Sunday, December 28, 2025

… and Stupidity

I’m thinking of this in terms of this response: Because I don’t read this as a “general claim,” I read it as a categorical one. AAG Dhillon does not say the applicable statute of limitations doesn’t run on January 6, 2026. She’s saying any such statute will be ignored in the name of retribution. What AAG Dhillon is publicly declaring is that malicious prosecutions will happen despite the barriers of the law. She is declaring that the law will not get in the way of criminal and civil investigations, that the DOJ is acting as a vigilante, not seeking justice, but seeking vengeance.

There is a deadline for bringing criminal prosecutions. That’s the law. That’s not the sum total of the law. But the statement: “No statute of limitations will hinder DOJ's efforts to bring justice to those who weaponized persecution of American citizens,” is a categorical statement that law doesn’t apply, only the power of government does. Which, in normal times, would see her cleaning out her desk before tomorrow morning.

This not the way you run a railroad.

2 comments:

  1. Every one of them were acting in their official capacity as members of the Congress. Even if they committed crimes they'd be immune from prosecution, that is if the Constitution meant anything other than what five or more corrupt, unelected hacks in black say it means.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. Nor is it treason. These idiots don’t know what “treason” is, they just know it’s bad Seriously bad. So they throw it around to sound bigger than they are. It just makes them smaller.

      Delete