A level of thirst that would be unbecoming for a high schooler https://t.co/vdPGwXgGrQ
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 4, 2021
"I would like to say 'This book is written to the glory of God', but nowadays this would be the trick of a cheat, i.e., it would not be correctly understood."--Ludwig Wittgenstein
"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards."--Soren Kierkegaard
Monday, January 04, 2021
"He's Just Not That Into You"
Getting the Year Started (On-line, that is)
God, bless to me the new day,
Never vouchsafed to me before;
It is to bless Thine own presence
Thou hast given me this time, O God.
Bless Thou to me mine eye,
May mine eye bless all it sees;
I will bless my neighbour,
May my neighbour bless me.
God, give me a clean heart,
Let me not from sight of Thine eye;
Bless to me my children and my wife,
And bless to me my means and my cattle.
from the Carmina Gadelica
Submitted For Your Amusement
Enjoying the Trumpalos tying themselves in knots, in a throwback to the Ukraine call, to scream that the Georgia call was perfect but it was treason to leak it.
— LawlessHat (@Popehat) January 4, 2021
These people are demented cultists.
And while I’m here, the Secret Service doesn’t enforce the Espionage Act; the Department of Justice does.
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 4, 2021
Imagine thinking that the problem with that call is that it was (lawfully) recorded. https://t.co/Rt90sl6o4f
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 4, 2021
And when none of that works:Charlie Kirk is going to be Charlie Kirk, but I appreciate the clarity of his view that state officials who happen to be Republicans owe their duty of loyalty to a candidate in the race instead of the citizens of their state. What a worldview. https://t.co/RoyiNZK0u9
— Orin Kerr (@OrinKerr) January 4, 2021
Curious.
— LawlessHat (@Popehat) January 4, 2021
If something is so secret that revealing it threatens national security, why is the President discussing it on a call with the Georgia Secretary of State and a bunch of lawyers without security clearances? https://t.co/xhGzE2OJFO
— Bad Legal Takes (@BadLegalTakes) January 4, 2021Precisely what it says in the Constitution!
"Does anybody know about it?" And by the way, we know where the tape came from:Had to transcribe this moment from The Call, too: pic.twitter.com/d4QVvusUym
— Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) January 4, 2021
Officials in Brad Raffensperger’s office recorded his call with President Trump on Saturday, but Georgia's secretary of state said he did not want it released unless Trump attacked him or misrepresented it, per @JMOCNN. Trump tweeted today attacking him.
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 4, 2021
This no longer means what they think it means.Back to work we go. pic.twitter.com/Lq258pv20N
— Donie O'Sullivan (@donie) January 4, 2021
Sunday, January 03, 2021
Bad Legal Takes
“Trump sounded at turns confused & meandering. At one point, he referred to Kemp as ‘George.’ He tossed out several different figures for Biden’s margin of victory in GA & referred to the Senate runoff, which is Tues., as happening ‘tomorrow’ & ‘Monday.’” https://t.co/xT0fMfKtla
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 3, 2021
But, sure, the Chairman of the Georgia GOP has a point:Can't believe this call lasted an hour.
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
Except Trump can't have filed the lawsuits yet. It's Sunday, the courts are closed in Georgia and everywhere else.The audio published by @TheWashingtonPost is heavily edited and omits the stipulation that all discussions were for the purpose of settling litigation and confidential under federal and state law.
— David Shafer (@DavidShafer) January 3, 2021
Trump's gonna have to produce the "full" version in court. Except that's already been done:There so much in here that's priceless. But my favorite is Sec. Raffensperger's response to @realDonaldTrump's claim that "close to 5000"
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) January 4, 2021
dead people voted in GA:
"The actual number were two. Two people that were dead voted. So that's wrong." https://t.co/7GG0UuOtos pic.twitter.com/MVDB6EFcsM
Turns out I could have shortened this whole post to this:The Post has published Trump’s full phone call with Georgia election officials. Listen to the audio and read the transcript. Via @AmyEGardner @paulina_milla @WordsOfSarah https://t.co/LP1JcecUzh
— Amy Gardner (@AmyEGardner) January 3, 2021
— Bad Legal Takes (@BadLegalTakes) January 3, 2021It's a Hall-of-Famer of Bad Legal Takes.
