There are actually three issues:New York Times says '3-D model' analysis shows Trump was struck by bullet — not 'debris' https://t.co/9KHdYGICLz
— Raw Story (@RawStory) July 26, 2024
It’s worth noting Chris Wray did not say Trump was not hit by a bullet. He said the FBI couldn’t determine that because they couldn’t get the medical records. This NYT analysis is interesting, but the best evidence is the medical records. Why can’t we see them? And what is the risk if any, of delayed, or present, brain injury?3 reasons:
— emptywheel (seiceáil) (@emptywheel) July 25, 2024
1) If it was a bullet he's at risk for delayed head injury.
2) There's a norm of transparency for candidate medical incidents Trump is violating, and MSM thus far has let that slide
3) He's running on "I took a bullet for democracy" not "I took shrapnel for fascism" https://t.co/Bhx1qiS3or
People are still saying Biden stepped down due to “cognitive decline.” Is Trump similarly at risk due to this injury? Don’t we deserve to know?
Also, too, as well:
Placed right above a story that explains why the FBI, which has forensic evidence NYT does not, is not yet sure. https://t.co/p17umiJx3J
— emptywheel (seiceáil) (@emptywheel) July 26, 2024
The NYT is all in for Trump just as it was in 2016, no matter what their editorials might pretend. And it's all about the top staffers and the Sulzbergers wanting their Trump giveaways extended. I've been meaning to investigate A.G.'s prepping at the "Ethical Culture" atheist prep but haven't gotten around to it. I figure after dumping on the elite Catholic preps I should be fair about that.
ReplyDelete