Wednesday, February 14, 2024

Ash Wednesday 2024

Ash Wednesday by T. S. Eliot

I
Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the agèd eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?

Because I do not hope to know
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power

Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is
nothing again
Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place
I rejoice that things are as they are and
I renounce the blessèd face
And renounce the voice
Because I cannot hope to turn again
Consequently I rejoice, having to construct something
Upon which to rejoice

And pray to God to have mercy upon us
And pray that I may forget
These matters that with myself I too much discuss
Too much explain
Because I do not hope to turn again
Let these words answer
For what is done, not to be done again
May the judgement not be too heavy upon us

Because these wings are no longer wings to fly
But merely vans to beat the air
The air which is now thoroughly small and dry
Smaller and dryer than the will
Teach us to care and not to care Teach us to sit still.

Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death
Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.

II 

Lady, three white leopards sat under a juniper-tree
In the cool of the day, having fed to sateity
On my legs my heart my liver and that which had been
contained
In the hollow round of my skull. And God said
Shall these bones live? shall these
Bones live? And that which had been contained
In the bones (which were already dry) said chirping:
Because of the goodness of this Lady
And because of her loveliness, and because
She honours the Virgin in meditation,
We shine with brightness. And I who am here dissembled
Proffer my deeds to oblivion, and my love
To the posterity of the desert and the fruit of the gourd.
It is this which recovers
My guts the strings of my eyes and the indigestible portions
Which the leopards reject. The Lady is withdrawn
In a white gown, to contemplation, in a white gown.
Let the whiteness of bones atone to forgetfulness.
There is no life in them. As I am forgotten
And would be forgotten, so I would forget
Thus devoted, concentrated in purpose. And God said
Prophesy to the wind, to the wind only for only
The wind will listen. And the bones sang chirping
With the burden of the grasshopper, saying

Lady of silences
Calm and distressed
Torn and most whole
Rose of memory
Rose of forgetfulness
Exhausted and life-giving
Worried reposeful
The single Rose
Is now the Garden
Where all loves end
Terminate torment
Of love unsatisfied
The greater torment
Of love satisfied
End of the endless
Journey to no end
Conclusion of all that
Is inconclusible
Speech without word and
Word of no speech
Grace to the Mother
For the Garden
Where all love ends.
Under a juniper-tree the bones sang, scattered and shining
We are glad to be scattered, we did little good to each
other,

Under a tree in the cool of day, with the blessing of sand,
Forgetting themselves and each other, united
In the quiet of the desert. This is the land which ye
Shall divide by lot. And neither division nor unity
Matters. This is the land. We have our inheritance.


III 

At the first turning of the second stair
I turned and saw below
The same shape twisted on the banister
Under the vapour in the fetid air
Struggling with the devil of the stairs who wears
The deceitul face of hope and of despair.

At the second turning of the second stair
I left them twisting, turning below;
There were no more faces and the stair was dark,
Damp, jaggèd, like an old man's mouth drivelling, beyond
repair,
Or the toothed gullet of an agèd shark.

At the first turning of the third stair
Was a slotted window bellied like the figs's fruit
And beyond the hawthorn blossom and a pasture scene
The broadbacked figure drest in blue and green
Enchanted the maytime with an antique flute.
Blown hair is sweet, brown hair over the mouth blown,
Lilac and brown hair;
Distraction, music of the flute, stops and steps of the mind
over the third stair, 
Fading, fading; strength beyond hope and despair
Climbing the third stair.

Lord, I am not worthy
Lord, I am not worthy
but speak the word only. 

IV 

Who walked between the violet and the violet
Whe walked between
The various ranks of varied green
Going in white and blue, in Mary's colour,
Talking of trivial things
In ignorance and knowledge of eternal dolour
Who moved among the others as they walked,
Who then made strong the fountains and made fresh the springs

Made cool the dry rock and made firm the sand
In blue of larkspur, blue of Mary's colour,
Sovegna vos

Here are the years that walk between, bearing
Away the fiddles and the flutes, restoring
One who moves in the time between sleep and waking, wearing

White light folded, sheathing about her, folded.
The new years walk, restoring
Through a bright cloud of tears, the years, restoring
With a new verse the ancient rhyme. Redeem
The time. Redeem
The unread vision in the higher dream
While jewelled unicorns draw by the gilded hearse.

The silent sister veiled in white and blue
Between the yews, behind the garden god,
Whose flute is breathless, bent her head and signed but spoke
no word

But the fountain sprang up and the bird sang down
Redeem the time, redeem the dream
The token of the word unheard, unspoken

Till the wind shake a thousand whispers from the yew

And after this our exile


V 

If the lost word is lost, if the spent word is spent
If the unheard, unspoken
Word is unspoken, unheard;
Still is the unspoken word, the Word unheard,
The Word without a word, the Word within
The world and for the world;
And the light shone in darkness and
Against the Word the unstilled world still whirled
About the centre of the silent Word.

O my people, what have I done unto thee.

Where shall the word be found, where will the word
Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence
Not on the sea or on the islands, not
On the mainland, in the desert or the rain land,
For those who walk in darkness
Both in the day time and in the night time
The right time and the right place are not here
No place of grace for those who avoid the face
No time to rejoice for those who walk among noise and deny
the voice

Will the veiled sister pray for
Those who walk in darkness, who chose thee and oppose thee,
Those who are torn on the horn between season and season,
time and time, between
Hour and hour, word and word, power and power, those who wait
In darkness? Will the veiled sister pray
For children at the gate
Who will not go away and cannot pray:
Pray for those who chose and oppose

O my people, what have I done unto thee.

