Monday, December 05, 2022

Oh, This'll Be Fun!

Follow along, won't you? "Some people say." "Big, strong men, with tears in their eyes..." "Musk says." You get the idea. Elon Musk, Esq. Nope, not a violation of law (not even obscene, under the law; but otherwise, yes, definitely obscene). And the standard for what's against the law? What bothers Elmo, of course! "Why's everybody always pickin' on me?" Whatever happened to "if it violates the law?" The best solution from a societal point of view is public criminal trials so all issues relevant to the prosecution or defense can be aired. And remember, it's not easy being Elmo. Or Trump, to hear Trump tell it. Somehow these associations constantly come to mind... Hmmm...government security police with a reputation for ruthlessness and government power to back it up, v. private company providing a service to the public at no charge. I begin to understand why Elmo thinks the First Amendment applies to Twitter when only non-government actors are involved. Like Trump (!), he has no idea how government works or what it's for. Conflict of interest? No; because Elmo doesn't find the situation in China "interesting." Or protesting the banning of Twitter in China. You know, in the name of "citizen journalism." But what about the 'hive mind' losing access to all those 'brain cells'? Or does Elmo consider them "drones"? So he hasn't read the files, but he's sure about what's in them? How does that work? The same way the self-driving Tesla does? Here we all remember the only evidence Apple ever stopped advertising on Twitter is that Elmo said so. News accounts of his meeting with Tim Cook pointed out Apple never stopped advertising on Twitter. John Barron was unavailable for comment. And FoxNews, America's Real Voice, and Newsmax are all unbiased sources of true and trustworthy news. Mac needs a drink; I need more coffee.

No comments:

Post a Comment