Law & Order
From your tweet to God’s ear.Actually this is one of those circumstances where I’m going to have to think about it because my sense is feds could find a crime to fit if they wanted to
— LawlessHat (@Popehat) January 3, 2021
NEW: Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) calls for criminal investigation of Trump Raffensberger call:
— Heidi Przybyla (@HeidiNBC) January 3, 2021
"more than a pathetic, rambling, delusional rant. His disgraceful effort to intimidate an elected official into deliberately changing and misrepresenting the legally confirmed
I still want to see Cruz and minions defending this phone call on Wednesday. Almost as much as I want to see Trump defend himself in Georgia.peaceful transition of power in our nation at risk.”
— Heidi Przybyla (@HeidiNBC) January 3, 2021
This seems directly pertinent.
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) January 3, 2021
I do not believe that @realDonaldTrump would enjoy a stint in a Georgia state prison. https://t.co/KWcTMZ84SN
Trump may have also committed election law crimes under Georgia state law
— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) January 3, 2021
- beyond the reach of pardon
- up to GA officials, not Biden DOJ, to decide whether to prosecute
What Georgia State Prof @AnthonyMKreis told @alliebice @kyledcheney @anitakumar01👇https://t.co/QwzqchhyFN pic.twitter.com/7GRGQoFLS2
I was wondering about that.Given just winning Georgia doesn’t help anything, we can imagine Trump’s had this same conversation with other states that didn’t leak the tape.
— Schooley (@Rschooley) January 3, 2021
Of course you know, this means war!It wasn't just Trump pressuring Raffensperger. Here's what Mark Meadows had to say on the call, per @bluestein https://t.co/vKc3ViIdgR pic.twitter.com/w4Mk99lBRE
— Mike Baker (@ByMikeBaker) January 3, 2021
.@JoeBiden senior adviser Bob Bauer on President Trump : “We now have irrefutable proof of a president pressuring and threatening an official of his own party to get him to rescind a state's lawful, certified vote count and fabricate another in its place.” pic.twitter.com/VRF1yfuUBN
— Arlette Saenz (@ArletteSaenz) January 3, 2021
Trump's threats to Georgia Sec of State; Trump, to Ukraine President; Trump to US Senators who won't violate the Constitution for him - and on and on - are all examples of POTUS criminal extortion and election tampering. And those who knowingly assist him violate 18 USC 2 & 371.
— Andrew Weissmann (@AWeissmann_) January 3, 2021
What does that do for everybody else in the room? And I still say this is grounds for shutting down any debate on “objections “ on Wednesday:Unless there are portions of the tape that somehow negate criminal intent, "I just want to find 11,780 votes" and his threats against Raffensperger and his counsel violate 52 U.S. Code § 20511. His best defense would be insanity.https://t.co/ZAtRgiRQmz
— Michael R. Bromwich (@mrbromwich) January 3, 2021
Seven House Republicans say it’s unconstitutional to reject a state’s electors, breaking w/ colleagues.
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) January 3, 2021
Kelly Armstrong
Ken Buck
Mike Gallagher
Nancy Mace
Thomas Massie
Tom McClintock
Chip Roy
“We must count the electoral votes submitted by the states.”https://t.co/iCHf1Mkf7I
Now say that on the Senate floor.In Georgia today, when asked about the Trump/Raffensperger tape or the January 6 challenge, Cruz refused to discuss either and talked about the runoffs.
— Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) January 3, 2021
"I get the media wants to report all sorts of things and get everyone distracted by whatever else is going on," he said.