Will the veiled sister between the slender
Yew trees pray for those who offend her
And are terrified and cannot surrender
And affirm before the world and deny between the rocks
In the last desert before the last blue rocks
The desert in the garden the garden in the desert
Of drouth, spitting from the mouth the withered apple-seed.

O my people.

VI 

Although I do not hope to turn again
Although I do not hope
Although I do not hope to turn

Wavering between the profit and the loss
In this brief transit where the dreams cross
The dreamcrossed twilight between birth and dying
(Bless me father) though I do not wish to wish these things
From the wide window towards the granite shore
The white sails still fly seaward, seaward flying
Unbroken wings

And the lost heart stiffens and rejoices
In the lost lilac and the lost sea voices
And the weak spirit quickens to rebel
For the bent golden-rod and the lost sea smell
Quickens to recover
The cry of quail and the whirling plover
And the blind eye creates
The empty forms between the ivory gates
And smell renews the salt savour of the sandy earth

This is the time of tension between dying and birth
The place of solitude where three dreams cross
Between blue rocks
But when the voices shaken from the yew-tree drift away
Let the other yew be shaken and reply.

Blessèd sister, holy mother, spirit of the fountain, spirit
of the garden,
Suffer us not to mock ourselves with falsehood
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still
Even among these rocks,
Our peace in His will
And even among these rocks
Sister, mother
And spirit of the river, spirit of the sea,
Suffer me not to be separated

And let my cry come unto Thee. 

This was Eliot publicly turning to Christianity.  Back to Christianity?  Most likely.  I don't know that he was ever that public an atheist.  He was turning to the establishment church, too, as he joined the Church of England at about this time, a church that, liturgically, is more or less properly called "Catholic lite."  So the language here may seem distinctly Catholic, to non-Catholics like me, anyway.  But it is also distinctly Anglican.

This was my first encounter, in high school where I first read Eliot, with the idea of Ash Wednesday.  Needless to say this poem was not terribly enlightening on the liturgical calendar for this observance.  But I return to it every year because it challenges me to understand, much in the same way I try to understand my relationship to God, and to everyone else.  I don't mean because I am so far removed from people, or even in some teen-angst sense from myself.  But every year I start over, "Because I do not hope to turn/Because I do not hope/Because I do not hope to turn again/[Still] Desiring this man's gift or that man's scope."  I tell myself I no longer strive to strive toward such things; but my self knows better than I.

Is that odd?

Shouldn’t Take Long

The House doesn’t have any evidence to present. They should be ready for trial right now and, without evidence to present, it shouldn’t take more than an hour to dispose of it.

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Not That The House Is In Better Shape Than The Party

And bravely does so on Newsmax. That’s one reason why he chose Newsmax. That’s the other. 🤡  I don’t think we could stop ‘em if we wanted to. Nothin’ to do now but get outta the way.

The Imperial Presidency Is Imperial

What else does the GOP have to do?

When The Donations Dry Up…

...Trump is toast.
Nearly $40 million of the $52.4 million in donor money was spent on law firms working on cases that had nothing to do with Trump's candidacy for the 2024 presidential election, the analysis found. 
The legions of MAGA faithful may not have been aware of this when they parted with their small-dollar donations last year, galvanized by Trump's cries of "witch hunt" as he was indicted in a New York hush-money scheme in April and a Georgia election-interference case in August. 
But significant portions of their donations went to law firms defending Trump in civil cases involving his real-estate empire and its top executives, including Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Ivanka Trump.

Analysis shows Trump spent $4 million more on civil cases than criminal ones. It’s impossible to discern just how the money was spent,  but Trump had three civil trials in 2023 (two Jean Carroll trials, and 8+ weeks in the NY civil fraud case). Trials are expensive. And Trump has four criminal trials to go. He spent $14.43 million on criminal cases without one trial yet. The best is yet to come.

Appeals are expensive, too. And he’s going to need money for appeals bonds. Lots and lots of money.

It's not clear why Trump uses money from his political donors to pay for his personal legal expenses. He's worth about $2.6 billion, a September analysis from Forbes found. In a deposition taken for the New York attorney general's civil fraud lawsuit, Trump suggested his net worth was as much as $14 billion. A January analysis from Bloomberg found he had $600 million in liquid assets. 
Trump may not be permitted to use PAC money to pay for any losses in court, though the FEC commissioners — half of whom are Republicans — have hesitated to enforce the agency's limits on spending. 
For the $5 million in sexual-abuse and defamation damages owed to Carroll for the loss in his 2023 trial, Trump took money from his real-estate company and gave it to himself, according to court filings. He then transferred the cash to a court-controlled account, where it must remain as he appeals the verdict. 
He must soon pay another $83.3 million for the second Carroll trial — which far exceeds his PAC coffers — and may need to put up hundreds of millions of dollars more once the judge who oversaw his civil fraud trial issues a judgment. In all those cases, he must put up the money as a bond or in escrow as he pursues appeals, which could take years to resolve. 
The PAC spending on legal fees in 2023 far exceeded previous years. In 2021 and 2022 combined, Trump spent $16 million on legal fees through the Save America PAC. Trump is poised to spend even more money on legal expenses this year. He already went through a grueling two-week trial in January to determine damages for defaming Carroll. In March, he's expected to sit for his first criminal trial, over the Manhattan district attorney's indictment over the payments to Daniels. Three more criminal cases are to follow. 
And then there's the race for the presidency, which Trump hopes to recapture. He might want to spend money on that, too.

