BREAKING: James Comer says that the Bidens had nothing to sell but Joe's Brand.
That's precisely the argument that Trump gave in the NYS case in which he was just described as a fraud.
HIs property didn't have value, his brand did.Jonathan Turley spoke:
Turley says these are facts:
1) Biden has spoken falsely abt these deals (this is not entirely true).
2) Biden was focus of multi-million influence peddling.
3) Biden MAY have benefited from scheme.The connection between 2) and 3) is purely speculative. It is NOT a “fact.”
Jamie Raskin brought visual aids:
Jamie Raskin shows boxes containing all the documents that James Comer has had no problem getting w/o impeachment, which show no evidence of wrongdoing.
Also:
Turns out the impeachment inquiry is not very inquisitive:
BREAKING: REpublicans are objecting to Devin Archer's testimony--their own witness!--to be introduced into Congressional record.And we end where we started:
BREAKING: Byron Donald establishes that it's a red flag when ownership moves from one family member to another, as has happened with Donald Trump!!!This impeachment inquiry (“l Am Curious (Yellow)”) is about:
1) Both-siding Donald Trump’s crimes, both charged and alleged but uninvestigated;
2) Pure vengeance by Trump via the House GOP;
3) All of the above.
Turley: The public does not buy into the idea that you can sell your family brand if it's influence peddling.And the GOP House member:
BREAKING: Mace has just laid out why Trump hid his tax returns, because he was hiding $17.5 M from a Chinese company AS PRESIDENT.Give away the game.
No comments:
Post a Comment