And when the chief executive tries to usurp the authority of Congress? What, just let him because his name is “Trump”?Jennings: If a district court judge tries to usurp the authority of the chief executive of this country, he should absolutely defy it. pic.twitter.com/sIzvurURXl
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
They aren’t compelled to do it. They are required to; by law. Remember the old adage, dipshit: “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.”Sununu: You just can’t compel the executive branch to spend the dollars
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
Phillip: Have you heard of The Impoundment Control Act of 1974?
Sununu: No. None of your viewers have either pic.twitter.com/DXpKJwu7IY
Yes. The federal isn’t a business, the POTUS is not a CFO. Article I: the Congress levies taxes and spends money. The POTUS doesn’t decide whether or not the Congress got it right. There is no line-item veto: of laws or of government spending.Sununu: If Congress appropriates $20 million for a program, as the chief executive, do I have to spend $20 million on that program? pic.twitter.com/XQ8ZVOs4Fh
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
I really want that clause in Art. II pointed out to me; the one Sununu insists is in there.Philip: What about when the trump administration says to congress, you created this agency, we're going to just decide it doesn't exist anymore.
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
Sununu: He runs the executive branch. He can decide who works for the executive branch.
Phillip: Where does this end? Congress… pic.twitter.com/xSw0Er4MnO
When the POTUS acts as if he’s above the law, the judges have a say in what the law is he took an oath to preserve, protect and defend.Jennings: Should the president have to share the presidency with 300 district court judges? No pic.twitter.com/Wy7q9rtZal
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
"Suckers!"Phillip: But on prices, people are wondering when are the groceries going to go down, when are the housing costs going to go down?
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
Sununu: They're not though, right? That would be deflation pic.twitter.com/P8MM5ma1dY
"You’ll thank me later for inflation now. And prices won’t go down, ‘cause that would be deflation. So: suckers! And tariffs will just make things worse; they always do. Worse for you, not for white guys like me! Suckers!”Sununu: So you're going to see tariffs come in hard and fast. They're painful a little bit. That's why he's doing them quick and early to hopefully get through it. pic.twitter.com/O9CdX2jbai
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
"Live free or die," right? Besides, we don’ need no steenkin’ healthcare! That’s just elites who tell us we do! Fuck ‘em and their ee-leetist med-ee-sin!Phillip: I suspect that some of the people in the state of New Hampshire would be affected by things like this.
— Acyn (@Acyn) February 11, 2025
Sununu: A bunch of overpaid academics that have been abusing the system.
Phillip: What I'm talking about is medical research, which is what these things fund. And I think Katie Britt is talking about this too
Sununu: No, Katie Britt is worried about a bunch of professors getting fired pic.twitter.com/GHZLfqAKef
We’ll see what happens when the shit hits the fan. Should be interesting.V surprised to hear a longtime Mitch McConnell ally say this. (McConnell who made defending the courts his life's work...)
— Rachael Bade (@rachaelmbade) February 11, 2025
This is notably different than what I'm hearing from Hill Rs, which is not to defy but to appeal. https://t.co/DaREf3azgo
No comments:
Post a Comment