The fact that the @nytimes still has this 100% false headline up is malpractice. Just admit you were duped and issue a correction! pic.twitter.com/4N4ssVo6BO
— Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti) July 9, 2024
They actually chose to run the story in the print edition even after the WH denial, under a slightly caveated headline: "Parkinson’s Expert Visited White House 8 Times in 8 Months, but Why Is Unclear"
— Dan Froomkin (PressWatchers.org) (@froomkin) July 9, 2024
"Why Is Unclear" is not a phrase that should appear in a new headline. https://t.co/GM452NO3il
"Some people say” is the new journalistic standard. Who knew?Important detail in @pbump's (overly generous) debunking of the Parkinson's conspiracy theory spread by @peterbakernyt and others.
— emptywheel (checking account) (@emptywheel) July 9, 2024
This conspiracy theory started from NYPost and Alex Berenson. People who call themselves journalists took as their assignment editors a right wing… pic.twitter.com/X7zZglygUl
No comments:
Post a Comment