“Us”? 🐁
Does he have a mouse in his pocket?Take a few minutes to listen to this incredible phone conversation Trump had with the GA secretary of state telling him "we won the election and it's not fair to take it away from us like this." #trumptapes https://t.co/9bc5zBKPEx
— Jerry Barmash (@JerryBarmash) January 3, 2021
No, that's not the fun part.The president, on tape, telling the #Georgia Secretary of State “I just want to find 11,780 votes.”
— Doug Reardon (@ReardonReports) January 3, 2021
That’s ONE MORE than the vote gap between him and Biden in the state https://t.co/wp7MXd7ZX1
Aren’t you glad we have a 25th amendment? Don’t you wish it was worth anything?“Trump sounded at turns confused & meandering. At one point, he referred to Kemp as ‘George.’ He tossed out several different figures for Biden’s margin of victory in GA & referred to the Senate runoff, which is Tues., as happening ‘tomorrow’ & ‘Monday.’” https://t.co/xT0fMfKtla
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 3, 2021
Well, now I feel better! Don’t you?Often, when Trump talked about numbers, in any context, he slid from, say, saying he'll spend $10 mill to $20 mill on his own campaign in a single sentence. On this call, he slides from 11,779 votes to saying he may have won Georgia by 500k. https://t.co/PI7dGL1ANR
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
She should have walked out of room. She shouldn’t have been in the room in the first place.Mitchell is said by some Trump aides to have been brought in many weeks ago by Mark Meadows. https://t.co/G8KvM5HWGw
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
State Bars have alot to answer for.The most astonishing part of this story isn't Trump. It's the advisers sitting on the call helping him pressure Raffensperger. https://t.co/YGF0g3KLpg
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 3, 2021
So do the House and Senate if they don’t sanction their yahoos after this report. Is this the evidence of fraud Johnson and Cruz are talking about?"They're laughing at you behind your back, Brad," Trump says, dusting off an old chestnut.
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
Inquiring minds want to know.The president keeps pushing a conspiracy theory that Dominion machines internal parts were secretly replaced. A GA official misses a few beats before answering, appearing to be stunned.
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
That would be a shame.Golly I sure hope nobody violates any crucial norms by criticizing Cleta Mitchell’s client advocacy
— LawlessHat (@Popehat) January 3, 2021
Actually this is one of those circumstances where I’m going to have to think about it because my sense is feds could find a crime to fit if they wanted to
— LawlessHat (@Popehat) January 3, 2021
The King is Dead. And Crazy as a Bedbug.
The ECA says "objections," which, yes, is terribly non-specific. But "objections" have to have some basis in law, otherwise Congress' actions are a nullity. Congress is not going to pass a resolution saying the elections was fraudulent, or even suspect. So there is, I think, a basis for objecting to any vote at all, up or down, on "objections" that are not going to provide a different outcome than the one before the Congress, and one allowed by law.NEW: 10 senators (including Cassidy, Romney, Murkowski and Collins) urge Congress to "fulfill its responsibility to certify the election results."
— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) January 3, 2021
"Further attempts to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election are contrary to the clearly expressed will of the American people" pic.twitter.com/aLklAHK1Be
I mean, Trump has just lost his fucking mind:statement from @repKenBuck, @RepArmstrongND, @RepGallagher, @NancyMace, @RepThomasMassie, @RepMcClintock, @chiproytx on election certification in the House pic.twitter.com/vrya8QNZ36
— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) January 3, 2021
That, by the way, was yesterday.Wow. https://t.co/b271qiszyE pic.twitter.com/uzjEbErAIV
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) January 3, 2021
Respectfully, President Trump: What you're saying is not true. The truth will come out https://t.co/ViYjTSeRcC
— GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (@GaSecofState) January 3, 2021
And really, the representatives in the House don't have any support even from the extreme right wing:“It’s gonna be costly to you.” I’ve charged extortion in mob cases with similar language. https://t.co/wB0jV9Mkhl
— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) January 3, 2021
Gotta go get more popcorn. Epiphany (Jan. 6) is gonna be lit!The memo doesn't mince words. https://t.co/FMq0bHAd0E
— Derek T. Muller (@derektmuller) January 3, 2021
“At Long Last, Senator, Have You No Shame?”
