Very Interesting

Maybe Akerman can shed some light on why this provision of Trump’s bond seems to give Chubb 60 days or more from an appellate judgment in Carroll’s favor before they have to pay her. https://t.co/VsTgA8EqgG pic.twitter.com/fmNoOb8KbW

— Lisa Rubin (@lawofruby) March 10, 2024

I’ve been wondering what possible grounds Carroll could have to object to the bond Trump is posting to appeal the second verdict.  This might be one.

I have no experience with appeals bonds. For all I know, this is a standard provision. I certainly don’t trust apparent expertise on Twitter. But I’m also curious what grounds, legal or factual, Carroll could use to object to this bond. I’m not sure the judge has one in mind, so much as he’s giving her every opportunity.

I just wonder if this might be one. I guess we’ll find out by tomorrow, 11:00 AM EDT. 🕚