and leading a profane chant. Or didn’t seem to notice he’s as emotionally stable as a five-year old. An emotionally troubled five-year old.*

I mean, a 52 year old man who is “Good Elmo” and “Bad Elmo” in the same hour? And this is just a “conundrum”? The NYT editors must have had a fit of the vapors at such language! How could they possibly report it?

Sometimes I really wonder about the “adults” in this world.
No word on whether this was “Good Elmo” or “Bad Elmo” speaking.

*He’s also pulled a truly Trumpian move of screwing his suit against Media Matters and made Texas and Missouri reconsider their interest in pursuing any action.

But “Dems In Disarray” Is So Alliterative 🫠

I read about the transfer before I read it in context of the monitor reporting it to Engoron. Which tells me Trump has not yet accepted the new regime, and he’s still functioning under the old rules.

It also tells me his situation is so complicated he’s not keeping up with all of it anyway. It also tells me Engoron will file this away for the conclusion of the trial and case. Unless Trump can get the appeals court to set aside the summary judgment (unlikely) his lawyers are going to have trouble arguing Trump didn’t just fail to comply with a lawful court order.

And that the court isn’t entitled to enforce its standing order with further sanctions.

Trump is just going to get himself in more and more trouble as he goes along. This is literally the least of it.
I almost feel sorry for the GOP.

Dems In Disarray

😎

Hail Mary, Full Of Grace

 The “They Lied More Than I Did!” Defense:

Trump also wants to counter arguments that his claims to have actually won the 2020 election but for massive, never-found fraud somehow contributed to mistrust in American elections. In fact, Trump attorneys wrote, the former president wants evidence about 2016 Russian interference “to demonstrate to the jury that he did not create or cause the environment that the prosecution seeks to blame him for.”
The “I Know You Are, But What Am I?” Defense:
Trump’s lawyers wrote elsewhere in the filing that the 2016 interference had “motivated” Trump to make extensive policy changes aimed at “foreign influence and cyber risks,” and “to be skeptical of claims about the absence of foreign influence in the 2020 election.” 
In 2020, Trump’s allies went wild with claims of foreign interference. Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows ordered DOJ officials to examine the ItalyGate theory, which posits that an Italian defense contractor used military satellites to zap the election away from Trump. At a now-infamous November 2020 press conference, Rudy Giuliani appeared alongside Sidney Powell as she attributed Trump’s loss to a Venezuelan conspiracy helmed by deceased communist Hugo Chavez.
One pauses to note no policy changes enacted by Trump justify his actions on January 6th, or actions leading up to that date. In fact, this is all just creating a record in appeal, as it is unlikely this evidence will be ordered discoverable, survive a limine hearing, or get before the jury. If it exists at all.

They got nuthin’. This is all trying to make the ketchup spaghetti stick to the wall.

So This Is Working Again

I’ll try not to abuse this power, but this seems a good point to start using it again.

Especially since Comer is going on Newsmax to complain about Democrats not letting him get away with one-sided hearings. Don’t they know Republicans are supposed to be able to do whatever they want to?

What Did The President Do, And When Did He Do It?

 What did the President know, and when did he know it?

That is not a defense here," he added. "What I mean by that is that you can think subjectively that the election was stolen. It doesn't mean you get to storm the Capitol, for example. And that's the difference. If you're engaging in something that you believe to be illegal, even if you have good intentions, that's still a crime. That distinction is going to be really important."
The famous question was first posed during the Watergate scandal. Nixon was the president then. The question has since become the gold standard for discussing criminal prosecutions. It’s understood to be the question of criminal intent.

It isn’t.

Criminal intent divides the question of the criminal act (you need both to establish a crime: a mens rea, often called “guilty mind,” and an actus reus, or criminal act) into two categories: intentional, and negligent. You’re culpable if negligence or intent is proven; but the punishment is worse for the latter, for what should be obvious reasons.

Now, not all crimes can be committed negligently; which means some require proof of intent. But proof of intent does not require a confession from the accused, or even clever cross-examination that gets more than the defendant wanted to reveal. It is shown by evidence proving the accused acted knowingly (as opposed to negligently, which might be a defense). If proving intent required evidence directly from the accused, every criminal case in America would founder on the 5th Amendment. The law doesn’t require first-hand evidence of the accused’s state of mind. Intent can be inferred from evidence of actions or statements made to witnesses.

So the ceaseless blather that Trump is finally caught by some tape or witness statement finally revealed to the public is as mindless as Trump’s constant cries (and efforts in court) to dismiss his New York fraud suit because of the testimony of one witness.

That only works on TeeVee, where they need to wrap up the trial in 60 minutes, including commercial breaks.

No one witness is going to make, or break, a trial. I’ve sat through trials, they are never that dramatic. A bad witness is a burden, a good witness a blessing, but if your cases rises or falls on one witness, you’re doing it wrong. 😑 

What did the President know, and when did he know it, is too strict a standard (and even then Nixon stumbled). It’s a political question, not a legal one. The question facing Trump some 91 times is: what did the President do, and when did he do it? The jury will decide why he did it based on the evidence of what he did, which will include what he said and what he was told. They will decide whether he had the requisite criminal intent. And Trump won’t have to testify about his “subjective” state of mind, for them to do it.

Core Political Speech For Me!


But not for thee!

Yes, Trump really is as dumb as a bag of hammers. No, MSNBC does not use “the public airwaves” (no, that doesn’t affect the analysis at all). Yes, Trump’s grip on reality has always been slippery when wet. And yes, “Election interference” is his “King’s’X’” that he thinks allows him to do whatever he wants.

It’s Trump’s year of magical thinking. He’s just going to get worse; which is the unimaginable part.