Of course, after the fraud trial, the only thing we can say for certain is that Trump lies about his net worth. And until we uncover another set of books with the real values, it’s safe to assume no one knows at all what Trump is worth; including Trump ( he believes his own lies). 

Is he happier spending other people’s money? Or is he not that rich? We’re about to find out. He can’t use PAC money to fund appeal binds; he has to pay his lawyers. If he starts stiffing them, they’ll drop him like a bad habit. He’ll never subject himself to proof he needs a public defender. He’d rather eat his own head.

Interesting times ahead.

“But! But! But! Mah Invasion!”

Dear World: Alabama Sends Its Regards

"We forced this issue. We kept forcing NATO all the way to eastern Europe and Putin just got tired of it. He said, 'Listen, I do not want missiles on my border from the United States. It'd be like Russian coming to Mexico and putting missiles in Mexico. I can understand what he's talking about. There should've been negotiations. This Administration does not know how to negotiate. Anthony Blinken, our Secretary of State? My gosh, is that the best we got?"
My gosh, is this the best Alabama’s got? 

Signs point to “Yes.”

Of course, their governor could be a human trafficker, like the governor of Texas:
I didn’t mean to leave out “embarrassment.”  But both descriptions are objectively true.

But we do have President Biden:
And Putin. A message to Sen. Tuberville; the gun-flapping jackass.

Wool Gathering

This is the Santos replacement special election. Conventional wisdom says Democrats vote early, GOP voters are elderly and vote in Election Day. Fir the life of me, if early voting is available, why does anybody vote on Election Day? Wasn’t that Chamberlain’s line? They were attracted to the easy path to clean work-no boss-short hours-no heavy lifting. And, like Reagan, all they have to do is utter banalities from time to time.

And to all the hand-wringers out there, certain the Court will bend time and space to help Trump, a question: when in 2020 did the Supremes ever help Trump?
Jn fact, I see a bright, silver lining in Roberts’ direction to DOJ to respond ASAP. He wants to dispose of this quickly, and while he has first bite at the apple, he still has to share with the class. Even if he’s unpersuaded, there have to be four votes for cert., or five to stay. Or a round rejection by the bench. I don’t think the Court wants to cobble together a reason to stay (they won’t do it just because, they’ll have to follow procedure; or spend a lot of effort explaining why they don’t have to), and from what I’ve read, Trump’s brief presents no good argument at all. So if DOJ does their job, that’s enough for the Court to refuse both stay and cert.

This is the way it works. Quit treating it like a TeeVee show or a zero sum game. If Trump isn’t losing fast enough for you, take up a new hobby.

Besides, Trump’s odds of winning are “zip” and “none.” He barely beat Hillary, who was never the political candidate Biden is (experience counts). And Trump is dissolving publicly into a gibbering idiot, while Democrats bear expectations like a rented mule in every special election that comes up. The best part if this is yet to come. If Trump does postpone some of his trials to 2025, and doesn’t win the White House, his grift runs into a brick wall. What campaign does he raise money for then? And as I keep saying, trials are where the meter keeps running, like one of those out of control dials in the movies.

Trump is going to find his delay strategy biting him in the ass. And that’s “heads you win, tails he loses.”

Paxton And Trump: Peas In A Pod 🫛

Ash Eve; or Mardi Gras; or Shrove Tuesday 2024


THERE is nothing better for mortals than to eat and drink and find enjoyment, for these are from the hand of God.--Ecclesiastes 2:24

CARNIVAL celebrates the unity of our human race as mortal creatures, who come into this world and depart from it without our consent, who must eat, drink, defecate, belch, and break wind in order to live, and procreate if our species is to survive. Our feelings about this are ambiguous. To us as individuals, it is a cause for rejoicing that we are not alone, that all of us, irrespective of age or sex or rank or talent, are in the same boat.--W.H. Auden

IN Europe some of the most famous celebrations of the three days before Ash Wednesday occur at Nice in France (La Bataille des FIeurs), Binche in Belgium (where there is a rewarding museum on the worldwide cult of Carnival), and Cologne and Munich in Germany. In all these spectacular events, the mask plays a prominent part, symbolizing as it always does the opportunity for licence, buffoonery, ribald jokes and a general relaxation of inhibitions.

From ancient times the importance of Carnival in Venice, which lasted for almost two months from Christmas until Ash Wednesday, was really based on the tacit participation and consent of the rulers of the city. Political despotism was suspended, and a mask could provide a protective cover for all types of games, adulteries, love affairs and conspiracies under the guise of popular merrymaking.