Proof that the King is dead is Chuck Todd (!) telling Johnson to take his crazy conspiracy theories back to the fringes where they came from.TODD: Why didn't you hold hearing about 9/11 truthers? Plenty of people think it was an inside job
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 3, 2021
RON JOHNSON: I could've held hearings on all kinds of things
T: The moon landing?
J: You have to pick & choose
T: I think you need to look in the mirror pic.twitter.com/QL2TmWwsrM
It really would be interesting if the Senate parliamentarian ruled that debates over issues the Senate cannot address because they are illegal and unconstitutional was used to shut down even the vote Cruz thinks he can get out of this. It would also be fitting.Graham not on board with the Cruz strategy. https://t.co/jEJo4FAr3B
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 3, 2021
When You’ve Lost Chuck Todd
"This fire was started when you completely ignored, for example, our investigation of Hunter Biden" -- Ron Johnson's defense on Meet the Press of his efforts to overturn Trump's election loss was pure whataboutism pic.twitter.com/ISgCVh3LrY
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 3, 2021
And this us why none of the 12 went on CNN:TODD: Why didn't you hold hearing about 9/11 truthers? Plenty of people think it was an inside job
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 3, 2021
RON JOHNSON: I could've held hearings on all kinds of things
T: The moon landing?
J: You have to pick & choose
T: I think you need to look in the mirror pic.twitter.com/QL2TmWwsrM
Sure, that could happen:Ted Cruz tells Maria Bartiromo that the "electoral commission" he's demanding could ultimately "set aside" the election results -- the implication being that this would clear the way for another Trump term pic.twitter.com/F7xuIe0FYL
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 3, 2021
I'm guessing the Q-Anon folks got this despite the cross-talk:Trump tweets the flagrantly unconstitutional suggestion that the Jan. 20 inaguration can be suspended.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) January 3, 2021
This will not happen, but if it did, Pelosi would be president, not Trump. pic.twitter.com/jSK5JdFQuP
Ted Cruz heard what happened on MTP:speaking to a narrower and narrower audience here: how many Americans can follow Johnson's line of argument - such as it is - except for the most die-hard of Trump supporters?https://t.co/4PjC1C3Ujk
— Alex Burns (@alexburnsNYT) January 3, 2021
And really, this deserves wider discussion:I think we need to tone *up* the rhetoric. You are the one making it a volatile situation, @tedcruz. You’re trying to steal an election (for a guy who called your wife ugly!). Don’t get surprised when people react accordingly. Bring back tarring and feathering!!! https://t.co/J152ZrwIFM
— Patterico (@Patterico) January 3, 2021
Well, and this, too:In which @SenTedCruz, styling himself as an election history expert, suggests that Congress should follow the precedent set when a Republican was handed the presidency in return for giving the South permission to get rid of Black people's civil rights without federal interference pic.twitter.com/R46gBeMhTg
— Andrew Feinberg (@AndrewFeinberg) January 3, 2021
Media: @jaketapper in today's homily: "Please note how many of the #Republicans objecting to @JoeBiden's win are also willing to raise questions about their own victories at the ballot box on the same day on the same ballot using the same voting systems. How many of them? Zero." pic.twitter.com/12CQRJdgMB
— Porter Anderson (@Porter_Anderson) January 3, 2021
Ron Johnson Is Going To Be On MTP
Because Chuck Todd. And Ron Johnson; who probably didn’t get the memo.CNN's @jaketapper says he invited the 12 GOP senators who are rejecting the election results to speak on @CNNSotu, and they all declined or failed to respond.
— Alexis Benveniste (@apbenven) January 3, 2021
A Legislative Version Of Laches
I’m old enough to remember the “Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity,” which Trump created in 2017, and which disbanded after finding ... nothing. https://t.co/pxWF7nk8Fg
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
True, though I’m not sure Blackburn and Tuberville know what day of the week it is without a calendar and an aide to point it out to them.They know Biden won.
