Wednesday, May 01, 2019

Getting On With It



I have to admit much of this questioning, even by Democrats, proves the case for letting counsel ask questions of witnesses (as I recall being done during Watergate hearings) to establish facts, then letting Congresspersons grandstand and make speeches (something being done on both sides of the aisle).

Some are worse than others, some are better; but lawyers drilling into witnesses is a better way to go (and why Barr doesn't want counsel for House committees questioning him).  However, it is not all darkness or light:


(Listening live:  Kamala Harris is proving her chops as a prosecuting attorney.  Barr is closer to sweating than he's been since I started listening, during Hirono's questions/speech.)  Like this, in fact:




Turns out Barr isn't a particularly good defense attorney.
And we still don't know what the meaning of "is," is:
And yes, we are in Wonderland:  "Sentence first, Verdict afterward!"
Facts, after all, are stupid things.  And Harris proved my point about who should ask questions:
Hmmmm.....


That's funny:


Yep. It is hard to see a whole lot of new factual ground being broken from now on.

1 comment:

  1. The highlight was Mazie Hirono and I found that I could understand why people are impressed with Kamala Harris for the first time. She was great. Patrick Lehey was as ineffective as ever. I haven't gone back to see Sheldon Whitehouse yet, he's usually very good.

    Barr doesn't stand up to a determined and smart questioner very well, does he. No wonder he's so scared of Nadler's format in the House.

    ReplyDelete