One of the most remarkable of all European carnivals-the Fasnacht of Basle in Switzerland-is however celebrated after Lent has begun. In the sixteenth century the church banned all masking, and the fiercely independent Baslers were so furious that they decided to double their sins and celebrate Carnival on the Monday after Ash Wednesday.--Lionel Lambourne

COME, therefore, let us enjoy the good things that exist, and make use of the creation to the full as in youth.
Let us take our fill of costly wine and perfumes,
and let no flower of spring pass us by.
Let us crown ourselves with rosebuds before they wither. Let none of us fail to share in our revelry;
because this is our portion, and this our lot.--Wisdom 2:6-9

We shall have mead
We shall have wine
We shall have feast
We shall have sweetness and milk
Honey and milk,
Wholesome ambrosia,
Abundance of that,
Abundance of that.

We shall have harp,
We shall have lute,
We shall have horn.
We shall have sweet psaltery
Of the melodious strings
And the regal lyre,
Of the songs we shall have,
Of the songs we shall have.

And the King of kings,
And Jesus Christ,
And the Spirit of peace
And of grace be with us
Of grace be with us.--Celtic blessing on Ash Eve

My memories of a childhood spent among the Presbyterians, raised by a former Primitive Baptist and former Methodist who compromised on Presbyterianism, are that "Lent" was barely known.  I knew Ash Wednesday from Eliot's poem, but that was in high school, and it was still exotic to me until seminary.  It was an old E&R seminary in a dominantly Catholic town (they weren't the St. Louis Cardinals because people loved redbirds in Missouri).  Ashes were as socially acceptable as revivals had been in my childhood East Texas hometown.  Ashes were also consistent with old E&R practice, which was still more Lutheran than Reformed.

But in my childhood church there was always a "Pancake Supper" on the Tuesday before Lent started.  I say "Lent" and "started" though I don't remember Lent actually being observed, except for Holy Week.  All I really remember is pancakes for supper!  Cool!  I think, too, we called it "Shrove Tuesday," though we really didn't know why at all. Still, dangerously ecumenical as it may sound, in the words of the old E&R order of worship, "Let it be unto you according to your faith." And this year, try some spices in your pancakes (I particularly recommend cinnamon and/or nutmeg) for, as one website observed, "a little decadence." I have a recipe for gingerbread pancakes from a restaurant I loved in Austin.  I ate them the morning my daughter was born, so they have a special meaning now.  It'll be that or buttermilk waffles.  Lent is coming, after all.

And our Eves are always more joyous than the day that follows.  Funny, that....

Monday, February 12, 2024

Amateur Hour

Weissmann was shocked that a Supreme Court filing — which argues Trump enjoyed absolute freedom as a sitting president — began with an oft-quoted quip from famous former New York Yankees catcher Yogi Berra; “This application is ‘déjà vu all over again.” 
“Their position is that the President of the United States can kill people,” Weissmann said on MSNBC. “If you were going to be snarky, they might as well have cited Yogi Bear.” 
That the former president's lawyers had time for jokes surprised Weissmann, considering Trump stands accused in Washington D.C. federal court of criminally attempting to overturn a presidential election in 2020.
Oh, it gets so much worse.
"The Special Counsel seeks urgently to force President Trump into a months-long criminal trial at the height of campaign season, effectively sidelining him and preventing him from campaigning against the current President to whom the Special Counsel ultimately reports, President Biden," the [f]iling continued. "This would impose grave First Amendment injuries on President Trump and all American voters, whether they support him or not, and threatens to tarnish the federal courts with the appearance of partisanship."
Where to begin? The First Amendment doesn’t work like that; both for voters, and for candidates. Second: Trump is being “sidelined” by the criminal justice system, not by the incumbent (Trump was properly indicted, twice, by two different grand juries). Third: points for invoking the ghost of Bush v Gore. Demerits for thinking the Court is that spooked; more demerits for thinking the Court is that easily spooked. So, better not to play that card.

I can’t figure out if Trump is ruining the lawyers he hires, or if they’re that bad already. Because this shit is embarrassing.

“Some People Say…”

If you don’t watch the video, he really does transition, in less than 30 seconds, from the state persecution of the Catholic Church in Nicaragua, to “leftist icon Taylor Swift” and Ice Spice’s “satanic hand gestures.”

I don’t even know what Xian hand gestures would be, other than the sign of the cross. Although I grew up with some Baptists who’d consider that “satanic,” 

So If Trump Had Putin’s Spine…?

...we’d really be screwed?

Now I feel MUCH better! 🙄🫠

What Is It About Missouri?

Because we can’t protect the children if we’re…going to protect the…children.

I’ve just started reading Derrida’s lectures on the death penalty, from 2000. Among other issues related to the topic, he notes the difficulty of the question of age, starting with why it matters at all, and how arbitrary the application of the question of age as applied to execution.

Even laws like age of majority and of consent are, ultimately, arbitrary; but the idea is to protect children. So we draw a legal line between “child” and “adult” based on age, not date of menarche. And while setting an age (at either end, is part of Derrida’s argument) for execution is ultimately arbitrary, the age for abortion is pretty much set by biology. And while the average onset of menarche has been moving younger, one-year old is still…too young.

I know; a long way of saying this guy is a complete moron. Aside from declaring even under-age rape victims deserve to suffer the full consequences of their victimhood. Next step is putting 5 year olds on the factory floor for the midnight shift, like in the days before child labor laws. Oh, wait, I’m thinking of Arkansas. Well, Missouri shares a border; won’t be long until that idea heads west.

So This Missouri Attorney…

...says if I don’t sing “The Star-Spangled Banner” I’m not entitled to vote. Although I don’t remember seeing “ability to sing” among the qualifications for voting (age; citizenship; registration; singing voice?).