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
They know there was no widespread fraud.
They know that there’s no chance any of these objections are sustained by either chamber—let alone both.
And they’re doing this *anyway.*
If the Republican Party had any principles left, it would expel all of them. https://t.co/sCw8rnjc30
Cruz knows this. He knows he’s trying to sound clever for the rubes. He imagines, like Hawley and the others, that he can position himself to replace Trump. Which is worse? That he tries? Or that he’s sure to fail?The Electoral Count Act of 1887, which is what governs how things are going to go on January 6, was enacted in direct response to the epic disaster that was the Election of 1876 (including the 1877 Electoral Commission). Much of its point was to *repudiate* that “precedent.” https://t.co/kbtdewKuOL
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
Navarro is wrong on both counts. But he’s playing to an audience of one.Peter Navarro says Pence has the authority to give them a ten day window and also says the inauguration date can be rescheduled pic.twitter.com/ZU22bp622d
— Acyn Torabi (@Acyn) January 3, 2021
It is not a coincidence that one of Trump’s favorite advisers is on TV saying Pence can do something that he actually can’t do, but which some Rs have convinced POTUS is in the realm of the possible (it isn’t) https://t.co/AilUWtAoeO
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
Pence is just trying to get Trump to stop calling him. Of course, the quality of the objections don’t matter; it’s all about the vote count. And neither house has majorities that want to face the unprecedented chaos of rejecting the vote of the people. Pay attention: neither Cruz nor Hawley is going that far.Pence is getting a lot of heat for this statement, but basically it seems to be yet another version of what folks around Trump said to Sidney Powell: if you have evidence, show it. If you don’t, there’s a reason why. https://t.co/y13aes6Xq0
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) January 3, 2021
The let's-blow-the-system-up-to-keep-Trump-in-power crowd has piled up an astonishing collection of losses.
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) January 3, 2021
And they're shattering speed records for losing cases. Losing like this normally takes weeks, maybe months. They pulled it off it in a day. https://t.co/ksIvXUsS7N
I really wanna hear somebody making that argument on the floor of the Senate.It feels like this calls for a legislative version of laches. If you felt a 10-day “emergency audit” was necessary, why didn’t you ask for it in November? https://t.co/589STunxdC
— Josh Barro (@jbarro) January 2, 2021
Saturday, January 02, 2021
Is Everybody Playing This Game?
On Twitter, anyway? (Fleischman is right. Beto is...fundraising?)Oy vey fella can we just say it sucks without throwing this term around willy nilly?
— Andrew Fleischman (@ASFleischman) January 2, 2021
It sucks. It betrays an indifference to our institutions. It suggests a total lack of personal integrity.
But it's not an attempt to overthrow the government. https://t.co/hLWQNaswrV
I Really Don’t Think...
Law enforcement is that concerned with what I take seriously or whether concerns about violence in D.C. are trending on Twitter.I fear that, because the antics of @realDonaldTrump and his enablers to keep him in power have become so comical, we may be underestimating the potential for violence that may result from them.
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) January 2, 2021
Funny how the “end of democracy” works equally well as a tactic for one side as for the other. Maybe fear of what law enforcement is paying attention to works that way, too.Gohmert says that if Congress doesn't overturn Trump's election loss, "it will mean the end of our republic, the end of the experiment in self-government." pic.twitter.com/dHYqclOnlv
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 2, 2021
The Fundamental Rule
...is that courts cannot issue advisory opinions (Unless you are the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on matters involving religious "rights" and you want to be sure somebody's "rights" are held sacrosanct the way God and the 1st Amendment intended).For those asking why federal courts keep tossing election suits for lack of “standing,” rather than because the claims lack merit, they don’t have a choice.#SCOTUS doctrine *requires* federal courts to decide whether plaintiffs have standing *before* they can reach the merits.
