Wednesday, February 28, 2024

They Want Ice Cubes In Hell, Too 🧊

I ain’t readin all that. I’m very happy for u tho. Or sorry that happened  Sounds like a personal problem, to me. Or, you know, not.
"The obvious point of such a facially absurd award is not to deprive Appellants of some purported 'ill-gotten gains,' but, rather, to impose a half a billion-dollar penalty for engaging in transactions with satisfied counterparties," the filing states. "The presence of a $100 million bond would only augment the security originally deemed sufficient by the Attorney General."
Translation: “It’s not fair! They’re being mean to me!” IOW:  to say that language fails to make a legally cognizable argument is to say water is wet.

And people in hell want ice cubes they aren’t going to get.

Every losing party thinks it’s not fair. Obviously that’s not grounds for special treatment.
"In the absence of a stay on the terms herein outlined, properties would likely need to be sold to raise capital under exigent circumstances," Trump's attorneys wrote. "And there would be no way to recover any property sold following a successful appeal and no means to recover the resulting financial losses."
Sux to be you, bro. Trump’s mouth finally wrote a check his ass can’t cash.
"TURN THOSE MACHINES BACK ON!!”

(Frankly, his alternative is to file bankruptcy. Which I expect the court is going to tell him. A final judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction is beyond the reach of equitable relief of “irreparable harm.” Trump had that opportunity when he could have entered settlement negotiations before the final judgment. Too late now to say the amount the state was asking for all along represents “irreparable harm.” That ship has sailed.)

(Adding: the purpose of an appeal bond is to make the plaintiff whole after the appeals run their course, so justice is not denied because the losing party has hidden all its assets. It’s not to punish Trump. If he has to sell properties at fire sale prices, well, it saves Letitia James the trouble.😈. Which is actually something they argued to the Court.)

No comments:

Post a Comment