By the way, the song he’s triggered by is a hymn:
Lift every voice and sing, 
'Til earth and heaven ring, 
Ring with the harmonies of Liberty; 
Let our rejoicing rise 
High as the list'ning skies, 
Let it resound loud as the rolling sea. 
Sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us, 
Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us; 
Facing the rising sun of our new day begun, 
Let us march on 'til victory is won.    
Stony the road we trod, 
Bitter the chastening rod, 
Felt in the days when hope unborn had died; 
Yet with a steady beat, 
Have not our weary feet 
Come to the place for which our fathers sighed? 
We have come over a way that with tears has been watered, 
We have come, treading our path through the blood of the slaughtered, 
Out from the gloomy past, 
'Til now we stand at last 
Where the white gleam of our bright star is cast. 
God of our weary years, 
God of our silent tears, 
Thou who has brought us thus far on the way; 
Thou who has by Thy might Led us into the light, 
Keep us forever in the path, we pray. 
Lest our feet stray from the places, our God, where we met Thee, 
our hearts drunk with the wine of the world, we forget Thee;  
Shadowed beneath Thy hand, 
May we forever stand, 
True to our God, 
True to our native land.
Funny how Xianity at the Super Bowl keeps triggering these people.

Easy Come, Easy Go

When you get down to it, Phang concluded, "the reality is it’s Trump’s supporters who are sending in their small-dollar donations who are paying for these lawyers and law firms. So what happens if Trump loses in November 2024 and he fails to regain the Oval Office? Will these donors continue to cover Trump’s legal bills? Or will he have to dig deep into his own pockets? More importantly, will Trump’s existing stable of lawyers be willing to continue to represent him if the money well runs dry?"
Gee, I wonder what will happen? 🤔 💸💸💸

Onward Xian Dreamers

There is an historical precedent for “warrior Jesus” going back at least to the “The Dream of the Rood.”
Then I spotted the first free-born racing bracing with bravado to mount me up merrily. Me there, I didn’t dare sway or shiver unless lordly words should allow — then I watched in wavering the reaches, the distances of earth. I could have mown these foes down — yet stood I still. (33b–38) 
“Unyaring himself then, this young — it was god all-surpassing — strong and set in purpose. He mounted upwards on gallows, heightened & humiliated, impetuous in the imagination of many & all, when he wanted to undo his humankind. (39–41) 
“I tremble in the man’s embrace — Hardly dare to humble me to earth, tumble down around distant regions, obligated yet to tower right here. I was areared a rood — tree, tower, & sign — heaving aloft the hearty first, heavenly bread-giver — hardly dare to heel or halter. (42–45)
And kept alive as recently as a hymn popular in my childhood, “Onward Christian Soldiers,” which also harmonizes with this picture:

Onward, Christian soldiers,
Marching as to war
With the cross of Jesus 
Going on before 

The tweet, however, is triggered by one of the great stories of Xian humility (not greater than the Crucifixion, although ironically John’s version practically has Jesus climb onto the cross as the Jesus of “Rood” does). This act Christians are meant to emulate, because indeed Christians are called to emulate the acts if the Christ and to act out the teachings of the Christ.

Which, as I said before, is what got some people all riled up about those ads (the first in particular, apparently).


Me? Or Your Lyin’ Ears?

You can tell Trump said something stupid… ...by how many people are denying he said it.

Sunday, February 11, 2024

🏈

A Memory Lapse?

He made this mistake when he was in office and the Chiefs won. Claire McCaskill pointedly corrected him on the error (the Chiefs are in KC MO, if you didn’t know).

Frankly, I don’t think Trump knows the city straddles the state line.

And Here I Thought The Game Was Over…

It appears white conservative Xians are easily triggered. Especially by the gospels.
It was just before the Passover Festival. Jesus knew that the hour had come for him to leave this world and go to the Father. Having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end. 
2 The evening meal was in progress, and the devil had already prompted Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, to betray Jesus. 3 Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God; 4 so he got up from the meal, took off his outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around his waist. 5 After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him. 
6 He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash my feet?” 
7 Jesus replied, “You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.” 
8 “No,” said Peter, “you shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered, “Unless I wash you, you have no part with me.” 
9 “Then, Lord,” Simon Peter replied, “not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!” 
10 Jesus answered, “Those who have had a bath need only to wash their feet; their whole body is clean. And you are clean, though not every one of you.” 11 For he knew who was going to betray him, and that was why he said not every one was clean. 
12 When he had finished washing their feet, he put on his clothes and returned to his place. “Do you understand what I have done for you?” he asked them. 13 “You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and rightly so, for that is what I am. 14 Now that I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one another’s feet. 15 I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you. 16 Very truly I tell you, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. 17 Now that you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them.
I used to do a foot-washing ceremony on Maundy Thursday for members of my church council. It made them and me uncomfortable, but they were the only people who would participate. It was a tradition /obligation of the office.

One of my seminary professors called it the sacrament-that-wasn’t. You’ll notice this is John’s version of Jesus’ last night with his disciples; but there is no institution of the Eucharist. Instead, there’s a foot-washing ceremony.

And it still makes us uncomfortable. 