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
In other words, Art. III courts can't decide a case on the merits (the legal questions raised) if the parties before the court shouldn't be before the court. I can't complain to the courts about something that happened to you, is what it means. Good friends yes, but, hah! Your injury is not mine, and the court can't remedy your injury based on my complaint about it. That's as simple a statement of standing as I can offer, and it's why the court threw out Gohmert's suit; and why the 5th Circuit will, too (and for mootness, probably, by the time they get to it). This is what Gohmert calls "having no remedy." He knows better (he was a judge, and undoubtedly wanted his judicial power respected), but he doesn't care or he's suffered some kind of brain injury. I really can't explain it, except that stupid is as stupid does.This stems from the 1998 Steel Co. ruling—rejecting the doctrine of “hypothetical jurisdiction,” where courts had *assumed* standing in cases in which it was easier to reject plaintiffs’ claims on the merits. As Justice Scalia wrote for the Court, Article III doesn’t permit that.
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 2, 2021
Grandstanding
The date is set by the Constitution. There is no provision in law or in the Constitution to reset this date on this basis or any other, short of a Constitutional Amendment.It's worth noting that in 2016, @SenTedCruz recognized that @realDonaldTrump was a "pathological liar," "utterly amoral," and "a narcissist at a level I don't think this country's ever seen."https://t.co/uHTPCFj8s5 https://t.co/rIqiwUxfm7 pic.twitter.com/D65yqnanAU
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) January 2, 2021
Well, He Gets Re-Elected....
...and the House doesn't sanction him.A sitting United States Congressman calls for violence because his candidate lost the election and the courts won’t help him keep the losing candidate in power. https://t.co/sNkf7LJr0K
— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) January 2, 2021
Sure, because when a child doesn't get what she wants, she throws a tantrum. And when adults don't get what they want, they attack people in the streets. I mean, why bother to grow up, right? Why respect the courts, right? ("You have no remedy" because you don't have a problem the courts can solve, Gohmert. You know that much. Or you should.)Louie Gohmert on Newsmax: "But if bottom line is, the court is saying, 'We're not going to touch this. You have no remedy' -- basically, in effect, the ruling would be that you gotta go the streets and be as violent as Antifa and BLM." pic.twitter.com/cZIdGTiQls
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 2, 2021
"He was baffled when he saw the Tralfamadorians close their little hands on their eyes."
"He knew from past experience what this meant: He was being stupid."Question for experts: Hypothetically, what would happen if Biden is inaugurated and a month later it's proven BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT that Martians have our real Constitution and it says Trump is president for life? Unlikely scenario, sure, but who would be president then? https://t.co/f4arCxpvRj
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) January 2, 2021
I Prefer To Call It...
..."Been there, done that." Age has its benefits, including lots and lots and lots of experiences to learn from. And a perspective available to youth, but little appreciated by them. Not paradise or perfection; but you learn what's important, and what isn't, and how to cope. It was remarkable how resilient my mother was in her last years. She outlived her husband and her Twitter sister, gave up her home of 50 years, moved from the town she’d lived in all those years, and managed to adjust to it all.No visitors. No friends at the dining table. Neighbors dying without notice. But many older adults have proved resilient during the pandemic, a phenomenon known as “crisis competence.” https://t.co/KeAPvjolex
— NYT Metro (@NYTMetro) January 2, 2021
Friday, January 01, 2021
But Trump Says He Did A Great Job
So, both sides now?"That comprehensive vaccination plans have not been developed at the federal level and sent to the states as models is as incomprehensible as it is inexcusable," @SenatorRomney says in new statement calling for Covid-19 vaccination sites in schools across the country. pic.twitter.com/0V53PszUjN
— David Lim (@davidalim) January 1, 2021
It’s almost like...
...the Vice-President holds a separate Constitutional office. Which can be represented by the Department of Justice in court. Because the DOJ is not the private law firm of the POTUS.ruh-roh https://t.co/F58INHdfNC
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) January 1, 2021
