Vs."Mr. Mueller didn’t have to say anything like that. He did so for a reason. And that reason may well be that there is troubling evidence in the substantial record that he compiled." https://t.co/sd6fCxXvAQ— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) March 25, 2019
"I am not a crook." Richard Nixon. He thought the country needed to know that, too. And it could be this is important to know, too:Gergen: "It's important for us to not believe our president is a crook, that our president and his team conspired. They didn't conspire. And that's a good thing. They did a lot of things that were suspicious, but they didn't conspire. And I think that's healthy for the country." pic.twitter.com/i00cvYTT9F— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) March 25, 2019
Maybe we need to see that report.....Recall that Barr sent an unsolicited 20-page memo last June to the DOJ that excoriated Mueller's probe of whether Trump obstructed justice, saying it was based on a "fatally misconceived theory," per @sgurman @aviswanatha. Trump tapped Barr as AG in Dec. https://t.co/jTAvQ7rgKm— Rebecca Ballhaus (@rebeccaballhaus) March 24, 2019
Not to mention that Barr was the one who wrote up the Bush I cover-up pardons. I don't think that gets mentioned often enough. If they don't release the Report to the pubic and the underlying evidence to the Congressional committees, there's no reason to trust any of it. I don't fully trust Mueller and he should have to answer questions on what he did and, especially, what he chose not to do. Trump elicited Russian meddling in the election in full view of the world during the campaign, his family and campaign were involved in meeting with Russian agents offering stolen information, and that doesn't get to what he did in the week he fired Comey. I want to know what Mueller's investigation of those incidents and others looked for and what they found and what they might have suspected they couldn't find in that regard.
ReplyDelete