It’s the humility, mostly. We don’t do humility tell

Fun With Numbers

It’s as good a reason as any to vote against Trump. But if Trump doesn’t deport 10 million people at least, MAGA gonna be pissed 😤. Of course, Trump will deport none and tell them he deported 100 million, and they’ll buy it.

Still, a “red army”? How many people actually went to the Capitol armed on J6? Yes, too many, but all 3000? How about the truck caravan that was going to shut down D.C.? Or the 700,000…70,000…7000.,,,handful of cars and no trucks that was going to close the border? At Eagle Pass? Did they have any idea how big the border is?

It’s just a further example of why Trump should be no closer to government than a prison cell. He’ll never raise an army, but he would do still more damage in the White House. More damage, we don’t need.

And some of the seed…

A sower went out to sow his seed. And as he sowed, some seed fell on the path and was trampled, and the birds of the sky ate it up. Some seed fell on rocky ground, and when it grew, it withered for lack of moisture. Some seed fell among thorns, and the thorns grew with it and choked it. And some seed fell on good soil, and when it grew, it produced fruit a hundredfold.” After saying this, he called out, “Whoever has ears to hear ought to hear.”

Luke 8:5-8

(The ad was by the Catholic Church (or a Catholic org., anyway). That IS Western Xianity.)

Oh, Yeah, It’s Black History Month*

Can’t have that.


*Yes, it took this long for the penny to drop. I’d heard about Taylor Swift. I only heard about the anthem this morning. 

***I finally saw Taylor Swift at the game. Right after Mahomes threw a fifty-two yard pass. Right before they fumbled on the next play.

Graphics And Graphic Bias

In other news: Biden is old! Did the Trump campaign report this as a payment in kind?

I do think the Sulzbergers love them some Trump tax cuts, but I also think the editorial desk is doing this because all the kewl kids are; and all the kewl kids agree Biden is just trying to make “fetch” happen.

Never doubt the power of a narrative.

The Corpse At Every Funeral

Oddly, the Copyright Office website makes no mention of Trump’s involvement.
On October 11, 2018, the unanimously passed Orrin G. Hatch–Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act (MMA) was signed into law. 
The MMA represents years of dedicated work by members of Congress, as well as negotiation and cooperation between a wide range of creators and business interests. The Copyright Office worked closely with Congress during these discussions, building on its foundational policy reports, which closely examined the issues facing the music industry and proposed statutory reforms. It is no surprise that the passage of the MMA—the result of extensive collaboration—was almost universally praised. 
The MMA is a bill whose time had come. Music law is complicated. Changing technology had left certain gaps in protection and compensation for some creators. These gaps go as far back as the early 20th century, when technology began to significantly change the way composers, lyricists, and publishers distributed musical works, which changed the way that people enjoy music. One of the earliest changes came in the form of piano rolls—a mechanical form of notating music so it could be performed automatically by a player piano. Over time, newer media—from wax cylinders and vinyl records to various formats of magnetic tape, like cassettes and eight-track cartridges, to compact discs—offered new ways for the public to experience music. These new recording methods allowed people far and wide to enjoy particular musical performances without being physically present during the actual performance. 
Congress saw the need to help address the changing landscape of music and in 1909 created new copyright protections to address these technological changes, as well as a statutory licensing system, which requires users to pay a set rate when they make and distribute musical works.
He is a sad, broken little person who can only understand himself as the center of every story and the reason the sun rises in the morning. Everywhere he looks he sees himself as the only important person. Yeah, nothing like Joe Biden at all.

Journalists Really Are Idiots

“Endangering national security” is specifically NOT what the Special Prosecutor reported.
Just to be very clear, the report didn't say he [Biden] wasn't engaged in any wrongdoing," the Meet the Press host stated. "In fact, it was quite firm in the fact that he mishandled classified documents, he just wasn't indicted and criminally charged. But let me follow up with you --."
Except possession is not 9/10ths of the law here (that’s not even a legal doctrine). Knowledge is the crucial element, and the report states in plain language that not only is there no evidence of knowledge, there are innocent explanations for Biden’s possession.
"But Kristen, wait. No, no, no, no no. You can't — I'm not going to accept that premise," Landrieu interrupted. "In an investigation, a special counsel determines based on the facts and the law about whether somebody engaged in criminal wrongdoing and he found out that the president did. As a matter of fact, he's the only special counsel that's been engaged in this kind of activity that had to say that he could not indict somebody, and that is a fact and so that's the big takeaway from this report from a legal perspective." 
"From a legal perspective, that is absolutely right," Welker replied. "He said he was not going to indict.”
"Because he didn't have the law and the facts to do it," her guest added. 
"Well, right, but he did say that classified documents were mishandled and he said that national security could have been jeopardized, but let me ask you this --," she continued. 
"But, Kristen, he didn't say national security — no ma'am, I'm sorry — he didn't say national security was compromised and you just heard from the secretary of national security —," Landrieu protested. 
"He said it could have been," the NBC host interrupted. 
"But it was not, and the facts and the law suggested that the president was not engaged in criminal activity," he replied before adding, "To be distinguished between the former president who right now has 91 felony counts pending against him in four different cases. So let's just keep the facts right and let's not make false comparisons between the two which people, unfortunately, do a lot of these days."
It’s reasonable to ask whether Welker is a journalist, or making Trump’s selective prosecution argument. Someone needs to remind her close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. She clearly thinks she’s being “objective.” But ignorance is only objective in the same way a stopped clock is right twice a day.

You need another clock to know when that moment is.

Framing

“What Did The President Know And When Did He Know It?”

A crime generally requires more than action, and in the case of possessing classified documents, it requires knowledge. This distinction was lost on the press, but not on the special counsel staff who wrote the report:
Some of the documents in these files were marked classified, though, because of the passage of time, we do not know whether Mr. Biden willfully retained the classified documents or consulted them when writing the book.” (p. 170) 
“We were limited in our ability to investigate these documents because of the significant passage of time since their creation. Although we cannot prove that Mr. Biden retained these classified documents willfully or used them in writing Promises to Keep, he did write about the foreign trips that were the subject of the documents.” (p. 177)  
“[T]hree notebooks found in Mr. Biden’s Delaware home had marked classified documents placed inside them. One of these notebooks, labeled “Af/Pak 1,” is discussed in Chapter Six. For the other two, the evidence does not suggest either that Mr. Biden retained the classified documents inside them willfully, or that the documents contain national defense information.” (p. 326) 
“Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges. For example, Mr. Biden could have found the classified Afghanistan documents at his Virginia home in 2017 and then forgotten about them soon after. This could convince some reasonable jurors that he did not retain them willfully …. And the place where the Afghanistan documents were eventually found in Mr. Biden’s Delaware garage-in a badly damaged box surrounded by household detritus-suggests the documents might have been forgotten.” (p.4)  
“It is possible that Mr. Biden encountered the classified Afghanistan documents at the Virginia home in February 2017, told Zwonitzer about them, and then, soon after, forgot about them and did not willfully retain them.” (p. 205) 
“There is some indication that Mr. Biden’s staff may have advised him that his notecards contained classified information and needed to be held in a secured location. But the investigation did not determine what, if anything, Mr. Biden’s staffers actually told him on this subject.” (p. 65) 
“For each of the marked classified documents found in Mr. Biden’s notebooks, we cannot prove that Mr. Biden knew about or intended to keep the document after he was vice president, or we cannot prove the document contains national defense information, or both. These documents do not support criminal charges against Mr. Biden.” (p. 329)
And if you’re thinking about the motion to dismiss in the grounds of selective prosecution Trump just filed in Florida, maybe his lawyers should read the report, too. A grand jury found Trump knowingly and willfully retained those documents. A special prosecutor found there were innocent explanations for what Biden did. And prosecutions are always supposed to be based on the facts.

Or, if you prefer, compare and contrast:
But another inference the evidence permits is that Mr. Biden returned the binder of classified material to the personal aide because, after leaving office, Mr. Biden did not intend to retain any marked classified documents. As Mr. Biden said in his interview with our office, if he had found marked classified documents after the vice presidency, “I would have gotten rid of them. I would have gotten them back to their source…. I had no purpose for them, and I think it would be inappropriate for me to keep clearly classified documents.” Some reasonable jurors may credit this statement and conclude that if Mr. Biden found the classified Afghanistan documents in the Virginia home, he forgot about them rather than willfully retaining them.” (p. 206) 
“Many will conclude that a president who knew he was illegally storing classified documents in his home would not have allowed a search of his home to discover those documents and then answered the government’s questions afterwards. While various parts of this argument are debatable, we expect the argument will carry real force for many reasonable jurors. These jurors will conclude that Mr. Biden–a powerful, sophisticated person with access to the best advice in the world would not have handed the government classified documents from his own home on a silver platter if he had willfully retained those documents for years. Just as a person who destroys evidence and lies often proves his guilt, a person who produces evidence and cooperates will be seen by many to be innocent.” (p. 210)
Not exactly the same actions Trump is alleged to have taken.

Journalists Are Idiots

We all think we know what a “crime” is because we’ve all seen TeeVee and movies, and what criminals do makes their actions a crime. So when you read this:
“Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen.”
We see “evidence” all the time in crime stories, right? Case closed! Guilty, guilty, guilty! Except “evidence” is a big tent, and there’s plenty more evidence cited in this report. But consider how Just Security says that executive summary should read, based on what the report says:
We have concluded that there is not a prosecutable case against Biden. Although there was a basis to open the investigation based on the fact that classified documents were found in Biden’s homes and office space, that is insufficient to establish a crime was committed. The illegal retention or dissemination of national defense information requires that he knew of the existence of such documents and that he knew they contained national defense information. It is not a crime without those additional elements. Our investigation, after a thorough year-long review, concludes that there is an absence of such necessary proof. Indeed, we have found a number of innocent explanations as to which we found no contrary evidence to refute them and found affirmative evidence in support of them.”
You may find tha last sentence too opinionated and beyond the scope of the actual report. So I’ll quote the report:
“In summary, the innocent explanation for the retention of the classified documents in the EYES ONLY envelope at the Penn Biden Center is not only plausible, it is a better explanation than one of willful retention. There is thus insufficient evidence to support charging Mr. Biden or anyone else with willful retention of the documents in the EYES ONLY envelope at the Penn Biden Center.” (p. 307)
In their introduction, Just Security explains the import of that language:
The report finds that the evidence of a knowing, willful violation of the criminal laws is wanting. Indeed, the report, on page 6, notes that there are “innocent explanations” that Hur “cannot refute.” That is but one of myriad examples we outline in great detail below of the report repeatedly finding a lack of proof. And those findings mean, in DOJ-speak, there is simply no case. Unrefuted innocent explanations is the sine qua non of not just a case that does not meet the standard for criminal prosecution – it means innocence. Or as former Attorney General Bill Barr and his former boss would have put it, a total vindication (but here, for real).

So that language is on p. 6 (surely journalists can read that far!) and p. 307. But journalists don’t (apparently) understand that “innocence” is seldom a term in criminal law. When “The Innocence Project” overturns a conviction, the court doesn’t declare the convicted to be innocent. It says he/she was wrongly convicted, usually because of the way evidence was handled. For a prosecutor to say there is not only insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but affirmatively that there is evidence for a plausible explanation of innocence is tantamount to Richard Dawkins publishing a book arguing God may be real after all.

Which is not what the press went with; to say the least.

The details are detailed at Just Security. This is just to say, not only “It ain’t necessarily so,” but it isn’t that way at all. Sure, Robert Hur supervised a shitty report; but the press proved themselves not to be Otis, but just to be useful idiots.

Burnt out ends of smoky days…

If you asked me when my mother passed away, I couldn’t necessarily tell you the exact year because it was many years ago,” Dr. Paul Newhouse, clinical core leader for the Vanderbilt Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, said. Almost every older patient has trouble remembering people’s names, Newhouse said.

My father died in 2016. My mother died in 2018. I remember only because I remember their ages when they died. I also remember their birthdates, so I calculate the year of death. My brother’s age at death is somehow less memorable, but as time passes I may work the same mnemonic into memory. 

Why not remember the years? I just don’t. I remember years of birth, but not of death.

This doesn’t mean a damned thing. To anybody; especially me. I can still recite as much of “The Raven”🐦‍⬛ as I managed to memorize in the 5th grade. Some things stick, some don’t.

It’s been 47 years (in May), but I remember those dates quite clearly.

When You Think It Can’t Get Worse

You can’t parody this. Yeah, that’s what happens at a Trump rally. Or maybe it’s that. Well, the foreign policy element got the Grey Lady’s attention. Credit where it is due, and all.  Who knows? Maybe Trump has pushed Biden off the front page.

Still, a patch of ice…

Saturday, February 10, 2024

But Biden Is Old, And That’s New(s)

“Truly unhinged stuff: Presumptive Republican nominee says he’ll encourage Russia to attack our allies triggering a world war if they don’t 'pay' (never mind that Europe is paying more than the US for Ukraine now)," he wrote. "This should be front page, top of broadcast, news." 
Former GOP communications director Tara Setmayer directed her message directly to the New York Times. 
"Hey [Times] Where's your headline about Trump abandoning NATO and encouraging Russia to attack our allies in Europe?" she asked Saturday. "'In fact I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want...' Openly encouraging our enemy to attack our allies gets a shrug... But Biden is old so.." 
New Yorker staff writer Susan Glasser on Saturday gave her view as someone who covers the ex-president. 
"Trump watcher perspective here: He's getting even more brazen. Even by Trump's standards, this is breathtaking."

To be honest, this is not new. Trump made these noises during his presidency (and in 2016, IIRC). It was the seed for why MAGA loves Putin.

I think at this point he would have to shoot someone on 5th Avenue at high noon to get any attention. Even then the headline would be: “Trump Returns To Manhattan”.

I’m Sure This Is Because Trump Is Running For Re-Election

 


Energy independence, however, is physically impossible.
Over the 2010s, the U.S. witnessed an increase in domestic production, much of it attributable to hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” in the shale formations ranging from Texas to North Dakota. It became the world’s largest oil producer in 2018, outproducing Russia and Saudi Arabia. 
The U.S. accounted for 14.7% of crude oil production worldwide in 2022, compared to 13.1% for Saudi Arabia and 12.7% for Russia. 
Despite leading petroleum production, the U.S. still trails seven countries in remaining proven reserves underground, with 55,251 million barrels. 
Venezuela has the biggest reserves with 303,221 million barrels. Saudi Arabia, with 267,192 million barrels, occupies the second spot, while Russia is seventh with 80,000 million barrels.
Renewable energy is still the best way to go.

“This Irony’s Gonna Be The Death Of Me”

Fish Rotting

"Where’s the vig?” I’m old enough to remember when he mocked Obama for using a teleprompter. Now he’s turned into Ron Burgundy. Which makes you wonder how much it would cost to bribe whoever sets up the teleprompter.

Energy independence is literally impossible. Oil is a multinational business operating in a global market. And the U.S. is producing so much oil it’s pissing off Saudi Arabia.
 
Trump literally doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
  I guess he really means it. So Trump doesn’t remember he tried that, and the courts blocked him? Gee…memory problems, huh? The fascists are his people. Doesn’t he know that?
💯  "Where’s the whale?” 🐋  But Biden forgot the year his son died in a special prosecutor interview where that information was irrelevant, so… Somebody call Michael Steele and ask him if this is “entertaining us”? First, someone needs to explain to him what “constitutional” means. And then how the economy works. Forget about the windmills. Scotland ruined him for that topic. A tactic Ken Paxton is using to punish Texas GOP representatives who impeached him. I’ve gotten three mailings damning the incumbent GOP representative for having Muslim sympathies

The fish rots from the head.
Details, details. Real men don’t like poetry anyway.

Where’s Melania?
Never mind; doesn’t matter.